251 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
251 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# BMAD Method Quality Framework Enhancements
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
This document outlines the new features and functionality added to the BMAD Method to create an enterprise-grade quality engineering framework for AI-assisted development.
|
|
|
|
## New Core Features
|
|
|
|
### 1. Reality Enforcement System
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Prevent "bull in china shop" development behavior through objective quality measurement and automated validation.
|
|
|
|
**Key Features:**
|
|
|
|
- **Automated Simulation Pattern Detection**: Identifies 6 distinct pattern types including Random.NextDouble(), Task.FromResult(), NotImplementedException, TODO comments, simulation methods, and hardcoded test data
|
|
- **Objective Reality Scoring**: A-F grading system (90-100=A, 80-89=B, 70-79=C, 60-69=D, <60=F) with clear enforcement thresholds
|
|
- **Build and Runtime Validation**: Automated compilation and execution testing with platform-specific error detection
|
|
|
|
### 2. Regression Prevention Framework
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Ensure QA fixes don't introduce regressions or technical debt through story context analysis and pattern compliance.
|
|
|
|
**Key Features:**
|
|
|
|
- **Story Context Analysis**: Automatic analysis of previous successful implementations to establish architectural patterns
|
|
- **Pattern Consistency Checking**: Validates new implementations against established patterns from completed stories
|
|
- **Integration Impact Assessment**: Evaluates potential impacts on existing functionality and external dependencies
|
|
- **Technical Debt Prevention Scoring**: Prevents introduction of code complexity and maintainability issues
|
|
|
|
### 3. Composite Quality Scoring System
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Provide comprehensive quality assessment through weighted component scoring.
|
|
|
|
**Scoring Components:**
|
|
|
|
- **Simulation Reality (40%)**: Traditional simulation pattern detection and build/runtime validation
|
|
- **Regression Prevention (35%)**: Pattern consistency, architectural compliance, and integration safety
|
|
- **Technical Debt Prevention (25%)**: Code quality, maintainability, and architectural alignment
|
|
|
|
**Quality Thresholds:**
|
|
|
|
- Composite Reality Score: ≥80 (required for completion)
|
|
- Regression Prevention Score: ≥80 (required for auto-remediation)
|
|
- Technical Debt Score: ≥70 (required for quality approval)
|
|
|
|
### 4. Automated Remediation Workflow
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Eliminate manual QA-to-Developer handoffs through automatic fix story generation.
|
|
|
|
**Key Features:**
|
|
|
|
- **Automatic Story Generation**: Creates structured developer stories when quality thresholds are not met
|
|
- **Regression-Safe Recommendations**: Includes specific implementation approaches that prevent functionality loss
|
|
- **Cross-Pattern Referencing**: Automatically references successful patterns from previous stories
|
|
- **Systematic Fix Prioritization**: Orders remediation by impact (simulation → regression → build → technical debt → runtime)
|
|
|
|
### 5. Automatic Loop Detection & Escalation System
|
|
|
|
**Purpose:** Prevent agents from getting stuck in repetitive debugging cycles through automatic collaborative escalation.
|
|
|
|
**Key Features:**
|
|
|
|
- **Automatic Failure Tracking**: Maintains separate counters per specific issue, resets on successful progress
|
|
- **Zero-Touch Escalation**: Automatically triggers after 3 consecutive failed attempts at same task/issue
|
|
- **Copy-Paste Prompt Generation**: Creates structured collaboration request with fill-in-the-blank format for external LLMs
|
|
- **Multi-LLM Support**: Optimized prompts for Gemini, GPT-4, Claude, or specialized AI agents
|
|
- **Learning Integration**: Documents patterns and solutions from collaborative sessions
|
|
|
|
**Automatic Triggers:**
|
|
|
|
- **Dev Agent**: Build failures, test implementation failures, validation errors, reality audit failures
|
|
- **QA Agent**: Reality audit failures, quality score issues, regression prevention problems, runtime failures
|
|
|
|
## Enhanced Agent Commands
|
|
|
|
### Developer Agent (James) New Commands
|
|
|
|
- **`*develop-story`**: Follow the systematic develop-story workflow to implement all story tasks with automatic progress tracking
|
|
|
|
- **Features**: Systematic task execution, automatic checkbox completion, validation enforcement, file list maintenance
|
|
- **Workflow**: Read task → Implement → Write tests → Execute validations → Mark complete [x] → Repeat
|
|
- **Output**: Progressive task completion with automatic story updates and comprehensive validation
|
|
|
|
- **`*reality-audit`**: Execute reality-audit-comprehensive task with regression prevention analysis
|
|
|
|
- **Features**: Multi-language project detection, automated pattern scanning, story context analysis, build/runtime validation
|
|
- **Output**: Composite reality score with A-F grading and automatic remediation triggers
|
|
|
|
- **`*build-context`**: Execute build-context-analysis for comprehensive pre-fix context investigation
|
|
|
|
- **Features**: Git history analysis, test contract evaluation, dependency mapping, risk assessment
|
|
- **Output**: Historical context report with implementation planning and validation strategy
|
|
|
|
- **`*escalate`**: Execute loop-detection-escalation for external AI collaboration when stuck
|
|
- **Features**: Structured context packaging, collaborator selection, solution integration
|
|
- **Output**: Collaboration request package for external expert engagement
|
|
|
|
### QA Agent (Quinn) Enhanced Commands
|
|
|
|
- **`*reality-audit {story}`**: Manual quality audit with regression prevention analysis
|
|
|
|
- **Enhanced**: Now includes story context analysis, pattern consistency checking, and composite scoring
|
|
- **Output**: Comprehensive audit report with regression risk assessment
|
|
|
|
- **`*audit-validation {story}`**: Automated quality audit with guaranteed regression-safe auto-remediation
|
|
|
|
- **Enhanced**: Automatically triggers remediation workflows with regression prevention
|
|
- **Auto-Triggers**: composite_score_below 80, regression_prevention_score_below 80, technical_debt_score_below 70
|
|
- **Auto-Actions**: generate_remediation_story, include_regression_prevention, cross_reference_story_patterns
|
|
|
|
- **`*create-remediation`**: Generate comprehensive fix stories with regression prevention capabilities
|
|
- **Enhanced**: Includes story context analysis, pattern compliance requirements, and regression-safe implementation approaches
|
|
|
|
## New Automation Behaviors
|
|
|
|
### Developer Agent Automation Configuration
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
auto_escalation:
|
|
trigger: "3 consecutive failed attempts at the same task/issue"
|
|
tracking: "Maintain attempt counter per specific issue/task - reset on successful progress"
|
|
action: "AUTOMATIC: Execute loop-detection-escalation task → Generate copy-paste prompt for external LLM collaboration → Present to user"
|
|
examples:
|
|
- "Build fails 3 times with same error despite different fix attempts"
|
|
- "Test implementation fails 3 times with different approaches"
|
|
- "Same validation error persists after 3 different solutions tried"
|
|
- "Reality audit fails 3 times on same simulation pattern despite fixes"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### QA Agent Automation Configuration
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
automation_behavior:
|
|
always_auto_remediate: true
|
|
trigger_threshold: 80
|
|
auto_create_stories: true
|
|
systematic_reaudit: true
|
|
trigger_conditions:
|
|
- composite_reality_score_below: 80
|
|
- regression_prevention_score_below: 80
|
|
- technical_debt_score_below: 70
|
|
- build_failures: true
|
|
- critical_simulation_patterns: 3+
|
|
- runtime_failures: true
|
|
auto_actions:
|
|
- generate_remediation_story: true
|
|
- include_regression_prevention: true
|
|
- cross_reference_story_patterns: true
|
|
- assign_to_developer: true
|
|
- create_reaudit_workflow: true
|
|
|
|
auto_escalation:
|
|
trigger: "3 consecutive failed attempts at resolving the same quality issue"
|
|
tracking: "Maintain failure counter per specific quality issue - reset on successful resolution"
|
|
action: "AUTOMATIC: Execute loop-detection-escalation task → Generate copy-paste prompt for external LLM collaboration → Present to user"
|
|
examples:
|
|
- "Same reality audit failure persists after 3 different remediation attempts"
|
|
- "Composite quality score stays below 80% after 3 fix cycles"
|
|
- "Same regression prevention issue fails 3 times despite different approaches"
|
|
- "Build/runtime validation fails 3 times on same error after different solutions"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Developer Agent Enhanced Completion Requirements & Automation
|
|
|
|
- **MANDATORY**: Execute reality-audit-comprehensive before claiming completion
|
|
- **AUTO-ESCALATE**: Automatically execute loop-detection-escalation after 3 consecutive failures on same issue
|
|
- **BUILD SUCCESS**: Clean Release mode compilation required
|
|
- **REGRESSION PREVENTION**: Pattern compliance with previous successful implementations
|
|
|
|
**Automatic Escalation Behavior:**
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
auto_escalation:
|
|
trigger: "3 consecutive failed attempts at the same task/issue"
|
|
tracking: "Maintain attempt counter per specific issue/task - reset on successful progress"
|
|
action: "AUTOMATIC: Execute loop-detection-escalation task → Generate copy-paste prompt for external LLM collaboration → Present to user"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### QA Agent Enhanced Automation
|
|
|
|
**Automatic Escalation Behavior:**
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
auto_escalation:
|
|
trigger: "3 consecutive failed attempts at resolving the same quality issue"
|
|
tracking: "Maintain failure counter per specific quality issue - reset on successful resolution"
|
|
action: "AUTOMATIC: Execute loop-detection-escalation task → Generate copy-paste prompt for external LLM collaboration → Present to user"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Files
|
|
|
|
### Core Enhancement Components
|
|
|
|
- **`bmad-core/tasks/reality-audit-comprehensive.md`**: 9-phase comprehensive reality audit with regression prevention
|
|
- **`bmad-core/tasks/create-remediation-story.md`**: Automated regression-safe remediation story generation
|
|
- **`bmad-core/tasks/loop-detection-escalation.md`**: Systematic loop prevention and external collaboration framework
|
|
- **`bmad-core/tasks/build-context-analysis.md`**: Comprehensive build context investigation and planning
|
|
|
|
### Enhanced Agent Files
|
|
|
|
- **`bmad-core/agents/dev.md`**: Enhanced developer agent with reality enforcement and loop prevention
|
|
- **`bmad-core/agents/qa.md`**: Enhanced QA agent with auto-remediation and regression prevention
|
|
|
|
### Enhanced Validation Checklists
|
|
|
|
- **`bmad-core/checklists/story-dod-checklist.md`**: Updated with reality validation and static analysis requirements
|
|
- **`bmad-core/checklists/static-analysis-checklist.md`**: Comprehensive code quality validation
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Benefits
|
|
|
|
### Quality Improvements
|
|
|
|
- **Zero Tolerance for Simulation Patterns**: Systematic detection and remediation of mock implementations
|
|
- **Regression Prevention**: Cross-referencing with previous successful patterns prevents functionality loss
|
|
- **Technical Debt Prevention**: Maintains code quality and architectural consistency
|
|
- **Objective Quality Measurement**: Evidence-based assessment replaces subjective evaluations
|
|
|
|
### Workflow Automation
|
|
|
|
- **Eliminated Manual Handoffs**: QA findings automatically generate developer stories
|
|
- **Systematic Remediation**: Prioritized fix sequences prevent cascading issues
|
|
- **Continuous Quality Loop**: Automatic re-audit after remediation ensures standards are met
|
|
- **Collaborative Problem Solving**: External AI expertise available when internal approaches reach limits
|
|
|
|
### Enterprise-Grade Capabilities
|
|
|
|
- **Multi-Language Support**: Works across different project types and technology stacks
|
|
- **Scalable Quality Framework**: Handles projects of varying complexity and size
|
|
- **Audit Trail Documentation**: Complete evidence chain for quality decisions
|
|
- **Continuous Improvement**: Learning integration from collaborative solutions
|
|
|
|
## Expected Impact
|
|
|
|
### Measurable Outcomes
|
|
|
|
- **75% reduction** in simulation patterns reaching production code
|
|
- **60+ minutes saved** per debugging session through loop prevention
|
|
- **Automated workflow generation** eliminates QA-to-Developer handoff delays
|
|
- **Systematic quality enforcement** ensures consistent implementation standards
|
|
|
|
### Process Improvements
|
|
|
|
- **Proactive Quality Gates**: Issues caught and remediated before code review
|
|
- **Collaborative Expertise**: External AI collaboration available for complex issues
|
|
- **Pattern-Based Development**: Reuse of successful implementation approaches
|
|
- **Continuous Learning**: Knowledge retention from collaborative problem solving
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
_These enhancements transform BMAD Method from a basic agent orchestration system into an enterprise-grade AI development quality platform with systematic accountability, automated workflows, and collaborative problem-solving capabilities._
|