9.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

Incorporate Reviewer Feedback

task: id: incorporate-reviewer-feedback name: Systematically Incorporate Reviewer Feedback description: Process and address technical reviewer, publisher, and beta reader feedback systematically persona_default: book-analyst inputs: - reviewer_feedback (technical review comments, publisher requests, beta reader notes) - affected_chapters steps: - Collect all reviewer feedback from all sources (technical, publisher, beta readers) - Categorize feedback by severity (critical/must-fix, important/should-fix, optional/nice-to-have) - Create feedback tracking log with status for each item - Address critical issues first (technical errors, broken code, security issues) - Fix important issues (clarity problems, missing examples, structural issues) - Consider optional suggestions (enhancements, additional topics, style preferences) - Test all code changes from feedback - Update text for clarity improvements requested - Track completion status in feedback log - Generate feedback-resolution-log documenting all changes - Run execute-checklist.md with existing-book-integration-checklist.md output: docs/feedback/{{book_title}}-feedback-resolution-log.md

Purpose

This task provides a systematic approach to processing reviewer feedback from technical reviewers, publishers, and beta readers. Ensures all feedback is triaged, addressed appropriately, and tracked to completion.

Prerequisites

Before starting this task:

Reviewer feedback collected from all sources
Chapters are in reviewable state
Testing environment set up for code changes
Understanding of feedback priorities (which issues are critical)

Workflow Steps

1. Collect All Reviewer Feedback

Gather feedback from all sources:

Technical Reviewer Feedback:

Technical accuracy issues
Code errors or improvements
Misleading explanations
Missing prerequisites
Incorrect terminology

Publisher Feedback:

Format compliance issues
Style guide violations
Length adjustments needed
Market positioning changes
Legal/licensing concerns

Beta Reader Feedback:

Clarity problems
Confusing sections
Missing examples
Difficulty level issues
Typos and errors

Consolidate into a single master feedback list.

2. Categorize Feedback by Severity

Triage each feedback item into priority categories:

Critical (Must-Fix):

Technical errors (incorrect information)
Broken code examples (won't run)
Security vulnerabilities
Legal/licensing issues
Publisher blocking issues (won't publish without fix)
Major clarity problems (readers can't follow)

Important (Should-Fix):

Unclear explanations (could be clearer)
Missing examples (would help understanding)
Structural issues (better organization possible)
Incomplete coverage (topic needs expansion)
Style inconsistencies
Minor technical inaccuracies

Nice-to-Have (Optional):

Style preferences (subjective improvements)
Additional topics (scope expansion)
Enhancement suggestions
Alternative explanations
Personal preferences

3. Create Feedback Tracking Log

Build a structured tracking system:

ID	Chapter	Severity	Issue	Requested By	Status	Resolution	Date
F001	Ch 3	Critical	Code won't run Python 3.12	Tech Review	Done	Fixed import	2024-01-15
F002	Ch 5	Important	Unclear JWT explanation	Beta Reader	Done	Added example	2024-01-16
F003	Ch 7	Optional	Add async/await example	Tech Review	Deferred	Future edition	2024-01-16

This provides visibility into progress and ensures nothing is missed.

4. Address Critical Issues First

Start with must-fix items:

For Technical Errors:

Verify the error (confirm it's incorrect)
Research the correct information
Update text and code
Test updated code
Add verification note to tracking log

For Broken Code:

Reproduce the issue
Fix the code
Test on target version(s)
Verify output is correct
Update text if output changed

For Security Issues:

Assess severity (CVSS score if applicable)
Fix immediately
Add security note if appropriate
Test fix thoroughly
Document in change log

For Publisher Blocking Issues:

Understand exact requirement
Implement change
Verify compliance
Get publisher confirmation
Mark resolved

Do not proceed to lower-priority items until all critical issues are resolved.

5. Fix Important Issues

Address should-fix items systematically:

For Clarity Problems:

Identify specific unclear section
Rewrite for clarity
Add examples if needed
Get second opinion (beta reader, colleague)
Update tracking log

For Missing Examples:

Understand what example is needed
Design example that teaches the concept
Write and test code
Integrate into chapter
Verify it improves understanding

For Structural Issues:

Assess reorganization impact
Plan structural change
Reorganize content
Update cross-references
Verify learning flow still works

For Incomplete Coverage:

Determine scope of addition
Write additional content
Test any new code
Integrate smoothly
Ensure doesn't bloat chapter excessively

6. Consider Optional Suggestions

Evaluate nice-to-have items carefully:

Decision Criteria:

Does it improve reader experience?
Is it within scope of current edition?
Do I have time/space for this?
Does it align with book goals?

Actions:

Implement: If valuable and feasible
Defer: If good idea but not for this edition (document for next edition)
Decline: If not aligned with book goals (document reason)

Document all decisions in tracking log, even for declined items.

7. Test All Code Changes

For every code change made from feedback:

Test code runs successfully
Test on target version(s)
Verify output matches text
Check for new errors or warnings
Run regression tests (ensure other examples still work)
Update code repository

No code changes should be marked complete without testing.

8. Update Text for Clarity

For text improvements from feedback:

Rewrite unclear sections
Add clarifying examples
Improve explanations
Fix terminology inconsistencies
Verify technical accuracy
Ensure voice/tone consistency

Use extracted code patterns and style guide to maintain consistency.

9. Track Completion Status

Update feedback tracking log continuously:

Mark items as "In Progress" when starting
Mark as "Done" when complete and tested
Mark as "Deferred" if postponing to next edition
Mark as "Declined" if not implementing (with reason)
Add completion date
Add resolution notes

This creates accountability and progress visibility.

10. Generate Feedback Resolution Log

Create comprehensive document summarizing all feedback processing:

# Feedback Resolution Log - [Book Title]

## Summary
- Total feedback items: 47
- Critical (resolved): 8/8
- Important (resolved): 23/25 (2 deferred)
- Optional (resolved): 7/14 (4 deferred, 3 declined)

## Critical Issues Resolved
[List with details]

## Important Issues Resolved
[List with details]

## Deferred Items
[List with rationale and target edition]

## Declined Items
[List with rationale]

## Code Changes
[List all code changes made]

## Text Changes
[List major text revisions]

## Reviewer Acknowledgments
[Thank reviewers]

This document provides transparency and completeness.

11. Run Integration Checklist

Use execute-checklist.md with existing-book-integration-checklist.md to ensure:

Changes maintain consistency with existing content
Voice and tone are consistent
Code patterns are followed
Cross-references are accurate
Learning flow is maintained

Success Criteria

A completed feedback incorporation should have:

All feedback collected from all sources
Feedback categorized by severity
Tracking log created and maintained
All critical issues resolved
All important issues addressed or consciously deferred
Optional items evaluated (implement, defer, or decline)
All code changes tested
Text clarity improvements made
Completion status tracked for every item
Feedback resolution log generated
Integration checklist passed
No blocking issues remain

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Ignoring low-severity feedback: Track and evaluate all feedback, even if declining
No prioritization: Must address critical items first
Scope creep: Optional items can expand scope significantly - be disciplined
Poor tracking: Without tracking, items get missed
Untested changes: All code changes must be tested
Inconsistent voice: Text changes must match existing style
No documentation: Document what changed and why

Next Steps

After incorporating feedback:

Send resolution log to reviewers for confirmation
Request final approval from technical reviewer
Get publisher sign-off on critical fixes
Proceed to final editorial review
Prepare for publication
Archive deferred items for next edition planning

9.1 KiB Raw Blame History