85 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Advanced Agent Coordination System
|
|
|
|
## Current Problems
|
|
1. **No cross-agent validation** - PM agent doesn't validate Analyst's technical feasibility assessments
|
|
2. **Conflicting outputs** - Architect might specify technologies that contradict PM's requirements
|
|
3. **No consensus mechanism** - When agents disagree, no resolution process
|
|
4. **No quality gates** - Poor output from one agent cascades to others
|
|
|
|
## Proposed Agent Coordination Improvements
|
|
|
|
### 1. Cross-Agent Validation Protocol
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Enhanced workflow with validation checkpoints
|
|
- step: 2
|
|
name: "Requirements Documentation"
|
|
agent: pm
|
|
validators:
|
|
- agent: analyst
|
|
validates: ["technical_feasibility", "market_assumptions"]
|
|
threshold: 0.8
|
|
- agent: architect
|
|
validates: ["technical_constraints", "scalability_requirements"]
|
|
threshold: 0.7
|
|
conflict_resolution:
|
|
method: "consensus_building"
|
|
facilitator: "analyst"
|
|
max_iterations: 3
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. Agent Conflict Resolution Matrix
|
|
```yaml
|
|
conflicts:
|
|
technical_feasibility:
|
|
participants: [pm, architect]
|
|
resolution: "architect_has_final_authority"
|
|
escalation: "create_technical_spike"
|
|
|
|
user_requirements:
|
|
participants: [analyst, pm, ux_expert]
|
|
resolution: "majority_vote_with_user_research"
|
|
escalation: "additional_user_interviews"
|
|
|
|
implementation_approach:
|
|
participants: [architect, developer]
|
|
resolution: "developer_implementation_preference"
|
|
escalation: "prototype_both_approaches"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Quality Gate System
|
|
```yaml
|
|
quality_gates:
|
|
analyst_output:
|
|
validators: [pm, architect]
|
|
criteria:
|
|
- testable_requirements: true
|
|
- market_validation: score > 7
|
|
- technical_feasibility: confirmed
|
|
failure_action: "iterate_with_feedback"
|
|
|
|
pm_output:
|
|
validators: [analyst, ux_expert, architect]
|
|
criteria:
|
|
- requirements_traceability: 100%
|
|
- user_story_completeness: score > 8
|
|
- technical_alignment: confirmed
|
|
failure_action: "requirements_workshop"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 4. Collaborative Decision Making
|
|
```yaml
|
|
# Enhanced agent prompts with collaboration instructions
|
|
architect_prompt_addition: |
|
|
## Collaboration Protocol
|
|
When reviewing PM outputs, specifically validate:
|
|
1. Technical feasibility of all user stories
|
|
2. Performance requirements against user expectations
|
|
3. Security implications of specified features
|
|
4. Scalability alignment with business projections
|
|
|
|
If conflicts arise:
|
|
1. Document specific technical concerns
|
|
2. Propose alternative approaches with trade-offs
|
|
3. Request PM clarification on priority conflicts
|
|
4. Escalate to consensus building if unresolved
|
|
``` |