420 lines
19 KiB
Markdown
420 lines
19 KiB
Markdown
# Product Owner (Sarah) Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document establishes comprehensive quality standards for Product Owner activities within the BMAD Method. These standards ensure consistent, high-quality product ownership that drives successful project outcomes and stakeholder satisfaction.
|
|
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
1. [Quality Framework](#quality-framework)
|
|
2. [Documentation Quality Standards](#documentation-quality-standards)
|
|
3. [Story Quality Standards](#story-quality-standards)
|
|
4. [Process Quality Standards](#process-quality-standards)
|
|
5. [Communication Quality Standards](#communication-quality-standards)
|
|
6. [Stakeholder Management Quality Standards](#stakeholder-management-quality-standards)
|
|
7. [Quality Metrics and Measurement](#quality-metrics-and-measurement)
|
|
8. [Quality Assurance Procedures](#quality-assurance-procedures)
|
|
9. [Continuous Improvement](#continuous-improvement)
|
|
|
|
## Quality Framework
|
|
|
|
### Quality Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Clarity**: All artifacts and communications are clear, unambiguous, and easily understood
|
|
2. **Completeness**: All necessary information is included and nothing critical is missing
|
|
3. **Consistency**: Standards and formats are applied uniformly across all work
|
|
4. **Traceability**: Clear connections exist between business needs and implementation
|
|
5. **Testability**: All requirements can be objectively validated and tested
|
|
6. **Value-Focus**: Every activity and artifact contributes to business value delivery
|
|
|
|
### Quality Dimensions
|
|
|
|
#### Functional Quality
|
|
- Requirements accuracy and completeness
|
|
- Story clarity and testability
|
|
- Acceptance criteria precision
|
|
- Business value articulation
|
|
|
|
#### Process Quality
|
|
- Adherence to defined processes
|
|
- Timely delivery of artifacts
|
|
- Stakeholder engagement effectiveness
|
|
- Risk and dependency management
|
|
|
|
#### Communication Quality
|
|
- Stakeholder satisfaction
|
|
- Information clarity and timeliness
|
|
- Feedback incorporation
|
|
- Conflict resolution effectiveness
|
|
|
|
## Documentation Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### User Story Documentation Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Story Structure Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Title**: Clear, descriptive, and follows naming conventions
|
|
- [ ] **Description**: Follows "As a...I want...So that" format correctly
|
|
- [ ] **Acceptance Criteria**: Written in Given-When-Then format
|
|
- [ ] **Definition of Done**: Complete and relevant to story scope
|
|
- [ ] **Priority**: Clearly assigned using defined prioritization framework
|
|
- [ ] **Estimate**: Story points assigned using team estimation process
|
|
|
|
#### Content Quality Criteria
|
|
- [ ] **Business Value**: Clearly articulated and measurable
|
|
- [ ] **User Persona**: Specific user type identified
|
|
- [ ] **Functionality**: Precise description of required capability
|
|
- [ ] **Benefit**: Clear explanation of value delivered
|
|
- [ ] **Testability**: All criteria can be objectively tested
|
|
- [ ] **Completeness**: All necessary information included
|
|
|
|
#### Documentation Standards
|
|
- [ ] **Grammar**: Proper grammar and spelling throughout
|
|
- [ ] **Formatting**: Consistent formatting and structure
|
|
- [ ] **Links**: All references and links are valid and current
|
|
- [ ] **Version Control**: Proper versioning and change tracking
|
|
- [ ] **Accessibility**: Documents are accessible to all stakeholders
|
|
|
|
### Epic and Feature Documentation Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Epic Quality Criteria
|
|
- [ ] **Business Objective**: Clear problem statement and business value
|
|
- [ ] **Scope Definition**: Well-defined boundaries and scope
|
|
- [ ] **Story Breakdown**: Complete decomposition into user stories
|
|
- [ ] **Dependencies**: All dependencies identified and documented
|
|
- [ ] **Success Criteria**: Measurable success metrics defined
|
|
- [ ] **Timeline**: Realistic timeline with key milestones
|
|
|
|
#### Feature Specification Quality
|
|
- [ ] **User Value**: Clear value proposition for target users
|
|
- [ ] **Functional Requirements**: Complete functional specification
|
|
- [ ] **Non-Functional Requirements**: Performance, security, accessibility requirements
|
|
- [ ] **Integration Points**: System integration requirements documented
|
|
- [ ] **Testing Strategy**: Comprehensive testing approach defined
|
|
|
|
### Backlog Documentation Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Backlog Structure Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Organization**: Logical organization by theme, epic, or priority
|
|
- [ ] **Prioritization**: Clear prioritization using defined framework
|
|
- [ ] **Estimation**: All items estimated using consistent approach
|
|
- [ ] **Status Tracking**: Current status clearly indicated
|
|
- [ ] **Dependency Mapping**: Dependencies clearly identified and tracked
|
|
|
|
#### Backlog Content Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Completeness**: All necessary backlog items included
|
|
- [ ] **Currency**: Backlog reflects current business priorities
|
|
- [ ] **Clarity**: All items clearly described and understood
|
|
- [ ] **Traceability**: Clear connection to business objectives
|
|
- [ ] **Actionability**: All items ready for development when prioritized
|
|
|
|
## Story Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### INVEST Principles Compliance
|
|
|
|
#### Independent
|
|
- [ ] **Standalone Value**: Story delivers value independently
|
|
- [ ] **Minimal Dependencies**: Limited dependencies on other stories
|
|
- [ ] **Development Independence**: Can be developed without waiting for other stories
|
|
- [ ] **Testing Independence**: Can be tested independently
|
|
|
|
#### Negotiable
|
|
- [ ] **Flexible Implementation**: Implementation details can be discussed
|
|
- [ ] **Scope Adjustment**: Story scope can be adjusted if needed
|
|
- [ ] **Solution Options**: Multiple implementation approaches possible
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Input**: Open to stakeholder feedback and refinement
|
|
|
|
#### Valuable
|
|
- [ ] **Business Value**: Clear business value articulated
|
|
- [ ] **User Value**: Delivers value to end users
|
|
- [ ] **Measurable Impact**: Value can be measured and validated
|
|
- [ ] **Priority Alignment**: Value aligns with business priorities
|
|
|
|
#### Estimable
|
|
- [ ] **Clear Requirements**: Requirements are clear enough for estimation
|
|
- [ ] **Technical Understanding**: Technical approach is understood
|
|
- [ ] **Scope Definition**: Story scope is well-defined
|
|
- [ ] **Complexity Assessment**: Complexity can be reasonably assessed
|
|
|
|
#### Small
|
|
- [ ] **Sprint Completion**: Can be completed within a single sprint
|
|
- [ ] **Focused Scope**: Addresses a single piece of functionality
|
|
- [ ] **Manageable Complexity**: Complexity is manageable for the team
|
|
- [ ] **Clear Boundaries**: Story boundaries are well-defined
|
|
|
|
#### Testable
|
|
- [ ] **Objective Criteria**: Acceptance criteria are objective and measurable
|
|
- [ ] **Test Scenarios**: Test scenarios can be defined
|
|
- [ ] **Validation Methods**: Clear methods for validating completion
|
|
- [ ] **Demo Capability**: Story can be demonstrated to stakeholders
|
|
|
|
### Acceptance Criteria Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Criteria Structure
|
|
- [ ] **Given-When-Then Format**: Uses proper BDD format
|
|
- [ ] **Specific Conditions**: Initial conditions clearly specified
|
|
- [ ] **Clear Actions**: Actions or triggers clearly defined
|
|
- [ ] **Expected Outcomes**: Expected results clearly stated
|
|
- [ ] **Edge Cases**: Important edge cases covered
|
|
- [ ] **Error Conditions**: Error scenarios addressed
|
|
|
|
#### Criteria Content Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Completeness**: All important scenarios covered
|
|
- [ ] **Clarity**: Criteria are unambiguous and specific
|
|
- [ ] **Testability**: Each criterion can be objectively tested
|
|
- [ ] **Relevance**: All criteria are relevant to story value
|
|
- [ ] **Achievability**: Criteria are technically feasible
|
|
- [ ] **Measurability**: Success can be objectively measured
|
|
|
|
### Definition of Done Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
#### DoD Completeness
|
|
- [ ] **Development Criteria**: Code completion and review requirements
|
|
- [ ] **Testing Criteria**: Unit, integration, and acceptance testing requirements
|
|
- [ ] **Quality Criteria**: Code quality and performance standards
|
|
- [ ] **Documentation Criteria**: Documentation update requirements
|
|
- [ ] **Deployment Criteria**: Deployment and configuration requirements
|
|
- [ ] **Approval Criteria**: Stakeholder approval requirements
|
|
|
|
#### DoD Relevance
|
|
- [ ] **Story Appropriate**: DoD is appropriate for story type and scope
|
|
- [ ] **Team Aligned**: DoD reflects team capabilities and processes
|
|
- [ ] **Quality Focused**: DoD ensures appropriate quality levels
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Aligned**: DoD meets stakeholder expectations
|
|
|
|
## Process Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### Sprint Planning Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Planning Preparation
|
|
- [ ] **Backlog Readiness**: Product backlog is refined and prioritized
|
|
- [ ] **Story Readiness**: Stories are estimated and have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [ ] **Capacity Planning**: Team capacity is calculated and documented
|
|
- [ ] **Dependency Resolution**: Dependencies are identified and resolved
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Availability**: Key stakeholders are available for clarification
|
|
|
|
#### Planning Execution
|
|
- [ ] **Goal Setting**: Clear sprint goal is defined and agreed
|
|
- [ ] **Story Selection**: Stories are selected based on priority and capacity
|
|
- [ ] **Task Breakdown**: Stories are broken down into actionable tasks
|
|
- [ ] **Commitment**: Team commits to realistic sprint scope
|
|
- [ ] **Risk Assessment**: Risks are identified and mitigation planned
|
|
|
|
### Backlog Refinement Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Refinement Process
|
|
- [ ] **Regular Cadence**: Refinement occurs on regular schedule
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Participation**: Appropriate stakeholders participate
|
|
- [ ] **Story Preparation**: Stories are prepared for upcoming sprints
|
|
- [ ] **Estimation Updates**: Estimates are updated based on new information
|
|
- [ ] **Priority Adjustment**: Priorities are adjusted based on business changes
|
|
|
|
#### Refinement Outcomes
|
|
- [ ] **Story Clarity**: Stories are clear and well-understood
|
|
- [ ] **Acceptance Criteria**: Acceptance criteria are complete and testable
|
|
- [ ] **Estimation Accuracy**: Estimates reflect current understanding
|
|
- [ ] **Dependency Identification**: Dependencies are identified and planned
|
|
- [ ] **Risk Assessment**: Risks are identified and documented
|
|
|
|
### Stakeholder Engagement Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Engagement Planning
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Identification**: All relevant stakeholders identified
|
|
- [ ] **Communication Plan**: Clear communication plan established
|
|
- [ ] **Meeting Cadence**: Regular meeting schedule established
|
|
- [ ] **Feedback Mechanisms**: Clear feedback collection processes
|
|
- [ ] **Decision Processes**: Clear decision-making processes defined
|
|
|
|
#### Engagement Execution
|
|
- [ ] **Timely Communication**: Stakeholders receive timely updates
|
|
- [ ] **Clear Information**: Information is clear and actionable
|
|
- [ ] **Feedback Integration**: Stakeholder feedback is incorporated
|
|
- [ ] **Expectation Management**: Stakeholder expectations are managed
|
|
- [ ] **Conflict Resolution**: Conflicts are resolved effectively
|
|
|
|
## Communication Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### Stakeholder Communication Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Communication Content Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Relevance**: Information is relevant to stakeholder needs
|
|
- [ ] **Accuracy**: Information is accurate and up-to-date
|
|
- [ ] **Completeness**: All necessary information is included
|
|
- [ ] **Clarity**: Information is clear and easily understood
|
|
- [ ] **Actionability**: Clear actions or decisions are identified
|
|
|
|
#### Communication Delivery Quality
|
|
- [ ] **Timeliness**: Information is delivered when needed
|
|
- [ ] **Appropriate Channel**: Correct communication channel is used
|
|
- [ ] **Audience Targeting**: Content is tailored to audience needs
|
|
- [ ] **Follow-up**: Appropriate follow-up is conducted
|
|
- [ ] **Documentation**: Important communications are documented
|
|
|
|
### Sprint Review Communication Standards
|
|
|
|
#### Review Preparation
|
|
- [ ] **Demo Preparation**: Demonstrations are well-prepared and tested
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Invitation**: Appropriate stakeholders are invited
|
|
- [ ] **Agenda Distribution**: Clear agenda is distributed in advance
|
|
- [ ] **Material Preparation**: Supporting materials are prepared
|
|
- [ ] **Environment Setup**: Demo environment is properly configured
|
|
|
|
#### Review Execution
|
|
- [ ] **Goal Alignment**: Review focuses on sprint goal achievement
|
|
- [ ] **Value Demonstration**: Business value is clearly demonstrated
|
|
- [ ] **Feedback Collection**: Stakeholder feedback is actively collected
|
|
- [ ] **Next Steps**: Clear next steps are identified and communicated
|
|
- [ ] **Action Items**: Action items are documented and assigned
|
|
|
|
## Quality Metrics and Measurement
|
|
|
|
### Story Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
#### Story Completion Metrics
|
|
- **Story Completion Rate**: Percentage of committed stories completed per sprint
|
|
- **Story Rejection Rate**: Percentage of stories rejected during review
|
|
- **Story Rework Rate**: Percentage of stories requiring significant rework
|
|
- **Story Cycle Time**: Average time from story creation to completion
|
|
|
|
#### Story Quality Metrics
|
|
- **Acceptance Criteria Coverage**: Average number of acceptance criteria per story
|
|
- **Defect Rate**: Number of defects found per story after completion
|
|
- **Stakeholder Satisfaction**: Stakeholder satisfaction with delivered stories
|
|
- **INVEST Compliance**: Percentage of stories meeting INVEST principles
|
|
|
|
### Process Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
#### Sprint Planning Metrics
|
|
- **Planning Efficiency**: Time spent in planning relative to sprint duration
|
|
- **Commitment Accuracy**: Accuracy of sprint commitments vs. actual delivery
|
|
- **Planning Preparation**: Percentage of stories ready for planning
|
|
- **Goal Achievement**: Percentage of sprint goals achieved
|
|
|
|
#### Backlog Quality Metrics
|
|
- **Backlog Health**: Ratio of ready stories to total backlog items
|
|
- **Estimation Accuracy**: Accuracy of story point estimates
|
|
- **Priority Stability**: Frequency of priority changes
|
|
- **Dependency Resolution**: Time to resolve identified dependencies
|
|
|
|
### Communication Quality Metrics
|
|
|
|
#### Stakeholder Engagement Metrics
|
|
- **Stakeholder Satisfaction**: Regular stakeholder satisfaction surveys
|
|
- **Communication Effectiveness**: Feedback on communication clarity and timeliness
|
|
- **Meeting Efficiency**: Stakeholder feedback on meeting effectiveness
|
|
- **Decision Speed**: Time from issue identification to decision
|
|
|
|
#### Information Quality Metrics
|
|
- **Information Accuracy**: Accuracy of information provided to stakeholders
|
|
- **Information Timeliness**: Timeliness of information delivery
|
|
- **Information Completeness**: Completeness of information provided
|
|
- **Information Usefulness**: Stakeholder assessment of information value
|
|
|
|
## Quality Assurance Procedures
|
|
|
|
### Story Quality Assurance Process
|
|
|
|
#### Story Creation QA
|
|
1. **Template Compliance**: Verify story follows standard template
|
|
2. **INVEST Validation**: Validate story meets INVEST principles
|
|
3. **Acceptance Criteria Review**: Review acceptance criteria for completeness and testability
|
|
4. **Business Value Validation**: Confirm business value is clearly articulated
|
|
5. **Dependency Check**: Identify and document dependencies
|
|
6. **Stakeholder Review**: Obtain stakeholder review and approval
|
|
|
|
#### Story Refinement QA
|
|
1. **Clarity Assessment**: Assess story clarity and understanding
|
|
2. **Estimation Validation**: Validate estimation accuracy and rationale
|
|
3. **Acceptance Criteria Update**: Update acceptance criteria based on new information
|
|
4. **Risk Assessment**: Assess and document story risks
|
|
5. **Priority Validation**: Confirm story priority alignment with business objectives
|
|
|
|
### Process Quality Assurance
|
|
|
|
#### Sprint Planning QA
|
|
1. **Preparation Checklist**: Verify all planning preparation completed
|
|
2. **Goal Definition**: Ensure sprint goal is clear and achievable
|
|
3. **Capacity Validation**: Validate team capacity calculations
|
|
4. **Commitment Review**: Review team commitment for realism
|
|
5. **Risk Mitigation**: Ensure risks are identified and mitigation planned
|
|
|
|
#### Backlog Management QA
|
|
1. **Prioritization Review**: Review prioritization logic and rationale
|
|
2. **Readiness Assessment**: Assess story readiness for development
|
|
3. **Dependency Mapping**: Validate dependency identification and planning
|
|
4. **Quality Standards**: Ensure all backlog items meet quality standards
|
|
5. **Stakeholder Alignment**: Confirm backlog alignment with stakeholder expectations
|
|
|
|
### Communication Quality Assurance
|
|
|
|
#### Stakeholder Communication QA
|
|
1. **Content Review**: Review communication content for accuracy and completeness
|
|
2. **Audience Appropriateness**: Ensure content is appropriate for target audience
|
|
3. **Timing Validation**: Validate communication timing and frequency
|
|
4. **Feedback Integration**: Ensure stakeholder feedback is incorporated
|
|
5. **Follow-up Tracking**: Track and ensure appropriate follow-up
|
|
|
|
#### Documentation QA
|
|
1. **Accuracy Verification**: Verify accuracy of all documented information
|
|
2. **Completeness Check**: Ensure all necessary information is documented
|
|
3. **Format Compliance**: Verify compliance with documentation standards
|
|
4. **Accessibility Review**: Ensure documentation is accessible to all stakeholders
|
|
5. **Version Control**: Ensure proper version control and change tracking
|
|
|
|
## Continuous Improvement
|
|
|
|
### Quality Improvement Process
|
|
|
|
#### Regular Quality Reviews
|
|
- **Weekly**: Review current sprint quality metrics and issues
|
|
- **Sprint Retrospectives**: Include quality focus in sprint retrospectives
|
|
- **Monthly**: Comprehensive quality metrics review and analysis
|
|
- **Quarterly**: Quality standards review and update
|
|
|
|
#### Improvement Identification
|
|
1. **Metric Analysis**: Analyze quality metrics to identify improvement opportunities
|
|
2. **Stakeholder Feedback**: Collect and analyze stakeholder feedback
|
|
3. **Team Input**: Gather team input on quality challenges and solutions
|
|
4. **Best Practice Research**: Research industry best practices and standards
|
|
5. **Root Cause Analysis**: Conduct root cause analysis for quality issues
|
|
|
|
#### Improvement Implementation
|
|
1. **Improvement Planning**: Develop specific improvement plans and timelines
|
|
2. **Standard Updates**: Update quality standards based on lessons learned
|
|
3. **Process Refinement**: Refine processes to address quality gaps
|
|
4. **Training and Development**: Provide training to address skill gaps
|
|
5. **Tool Enhancement**: Enhance tools and templates to support quality
|
|
|
|
### Quality Culture Development
|
|
|
|
#### Team Quality Awareness
|
|
- **Quality Training**: Regular training on quality standards and practices
|
|
- **Quality Metrics Sharing**: Share quality metrics and trends with team
|
|
- **Quality Recognition**: Recognize and celebrate quality achievements
|
|
- **Quality Discussions**: Regular discussions about quality in team meetings
|
|
|
|
#### Stakeholder Quality Engagement
|
|
- **Quality Expectations**: Clearly communicate quality expectations to stakeholders
|
|
- **Quality Feedback**: Actively seek stakeholder feedback on quality
|
|
- **Quality Transparency**: Maintain transparency about quality metrics and issues
|
|
- **Quality Collaboration**: Collaborate with stakeholders on quality improvement
|
|
|
|
### Quality Standards Evolution
|
|
|
|
#### Standards Review Process
|
|
1. **Regular Assessment**: Regularly assess effectiveness of current standards
|
|
2. **Industry Benchmarking**: Benchmark standards against industry best practices
|
|
3. **Stakeholder Input**: Gather stakeholder input on standards effectiveness
|
|
4. **Team Feedback**: Collect team feedback on standards usability
|
|
5. **Continuous Refinement**: Continuously refine standards based on experience
|
|
|
|
#### Standards Update Process
|
|
1. **Change Proposal**: Formal process for proposing standards changes
|
|
2. **Impact Assessment**: Assess impact of proposed changes
|
|
3. **Stakeholder Review**: Review proposed changes with stakeholders
|
|
4. **Implementation Planning**: Plan implementation of approved changes
|
|
5. **Change Communication**: Communicate changes to all affected parties
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
These comprehensive quality standards ensure that Product Owner activities within the BMAD Method consistently deliver high-quality outcomes that drive project success and stakeholder satisfaction. Regular application and continuous improvement of these standards will enhance the effectiveness of product ownership practices.
|