14 KiB
14 KiB
| 1 | num | category | method_name | description | output_pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | advanced | Tree of Thoughts | Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches | paths → evaluation → selection |
| 3 | 2 | advanced | Graph of Thoughts | Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns | nodes → connections → patterns |
| 4 | 3 | advanced | Thread of Thought | Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency | context → thread → synthesis |
| 5 | 4 | advanced | Self-Consistency Validation | Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters | approaches → comparison → consensus |
| 6 | 5 | advanced | Meta-Prompting Analysis | Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving | current → analysis → optimization |
| 7 | 6 | advanced | Reasoning via Planning | Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making | model → planning → strategy |
| 8 | 7 | advanced | Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding | Force explicit intermediate reasoning steps before any conclusion — prevents intuitive leaps that skip flawed logic | premise → step → step → conclusion |
| 9 | 8 | advanced | Few-Shot Exemplar Priming | Provide 2-3 worked examples of the desired reasoning pattern before the real task — aligns output format and depth through demonstration | examples → pattern recognition → application |
| 10 | 9 | collaboration | Stakeholder Round Table | Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests | perspectives → synthesis → alignment |
| 11 | 10 | collaboration | Expert Panel Review | Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed | expert views → consensus → recommendations |
| 12 | 11 | collaboration | Debate Club Showdown | Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground | thesis → antithesis → synthesis |
| 13 | 12 | collaboration | User Persona Focus Group | Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs | reactions → concerns → priorities |
| 14 | 13 | collaboration | Time Traveler Council | Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures | past wisdom → present choice → future impact |
| 15 | 14 | collaboration | Cross-Functional War Room | Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability | constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution |
| 16 | 15 | collaboration | Mentor and Apprentice | Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching | explanation → questions → deeper understanding |
| 17 | 16 | collaboration | Good Cop Bad Cop | Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address | encouragement → criticism → balanced view |
| 18 | 17 | collaboration | Improv Yes-And | Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building | idea → build → build → surprising result |
| 19 | 18 | collaboration | Customer Support Theater | Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps | complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention |
| 20 | 19 | collaboration | Six Thinking Hats | Rotate through six modes (facts - feelings - caution - optimism - creativity - process) to ensure a group covers every angle without crosstalk | white → red → black → yellow → green → blue |
| 21 | 20 | collaboration | Delphi Method | Experts give independent estimates - see anonymized results - then revise — converges on calibrated group judgment while avoiding anchoring bias | independent estimates → reveal → revise → converge |
| 22 | 21 | competitive | Red Team vs Blue Team | Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions | defense → attack → hardening |
| 23 | 22 | competitive | Shark Tank Pitch | Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition | pitch → challenges → refinement |
| 24 | 23 | competitive | Code Review Gauntlet | Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices | reviews → debates → standards |
| 25 | 24 | core | First Principles Analysis | Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems | assumptions → truths → new approach |
| 26 | 25 | core | 5 Whys Deep Dive | Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures | why chain → root cause → solution |
| 27 | 26 | core | Socratic Questioning | Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery | questions → revelations → understanding |
| 28 | 27 | core | Critique and Refine | Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts | strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined |
| 29 | 28 | core | Explain Reasoning | Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency | steps → logic → conclusion |
| 30 | 29 | core | Expand or Contract for Audience | Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities | audience → adjustments → refined content |
| 31 | 30 | core | Second-Order Thinking | Think beyond immediate consequences to anticipate cascading effects and long-term implications - essential for strategic decisions where first-order solutions create hidden downstream problems | action → consequences → second-order effects → informed choice |
| 32 | 31 | core | Inversion Analysis | Flip the problem by asking what would guarantee failure instead of how to succeed - reveals hidden obstacles and blind spots by approaching challenges from the opposite direction | goal → invert → failure paths → avoidance → solution |
| 33 | 32 | core | Problem Decomposition | Break a complex problem into independent sub-problems - solve each - then reassemble — essential when a task is too large or tangled to tackle whole | whole → parts → solutions → reassembly |
| 34 | 33 | core | Analogy Mapping | Find a well-understood parallel domain and transfer its structure to the current problem — unlocks insight by borrowing proven mental models | source domain → mapping → target insight |
| 35 | 34 | core | Steelmanning | Construct the strongest possible version of an opposing argument before responding — builds credibility and catches blind spots that strawmanning misses | opposing view → strongest form → honest rebuttal |
| 36 | 35 | creative | SCAMPER Method | Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation | S→C→A→M→P→E→R |
| 37 | 36 | creative | Reverse Engineering | Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints | end state → steps backward → path forward |
| 38 | 37 | creative | What If Scenarios | Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration | scenarios → implications → insights |
| 39 | 38 | creative | Random Input Stimulus | Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking | random word → associations → novel ideas |
| 40 | 39 | creative | Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm | Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration | contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise |
| 41 | 40 | creative | Genre Mashup | Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination | domain A + domain B → hybrid insights |
| 42 | 41 | creative | Constraint Injection | Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure | add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate |
| 43 | 42 | creative | Morphological Analysis | List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations | parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation |
| 44 | 43 | framing | Abstraction Laddering | Move up ("why?") for strategic clarity or down ("how?") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude | concrete ↔ abstract → right level |
| 45 | 44 | framing | Reframe the Question | Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer | stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution |
| 46 | 45 | framing | Stakeholder Lens Rotation | Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked | perspective A → B → C → gaps found |
| 47 | 46 | learning | Feynman Technique | Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding | complex → simple → gaps → mastery |
| 48 | 47 | learning | Active Recall Testing | Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps | test → gaps → reinforcement |
| 49 | 48 | learning | Deliberate Practice Loop | Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition | isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat |
| 50 | 49 | philosophical | Occam's Razor Application | Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging | options → simplification → selection |
| 51 | 50 | philosophical | Trolley Problem Variations | Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions | dilemma → analysis → decision |
| 52 | 51 | research | Literature Review Personas | Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality | sources → critiques → synthesis |
| 53 | 52 | research | Thesis Defense Simulation | Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions | thesis → challenges → defense → refinements |
| 54 | 53 | research | Comparative Analysis Matrix | Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring | options → criteria → scores → recommendation |
| 55 | 54 | research | Source Triangulation | Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias | claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating |
| 56 | 55 | retrospective | Hindsight Reflection | Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews | future view → insights → application |
| 57 | 56 | retrospective | Lessons Learned Extraction | Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement | experience → lessons → actions |
| 58 | 57 | risk | Pre-mortem Analysis | Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches | failure scenario → causes → prevention |
| 59 | 58 | risk | Failure Mode Analysis | Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems | components → failures → prevention |
| 60 | 59 | risk | Challenge from Critical Perspective | Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink | assumptions → challenges → strengthening |
| 61 | 60 | risk | Identify Potential Risks | Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation | categories → risks → mitigations |
| 62 | 61 | risk | Chaos Monkey Scenarios | Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully | break → observe → harden |
| 63 | 62 | risk | Assumption Audit | Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations | list → rate → stress-test → shore up |
| 64 | 63 | risk | Cascading Failure Simulation | Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure | trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple |
| 65 | 64 | technical | Architecture Decision Records | Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented | options → trade-offs → decision → rationale |
| 66 | 65 | technical | Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved | Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels | simple → detailed → technical → aha |
| 67 | 66 | technical | Algorithm Olympics | Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison | implementations → benchmarks → winner |
| 68 | 67 | technical | Security Audit Personas | Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles | vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance |
| 69 | 68 | technical | Performance Profiler Panel | Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack | symptoms → analysis → optimizations |
| 70 | 69 | technical | Boundary & Edge Case Sweep | Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses | inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found |