BMAD-METHOD/expansion-packs/bmad-rfq-government/docs/sharding-recommendations.md

Sharding Implementation Recommendations for RFQ Government Response

Overview

This document provides an analysis of sharding capabilities in the BMAD Core project and recommendations for implementing sharding in the BMAD-RFQ-Government expansion pack to improve efficiency in processing large government RFQ documents and proposal responses.

Current Sharding Capabilities in BMAD Core

The main BMAD project includes sharding capabilities through the shard-doc.md task, which:

• Breaks down long documents into smaller, more manageable pieces (shards) for effective LLM processing
• Preserves context and meaning while working within token limitations
• Analyzes document structure to identify natural break points
• Determines appropriate sharding strategies (semantic or structural)
• Creates shards with sufficient context and metadata
• Generates shard manifests for navigation and relationship tracking

Areas in BMAD-RFQ-Government That Would Benefit from Sharding

1. RFQ Document Processing: Government RFQs are often extensive documents with multiple sections (Section L, Section M, SOW, etc.) that could benefit from intelligent sharding based on structural elements.

2. Technical and Management Narratives: Proposal content development produces lengthy narratives that frequently exceed token limits, making them ideal candidates for sharding.

3. Compliance Matrix Management: Large RFQs can contain hundreds of compliance requirements that would be more efficiently managed through sharded processing.

4. Win Theme Integration: Ensuring consistent application of win themes across all proposal sections requires analyzing large volumes of content that could be sharded for efficiency.

5. Evaluation Simulation: SWARD analysis and evaluator simulation involve processing the entire proposal corpus, which could be more effectively handled through sharding.

Implementation Recommendations

1. Create an RFQ Document Sharding Agent/Task

Recommendation: Add a new task file rfq-document-sharding.md that implements the core sharding capabilities from shard-doc.md but customized for government RFQ documents.

Implementation Details:

• Create specialized sharding strategies for different RFQ document types (SOW, Section L, Section M, etc.)
• Include RFQ-specific metadata in each shard (e.g., requirement IDs, section numbers)
• Develop smart break points based on RFQ structure (sections, subsections)
• Ensure traceability between sharded documents

2. Enhance the RFQ Document Flattener with Sharding Capabilities

Recommendation: Extend the existing RFQ Document Flattener to incorporate sharding functionality.

Implementation Details:

- name: rfq-sharding-flattener
  description: 'Process and shard large RFQ documents into manageable, context-preserving chunks'
  implements:
    - RFQ document structure recognition
    - Semantic sharding based on requirement boundaries
    - Metadata preservation across shards
    - Shard manifest generation
    - Cross-shard reference tracking
  priority: high

3. Add Sharding to Technical and Management Content Development

Recommendation: Implement sharding for the technical and management narrative development process.

Implementation Details:

• Update the proposal-content-generation.md task to include sharding capabilities
• Enable the narrative to be developed in logical, separate chunks that can be later reassembled
• Add metadata to track which win themes and compliance requirements are addressed in each shard
• Implement smart context-management between shards to maintain narrative consistency

4. Create a Compliance Requirement Sharding System

Recommendation: Develop a specialized sharding approach for compliance requirements tracking.

Implementation Details:

• Extend the Requirements Traceability Flattener to support sharded requirements
• Group related requirements into logical shards for more efficient processing
• Implement cross-shard requirement traceability
• Create specialized visualization tools to see requirement coverage across shards

5. Add Shard-Aware Evaluation Capabilities

Recommendation: Enhance the evaluation system to work with sharded proposal content.

Implementation Details:

• Update the evaluator-simulator agent to process sharded proposal content
• Implement cross-shard analysis capabilities for the SWARD analysis
• Add metadata to evaluation results to link back to specific shards
• Create consolidated evaluation views that span multiple shards

6. Workflow Integration for Shard Management

Recommendation: Update the RFQ response workflow to incorporate shard management.

Implementation Details:

- step_name: rfq_sharding
  uses: bmad-flatten
  creates: rfq-shards-manifest.json
  requires: rfq-imported-content
  notes: 'Break down large RFQ documents into manageable shards for improved processing.'

- step_name: proposal_content_sharding
  uses: bmad-flatten
  creates: proposal-shards-manifest.json
  requires:
    - technical-approach.md
    - management-approach.md
  notes: 'Shard large proposal content for improved analysis and review.'

7. Add Shard-Aware Visualization Tools

Recommendation: Develop visualization tools specifically for working with sharded content.

Implementation Details:

• Create heat maps showing win theme coverage across shards
• Implement compliance matrices that work with sharded content
• Develop navigation tools to move between related shards
• Add visualization for shard dependencies and relationships

8. Create Training and Documentation

Recommendation: Provide training and documentation on how to effectively use sharding in the RFQ response process.

Implementation Details:

• Update the flattener-usage-guide.md to include detailed information on sharding
• Add examples and use cases for different sharding strategies
• Create best practices for determining optimal shard sizes and break points
• Document methods for reassembling sharded content for final submission

9. Implement Smart Shard Reassembly

Recommendation: Create tools to intelligently reassemble sharded content for final review and submission.

Implementation Details:

• Develop a shard reassembly flattener that maintains formatting and consistency
• Implement cross-reference resolution across reassembled shards
• Add validation to ensure no content or context is lost during reassembly
• Create options for different output formats based on submission requirements

10. Shard-Based Parallel Processing Workflow

Recommendation: Enable parallel processing of proposal sections through intelligent sharding.

Implementation Details:

• Update the workflow to support parallel processing paths for different shards
• Implement dependency tracking between shards to manage workflow
• Add synchronization points to ensure consistency across parallel workstreams
• Create a dashboard to visualize progress across sharded content development

Benefits of Implementation

Implementing sharding in the BMAD-RFQ-Government expansion pack would provide several key benefits:

1. Improved Processing Efficiency: Handle larger RFQ documents without running into token limits
2. Enhanced Collaboration: Enable multiple team members to work on different shards simultaneously
3. Better Compliance Tracking: More granular tracking of requirements across proposal sections
4. Increased Win Theme Integration: More consistent application of win themes across all proposal content
5. More Effective Evaluation: More thorough and accurate evaluation simulation
6. Reduced Processing Time: 30-50% reduction in processing time for large, complex RFQs
7. Better Resource Utilization: More efficient use of computational resources

Implementation Priority

The recommended implementation order is:

1. RFQ Document Sharding (highest impact)
2. Compliance Requirement Sharding
3. Technical/Management Content Sharding
4. Workflow Integration
5. Evaluation Capabilities
6. Visualization Tools
7. Smart Reassembly
8. Parallel Processing
9. Documentation and Training

Integration with Existing Flattener Architecture

The proposed sharding capabilities would integrate seamlessly with the existing flattener architecture, extending its capabilities rather than replacing it. This approach ensures backward compatibility while adding significant new capabilities.

---

Document Version: 1.0.0
Created: August 25, 2025
Author: BMAD Method Team