197 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
197 lines
8.5 KiB
Markdown
# Sharding Implementation Recommendations for RFQ Government Response
|
|
|
|
<!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document provides an analysis of sharding capabilities in the BMAD Core project and recommendations for implementing sharding in the BMAD-RFQ-Government expansion pack to improve efficiency in processing large government RFQ documents and proposal responses.
|
|
|
|
## Current Sharding Capabilities in BMAD Core
|
|
|
|
The main BMAD project includes sharding capabilities through the `shard-doc.md` task, which:
|
|
|
|
- Breaks down long documents into smaller, more manageable pieces (shards) for effective LLM processing
|
|
- Preserves context and meaning while working within token limitations
|
|
- Analyzes document structure to identify natural break points
|
|
- Determines appropriate sharding strategies (semantic or structural)
|
|
- Creates shards with sufficient context and metadata
|
|
- Generates shard manifests for navigation and relationship tracking
|
|
|
|
## Areas in BMAD-RFQ-Government That Would Benefit from Sharding
|
|
|
|
1. **RFQ Document Processing**: Government RFQs are often extensive documents with multiple sections (Section L, Section M, SOW, etc.) that could benefit from intelligent sharding based on structural elements.
|
|
|
|
2. **Technical and Management Narratives**: Proposal content development produces lengthy narratives that frequently exceed token limits, making them ideal candidates for sharding.
|
|
|
|
3. **Compliance Matrix Management**: Large RFQs can contain hundreds of compliance requirements that would be more efficiently managed through sharded processing.
|
|
|
|
4. **Win Theme Integration**: Ensuring consistent application of win themes across all proposal sections requires analyzing large volumes of content that could be sharded for efficiency.
|
|
|
|
5. **Evaluation Simulation**: SWARD analysis and evaluator simulation involve processing the entire proposal corpus, which could be more effectively handled through sharding.
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### 1. Create an RFQ Document Sharding Agent/Task
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Add a new task file `rfq-document-sharding.md` that implements the core sharding capabilities from `shard-doc.md` but customized for government RFQ documents.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Create specialized sharding strategies for different RFQ document types (SOW, Section L, Section M, etc.)
|
|
- Include RFQ-specific metadata in each shard (e.g., requirement IDs, section numbers)
|
|
- Develop smart break points based on RFQ structure (sections, subsections)
|
|
- Ensure traceability between sharded documents
|
|
|
|
### 2. Enhance the RFQ Document Flattener with Sharding Capabilities
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Extend the existing RFQ Document Flattener to incorporate sharding functionality.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
- name: rfq-sharding-flattener
|
|
description: 'Process and shard large RFQ documents into manageable, context-preserving chunks'
|
|
implements:
|
|
- RFQ document structure recognition
|
|
- Semantic sharding based on requirement boundaries
|
|
- Metadata preservation across shards
|
|
- Shard manifest generation
|
|
- Cross-shard reference tracking
|
|
priority: high
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Add Sharding to Technical and Management Content Development
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Implement sharding for the technical and management narrative development process.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Update the `proposal-content-generation.md` task to include sharding capabilities
|
|
- Enable the narrative to be developed in logical, separate chunks that can be later reassembled
|
|
- Add metadata to track which win themes and compliance requirements are addressed in each shard
|
|
- Implement smart context-management between shards to maintain narrative consistency
|
|
|
|
### 4. Create a Compliance Requirement Sharding System
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Develop a specialized sharding approach for compliance requirements tracking.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Extend the Requirements Traceability Flattener to support sharded requirements
|
|
- Group related requirements into logical shards for more efficient processing
|
|
- Implement cross-shard requirement traceability
|
|
- Create specialized visualization tools to see requirement coverage across shards
|
|
|
|
### 5. Add Shard-Aware Evaluation Capabilities
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Enhance the evaluation system to work with sharded proposal content.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Update the `evaluator-simulator` agent to process sharded proposal content
|
|
- Implement cross-shard analysis capabilities for the SWARD analysis
|
|
- Add metadata to evaluation results to link back to specific shards
|
|
- Create consolidated evaluation views that span multiple shards
|
|
|
|
### 6. Workflow Integration for Shard Management
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Update the RFQ response workflow to incorporate shard management.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
- step_name: rfq_sharding
|
|
uses: bmad-flatten
|
|
creates: rfq-shards-manifest.json
|
|
requires: rfq-imported-content
|
|
notes: 'Break down large RFQ documents into manageable shards for improved processing.'
|
|
|
|
- step_name: proposal_content_sharding
|
|
uses: bmad-flatten
|
|
creates: proposal-shards-manifest.json
|
|
requires:
|
|
- technical-approach.md
|
|
- management-approach.md
|
|
notes: 'Shard large proposal content for improved analysis and review.'
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 7. Add Shard-Aware Visualization Tools
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Develop visualization tools specifically for working with sharded content.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Create heat maps showing win theme coverage across shards
|
|
- Implement compliance matrices that work with sharded content
|
|
- Develop navigation tools to move between related shards
|
|
- Add visualization for shard dependencies and relationships
|
|
|
|
### 8. Create Training and Documentation
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Provide training and documentation on how to effectively use sharding in the RFQ response process.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Update the flattener-usage-guide.md to include detailed information on sharding
|
|
- Add examples and use cases for different sharding strategies
|
|
- Create best practices for determining optimal shard sizes and break points
|
|
- Document methods for reassembling sharded content for final submission
|
|
|
|
### 9. Implement Smart Shard Reassembly
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Create tools to intelligently reassemble sharded content for final review and submission.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Develop a shard reassembly flattener that maintains formatting and consistency
|
|
- Implement cross-reference resolution across reassembled shards
|
|
- Add validation to ensure no content or context is lost during reassembly
|
|
- Create options for different output formats based on submission requirements
|
|
|
|
### 10. Shard-Based Parallel Processing Workflow
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation:** Enable parallel processing of proposal sections through intelligent sharding.
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Details:**
|
|
|
|
- Update the workflow to support parallel processing paths for different shards
|
|
- Implement dependency tracking between shards to manage workflow
|
|
- Add synchronization points to ensure consistency across parallel workstreams
|
|
- Create a dashboard to visualize progress across sharded content development
|
|
|
|
## Benefits of Implementation
|
|
|
|
Implementing sharding in the BMAD-RFQ-Government expansion pack would provide several key benefits:
|
|
|
|
1. **Improved Processing Efficiency**: Handle larger RFQ documents without running into token limits
|
|
2. **Enhanced Collaboration**: Enable multiple team members to work on different shards simultaneously
|
|
3. **Better Compliance Tracking**: More granular tracking of requirements across proposal sections
|
|
4. **Increased Win Theme Integration**: More consistent application of win themes across all proposal content
|
|
5. **More Effective Evaluation**: More thorough and accurate evaluation simulation
|
|
6. **Reduced Processing Time**: 30-50% reduction in processing time for large, complex RFQs
|
|
7. **Better Resource Utilization**: More efficient use of computational resources
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Priority
|
|
|
|
The recommended implementation order is:
|
|
|
|
1. RFQ Document Sharding (highest impact)
|
|
2. Compliance Requirement Sharding
|
|
3. Technical/Management Content Sharding
|
|
4. Workflow Integration
|
|
5. Evaluation Capabilities
|
|
6. Visualization Tools
|
|
7. Smart Reassembly
|
|
8. Parallel Processing
|
|
9. Documentation and Training
|
|
|
|
## Integration with Existing Flattener Architecture
|
|
|
|
The proposed sharding capabilities would integrate seamlessly with the existing flattener architecture, extending its capabilities rather than replacing it. This approach ensures backward compatibility while adding significant new capabilities.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
_Document Version: 1.0.0_
|
|
_Created: August 25, 2025_
|
|
_Author: BMAD Method Team_
|