6.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

Technical Standards Enforcement Task

Purpose

Enforce technical standards across all development activities to ensure consistency, maintainability, and quality. This task provides systematic validation of code against established technical standards and best practices.

Integration with Memory System

What patterns to search for: Common standard violations, successful enforcement strategies, team compliance patterns, technical debt accumulation
What outcomes to track: Standards compliance rates, technical debt trends, code quality metrics, team adoption success
What learnings to capture: Effective enforcement approaches, standard evolution needs, team training requirements, automation opportunities

Technical Standards Categories

Code Standards

code_standards:
  naming_conventions:
    - classes: PascalCase
    - functions: camelCase
    - constants: UPPER_SNAKE_CASE
    - files: kebab-case
  
  structure:
    - max_file_length: 500
    - max_function_length: 50
    - max_cyclomatic_complexity: 10
    - max_nesting_depth: 4
  
  documentation:
    - functions: required_jsdoc
    - classes: required_comprehensive
    - complex_logic: inline_comments_required

Architecture Standards

Pattern Compliance: Repository, Service, Controller patterns
Dependency Direction: Clean architecture principles
Module Boundaries: Clear separation of concerns
API Contracts: Consistent interface design
Error Handling: Standardized error propagation

Security Standards

Authentication: OAuth2/JWT implementation
Authorization: RBAC implementation
Data Validation: Input sanitization
Encryption: Data at rest and in transit
Secrets Management: No hardcoded credentials

Performance Standards

Response Times: <200ms for API calls
Query Optimization: No N+1 queries
Caching Strategy: Redis for hot data
Resource Limits: Memory and CPU boundaries
Async Operations: For long-running tasks

Enforcement Process

Step 1: Automated Validation

def run_automated_checks():
    checks = {
        "linting": run_eslint_prettier(),
        "type_checking": run_typescript_check(),
        "test_coverage": run_coverage_report(),
        "security_scan": run_security_audit(),
        "performance": run_lighthouse_audit()
    }
    return aggregate_results(checks)

Step 2: Manual Review Checklist

Architecture Alignment: Follows established patterns
Code Clarity: Self-documenting and readable
Error Scenarios: All edge cases handled
Performance Impact: No obvious bottlenecks
Security Considerations: No vulnerabilities introduced

Step 3: Standards Violation Tracking

## Violation Report
**File**: {filepath}
**Standard**: {violated_standard}
**Severity**: {critical/high/medium/low}
**Description**: {what_is_wrong}
**Fix**: {how_to_fix}
**Reference**: {link_to_standard}

Quality Gates

Pre-Commit Gate

Local linting passes
Type checking passes
Unit tests pass
Commit message follows convention

Pull Request Gate

All automated checks pass
Code coverage maintained
No security vulnerabilities
Performance benchmarks met
Documentation updated

Pre-Deploy Gate

Integration tests pass
Security scan clean
Performance tests pass
Rollback plan documented

Enforcement Strategies

Progressive Enhancement

Warning Phase: Notify but don't block
Soft Enforcement: Block with override option
Hard Enforcement: Block without override
Continuous Monitoring: Track compliance trends

Team Enablement

enablement_activities = {
    "training": ["standards workshop", "best practices session"],
    "documentation": ["standards wiki", "example repository"],
    "tooling": ["IDE plugins", "pre-commit hooks"],
    "mentoring": ["pair programming", "code review feedback"]
}

Success Metrics

Standards compliance rate >95%
Technical debt ratio <5%
Code review cycle time <2 hours
Zero critical violations in production
Team satisfaction with standards >80%

Memory Integration

# Standards enforcement memory
enforcement_memory = {
    "type": "standards_enforcement",
    "enforcement_run": {
        "timestamp": run_timestamp,
        "scope": files_checked,
        "standards": standards_applied
    },
    "violations": {
        "total": violation_count,
        "by_severity": severity_breakdown,
        "by_category": category_breakdown,
        "repeat_offenders": frequent_violations
    },
    "trends": {
        "compliance_rate": current_compliance,
        "improvement": vs_last_period,
        "problem_areas": persistent_issues
    },
    "actions": {
        "automated_fixes": auto_fix_count,
        "manual_fixes": manual_fix_count,
        "exemptions": exemption_grants
    },
    "team_impact": {
        "productivity": velocity_impact,
        "satisfaction": developer_feedback
    }
}

Enforcement Output Template

# Technical Standards Enforcement Report
**Date**: {timestamp}
**Scope**: {project/module}
**Compliance**: {percentage}%

## Summary
- **Files Scanned**: {count}
- **Standards Checked**: {count}
- **Violations Found**: {count}
- **Auto-Fixed**: {count}

## Violations by Category
| Category | Count | Severity | Trend |
|----------|-------|----------|--------|
| Code Style | {n} | {sev} | {trend} |
| Architecture | {n} | {sev} | {trend} |
| Security | {n} | {sev} | {trend} |
| Performance | {n} | {sev} | {trend} |

## Critical Issues
{list_of_critical_violations}

## Recommendations
1. **Immediate Actions**: {urgent_fixes}
2. **Training Needs**: {identified_gaps}
3. **Tool Improvements**: {automation_opportunities}
4. **Standard Updates**: {evolution_suggestions}

## Next Steps
{action_plan_with_owners}

Brotherhood Collaboration

Standards review with architecture team
Enforcement strategy with tech leads
Training plan with team leads
Tool selection with DevOps team

6.1 KiB Raw Blame History