476 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
476 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
# Tutorial 05C: Synthesize from Documentation
|
|
|
|
**Transform existing research into an actionable Trigger Map**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This tutorial walks you through synthesizing your existing documentation into a complete Trigger Map with Saga the Analyst. Instead of starting from scratch, you'll validate and organize what you already have, filling gaps through focused conversation.
|
|
|
|
**Time:** 30-45 minutes
|
|
**Prerequisites:** Existing documentation (vision docs, user research, plans, or interviews)
|
|
**What you'll create:** Synthesized Trigger Map + gap analysis
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## When to Use This Approach
|
|
|
|
**Documentation Synthesis is ideal for:**
|
|
- ✅ You have extensive vision/strategy documents
|
|
- ✅ User research or interview transcripts exist
|
|
- ✅ Project plans or roadmaps already created
|
|
- ✅ Need to make existing documentation actionable
|
|
- ✅ Documentation is too long for anyone to read
|
|
|
|
**Use Full Trigger Mapping instead if:**
|
|
- ❌ Starting from scratch with no documentation
|
|
- ❌ Documentation is minimal or non-existent
|
|
|
|
**Use Slim Trigger Map instead if:**
|
|
- ❌ Need quick validation (under 20 minutes)
|
|
- ❌ Single user journey focus
|
|
|
|
**Not sure which to use?** See [Lesson 2: Heritage & Evolution](lesson-02-heritage-evolution.md#three-approaches-choose-your-path)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## The Problem This Solves
|
|
|
|
**Common scenario:**
|
|
- Organization spends thousands on research
|
|
- 200-page reports nobody reads
|
|
- Interview transcripts gathering dust
|
|
- Vision documents lost in shared drives
|
|
- Designers paste 100+ pages into AI chats (hitting token limits)
|
|
|
|
**The solution:**
|
|
Transform that investment into a **single-slide strategic artifact** you can actually use in daily design work and AI conversations.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Before You Start
|
|
|
|
### What You Need
|
|
|
|
**Documentation (any combination of):**
|
|
- Vision or strategy documents
|
|
- User research reports
|
|
- Interview transcripts
|
|
- Target group analysis
|
|
- Project plans or roadmaps
|
|
- Feature specifications
|
|
- Market research
|
|
|
|
**Also need:**
|
|
- ✅ WDS installed and Saga activated
|
|
- ✅ 30-45 minutes of focused time
|
|
- ✅ Ability to share documentation (paste, upload, or describe)
|
|
|
|
### What to Expect
|
|
|
|
**Saga will:**
|
|
- Analyze your documentation
|
|
- Frame questions based on what your material suggests
|
|
- Validate findings with you
|
|
- Fill gaps through conversation
|
|
- Identify documentation strengths and weaknesses
|
|
- Create your Trigger Map
|
|
|
|
**You will:**
|
|
- Share your documentation
|
|
- Validate what Saga extracts
|
|
- Fill gaps where documentation is incomplete
|
|
- Make prioritization decisions
|
|
- Confirm strategic alignment
|
|
|
|
**Important:** Documentation may only answer **part** of the Trigger Map questions. That's normal. Saga will frame questions as "Your material suggests X, is this correct?" and fill gaps collaboratively.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workshop Flow
|
|
|
|
### Starting the Workshop
|
|
|
|
**In your IDE, activate Saga:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
@saga I have existing documentation I want to synthesize into a Trigger Map. I have [describe what you have: vision docs, user research, plans, etc.].
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Then share your documentation:**
|
|
- Paste content directly into chat
|
|
- Upload files
|
|
- Provide links to documents
|
|
- Describe what's available
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workshop 1: Business Goals (5-10 minutes)
|
|
|
|
### What Saga Will Do
|
|
|
|
**Analyze your documentation for:**
|
|
- Vision statements (explicit or implied)
|
|
- Strategic objectives (SMART or vague)
|
|
- Business goals and success criteria
|
|
|
|
### Three Scenarios
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 1: Clear vision and objectives found**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "Your documentation suggests this vision:
|
|
'Be the most trusted platform for dog owners in Sweden'
|
|
|
|
Is this accurate?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 2: Vague or implied vision**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "I found aspirational language in your docs.
|
|
It seems like your vision is: [interpreted vision]
|
|
But this isn't explicitly stated. Is this accurate?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 3: No vision found (reverse engineering)**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "I don't see an explicit vision statement.
|
|
However, based on your objectives and plans,
|
|
the implied vision seems to be: [inferred vision]
|
|
|
|
This is reverse-engineered from what you're trying to achieve.
|
|
Does this capture your aspirational goal?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Validate or refine:**
|
|
- Does the extracted vision capture your aspirational goal?
|
|
- Are the objectives truly SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)?
|
|
- Do objectives connect to the vision?
|
|
|
|
**Fill gaps:**
|
|
- If vision is missing, define it
|
|
- If objectives are vague, sharpen them using SMART method
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workshop 2: Target Groups (5-10 minutes)
|
|
|
|
### What Saga Will Do
|
|
|
|
**Analyze your documentation for:**
|
|
- User segments or personas
|
|
- Behavioral descriptions
|
|
- User contexts and situations
|
|
- Demographics (but will push for psychology)
|
|
- User quotes or interview insights
|
|
|
|
### Three Scenarios
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 1: Target groups found**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "Your documentation identifies these user groups:
|
|
1. Dog Trainers - Professional trainers with 1000+ followers
|
|
2. Dog Owners - First-time owners seeking guidance
|
|
3. Veterinarians - Professionals recommending resources
|
|
|
|
I found 3 groups total. Should we focus on the top 3-4 most critical for your objectives?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 2: Demographics only (needs behavioral depth)**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "Your documentation mentions:
|
|
- Women aged 25-40
|
|
- Urban professionals
|
|
- Pet owners
|
|
|
|
However, these are demographic descriptions.
|
|
For Trigger Mapping, we need behavioral profiles.
|
|
|
|
For each group, what's their context and situation when using your product?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Scenario 3: No clear target groups**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "I don't see clear target group definitions.
|
|
Based on the context, these groups might be relevant:
|
|
- [Inferred group 1]: [reasoning]
|
|
- [Inferred group 2]: [reasoning]
|
|
|
|
Who are the 3-4 key user groups whose product usage will drive your objectives?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Validate or refine:**
|
|
- Are these the right target groups?
|
|
- Do descriptions capture behavioral context (not just demographics)?
|
|
- Is there psychological depth (goals, frustrations, context)?
|
|
|
|
**Fill gaps:**
|
|
- Transform demographics into behavioral profiles
|
|
- Add context and situation
|
|
- Include user quotes from research if available
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workshop 3: Driving Forces (5-10 minutes)
|
|
|
|
### What Saga Will Do
|
|
|
|
**For each persona, analyze documentation for:**
|
|
- Positive drivers (wants, desires, aspirations)
|
|
- Negative drivers (fears, frustrations, anxieties)
|
|
- Pain points and desired outcomes
|
|
|
|
### Common Pattern: Missing Negative Drivers
|
|
|
|
**Most documentation focuses on positive wants:**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "Your documentation suggests Dog Trainers want to:
|
|
- Build their professional reputation
|
|
- Share training techniques
|
|
- Connect with potential clients
|
|
|
|
But I don't see explicit fears or frustrations.
|
|
|
|
Let's think about the flip side: What do they fear or want to avoid?
|
|
- Fear of looking unprofessional?
|
|
- Fear of wasting time on ineffective platforms?
|
|
- Frustration with current solutions?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Validate or refine:**
|
|
- Do positive drivers capture what users want to achieve?
|
|
- Are negative drivers identified? (Often missing in docs)
|
|
- Are drivers specific to usage context (not general life goals)?
|
|
|
|
**Fill gaps:**
|
|
- Transform pain points into psychological drivers
|
|
- Identify fears and frustrations (loss aversion is powerful!)
|
|
- Make drivers specific to product usage context
|
|
|
|
**Remember:** Negative drivers are often MORE powerful than positive ones.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Workshop 4: Prioritization (5-10 minutes)
|
|
|
|
### What Saga Will Do
|
|
|
|
**Check documentation for priority signals:**
|
|
- Explicit priority statements
|
|
- Resource allocation (budget, team focus)
|
|
- Timeline emphasis (what's first)
|
|
- Frequency of mention
|
|
- Depth of research on certain groups
|
|
|
|
**Then prioritize through conversation:**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "For each group, let's assess:
|
|
|
|
Impact on objectives: If this group succeeds with your product,
|
|
how much does it drive your objectives? (High/Medium/Low)
|
|
|
|
Feasibility: How easy is it to reach and serve this group?
|
|
(High/Medium/Low)
|
|
|
|
Let's start with Dog Trainers:
|
|
- Impact on objectives?
|
|
- Feasibility?"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Assess each group:**
|
|
- Impact on objectives (High/Medium/Low)
|
|
- Feasibility to reach and serve (High/Medium/Low)
|
|
|
|
**Validate prioritization:**
|
|
- Does the ranking align with your strategic thinking?
|
|
- Are top drivers the most critical to address?
|
|
- Does the focus statement capture where design efforts should go?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Gap Analysis & Validation (5-10 minutes)
|
|
|
|
### What Saga Will Do
|
|
|
|
**Identify documentation strengths:**
|
|
```
|
|
✅ Clear vision statement
|
|
✅ Deep user research with interview quotes
|
|
✅ Behavioral personas with psychological depth
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Identify gaps:**
|
|
```
|
|
⚠️ Objectives are vague (not fully SMART)
|
|
- Impact: Hard to measure success
|
|
- What we did: Sharpened through conversation
|
|
|
|
⚠️ Negative drivers not explicitly mentioned
|
|
- Impact: Missing powerful motivators
|
|
- What we did: Inferred from pain points and validated
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Validate strategic alignment:**
|
|
```
|
|
Saga: "Your documentation says you want:
|
|
'Be the most trusted platform for dog owners'
|
|
|
|
Your plan/features suggest:
|
|
'Focus on professional trainers and monetization'
|
|
|
|
⚠️ Potential misalignment detected:
|
|
- Documentation emphasizes trust and all dog owners
|
|
- Plan focuses on professional segment and revenue
|
|
- Recommendation: Clarify if vision should be narrowed or plan broadened
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Your Task
|
|
|
|
**Review gaps:**
|
|
- Accept gaps and note for future research?
|
|
- Fill critical gaps now through focused conversation?
|
|
|
|
**Validate alignment:**
|
|
- Does your plan support your vision?
|
|
- Are there contradictions between docs and plans?
|
|
- Should anything be adjusted?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What You'll Receive
|
|
|
|
### Trigger Map Documentation
|
|
|
|
**Same comprehensive output as full Trigger Mapping:**
|
|
- Vision statement
|
|
- Strategic objectives (SMART)
|
|
- Prioritized target groups with personas
|
|
- Driving forces (positive and negative)
|
|
- Mermaid diagram visualization
|
|
- Strategic focus statement
|
|
|
|
**Plus additional synthesis artifacts:**
|
|
- Gap analysis (what's strong vs. weak in documentation)
|
|
- Alignment check (does plan match vision?)
|
|
- Recommendations for future research
|
|
|
|
### How to Use Your Trigger Map
|
|
|
|
**Daily design work:**
|
|
- Reference it when making design decisions
|
|
- Validate features against prioritized drivers
|
|
- Keep team aligned on strategic priorities
|
|
|
|
**AI conversations:**
|
|
- Share single-slide Trigger Map instead of 200-page reports
|
|
- Provide strategic context without hitting token limits
|
|
- Much more useful than pasting extensive documentation
|
|
|
|
**Team alignment:**
|
|
- Single source of truth for strategy
|
|
- Clear priorities everyone understands
|
|
- Defensible design decisions
|
|
|
|
**Future research:**
|
|
- Gap analysis guides what to research next
|
|
- Identifies assumptions to validate
|
|
- Prevents redundant research
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Tips for Success
|
|
|
|
### Prepare Your Documentation
|
|
|
|
**Before starting:**
|
|
- Gather all relevant documents
|
|
- Know what you have (vision, research, plans, etc.)
|
|
- Be ready to share (paste, upload, or describe)
|
|
|
|
**Don't worry if:**
|
|
- Documentation is incomplete (normal!)
|
|
- Some sections are vague (we'll sharpen them)
|
|
- Negative drivers aren't mentioned (we'll add them)
|
|
- Prioritization isn't explicit (we'll determine it)
|
|
|
|
### During the Workshop
|
|
|
|
**Be honest about gaps:**
|
|
- "I don't know" is a valid answer
|
|
- Gaps help identify future research needs
|
|
- Better to acknowledge than guess
|
|
|
|
**Validate actively:**
|
|
- Don't just accept what Saga extracts
|
|
- Correct misinterpretations
|
|
- Refine vague statements
|
|
|
|
**Think psychologically:**
|
|
- Move beyond demographics to behavior
|
|
- Consider both positive and negative drivers
|
|
- Focus on usage context, not general life goals
|
|
|
|
### After the Workshop
|
|
|
|
**Use your Trigger Map:**
|
|
- Reference it in design decisions
|
|
- Share it in AI chats for context
|
|
- Keep it updated as strategy evolves
|
|
|
|
**Address gaps:**
|
|
- Plan research to fill critical gaps
|
|
- Validate assumptions with users
|
|
- Update Trigger Map as you learn
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Common Questions
|
|
|
|
**Q: What if my documentation is really extensive (100+ pages)?**
|
|
A: Perfect use case! Saga will extract the strategic elements and create a single-slide reference. Much more useful than reading hundreds of pages.
|
|
|
|
**Q: What if documentation contradicts itself?**
|
|
A: Saga will identify contradictions during alignment check. You'll discuss and resolve them.
|
|
|
|
**Q: What if I only have partial documentation (e.g., just user research, no vision)?**
|
|
A: No problem. Saga will extract what's there and fill gaps through conversation. You'll end up with a complete Trigger Map.
|
|
|
|
**Q: Can I update the Trigger Map later if documentation changes?**
|
|
A: Yes! You can re-run synthesis or update specific sections as your strategy evolves.
|
|
|
|
**Q: How is this different from just reading my documentation?**
|
|
A: Trigger Map organizes research into actionable structure, identifies gaps, validates alignment, and creates a single-slide reference you can actually use daily.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
**After completing this tutorial:**
|
|
|
|
1. **Review your Trigger Map** - Does it accurately represent your strategy?
|
|
2. **Address critical gaps** - Plan research to fill important missing pieces
|
|
3. **Share with team** - Get alignment on strategic priorities
|
|
4. **Use in design work** - Reference it when making design decisions
|
|
5. **Proceed to Module 06** - UX Design (where Trigger Map guides your work)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Related Resources
|
|
|
|
- [Lesson 2: Heritage & Evolution](lesson-02-heritage-evolution.md) - Understanding the three approaches
|
|
- [Tutorial 05: Full Trigger Mapping](tutorial-05.md) - Starting from scratch
|
|
- [Tutorial 05B: Slim Trigger Map](tutorial-05b-value-trigger-chain.md) - Quick validation
|
|
- [Module 05 Overview](module-05-overview.md) - Complete module guide
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Ready to transform your documentation into an actionable Trigger Map?** Activate Saga and begin! 🎯
|