122 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
122 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# TODO List for PR #826 Investigation
|
|
|
|
**PR:** #826 - Feature/enhanced product planning
|
|
**Created:** 2025-10-28
|
|
**Type:** Documentation review
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1: Environment Setup & Context Gathering
|
|
|
|
- [x] **1.1** Download and apply PR #826 patch to review branch
|
|
- [x] **1.2** Survey repository root directory structure and conventions
|
|
- [x] **1.3** List all existing markdown files in root
|
|
- [x] **1.4** Review `docs/` directory structure and organization
|
|
- [x] **1.5** Identify existing planning/workflow documentation
|
|
- [x] **1.6** Check `PRD.md` content and purpose
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Content & Placement Analysis
|
|
|
|
- [x] **2.1** Read full `high-level-product-plan.md` content from patch
|
|
- [x] **2.2** Compare with existing BMAD documentation for overlap
|
|
- [x] **2.3** Assess content relevance to BMAD methodology
|
|
- [x] **2.4** Evaluate markdown formatting and lint compliance
|
|
- [x] **2.5** Check for BMAD-specific references or integration points
|
|
- [x] **2.6** Identify gaps or missing sections in the content
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3: Repository Convention Review
|
|
|
|
- [x] **3.1** Analyze filename conventions in repository root
|
|
- [x] **3.2** Check documentation organization patterns
|
|
- [x] **3.3** Review CONTRIBUTING.md for doc contribution guidelines (if exists)
|
|
- [x] **3.4** Assess whether root placement aligns with project structure
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4: Integration & Enhancement Assessment
|
|
|
|
- [x] **4.1** Determine if content could reference BMAD agents
|
|
- [x] **4.2** Identify opportunities to link to BMAD workflows
|
|
- [x] **4.3** Consider if content should invoke BMAD CLI/modules
|
|
- [x] **4.4** Evaluate whether generic → BMAD-specific enhancement is warranted
|
|
|
|
## Phase 5: Validation & Testing
|
|
|
|
- [x] **5.1** Run markdown linters on proposed file
|
|
- [x] **5.2** Verify links and references (if any)
|
|
- [x] **5.3** Check for spelling/grammar issues
|
|
- [x] **5.4** Validate formatting consistency with existing docs
|
|
|
|
## Phase 6: Decision & Recommendation
|
|
|
|
- [x] **6.1** Decide on acceptance, relocation, or enhancement request
|
|
- [x] **6.2** Draft specific placement recommendation (if relocating)
|
|
- [x] **6.3** Identify specific enhancement suggestions (if applicable)
|
|
- [x] **6.4** Prepare constructive feedback for contributor
|
|
|
|
## Phase 7: PR Review & Response
|
|
|
|
- [x] **7.1** Write clear, helpful PR comment with findings
|
|
- [x] **7.2** Include specific suggestions (file path, enhancements, etc.)
|
|
- [x] **7.3** Thank contributor for submission
|
|
- [x] **7.4** Post review (approve, request changes, or comment)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ✅ INVESTIGATION COMPLETE
|
|
|
|
**All phases completed successfully!**
|
|
|
|
**Outcome:** REQUEST CHANGES review posted to PR #826
|
|
|
|
**Summary:**
|
|
|
|
- **Content Quality:** Excellent, comprehensive planning checklist
|
|
- **Required Changes:**
|
|
1. Relocate to `docs/planning/product-planning-checklist.md`
|
|
2. Fix 148 trailing whitespace errors with Prettier
|
|
- **Optional Enhancement:** Add BMAD workflow integration section
|
|
- **Review Tone:** Constructive, appreciative, helpful
|
|
|
|
**Artifacts Created:**
|
|
|
|
- `.patch/826/PR-826-Summary.md` - PR overview
|
|
- `.patch/826/plan.md` - Investigation plan
|
|
- `.patch/826/todo.md` - This checklist
|
|
- `.patch/826/syntax-analysis.md` - Markdown validation
|
|
- `.patch/826/convention-analysis.md` - BMAD documentation structure
|
|
- `.patch/826/integration-assessment.md` - BMAD workflow mapping
|
|
- `.patch/826/validation-findings.md` - Validation test results
|
|
- `.patch/826/recommendation.md` - Decision rationale
|
|
- `.patch/826/PR-826-review-comment.md` - Posted GitHub review
|
|
|
|
**Next Steps:**
|
|
|
|
- Monitor PR for contributor response
|
|
- Re-review when changes applied
|
|
- Clean up workspace and revert to v6-alpha
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Quick Reference
|
|
|
|
**Files to check:**
|
|
|
|
- Repository root `*.md` files
|
|
- `docs/` directory structure
|
|
- `PRD.md`
|
|
- `README.md`
|
|
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`
|
|
- Existing workflow/template docs
|
|
|
|
**Key questions:**
|
|
|
|
1. Where should generic planning docs live?
|
|
2. Does this overlap with existing content?
|
|
3. Should this be BMAD-enhanced or kept generic?
|
|
4. Does the filename follow conventions?
|
|
|
|
**Likely outcome:**
|
|
|
|
- Accept with suggested relocation to `docs/planning/` or `docs/guides/`
|
|
- Optional: Suggest BMAD-specific enhancements
|
|
- Low risk, straightforward review
|