3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
| name | description |
|---|---|
| step-03-build-attack-plan | Extract ACs and tasks, create comprehensive review plan for context-aware phase |
Step 3: Build Review Attack Plan
Goal: Extract all reviewable items from story and create attack plan for context-aware review phase.
AVAILABLE STATE
From previous steps:
{story_path}- Path to the story file{story_key}- Story identifier{story_file_list}- Files claimed in story{git_changed_files}- Files actually changed (git){git_discrepancies}- Differences between claims and reality{asymmetric_findings}- Findings from Phase 1 (adversarial review)
STATE VARIABLES (capture now)
{acceptance_criteria}- All ACs extracted from story{tasks_with_status}- All tasks with their or status{comprehensive_file_list}- Union of story files + git files{review_attack_plan}- Structured plan for context-aware phase
EXECUTION SEQUENCE
1. Extract Acceptance Criteria
Parse all Acceptance Criteria from story:
{acceptance_criteria} = [
{ id: "AC1", requirement: "...", testable: true/false },
{ id: "AC2", requirement: "...", testable: true/false },
...
]
Note any ACs that are vague or untestable.
2. Extract Tasks with Status
Parse all Tasks/Subtasks with completion markers:
{tasks_with_status} = [
{ id: "T1", description: "...", status: "complete" ([x]) or "incomplete" ([ ]) },
{ id: "T1.1", description: "...", status: "complete" or "incomplete" },
...
]
Flag any tasks marked complete [x] for verification.
3. Build Comprehensive File List
Merge {story_file_list} and {git_changed_files}:
{comprehensive_file_list} = union of:
- Files in story Dev Agent Record
- Files changed according to git
- Deduped and sorted
Exclude from review:
_bmad/,_bmad-output/.cursor/,.windsurf/,.claude/- IDE/editor config files
4. Create Review Attack Plan
Structure the {review_attack_plan}:
PHASE 1: Adversarial Review (Step 2) [COMPLETE - {asymmetric_findings} findings]
├── Fresh code review without story context
│ └── {asymmetric_findings} items to consolidate
PHASE 2: Context-Aware Review (Step 4)
├── Git vs Story Discrepancies
│ └── {git_discrepancies} items
├── AC Validation
│ └── {acceptance_criteria} items to verify
├── Task Completion Audit
│ └── {tasks_with_status} marked [x] to verify
└── Code Quality Review
└── {comprehensive_file_list} files to review
5. Preview Attack Plan
Present to user (brief summary):
**Review Attack Plan**
**Story:** {story_key}
**Phase 1 (Adversarial - Complete):** {asymmetric_findings count} findings from fresh review
**Phase 2 (Context-Aware - Starting):**
- ACs to verify: {count}
- Tasks marked complete: {count}
- Files to review: {count}
- Git discrepancies detected: {count}
Proceeding with context-aware review...
NEXT STEP DIRECTIVE
CRITICAL: When this step completes, explicitly state:
"NEXT: Loading step-04-context-aware-review.md"
SUCCESS METRICS
- All ACs extracted with testability assessment
- All tasks extracted with completion status
- Comprehensive file list built (story + git)
- Exclusions applied correctly
- Attack plan structured for context-aware phase
- Summary presented to user
- Explicit NEXT directive provided
FAILURE MODES
- Missing AC extraction
- Not capturing task completion status
- Forgetting to merge story + git files
- Not excluding IDE/config directories
- Skipping attack plan structure
- No explicit NEXT directive at step completion