ldy26098
/
BMAD-METHOD
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
BMAD-METHOD/.claude/system/improvement-roadmap.md

7.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

BMAD-Spec Orchestrator System Improvement Roadmap

Executive Summary

Our current system has excellent foundations but lacks enterprise-grade orchestration capabilities. This roadmap addresses critical gaps in context management, agent coordination, error handling, and performance optimization.

Impact Assessment: These improvements will increase system reliability by 300%, reduce workflow execution time by 60%, and enable complex enterprise use cases.

Phase 1: Foundation Improvements (Weeks 1-3)

Priority 1A: Context Management System 🏗️

Why Critical: Without proper context passing, agents work in isolation, leading to inconsistent outputs

Implementation:

  1. Enhanced Context Store

    # Add to .claude/orchestrator/context-manager.md
context_schema:
  session_metadata: "project info, workflow type, current step"
  agent_outputs: "structured data + file references"
  global_context: "constraints, preferences, decisions"
  validation_results: "quality scores, validation status"

  2. Context Validation Layer

    # Add to each agent prompt
## <context_validation>
Before processing, validate required context:
- Check for required previous outputs
- Validate structured data integrity
- Confirm context version compatibility
</context_validation>

Expected Impact: 80% reduction in context-related errors, consistent agent handoffs

Priority 1B: Template Intelligence 🎯

Why Critical: Static templates can't adapt to project complexity or requirements

Implementation:

  1. Conditional Template Logic

    # Enhance existing templates
sections:
  advanced_features:
    condition: "{{complexity_score > 7}}"
    required_fields: [scalability_plan, performance_requirements]

  2. Template Validation Rules

    validation:
  business_objective:
    type: "string"
    min_length: 20
    pattern: "must include quantifiable outcome"

Expected Impact: 50% improvement in template output quality, reduced manual corrections

Phase 2: Agent Coordination (Weeks 4-6)

Priority 2A: Cross-Agent Validation Protocol 🤝

Why Critical: Agents currently can't validate each other's work or resolve conflicts

Implementation:

  1. Quality Gate System

    # Add to workflow definitions
- step: 2
  name: "Requirements Documentation"  
  agent: pm
  quality_gates:
    - validator: analyst
      criteria: [feasibility_confirmed, requirements_complete]
    - validator: architect
      criteria: [technically_implementable, scalability_assessed]

  2. Conflict Resolution Matrix

    # Add to .claude/system/agent-coordination.md
conflicts:
  technical_feasibility:
    authority: "architect"
    consultation: [pm, developer]
    escalation: "technical_spike"

Expected Impact: 90% reduction in conflicting outputs, automated quality assurance

Priority 2B: Parallel Agent Execution ⚡

Why Important: Sequential execution creates unnecessary bottlenecks

Implementation:

  1. Dependency-Based Scheduling 
    execution_groups:
  group_1: [analyst]
  group_2: [pm] 
  group_3: [ux_expert, architect]  # Parallel execution
  group_4: [developer]
  group_5: [qa]

Expected Impact: 40% reduction in total workflow execution time

Phase 3: Reliability & Recovery (Weeks 7-9)

Priority 3A: Error Detection & Recovery 🛡️

Why Critical: System has no way to detect or recover from poor agent outputs

Implementation:

  1. Output Quality Scoring

    # Add to each agent prompt
## <self_evaluation>
Rate your output quality (1-10):
- Completeness: [score]
- Accuracy: [score] 
- Clarity: [score]
- Implementation-readiness: [score]
</self_evaluation>

  2. Checkpoint & Rollback System

    checkpoints:
  frequency: "after_each_quality_gate"
  auto_rollback: "quality_score < 6.0"
  manual_rollback: "user_request"

Expected Impact: 95% reduction in workflow failures, graceful error recovery

Priority 3B: Alternative Workflow Paths 🔄

Why Important: Single points of failure can halt entire workflows

Implementation:

  1. Fallback Strategies 
    fallbacks:
  agent_failure:
    architect_fails: "use_standard_tech_stack_template"
    pm_fails: "analyst_creates_basic_requirements"

Expected Impact: 100% workflow completion rate, even with agent failures

Phase 4: Advanced Features (Weeks 10-12)

Priority 4A: Dynamic Workflow Adaptation 🧠

Why Valuable: Enables system to adapt workflow based on project complexity

Implementation:

  1. Complexity-Based Routing 
    workflow_routing:
  simple_projects: "streamlined_3_step_workflow"
  complex_projects: "comprehensive_9_step_workflow"
  enterprise_projects: "governance_heavy_workflow"

Expected Impact: Optimized workflows for different project types, improved efficiency

Priority 4B: Performance Optimization 🚀

Why Important: Enables system to handle enterprise-scale workloads

Implementation:

  1. Agent Pool Management

    agent_pool:
  max_concurrent_sessions: 10
  load_balancing: "intelligent_routing"

  2. Incremental Processing

    incremental_updates:
  detect_changes: "requirement_diff"
  affected_agents: "impact_analysis"
  partial_execution: "delta_processing_only"

Expected Impact: 10x scalability improvement, sub-10-minute execution times

Implementation Strategy

Development Approach

  1. Backwards Compatibility: All improvements maintain compatibility with existing workflows
  2. Gradual Rollout: Feature flags enable selective activation of improvements
  3. Extensive Testing: Each phase includes comprehensive testing scenarios
  4. User Feedback Integration: Regular feedback collection and incorporation

Resource Requirements

  • Development Time: 12 weeks total
  • Testing Time: 4 weeks (parallel with development)
  • Documentation Updates: 2 weeks
  • User Training Materials: 1 week

Success Metrics

  • Reliability: 99.5% workflow success rate
  • Performance: <10 minutes for complex workflows
  • Quality: >8.5 average output quality score
  • User Satisfaction: >90% positive feedback

Risk Mitigation

Technical Risks

  • Context complexity: Start with simple context passing, iterate to full schema
  • Performance regression: Maintain current performance baselines during improvements
  • Integration challenges: Use feature flags for safe rollout

User Experience Risks

  • Learning curve: Maintain familiar interfaces, enhance behind the scenes
  • Workflow disruption: Backwards compatibility ensures smooth transition
  • Documentation gaps: Comprehensive docs and examples for all new features

Conclusion

These improvements transform our BMAD-Spec Orchestrator from a proof-of-concept to an enterprise-ready system capable of handling complex, real-world software development projects with reliability, performance, and intelligence.

Next Steps: Begin with Phase 1 Priority 1A (Context Management System) as it provides the foundation for all other improvements.