BMAD-METHOD/docs/how-to/workflows/run-implementation-readines...

163 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

---
title: "How to Run Implementation Readiness"
description: How to validate planning and solutioning before implementation
---
Use the `implementation-readiness` workflow to validate that planning and solutioning are complete and aligned before Phase 4 implementation.
---
## When to Use This
- **Always** before Phase 4 for BMad Method and Enterprise projects
- After create-epics-and-stories workflow completes
- Before sprint-planning workflow
- When stakeholders request readiness check
---
## When to Skip This
- Quick Flow (no solutioning phase)
- BMad Method Simple (no gate check required)
---
## Prerequisites
- BMad Method installed
- Architect agent available
- PRD, Architecture, and Epics completed
---
## Steps
### 1. Load the Architect Agent
Start a fresh chat and load the Architect agent.
### 2. Run the Workflow
```
*implementation-readiness
```
### 3. Let the Agent Validate
The workflow systematically checks:
- PRD completeness
- Architecture completeness
- Epic/Story completeness
- Alignment between all documents
### 4. Review the Gate Decision
The agent produces a gate decision with rationale.
---
## Gate Decision Outcomes
### ✅ PASS
- All critical criteria met
- Minor gaps acceptable with documented plan
- **Action:** Proceed to Phase 4
### ⚠️ CONCERNS
- Some criteria not met but not blockers
- Gaps identified with clear resolution path
- **Action:** Proceed with caution, address gaps in parallel
### ❌ FAIL
- Critical gaps or contradictions
- Architecture missing key decisions
- Epics conflict with PRD/architecture
- **Action:** BLOCK Phase 4, resolve issues first
---
## What Gets Checked
### PRD/GDD Completeness
- Problem statement clear and evidence-based
- Success metrics defined
- User personas identified
- Functional requirements (FRs) complete
- Non-functional requirements (NFRs) specified
- Risks and assumptions documented
### Architecture Completeness
- System architecture defined
- Data architecture specified
- API architecture decided
- Key ADRs documented
- Security architecture addressed
- FR/NFR-specific guidance provided
- Standards and conventions defined
### Epic/Story Completeness
- All PRD features mapped to stories
- Stories have acceptance criteria
- Stories prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- Dependencies identified
- Story sequencing logical
### Alignment Checks
- Architecture addresses all PRD FRs/NFRs
- Epics align with architecture decisions
- No contradictions between epics
- NFRs have technical approach
- Integration points clear
---
## What You Get
An `implementation-readiness.md` document containing:
1. **Executive Summary** (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL)
2. **Completeness Assessment** (scores for PRD, Architecture, Epics)
3. **Alignment Assessment** (PRD↔Architecture, Architecture↔Epics)
4. **Quality Assessment** (story quality, dependencies, risks)
5. **Gaps and Recommendations** (critical/minor gaps, remediation)
6. **Gate Decision** with rationale
7. **Next Steps**
---
## Example
E-commerce platform → CONCERNS ⚠️
**Gaps identified:**
- Missing security architecture section
- Undefined payment gateway
**Recommendation:**
- Complete security section
- Add payment gateway ADR
**Action:** Proceed with caution, address before payment epic.
---
## Tips
- Run this before every Phase 4 start
- Take FAIL decisions seriously - fix issues first
- Use CONCERNS as a checklist for parallel work
- Document why you proceed despite concerns
---
## Related
- [Create Architecture](/docs/how-to/workflows/create-architecture.md) - Architecture workflow
- [Create Epics and Stories](/docs/how-to/workflows/create-epics-and-stories.md) - Work breakdown
- [Run Sprint Planning](/docs/how-to/workflows/run-sprint-planning.md) - Start implementation