ldy26098
/
BMAD-METHOD
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
BMAD-METHOD/docs/dev-success-metrics.md

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

Developer Success Metrics

BMAD Method Documentation

Introduction

This document defines the success metrics for developers working within the BMAD Method framework. These metrics provide a comprehensive framework for measuring developer effectiveness, quality of work, and contribution to project success. The metrics are designed to be objective, actionable, and aligned with overall project goals.

Success Metric Categories

Developer success is measured across five key categories:

  1. Delivery Performance - Measures the developer's ability to deliver work efficiently
  2. Code Quality - Assesses the quality of code produced
  3. Technical Impact - Evaluates the developer's technical contribution to the project
  4. Collaboration - Measures effectiveness in working with others
  5. Growth & Learning - Tracks professional development and knowledge sharing

Metric Definitions and Targets

1. Delivery Performance (25%)

1.1 Cycle Time

  • Definition: Average time from task start to completion
  • Measurement: (Completion Date - Start Date) / Number of Tasks
  • Target: < 3 days for standard tasks, < 1 day for small tasks, < 7 days for complex tasks
  • Data Source: Project management tool

1.2 Estimation Accuracy

  • Definition: Accuracy of time/effort estimates
  • Measurement: Actual Time / Estimated Time (1.0 is perfect)
  • Target: Between 0.8 and 1.2 (±20% variance)
  • Data Source: Time tracking system, project management tool

1.3 Throughput

  • Definition: Number of tasks completed per sprint
  • Measurement: Count of completed tasks per sprint
  • Target: Team average ±15%
  • Data Source: Project management tool

1.4 First-Time Acceptance Rate

  • Definition: Percentage of work accepted without rework
  • Measurement: (Tasks Accepted First Time / Total Tasks) × 100
  • Target: > 85%
  • Data Source: Code review system, project management tool

1.5 On-Time Delivery

  • Definition: Percentage of tasks delivered by committed date
  • Measurement: (Tasks Delivered On Time / Total Tasks) × 100
  • Target: > 90%
  • Data Source: Project management tool

2. Code Quality (25%)

2.1 Defect Density

  • Definition: Number of defects per unit of code
  • Measurement: Defects / 1000 Lines of Code
  • Target: < 1.0 defects per 1000 LOC
  • Data Source: Issue tracking system, code repository

2.2 Test Coverage

  • Definition: Percentage of code covered by tests
  • Measurement: (Covered Lines / Total Lines) × 100
  • Target: > 80% overall, > 90% for critical paths
  • Data Source: Test coverage tools

2.3 Static Analysis Score

  • Definition: Score from static analysis tools
  • Measurement: Composite score from tools like SonarQube
  • Target: > 85/100
  • Data Source: Static analysis tools

2.4 Code Review Feedback

  • Definition: Quality issues identified in code reviews
  • Measurement: Average number of substantive comments per review
  • Target: < 3 substantive issues per review
  • Data Source: Code review system

2.5 Technical Debt Contribution

  • Definition: Net change in technical debt
  • Measurement: (Technical Debt Reduced - Technical Debt Added)
  • Target: Net positive (more debt reduced than added)
  • Data Source: Static analysis tools, technical debt tracking

3. Technical Impact (20%)

3.1 Architecture Contribution

  • Definition: Contribution to system architecture
  • Measurement: Qualitative assessment by Architect
  • Target: Positive contribution score
  • Data Source: Architecture review process

3.2 Innovation

  • Definition: Introduction of valuable new approaches or solutions
  • Measurement: Count of innovations adopted
  • Target: At least 1 per quarter
  • Data Source: Innovation tracking, retrospectives

3.3 Performance Optimization

  • Definition: Measurable performance improvements
  • Measurement: Percentage improvement in key metrics
  • Target: 10%+ improvement when optimization is the goal
  • Data Source: Performance testing tools

3.4 Reusability

  • Definition: Creation of reusable components/code
  • Measurement: Adoption rate of created components
  • Target: > 2 reuses per component
  • Data Source: Component usage tracking

3.5 Technical Leadership

  • Definition: Influence on technical decisions and direction
  • Measurement: Qualitative assessment by team and leadership
  • Target: Positive influence score
  • Data Source: Peer feedback, leadership assessment

4. Collaboration (15%)

4.1 Cross-functional Collaboration

  • Definition: Effective work with non-developer roles
  • Measurement: Feedback score from other roles
  • Target: > 4.0/5.0 average score
  • Data Source: Collaboration feedback surveys

4.2 Code Review Participation

  • Definition: Active participation in code reviews
  • Measurement: (Reviews Completed / Reviews Assigned) × 100
  • Target: > 90% completion rate
  • Data Source: Code review system

4.3 Knowledge Sharing

  • Definition: Contribution to team knowledge
  • Measurement: Count of documented knowledge sharing activities
  • Target: At least 1 formal sharing per month
  • Data Source: Knowledge base contributions, presentations

4.4 Mentoring

  • Definition: Support provided to other team members
  • Measurement: Mentoring hours and feedback
  • Target: Positive mentoring impact
  • Data Source: Mentoring program tracking, mentee feedback

4.5 Team Support

  • Definition: Assistance provided to unblock others
  • Measurement: Instances of meaningful support
  • Target: Regular support activities
  • Data Source: Peer recognition, support tracking

5. Growth & Learning (15%)

5.1 Skill Development

  • Definition: Acquisition of new technical skills
  • Measurement: Skills added to competency matrix
  • Target: At least 2 new skills or significant improvements per quarter
  • Data Source: Skill assessment, learning platform

5.2 Learning Activity

  • Definition: Time invested in learning
  • Measurement: Hours spent on structured learning
  • Target: At least 4 hours per week
  • Data Source: Learning platform, self-reporting

5.3 Certification Progress

  • Definition: Progress toward relevant certifications
  • Measurement: Milestones achieved toward certification
  • Target: On track with certification plan
  • Data Source: Certification tracking

5.4 Feedback Implementation

  • Definition: Application of received feedback
  • Measurement: Percentage of feedback items addressed
  • Target: > 80% of feedback addressed
  • Data Source: Feedback tracking, 1:1 meetings

5.5 Continuous Improvement

  • Definition: Self-initiated improvements in work processes
  • Measurement: Count of implemented improvements
  • Target: At least 1 significant improvement per quarter
  • Data Source: Process improvement tracking, retrospectives

Success Scoring System

Calculation Method

Each metric is scored on a scale of 1-5:

Score Description
5 Exceptional - Significantly exceeds target
4 Exceeds - Above target
3 Meets - Meets target
2 Approaching - Below target but improving
1 Needs Improvement - Significantly below target

The overall success score is calculated as a weighted average:

Overall Score = (Delivery × 0.25) + (Quality × 0.25) + (Impact × 0.20) + 
                (Collaboration × 0.15) + (Growth × 0.15)

Performance Levels

Based on the overall score, performance is classified into one of four levels:

Level Score Range Description
Distinguished 4.5 - 5.0 Exceptional performance across all dimensions
Strong 3.5 - 4.4 Strong performance exceeding expectations
Proficient 3.0 - 3.4 Solid performance meeting expectations
Developing < 3.0 Performance needs improvement in key areas

Measurement Process

Data Collection

Success metrics data is collected through:

  1. Automated Tools:

    • Project management system
    • Code repository analytics
    • Static analysis tools
    • Test coverage tools
    • Time tracking system

  2. Manual Assessment:

    • Peer feedback
    • Leadership assessment
    • Self-assessment
    • Code review feedback

Measurement Frequency

  • Sprint-level Metrics: Collected and reviewed each sprint
  • Monthly Metrics: Aggregated and reviewed monthly
  • Quarterly Metrics: Comprehensive review quarterly
  • Annual Metrics: Full performance assessment annually

Reporting and Visualization

Metrics are reported through:

  1. Personal Dashboard: Individual view of personal metrics
  2. Team Dashboard: Anonymized team-level metrics
  3. Trend Analysis: Performance trends over time
  4. Comparative Analysis: Benchmarking against team averages

Using Success Metrics

For Individual Developers

Success metrics should be used by developers to:

  1. Self-assessment: Identify personal strengths and areas for improvement
  2. Goal Setting: Establish specific, measurable development goals
  3. Progress Tracking: Monitor improvement over time
  4. Career Development: Guide professional growth and specialization

For Team Leads and Managers

Success metrics should be used by leads and managers to:

  1. Performance Coaching: Provide targeted feedback and guidance
  2. Resource Allocation: Assign tasks based on strengths and development needs
  3. Team Composition: Build balanced teams with complementary skills
  4. Recognition: Identify and recognize exceptional performance

For Organizations

Success metrics should be used by organizations to:

  1. Process Improvement: Identify systemic issues affecting developer success
  2. Training Programs: Design targeted training based on common development needs
  3. Best Practices: Identify and propagate effective practices
  4. Talent Development: Support career progression and growth

Continuous Improvement of Metrics

The success metrics framework itself is subject to continuous improvement:

  1. Metric Review: Quarterly review of metric effectiveness
  2. Feedback Collection: Regular feedback from developers and stakeholders
  3. Calibration: Adjustment of targets based on project context
  4. Evolution: Addition, modification, or removal of metrics as needed

Appendix: Success Metrics Dashboard

Sample Individual Dashboard

Developer Success Metrics - Q2 2025
Developer: [Name]

Overall Score: 4.2/5.0 (Strong)

Category Scores:
- Delivery Performance: 4.3/5.0
- Code Quality: 4.5/5.0
- Technical Impact: 4.0/5.0
- Collaboration: 4.2/5.0
- Growth & Learning: 3.8/5.0

Top Strengths:
1. Test Coverage (5.0/5.0)
2. Code Review Participation (4.8/5.0)
3. Architecture Contribution (4.7/5.0)

Development Areas:
1. Estimation Accuracy (3.2/5.0)
2. Learning Activity (3.4/5.0)
3. Technical Debt Contribution (3.5/5.0)

Trend: +0.3 from previous quarter

Sample Team Dashboard

Team Success Metrics - Q2 2025
Team: [Team Name]

Team Average Score: 3.9/5.0

Category Averages:
- Delivery Performance: 3.8/5.0
- Code Quality: 4.1/5.0
- Technical Impact: 3.7/5.0
- Collaboration: 4.0/5.0
- Growth & Learning: 3.9/5.0

Team Strengths:
1. Code Review Participation (4.6/5.0)
2. Test Coverage (4.4/5.0)
3. Knowledge Sharing (4.3/5.0)

Team Development Areas:
1. Estimation Accuracy (3.3/5.0)
2. Defect Density (3.4/5.0)
3. Innovation (3.5/5.0)

Trend: +0.2 from previous quarter

Last Updated: June 2025


Now, let me create a sprint status file to track the progress of Sprint 4: