ldy26098
/
BMAD-METHOD
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
BMAD-METHOD/src/modules/bmvcs/docs/DEVELOPMENT_APPROACH.md

9.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

BMVCS Development Approach

Document Type: Module Development Analysis Status: Retrospective Analysis Version: 1.0.0 Date: 2025-09-30

Overview

This document analyzes the development approach used for creating the BMVCS module and compares it with the standard BMB (BMAD Builder) create-module workflow introduced in BMAD v6.

Module Creation Strategy

BMVCS was developed using a direct development approach rather than the standard BMB create-module workflow. This was an intentional choice that proved beneficial for this specific module.

Why Direct Development?

Advantages for BMVCS

The direct development approach provided several key benefits:

1. Speed

  • Rapid prototyping without multi-step wizard overhead
  • Immediate implementation of ideas
  • No waiting for workflow prompts
  • Fast iteration cycles

2. Flexibility

  • Freedom to experiment with VCS-agnostic concepts
  • Ability to deviate from standard patterns when needed
  • Custom structure for unique requirements
  • Real-time architectural decisions

3. Customization

  • Unique structure tailored to specific needs
  • Custom VCS adaptation templates system
  • Innovative confidence scoring mechanism
  • Specialized discovery task patterns

4. Innovation

  • Space to develop new patterns
  • Discovery tasks with interactive prompts
  • Adapter agent paradigm
  • Template-based workflow adaptations

When to Use Each Approach

Use Direct Development When:

✓ You have clear vision of the module structure ✓ Experimenting with new concepts or patterns ✓ Working in alpha/research mode ✓ Need fast iteration cycles ✓ Creating innovative/non-standard modules ✓ Have deep understanding of BMAD v6 architecture

Use BMB create-module When:

✓ First time creating a BMAD module ✓ Need guided process with validation ✓ Want guaranteed v6 compatibility ✓ Prefer scaffolding over manual creation ✓ Building standard domain modules ✓ Want automatic roadmap and TODO generation

BMVCS vs BMB Standards Compliance

Despite bypassing the BMB workflow, BMVCS fully adheres to BMAD v6 module standards:

Component BMB Standard BMVCS Implementation Status
Structure agents/, workflows/, tasks/, templates/ All present ✅ Compliant
Installer _module-installer/ with config Complete with custom logic ✅ Compliant
Primary Agent Minimum 1 agent vcs-adapter.md ✅ Compliant
Workflows 2-10 workflows setup-vcs workflow ✅ Compliant
Tasks Supporting tasks 3 tasks (discover, adapt, validate) ✅ Compliant
Documentation README + docs README + 4 detailed docs ✅ Compliant
Templates Shared resources 5 VCS adaptation templates ✅ Compliant
Examples Usage examples Comprehensive examples/ folder ✅ Compliant
Installer Config install-menu-config.yaml Complete configuration ✅ Compliant
Module Metadata Version, status, code All present in README ✅ Compliant

Additional Components Beyond Standards

BMVCS includes components that exceed BMB standards:

  • Confidence Scoring System - Novel VCS detection algorithm
  • Adaptation Templates - YAML-based workflow configurations
  • Interactive Discovery - Multi-step VCS identification process
  • Integration Hooks - Optional BMM agent integration points

Comparison: What Each Approach Provides

BMB create-module Provides

Workflow Features:

  • Interactive module brainstorming session
  • Module brief creation workflow
  • Step-by-step component planning
  • Automatic directory scaffolding
  • Generated configuration files
  • Module validation checks
  • Development roadmap (TODO.md)
  • Post-creation summary

Quality Assurance:

  • Guaranteed v6 structure compliance
  • Configuration file templates
  • Installer setup automation
  • Documentation templates
  • Component naming validation

Direct Development Provides

Flexibility:

  • Immediate implementation
  • Custom architectural patterns
  • Experimentation freedom
  • Innovation space
  • Rapid prototyping

Trade-offs:

  • Manual structure creation
  • Self-validation required
  • Documentation written from scratch
  • Installer logic custom-built

BMVCS Development Timeline

Phase 1: Concept & Research

  • Analyzed BMAD v6 architecture changes
  • Researched VCS-agnostic approaches
  • Studied BMB module structure patterns
  • Decided on direct development approach

Phase 2: Core Structure

  • Created module directory structure
  • Built VCS Adapter agent
  • Designed discovery task flow
  • Implemented adaptation templates

Phase 3: Integration & Testing

  • Developed installer configuration
  • Created workflow components
  • Built validation mechanisms
  • Tested with multiple VCS types

Phase 4: Documentation

  • Wrote comprehensive README
  • Created principle documents
  • Built example implementations
  • Added confidence scoring docs

Lessons Learned

What Worked Well

  1. Rapid Prototyping

    • Concepts became implementations quickly
    • Easy to pivot when better ideas emerged
    • No workflow constraints slowing progress

  2. Custom Innovation

    • Confidence scoring system emerged naturally
    • Template-based adaptations designed iteratively
    • Discovery flow refined through experimentation

  3. Architecture Flexibility

    • Could break conventions when beneficial
    • Novel patterns (adapter agent) explored freely
    • Integration hooks added organically

What Could Be Improved

  1. Validation Checkpoints

    • Manual verification of BMB compliance needed
    • No automatic structure validation
    • Self-auditing required

  2. Documentation Overhead

    • More upfront documentation writing
    • No auto-generated component lists
    • Manual README maintenance

  3. Roadmap Management

    • No automatic TODO.md generation
    • Manual tracking of remaining work
    • Self-managed development phases

Recommendations for Future Modules

For Standard Modules

Use BMB create-module workflow:

  • Domain-specific modules (Legal, Medical, Finance, etc.)
  • Content creation modules
  • Productivity tools
  • Game development modules
  • Standard agent + workflow combinations

For Innovative Modules

Consider direct development:

  • Novel architectural patterns
  • Research/experimental modules
  • Cross-cutting concerns (like BMVCS)
  • Infrastructure modules
  • Tool/builder modules

Hybrid Approach

Combine both methods:

  1. Use BMB for initial scaffolding
  2. Customize structure for special needs
  3. Add innovative components manually
  4. Leverage BMB validation at end

Key Takeaways

Both Approaches Are Valid

  • BMB create-module = Scaffolding tool for structured creation
  • Direct development = Production-ready structure built manually

BMVCS Proves a Point

Understanding BMAD v6 architecture allows successful module creation without mandatory tooling. The direct development approach can be faster and more flexible for experienced developers working on innovative modules.

This May Become a Pattern

The "rapid prototyping pattern" demonstrated by BMVCS development could be documented as an official alternative approach for experienced BMAD module developers.

Future Possibilities

Retrospective BMB Validation

  • Run BMB validation tools on existing modules
  • Compare hand-built vs generated structures
  • Identify gaps or improvements
  • Update module to incorporate BMB best practices

Tooling Enhancement

  • Create "validate-module" tool for manual modules
  • Build "enhance-module" to add BMB features to existing modules
  • Develop "module-audit" for compliance checking

Documentation Pattern

  • Use BMVCS as case study in BMB documentation
  • Show both approaches in module creation guides
  • Provide decision matrix for approach selection

Conclusion

BMVCS demonstrates that direct development is a viable alternative to the BMB create-module workflow for certain types of modules. While BMB provides structure and guidance, direct development offers speed and flexibility for experienced developers working on innovative or experimental modules.

The key is understanding when to use which approach based on:

  • Developer experience level
  • Module complexity and novelty
  • Need for speed vs structure
  • Standard vs innovative patterns

Both approaches have their place in the BMAD v6 ecosystem, and this document serves as guidance for future module developers choosing their path.

Author: BMAD-METHOD Development Team Contributors: Claude Code AI Assistant License: Same as BMAD-METHOD project