4.3 KiB

Raw Blame History

Ultra-Deep Thinking Mode (UDTM) Task

Purpose

Execute rigorous, multi-angle analysis and verification protocol to ensure highest quality decision-making across all BMAD personas. This generic UDTM provides a comprehensive framework for deep analytical thinking.

Integration with Memory System

What patterns to search for: Similar analytical contexts, successful decision patterns, common pitfalls in similar analyses
What outcomes to track: Decision quality metrics, time-to-insight, assumption validation accuracy
What learnings to capture: Effective analysis patterns, common blind spots, successful verification strategies

UDTM Protocol Adaptation

Standard 90-minute protocol adaptable to persona-specific needs

Phase 1: Multi-Angle Analysis (35 minutes)

Primary Domain Perspective: Core expertise area analysis
Cross-Domain Integration: How this connects to other system aspects
Stakeholder Impact: Effects on all involved parties
System-Wide Implications: Broader system effects
Risk and Opportunity: Potential failures and optimization chances
Alternative Approaches: Other viable solutions

Phase 2: Assumption Challenge (15 minutes)

List ALL assumptions - explicit and implicit
Systematic challenge - attempt to disprove each
Evidence gathering - document proof for/against
Dependency mapping - identify assumption chains
Confidence scoring - rate each assumption's validity

Phase 3: Triple Verification (25 minutes)

Primary Source: Direct evidence from authoritative sources
Pattern Analysis: Historical patterns and precedents
External Validation: Independent verification methods
Cross-Reference: Ensure all sources align
Confidence Assessment: Overall verification strength

Phase 4: Weakness Hunting (15 minutes)

What are the blind spots in this analysis?
What biases might be affecting judgment?
What edge cases haven't been considered?
What cascade failures could occur?
What assumptions are most fragile?

Quality Gates

Pre-Analysis Gate

Context fully understood
All relevant information gathered
Memory patterns reviewed
Success criteria defined

Analysis Quality Gate

All perspectives thoroughly explored
Assumptions explicitly documented
Evidence comprehensively gathered
Alternatives seriously considered

Completion Gate

Confidence level >95%
All weaknesses addressed
Verification completed
Documentation comprehensive

Success Criteria

All protocol phases completed with documentation
Multi-angle analysis covers minimum 6 perspectives
Assumption validation rate >90%
Triple verification achieved
Weakness hunting yields actionable insights
Overall confidence >95%

Memory Integration

# Pre-UDTM memory search
memory_queries = [
    f"UDTM analysis {current_context} successful patterns",
    f"common pitfalls {analysis_type} {domain}",
    f"assumption failures {similar_context}",
    f"verification strategies {problem_type}"
]

# Post-UDTM memory creation
analysis_memory = {
    "type": "udtm_analysis",
    "context": current_context,
    "perspectives_explored": perspectives_list,
    "assumptions_validated": validation_results,
    "weaknesses_identified": weakness_list,
    "outcome": analysis_outcome,
    "confidence": confidence_score,
    "reusable_insights": key_learnings
}

Output Template

# UDTM Analysis: {Topic}
**Date**: {timestamp}
**Analyst**: {persona}
**Confidence**: {percentage}%

## Multi-Angle Analysis
### Perspective 1: {Name}
{Detailed analysis}

### Perspective 2: {Name}
{Detailed analysis}

[Continue for all perspectives]

## Assumption Validation
| Assumption | Evidence For | Evidence Against | Confidence |
|------------|--------------|------------------|------------|
| {assumption} | {evidence} | {counter} | {score}% |

## Triple Verification Results
- **Primary Source**: {findings}
- **Pattern Analysis**: {findings}
- **External Validation**: {findings}

## Identified Weaknesses
1. {weakness}: {mitigation strategy}
2. {weakness}: {mitigation strategy}

## Final Recommendation
{Comprehensive recommendation with confidence level}

4.3 KiB Raw Blame History