BMAD-METHOD/.patch/494/investigation-report.md

80 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

# TODO-001 Investigation Report: Locating the Problematic File
## Status: ⚠️ Issue Not Found in Current Codebase
### Files Searched:
1.`c:\Users\kdejo\DEV\bmad-v6\bmad\core\agents\bmad-master.md` - Found, examined
2.`c:\Users\kdejo\DEV\bmad-v6\src\core\agents\bmad-master.agent.yaml` - Found, examined (YAML format)
3.`.claude\commands\bmad\core\agents\bmad-master.md` - Found (duplicate)
### Search Results:
-**No instances of `Dependencies map to root/type/name` found**
-**No instances of `root/type/name` pattern found**
-**No IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION documentation found**
-**Line 14 in bmad-master.md does not contain dependency mapping**
### Current bmad-master.md Content (Line 14):
```xml
<step n="4">Load into memory {project-root}/bmad/core/config.yaml and set variable project_name, output_folder, user_name, communication_language</step>
```
**This line uses proper variable interpolation syntax: `{project-root}`**
## Investigation Findings:
### 1. Path Resolution Logic Found:
- **File**: `tools/cli/installers/lib/core/dependency-resolver.js`
- **Function**: `parseFileReferences()` and `resolveSingleDependency()`
- **Status**: ✅ **Already uses correct `{project-root}` syntax**
### 2. Variable Interpolation Patterns:
Throughout the codebase, I found consistent use of:
-`{project-root}` - Correctly used everywhere
-`{user_name}` - Properly formatted variables
-`{communication_language}` - Proper syntax
### 3. Dependency Resolution Code Analysis:
```javascript
// From dependency-resolver.js line 295+
if (depPath.includes('{project-root}')) {
// Remove {project-root} and resolve as bmad path
depPath = depPath.replace('{project-root}', '');
// ... proper resolution logic
}
```
**✅ Code correctly handles variable interpolation with curly braces**
## Hypothesis: Issue Status
### Possible Scenarios:
1. **🎯 Issue Already Fixed**: The bug may have been fixed in a previous commit
2. **🔄 Different Branch**: Issue exists on a different branch (main vs v6-alpha)
3. **📁 Different File**: Issue is in a file we haven't found yet
4. **🏷️ Different Version**: Issue reporter was using an older version
### Next Actions:
1. **Check commit history** for previous fixes to dependency resolution
2. **Search main branch** to see if issue exists there
3. **Search for any file containing IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION**
4. **Look for workflow.xml or similar files** that might contain the problematic syntax
## Updated TODO Status:
-**TODO-001.1**: Found bmad-master.md files
-**TODO-001.2**: Line 14 does NOT contain problematic syntax
-**TODO-001.3**: Documented current behavior (uses correct syntax)
## Recommendation:
**Either the issue has already been resolved, or we need to investigate further to find where the `root/type/name` syntax actually exists in the codebase.**