6.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

Code Review Template

Review Information

Project: [Project Name]
Review Date: [Date]
Reviewer: Polyglot Code Review Specialist
Review Scope: [Files/Modules Reviewed]
Technology Stack: [React, TypeScript, Node.js, ASP.NET, Python]

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment

Rating: (1-5 stars)
Summary: [Brief overall assessment of code quality]

Key Metrics

Security Score: [Rating/10] - [Brief explanation]
Performance Score: [Rating/10] - [Brief explanation]
Maintainability Score: [Rating/10] - [Brief explanation]
Best Practices Score: [Rating/10] - [Brief explanation]

Critical Issues Summary

Blocking Issues: [Count] - Must be fixed before deployment
High Priority: [Count] - Should be addressed in current iteration
Medium Priority: [Count] - Address in next iteration
Low Priority: [Count] - Future optimization opportunities

Detailed Analysis

Security Review

Critical Security Issues

```markdown Issue: [Security vulnerability description] Severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low Location: [File:Line or function name] Impact: [Potential security impact] Recommendation: [Specific fix with code example]

Example Fix:

// Before (vulnerable)
[vulnerable code example]

// After (secure)
[secure code example]


#### Security Best Practices
- [ ] Input validation implemented
- [ ] SQL injection prevention
- [ ] XSS protection in place
- [ ] Authentication properly implemented
- [ ] Authorization checks present
- [ ] Sensitive data properly handled
- [ ] Dependencies security validated

###  Performance Review

#### Performance Issues Identified
\```markdown
**Issue:** [Performance bottleneck description]
**Impact:** [Performance impact - response time, memory usage, etc.]
**Location:** [File:Line or function name]
**Recommendation:**
[Specific optimization with expected improvement]

**Example Optimization:**
```[language]
// Before (inefficient)
[inefficient code example]

// After (optimized)
[optimized code example]
// Expected improvement: [specific metrics]


#### Performance Metrics
- **Response Time:** [Current vs Target]
- **Memory Usage:** [Current vs Target]
- **Database Queries:** [Count and efficiency]
- **Caching Strategy:** [Implementation status]

###  Code Quality Review

#### Architecture and Design
- **Component Structure:** [Assessment of component organization]
- **Separation of Concerns:** [How well responsibilities are separated]
- **Design Patterns:** [Appropriate pattern usage]
- **Code Reusability:** [DRY principle adherence]

#### Code Maintainability
\```markdown
**Strengths:**
- [List of well-implemented aspects]

**Areas for Improvement:**
- [Specific maintainability issues with solutions]

**Refactoring Suggestions:**
```[language]
// Current implementation
[current code]

// Suggested refactoring
[improved code]
// Benefits: [explanation of improvements]


###  Cross-Platform Integration Review

#### Integration Consistency
- **API Contracts:** [Consistency across platforms]
- **Error Handling:** [Standardization assessment]
- **Authentication:** [Cross-platform auth implementation]
- **Data Serialization:** [Consistency in data handling]

#### Platform-Specific Considerations
\```markdown
**React/TypeScript Frontend:**
- [Frontend-specific findings and recommendations]

**Node.js Backend:**
- [Backend-specific findings and recommendations]

**ASP.NET Services:**
- [ASP.NET-specific findings and recommendations]

**Python Components:**
- [Python-specific findings and recommendations]

Best Practices Compliance

Language-Specific Best Practices

React: [Component patterns, hooks usage, performance]
TypeScript: [Type safety, interface design, generic usage]
Node.js: [Async patterns, error handling, middleware]
ASP.NET: [MVC patterns, dependency injection, data access]
Python: [PEP compliance, framework patterns, testing]

General Best Practices

Code readability and documentation
Error handling and logging
Testing coverage and quality
Configuration management
Dependency management

Action Items

Critical (Must Fix Before Deployment)

[Issue Title]
- Description: [Detailed description]
- Location: [File:Line]
- Fix: [Specific solution]
- Estimated Time: [Time to fix]

High Priority (Current Iteration)

[Issue Title]
- Description: [Detailed description]
- Location: [File:Line]
- Fix: [Specific solution]
- Estimated Time: [Time to fix]

Medium Priority (Next Iteration)

[Issue Title]
- Description: [Detailed description]
- Location: [File:Line]
- Fix: [Specific solution]
- Estimated Time: [Time to fix]

Suggestions (Future Optimization)

[Optimization Title]
- Description: [Detailed description]
- Benefit: [Expected improvement]
- Estimated Time: [Time to implement]

Learning Opportunities

Recommended Resources

Security: [Links to security best practices and guides]
Performance: [Performance optimization resources]
Best Practices: [Language-specific best practice guides]
Architecture: [Design pattern and architecture resources]

Training Recommendations

[Specific training areas for the development team]
[Workshops or courses that would benefit the team]
[Internal knowledge sharing opportunities]

Follow-up Actions

Next Steps

Immediate Actions: [What needs to be done right away]
Short-term Goals: [Improvements for next 1-2 sprints]
Long-term Improvements: [Strategic improvements over time]

Review Schedule

Follow-up Review: [Date for next review]
Progress Check: [Intermediate check-in date]
Metrics Review: [When to assess improvement metrics]

Success Metrics

Code Quality Improvement: [How to measure improvement]
Security Enhancement: [Security metrics to track]
Performance Gains: [Performance metrics to monitor]
Developer Productivity: [Productivity metrics to consider]

Additional Notes

[Any additional context, special considerations, or team-specific notes]

Review Completed By: Polyglot Code Review Specialist
Review Duration: [Time spent on review]
Next Review Date: [Scheduled follow-up]
Contact: [How to reach reviewer for questions]

6.4 KiB Raw Blame History