BMAD-METHOD/.agents/skills/bmad-quick-dev/step-03-implement.md

125 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown

---
---
# Step 3: Implement
## RULES
- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
- No push. No remote ops.
- Sequential execution only.
- Content inside `<frozen-after-approval>` in `{spec_file}` is read-only. Do not modify.
## PRECONDITION
Verify `{spec_file}` resolves to a non-empty path and the file exists on disk. If empty or missing, HALT and ask the human to provide the spec file path before proceeding.
## INSTRUCTIONS
### Pre-Implementation Check
**CRITICAL: Calculate structural blast radius and obtain human approval before ANY code modification. NEVER skip this check.**
1. **Identify targets**: Extract the symbols and files being modified from `{spec_file}` — the `## Code Map` section lists target files and their roles.
2. **Calculate blast radius with built-in summarization and freshness check**: For each target symbol, call the memtrace-adapter: `node _bmad/scripts/memtrace/memtrace-adapter.mjs --target <symbol> --query get_impact --check-freshness --summarize`. The adapter verifies index freshness (via `--check-freshness`) before the blast radius query — no separate `list_repos` call needed. Process targets SEQUENTIALLY using `for...of` — NEVER use `Promise.all`. On exit code 0: parse STDOUT JSON; use `summarized.critical_dependents`, `summarized.module_impact`, `summarized.total_affected`, and `summarized.token_estimate` for the Confidence Report (guaranteed ≤2000 tokens). Extract `affected_symbols` (raw) for qa-memtrace.mjs. On exit code 1: check STDERR for `[FRESHNESS]` (stale/missing index) vs `MEMTRACE_MCP_ERROR_TIMEOUT` (MCP unreachable) → HALT.
4. **Token budget already satisfied**: The adapter's `--summarize` flag guarantees the `summarized` field is under 2000 tokens. No manual summarization needed. Use `summarized.token_estimate` to confirm compliance.
5. **Present Blast Radius Confidence Report**:
```
## Blast Radius Confidence Report
**Target:** [symbol/file]
**Risk Level:** [Low/Medium/High/Critical]
**Affected Symbols:** N downstream dependents across M files
### Critical Dependents (Depth 1-2)
- `symbol` in `file` — relationship
### Module Impact Summary
- module: N symbols (High/Med/Low risk)
### Recommended Pre-Flight Checks
- Review test coverage for: top modules
- Pay special attention to: bridge/central symbols touched
---
**Decision Required:** Modify [target]? [A] Approve / [R] Reject
```
5a. **Generate Test Coverage Justification**: Before halting for user approval, map each affected module from the blast radius report to test files covering the impacted symbols:
- Discover test files using conventions: `test/`, `__tests__/`, `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*` patterns — search/grep for affected symbol names in test files
- Assign a coverage status per module: `Yes` (all covered), `Partial:N` (N of M covered), or `None` (no tests found)
- Append the justification using this format after the "---" separator in the Confidence Report:
```
### Test Coverage Justification
| Module | Affected Symbols | Test Files | Coverage |
|--------|-----------------|------------|----------|
| `path/to/module` | N symbols | `test/module.test.ts` | Yes |
| `path/to/other` | M symbols | — | **None** |
**Coverage Summary:**
- **Covered:** X/Y modules (Z affected symbols)
- **Uncovered:** A/Y modules (B affected symbols — needs tests)
- **Partial:** C/Y modules (D/N symbols covered)
**Justification Notes:**
- `module-A`: Covered by existing tests in `test/module-a.test.ts`
- `module-B`: No test coverage found — requires new test file
- `module-C`: Partial coverage — `test/module-c.test.ts` covers 3 of 5 impacted functions
```
- If the blast radius has zero affected modules, skip the justification and note "No affected modules to map"
- Enforce combined token budget (blast radius + justification ≤ 2000 tokens). Prioritize: uncovered modules, then high-risk, then covered
- Ask the user for a coverage threshold percentage (0 = never block, 100 = block if any uncovered); default to flag-only mode if declined
- Write the full Test Coverage Justification into `{spec_file}`'s completion notes section before proceeding
5b. **Execute Mathematical Quality Gate (Phase 2)**: If the blast radius has zero affected modules (empty result from get_impact), skip this step and note "Mathematical Quality Gate: SKIPPED (empty blast radius)." Otherwise:
- Serialize the blast radius data and test coverage data to temporary JSON files in the system temp directory
- Use the user-provided coverage threshold (default 100 if none given)
- Run: `node _bmad/scripts/memtrace/qa-memtrace.mjs --blast-radius <temp-blast-file> --test-coverage <temp-coverage-file> --threshold <N>`
- Read the script's STDOUT and capture its exit code
- **If exit 0**: log the output to `{spec_file}` completion notes under "Mathematical Quality Gate Output" and continue
- **If exit 1**: persist the output to `{spec_file}` completion notes, present the uncovered nodes, then HALT: "Mathematical quality gate failed. N of M required nodes are not covered by tests. Agent must write/update tests for the listed uncovered nodes before proceeding. Do NOT proceed until the quality gate passes."
- The qa-memtrace.mjs exit code is the FINAL authority. Exit 1 is a HARD BLOCK on implementation.
5c. **Dead Code Pitfall Validation**: If the story involves dead-code removal (find_dead_code usage in context or tasks):
- Call the memtrace-adapter: `node _bmad/scripts/memtrace/memtrace-adapter.mjs --target <module_path> --query find_dead_code [--repo <repo_id>]`. Process sequentially — NEVER use `Promise.all`. Parse the adapter's STDOUT JSON for the `symbols` array.
- Serialize candidates to a temp JSON file.
- Run: `node _bmad/scripts/memtrace/validate-dead-code.mjs --candidates <temp-file>`
- If exit 0: log output to `{spec_file}` completion notes as "Dead Code Pitfall Validation Report". Present SUSPECT entries for manual review. FALSE_POS and GHOST are ignored.
- If exit 1: log error to completion notes and proceed without pitfall validation (error is logged, not a hard block).
- Clean up temp files.
- If story does NOT involve dead-code removal, skip this step entirely.
6. **HALT for decision**: Ask the user: "Decision: Proceed with modification? [A] Approve — proceed to implementation | [R] Reject — halt execution"
- If **Approve**: Continue to the Baseline step below
- If **Reject**: HALT — "Blast radius verification rejected. Execution halted. Please provide guidance."
---
### Baseline
Capture `baseline_commit` (current HEAD, or `NO_VCS` if version control is unavailable) into `{spec_file}` frontmatter before making any changes.
### Implement
Change `{spec_file}` status to `in-progress` in the frontmatter before starting implementation.
Follow `./sync-sprint-status.md` with `{target_status}` = `in-progress`.
If `{spec_file}` has a non-empty `context:` list in its frontmatter, load those files before implementation begins. When handing to a sub-agent, include them in the sub-agent prompt so it has access to the referenced context.
Hand `{spec_file}` to a sub-agent/task and let it implement. If no sub-agents are available, implement directly.
**Path formatting rule:** Any markdown links written into `{spec_file}` must use paths relative to `{spec_file}`'s directory so they are clickable in VS Code. Any file paths displayed in terminal/conversation output must use CWD-relative format with `:line` notation (e.g., `src/path/file.ts:42`) for terminal clickability. No leading `/` in either case.
### Self-Check
Before leaving this step, verify every task in the `## Tasks & Acceptance` section of `{spec_file}` is complete. Mark each finished task `[x]`. If any task is not done, finish it before proceeding.
## NEXT
Read fully and follow `./step-04-review.md`