265 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
265 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
# Performance Optimization Specialist Quality Checklist
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Overview
|
|
**Checklist ID:** performance-optimization-specialist-checklist
|
|
**Version:** 1.0
|
|
**Last Updated:** [Date]
|
|
**Applicable To:** Performance optimization deliverables, analysis reports, optimization plans
|
|
|
|
## Performance Analysis Quality Standards
|
|
|
|
### 1. Performance Baseline Assessment
|
|
- [ ] **Comprehensive Metrics Collection**
|
|
- [ ] Frontend performance metrics captured (Core Web Vitals, load times, bundle sizes)
|
|
- [ ] Backend performance metrics captured (response times, throughput, resource usage)
|
|
- [ ] Database performance metrics captured (query times, connection usage, index efficiency)
|
|
- [ ] Infrastructure metrics captured (CPU, memory, disk, network utilization)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Measurement Accuracy**
|
|
- [ ] Performance measurements taken under realistic conditions
|
|
- [ ] Multiple measurement samples collected for statistical significance
|
|
- [ ] Peak and off-peak performance variations documented
|
|
- [ ] Cross-browser and cross-device performance validated
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Baseline Documentation**
|
|
- [ ] Current performance state clearly documented
|
|
- [ ] Performance targets and SLAs defined
|
|
- [ ] Historical performance trends analyzed
|
|
- [ ] Comparative benchmarks established
|
|
|
|
### 2. Bottleneck Identification and Analysis
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Root Cause Analysis**
|
|
- [ ] Performance bottlenecks identified with specific root causes
|
|
- [ ] Impact assessment quantified for each bottleneck
|
|
- [ ] Dependencies and interconnections mapped
|
|
- [ ] Priority ranking based on impact and complexity
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Technology-Specific Analysis**
|
|
- [ ] React/TypeScript performance patterns analyzed
|
|
- [ ] Node.js event loop and memory usage evaluated
|
|
- [ ] .NET GC pressure and async patterns assessed
|
|
- [ ] Python GIL contention and memory optimization reviewed
|
|
- [ ] Database query patterns and indexing strategies evaluated
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Cross-Platform Considerations**
|
|
- [ ] Performance implications across technology stacks assessed
|
|
- [ ] Integration points and data flow bottlenecks identified
|
|
- [ ] Caching strategies evaluated across all layers
|
|
- [ ] Network and serialization performance analyzed
|
|
|
|
### 3. Optimization Strategy Quality
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Optimization Prioritization**
|
|
- [ ] Optimizations prioritized by impact vs. effort matrix
|
|
- [ ] Quick wins identified and separated from long-term improvements
|
|
- [ ] Resource requirements accurately estimated
|
|
- [ ] Implementation timeline realistic and achievable
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Technical Soundness**
|
|
- [ ] Optimization recommendations follow industry best practices
|
|
- [ ] Technology-specific optimization patterns correctly applied
|
|
- [ ] Performance trade-offs clearly explained
|
|
- [ ] Scalability implications considered
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Implementation Feasibility**
|
|
- [ ] Technical implementation approach detailed
|
|
- [ ] Required tools and infrastructure identified
|
|
- [ ] Team skill requirements assessed
|
|
- [ ] Risk factors and mitigation strategies defined
|
|
|
|
### 4. Performance Monitoring and Measurement
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Monitoring Strategy**
|
|
- [ ] Comprehensive monitoring plan covering all performance aspects
|
|
- [ ] Real-time and historical monitoring capabilities defined
|
|
- [ ] Alert thresholds and escalation procedures established
|
|
- [ ] Performance dashboard design optimized for stakeholder needs
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)**
|
|
- [ ] Relevant KPIs selected for each technology stack
|
|
- [ ] Performance targets aligned with business objectives
|
|
- [ ] Measurement methodology clearly defined
|
|
- [ ] Success criteria quantifiable and measurable
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Continuous Monitoring**
|
|
- [ ] Automated performance monitoring implemented
|
|
- [ ] Performance regression detection capabilities established
|
|
- [ ] Regular performance review processes defined
|
|
- [ ] Performance trend analysis and prediction capabilities
|
|
|
|
### 5. Testing and Validation
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Performance Testing Strategy**
|
|
- [ ] Load testing scenarios cover realistic usage patterns
|
|
- [ ] Stress testing validates system limits and recovery
|
|
- [ ] Spike testing evaluates sudden load increases
|
|
- [ ] Endurance testing validates long-term stability
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Test Environment Validation**
|
|
- [ ] Test environment representative of production
|
|
- [ ] Test data volumes and complexity realistic
|
|
- [ ] Network conditions and latency simulated
|
|
- [ ] Third-party service dependencies mocked appropriately
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Results Validation**
|
|
- [ ] Performance improvements validated through testing
|
|
- [ ] Regression testing confirms no negative impacts
|
|
- [ ] User experience improvements measurable
|
|
- [ ] Business metric improvements trackable
|
|
|
|
## Code Quality and Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### 6. Frontend Optimization Quality (React/TypeScript)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Component Optimization**
|
|
- [ ] React.memo usage appropriate and effective
|
|
- [ ] useMemo and useCallback applied correctly
|
|
- [ ] Component re-render patterns optimized
|
|
- [ ] Virtual DOM usage patterns efficient
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Bundle Optimization**
|
|
- [ ] Code splitting implemented effectively
|
|
- [ ] Tree shaking configured and working
|
|
- [ ] Lazy loading applied appropriately
|
|
- [ ] Bundle analysis and size monitoring in place
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Network Optimization**
|
|
- [ ] API call patterns optimized
|
|
- [ ] Caching strategies implemented correctly
|
|
- [ ] Image optimization and lazy loading applied
|
|
- [ ] CDN usage optimized
|
|
|
|
### 7. Backend Optimization Quality (Node.js/Python/.NET)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Asynchronous Patterns**
|
|
- [ ] Async/await patterns used correctly
|
|
- [ ] Event loop blocking minimized
|
|
- [ ] Concurrent processing optimized
|
|
- [ ] Resource pooling implemented effectively
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Memory Management**
|
|
- [ ] Memory leak prevention measures implemented
|
|
- [ ] Garbage collection optimized
|
|
- [ ] Object pooling used where appropriate
|
|
- [ ] Memory usage patterns efficient
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Database Optimization**
|
|
- [ ] Query optimization implemented
|
|
- [ ] Connection pooling configured correctly
|
|
- [ ] Caching strategies effective
|
|
- [ ] Index usage optimized
|
|
|
|
### 8. Infrastructure and Scalability
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Scalability Design**
|
|
- [ ] Horizontal scaling capabilities considered
|
|
- [ ] Load balancing strategies appropriate
|
|
- [ ] Auto-scaling configurations optimized
|
|
- [ ] Resource allocation efficient
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Infrastructure Optimization**
|
|
- [ ] Server configuration optimized for workload
|
|
- [ ] Network configuration optimized
|
|
- [ ] Storage performance optimized
|
|
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting comprehensive
|
|
|
|
## Documentation and Communication
|
|
|
|
### 9. Documentation Quality
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Technical Documentation**
|
|
- [ ] Performance analysis methodology clearly documented
|
|
- [ ] Optimization implementation steps detailed
|
|
- [ ] Configuration changes documented
|
|
- [ ] Troubleshooting guides provided
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Communication**
|
|
- [ ] Executive summary appropriate for business stakeholders
|
|
- [ ] Technical details appropriate for development teams
|
|
- [ ] Performance improvements quantified and explained
|
|
- [ ] ROI and business impact clearly communicated
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Knowledge Transfer**
|
|
- [ ] Team training materials provided
|
|
- [ ] Best practices documented
|
|
- [ ] Ongoing maintenance procedures defined
|
|
- [ ] Performance culture guidelines established
|
|
|
|
### 10. Integration and Collaboration
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Cross-Persona Integration**
|
|
- [ ] Architect collaboration on performance requirements
|
|
- [ ] Developer collaboration on implementation
|
|
- [ ] DevOps collaboration on monitoring and infrastructure
|
|
- [ ] QA collaboration on performance testing
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Tool Integration**
|
|
- [ ] Performance monitoring tools integrated
|
|
- [ ] Profiling tools configured and accessible
|
|
- [ ] Testing tools integrated into CI/CD pipeline
|
|
- [ ] Alerting systems integrated with incident response
|
|
|
|
## Quality Validation Checklist
|
|
|
|
### 11. Final Quality Review
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Completeness Check**
|
|
- [ ] All performance aspects covered comprehensively
|
|
- [ ] No critical performance areas overlooked
|
|
- [ ] All technology stacks addressed appropriately
|
|
- [ ] Cross-platform considerations included
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Accuracy Validation**
|
|
- [ ] Performance measurements accurate and reliable
|
|
- [ ] Optimization recommendations technically sound
|
|
- [ ] Implementation estimates realistic
|
|
- [ ] Success metrics achievable
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Stakeholder Approval**
|
|
- [ ] Technical stakeholders reviewed and approved
|
|
- [ ] Business stakeholders understand and approve
|
|
- [ ] Implementation team committed to timeline
|
|
- [ ] Resource allocation confirmed
|
|
|
|
### 12. Success Metrics Validation
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Performance Metrics**
|
|
- [ ] All performance targets clearly defined
|
|
- [ ] Measurement methodology established
|
|
- [ ] Baseline and target values documented
|
|
- [ ] Success criteria quantifiable
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Business Impact Metrics**
|
|
- [ ] User experience improvements measurable
|
|
- [ ] Business metric improvements trackable
|
|
- [ ] ROI calculations accurate and realistic
|
|
- [ ] Cost-benefit analysis comprehensive
|
|
|
|
## Checklist Completion
|
|
|
|
### Quality Score Calculation
|
|
- **Total Items:** [Count of applicable checklist items]
|
|
- **Completed Items:** [Count of checked items]
|
|
- **Quality Score:** [Completed/Total 100]%
|
|
- **Quality Rating:** [Excellent (95%) | Good (85-94%) | Satisfactory (75-84%) | Needs Improvement (<75%)]
|
|
|
|
### Review and Approval
|
|
- [ ] **Self-Review Completed:** Performance Optimization Specialist
|
|
- [ ] **Peer Review Completed:** [Reviewer Name]
|
|
- [ ] **Technical Review Completed:** [Technical Lead Name]
|
|
- [ ] **Final Approval:** [Approver Name]
|
|
|
|
### Next Steps
|
|
- [ ] Address any identified gaps or issues
|
|
- [ ] Schedule implementation kickoff
|
|
- [ ] Set up monitoring and tracking
|
|
- [ ] Plan regular review cycles
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Checklist Owner:** Performance Optimization Specialist
|
|
**Review Frequency:** Per deliverable
|
|
**Last Review:** [Date]
|
|
**Next Review:** [Date]
|