275 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
275 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Story Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
Comprehensive self-assessment framework for developers to validate completed work before marking stories as ready for review. Ensures quality delivery, maintainable code, and complete implementation of all requirements.
|
|
|
|
## Required Validation Context
|
|
Before proceeding, ensure you have:
|
|
- ✅ Completed story implementation
|
|
- ✅ All acceptance criteria addressed
|
|
- ✅ Code committed and pushed to repository
|
|
- ✅ Local testing completed successfully
|
|
- ✅ Documentation updates prepared
|
|
|
|
## Quality Standards
|
|
This checklist ensures adherence to enterprise-grade quality standards:
|
|
- **Functionality**: All requirements met and tested
|
|
- **Code Quality**: Maintainable, secure, and well-documented
|
|
- **Testing**: Comprehensive coverage with passing tests
|
|
- **Standards**: Compliance with project conventions and best practices
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Requirements & Acceptance Criteria Fulfillment
|
|
|
|
### Functional Requirements Validation
|
|
- [ ] All functional requirements specified in story completely implemented
|
|
- [ ] Each acceptance criterion individually tested and confirmed working
|
|
- [ ] User workflow from start to finish verified manually
|
|
- [ ] All specified user interface elements implemented correctly
|
|
- [ ] Business logic requirements fulfilled as documented
|
|
|
|
### Feature Completeness Assessment
|
|
- [ ] Core functionality works as intended in all specified scenarios
|
|
- [ ] Integration with existing features tested and confirmed working
|
|
- [ ] Data flow through system verified end-to-end
|
|
- [ ] API contracts and interfaces implemented per specification
|
|
- [ ] User experience matches design and usability requirements
|
|
|
|
### Edge Case & Error Handling
|
|
- [ ] Boundary conditions tested (empty inputs, maximum values, etc.)
|
|
- [ ] Error conditions handled gracefully with appropriate user feedback
|
|
- [ ] Invalid input validation working correctly
|
|
- [ ] System behavior under stress or unusual conditions verified
|
|
- [ ] Fallback mechanisms tested and functioning properly
|
|
|
|
**Requirements Status**: {{requirements_completion_status}}
|
|
**Remaining Issues**: {{remaining_requirements_issues}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Code Quality & Standards Compliance
|
|
|
|
### Coding Standards Adherence
|
|
- [ ] Code follows established project coding standards and style guides
|
|
- [ ] File organization matches project structure conventions
|
|
- [ ] Naming conventions consistently applied throughout
|
|
- [ ] Code formatting automated tools (linters, formatters) passing
|
|
- [ ] No new linting errors or warnings introduced
|
|
|
|
### Security Best Practices
|
|
- [ ] Input validation implemented for all user inputs and API endpoints
|
|
- [ ] Authentication and authorization requirements properly implemented
|
|
- [ ] Sensitive data handling follows security protocols
|
|
- [ ] SQL injection and XSS protection measures applied
|
|
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets, API keys, or sensitive information in code
|
|
|
|
### Code Maintainability
|
|
- [ ] Code is well-structured with appropriate separation of concerns
|
|
- [ ] Complex logic documented with clear, helpful comments
|
|
- [ ] Functions and methods appropriately sized and single-purpose
|
|
- [ ] Code duplication minimized through proper abstraction
|
|
- [ ] Technical debt minimized or appropriately documented
|
|
|
|
### Technology Stack Compliance
|
|
- [ ] Approved technologies and versions used as specified
|
|
- [ ] Framework patterns and conventions followed consistently
|
|
- [ ] Third-party libraries used appropriately and securely
|
|
- [ ] Database interactions follow established patterns
|
|
- [ ] API design consistent with project standards
|
|
|
|
**Code Quality Assessment**: {{code_quality_status}}
|
|
**Technical Debt Created**: {{technical_debt_notes}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Testing Excellence & Coverage
|
|
|
|
### Unit Testing Implementation
|
|
- [ ] Unit tests written for all new functions and methods
|
|
- [ ] Test coverage meets project standards (typically 80%+ for new code)
|
|
- [ ] Tests cover both positive and negative scenarios
|
|
- [ ] Mock objects and test doubles used appropriately
|
|
- [ ] Tests are maintainable and follow testing conventions
|
|
|
|
### Integration Testing Coverage
|
|
- [ ] Integration points with existing systems tested
|
|
- [ ] API integration tests implemented where applicable
|
|
- [ ] Database integration tests verify data operations
|
|
- [ ] Third-party service integrations tested (with mocks where appropriate)
|
|
- [ ] Cross-component functionality verified through tests
|
|
|
|
### End-to-End & System Testing
|
|
- [ ] Critical user journeys tested end-to-end
|
|
- [ ] Full-stack functionality verified through automated tests
|
|
- [ ] User interface interactions tested where applicable
|
|
- [ ] Performance characteristics verified meet requirements
|
|
- [ ] System behavior under realistic load conditions tested
|
|
|
|
### Test Quality & Reliability
|
|
- [ ] All tests passing consistently and reliably
|
|
- [ ] Tests provide meaningful failure messages when they fail
|
|
- [ ] Test data setup and teardown handled properly
|
|
- [ ] Tests are independent and can run in any order
|
|
- [ ] Flaky or unreliable tests identified and fixed
|
|
|
|
**Testing Status**: {{testing_completion_status}}
|
|
**Test Coverage**: {{test_coverage_percentage}}%
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 4. Functionality Verification & Manual Testing
|
|
|
|
### Manual Testing Completion
|
|
- [ ] Functionality manually verified through complete user workflow
|
|
- [ ] All user interface elements tested across target browsers/devices
|
|
- [ ] Mobile responsiveness verified if applicable
|
|
- [ ] Accessibility features tested (keyboard navigation, screen readers)
|
|
- [ ] Performance acceptable during manual testing
|
|
|
|
### Cross-Platform & Environment Testing
|
|
- [ ] Functionality tested in development environment
|
|
- [ ] Integration tested with staging environment (if applicable)
|
|
- [ ] Browser compatibility verified for supported browsers
|
|
- [ ] Mobile device testing completed if applicable
|
|
- [ ] Different user roles and permissions tested where relevant
|
|
|
|
### User Experience Validation
|
|
- [ ] User workflow intuitive and matches expected behavior
|
|
- [ ] Error messages clear and helpful to users
|
|
- [ ] Loading states and progress indicators working properly
|
|
- [ ] Data validation provides appropriate user feedback
|
|
- [ ] Overall user experience polished and professional
|
|
|
|
**Manual Testing Status**: {{manual_testing_status}}
|
|
**UX Issues Identified**: {{ux_issues_found}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 5. Build, Deploy & Configuration Management
|
|
|
|
### Build System Integration
|
|
- [ ] Project builds successfully without errors or warnings
|
|
- [ ] All linting checks passing without issues
|
|
- [ ] Automated tests integrated into build process and passing
|
|
- [ ] Build artifacts generated correctly
|
|
- [ ] Build performance acceptable (no significant slowdown introduced)
|
|
|
|
### Dependency Management
|
|
- [ ] New dependencies properly justified and documented
|
|
- [ ] Dependency versions pinned appropriately
|
|
- [ ] No known security vulnerabilities in dependencies
|
|
- [ ] Dependency conflicts resolved
|
|
- [ ] Package.json/requirements.txt updated correctly
|
|
|
|
### Environment & Configuration
|
|
- [ ] Environment variables documented and configured securely
|
|
- [ ] Configuration changes documented and version controlled
|
|
- [ ] Secrets management handled properly
|
|
- [ ] Database migrations (if any) tested and reversible
|
|
- [ ] Infrastructure changes documented
|
|
|
|
**Build & Deploy Status**: {{build_deploy_status}}
|
|
**Configuration Changes**: {{configuration_changes}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 6. Documentation & Knowledge Transfer
|
|
|
|
### Code Documentation
|
|
- [ ] Public APIs documented with clear examples
|
|
- [ ] Complex business logic explained in comments
|
|
- [ ] Database schema changes documented
|
|
- [ ] Configuration options and environment variables documented
|
|
- [ ] Known limitations or future considerations noted
|
|
|
|
### User-Facing Documentation
|
|
- [ ] User-facing features documented in appropriate user guides
|
|
- [ ] API documentation updated for any endpoint changes
|
|
- [ ] Help text and tooltips added for complex features
|
|
- [ ] Error message documentation updated
|
|
- [ ] Feature announcements prepared if applicable
|
|
|
|
### Technical Documentation
|
|
- [ ] Architecture changes documented in system documentation
|
|
- [ ] Deployment procedures updated if changed
|
|
- [ ] Troubleshooting guides updated with new scenarios
|
|
- [ ] Performance characteristics documented
|
|
- [ ] Security considerations documented
|
|
|
|
**Documentation Status**: {{documentation_completion_status}}
|
|
**Documentation Updates Required**: {{documentation_updates_needed}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 7. Story Administration & Project Management
|
|
|
|
### Story Task Completion
|
|
- [ ] All tasks within story marked complete
|
|
- [ ] Story progress updated to reflect actual work completed
|
|
- [ ] Time tracking and effort estimation updated
|
|
- [ ] Blockers and impediments resolved or escalated
|
|
- [ ] Story points/effort estimates validated against actual work
|
|
|
|
### Change Documentation
|
|
- [ ] Development decisions and changes documented in story
|
|
- [ ] Scope changes or requirement clarifications noted
|
|
- [ ] Technical approach changes from original plan documented
|
|
- [ ] Collaboration with other team members documented
|
|
- [ ] Lessons learned and future recommendations noted
|
|
|
|
### Project Integration
|
|
- [ ] Changes integrated with main/develop branch successfully
|
|
- [ ] Merge conflicts resolved appropriately
|
|
- [ ] Code review preparations completed
|
|
- [ ] Release notes and changelog entries prepared
|
|
- [ ] Impact on other stories or features assessed
|
|
|
|
**Story Administration Status**: {{story_admin_status}}
|
|
**Project Integration Notes**: {{project_integration_notes}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Final Definition of Done Assessment
|
|
|
|
### Completion Summary
|
|
**Overall Completion**: {{overall_completion_percentage}}%
|
|
**Quality Level**: {{quality_assessment}} (Excellent/Good/Acceptable/Needs Improvement)
|
|
**Ready for Review**: {{ready_for_review}} (Yes/No/With Conditions)
|
|
|
|
### Outstanding Issues
|
|
1. **{{outstanding_issue_1}}** - {{issue_1_severity}} - {{issue_1_plan}}
|
|
2. **{{outstanding_issue_2}}** - {{issue_2_severity}} - {{issue_2_plan}}
|
|
3. **{{outstanding_issue_3}}** - {{issue_3_severity}} - {{issue_3_plan}}
|
|
|
|
### Technical Debt & Follow-up Work
|
|
- **Technical Debt Created**: {{technical_debt_summary}}
|
|
- **Follow-up Stories Needed**: {{followup_stories_required}}
|
|
- **Future Optimization Opportunities**: {{optimization_opportunities}}
|
|
|
|
### Development Insights
|
|
- **Primary Development Approach**: {{development_approach}}
|
|
- **Key Challenges Encountered**: {{key_challenges}}
|
|
- **Solutions Applied**: {{solutions_implemented}}
|
|
- **Lessons Learned**: {{lessons_learned}}
|
|
- **Recommendations for Similar Work**: {{future_recommendations}}
|
|
|
|
### Final Confirmation
|
|
- [ ] I confirm all applicable checklist items have been addressed
|
|
- [ ] All critical issues resolved or appropriately documented
|
|
- [ ] Story implementation complete and ready for code review
|
|
- [ ] No known defects that would impact user experience
|
|
- [ ] Work meets professional quality standards for production deployment
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Developer Sign-off
|
|
|
|
**Developer**: {{developer_name}}
|
|
**Completion Date**: {{completion_date}}
|
|
**Story ID**: {{story_identifier}}
|
|
**Development Hours**: {{total_development_hours}}
|
|
|
|
**Final Implementation Notes**: {{final_implementation_notes}}
|
|
|
|
**Quality Assurance Statement**: This story has been implemented according to all requirements and quality standards. The code is maintainable, secure, and ready for production use. |