Merge branch '2-gabadi/tasks-review' into feature/story-implementation-expansion-pack

This commit is contained in:
2-gabadi 2025-06-19 03:17:27 -03:00
commit df2a970368
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: EA11A57F8E259893
5 changed files with 47 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
## Epic Business Readiness Validation ## Epic Business Readiness Validation
### Epic Existence & Status Verification ### Epic Existence & Status Verification
- [ ] **Epic file exists**: `docs/epic{epic_number}.md` or alternative location confirmed - [ ] **Epic file exists**: Epic file located in `docs/prd/epic-{epic_number}-*.md` or `docs/epics/epic-{epic_number}-*.md` or user-specified location confirmed
- [ ] **Epic status approved**: Epic status is "Approved" (not Draft/In Progress/Review) - [ ] **Epic status approved**: Epic status is "Approved" (not Draft/In Progress/Review)
- [ ] **Epic completion readiness**: Epic has clear business objectives and scope defined - [ ] **Epic completion readiness**: Epic has clear business objectives and scope defined
- [ ] **Epic format compliance**: Epic follows project template and documentation standards - [ ] **Epic format compliance**: Epic follows project template and documentation standards

View File

@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ APPROVAL DECISION:
[[LLM: Ensure story is right-sized and appropriately prioritized]] [[LLM: Ensure story is right-sized and appropriately prioritized]]
- [ ] **MVP Alignment**: Story scope aligns with MVP boundaries (not over-engineered) - [ ] **Scope Appropriateness**: Story scope aligns with project phase and delivery boundaries
- [ ] **Iteration Size**: Story can be completed in single development iteration - [ ] **Deliverable Size**: Story can be completed within project's standard delivery timeframe
- [ ] **Priority Justification**: Story priority is appropriate for current epic phase - [ ] **Priority Justification**: Story priority aligns with current project objectives and constraints
- [ ] **Dependency Clarity**: Prerequisites and dependencies are clearly identified - [ ] **Dependency Clarity**: Prerequisites and dependencies are clearly identified
- [ ] **Risk Assessment**: Business risk of implementing/not implementing is understood - [ ] **Risk Assessment**: Business risk of implementing/not implementing is understood

View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Product Owner validation and approval of story for development readiness. Valida
### 1. Load Story and Epic Context ### 1. Load Story and Epic Context
- Read the complete story file - Read the complete story file
- Read the parent epic file (`docs/epic{epic_number}.md`) for context - Read the parent epic file (located via `docs/prd/epic-{epic_number}-*.md` or `docs/epics/epic-{epic_number}-*.md`) for context
- Extract story status, user story, acceptance criteria, and business context - Extract story status, user story, acceptance criteria, and business context
- Understand the story's role within the epic objectives - Understand the story's role within the epic objectives

View File

@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ Ensure development environment is ready and validated for story implementation.
## Task Execution ## Task Execution
### 1. Environment Health Check ### 1. Environment Health Check
- Verify development services are running (database, redis, backend, frontend) - Verify project-specific development services are running (check project documentation for required services)
- Check service connectivity and responsiveness - Check service connectivity and responsiveness based on project architecture
- Validate port availability and configuration - Validate port availability and configuration as defined in project setup
- Ensure no service conflicts or failures - Ensure no service conflicts or failures in the development stack
### 2. Development Dependencies ### 2. Development Dependencies
- Verify all required dependencies are installed - Verify all required dependencies are installed
@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ Ensure development environment is ready and validated for story implementation.
- Check that development server starts successfully - Check that development server starts successfully
### 4. Authentication and Security ### 4. Authentication and Security
- Test authentication flow with development credentials - Test authentication flow with development credentials (if project requires authentication)
- Verify authorization rules are working - Verify authorization rules are working according to project security model
- Check security configurations are properly set - Check security configurations are properly set per project requirements
- Validate API access and permissions - Validate API access and permissions as defined in project documentation
### 5. Story-Specific Validation ### 5. Story-Specific Validation
- Review story requirements for any special environment needs - Review story requirements for any special environment needs

View File

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ This task provides efficient architect-only validation after comprehensive Round
1. **Review implementation documentation** 1. **Review implementation documentation**
- Read story file implementation section thoroughly - Read story file implementation section thoroughly
- Compare implemented fixes against original consolidated feedback - Compare implemented fixes against original consolidated feedback
- Identify any MVP-BLOCKING items that were not addressed - Identify any REQUIRED-FOR-COMPLETION items that were not addressed
- Note any technical decisions or changes made during implementation - Note any technical decisions or changes made during implementation
2. **Assess validation approach needed** 2. **Assess validation approach needed**
@ -73,29 +73,29 @@ This task provides efficient architect-only validation after comprehensive Round
**Epic alignment validation:** **Epic alignment validation:**
- Ensure changes maintain epic scope and objectives - Ensure changes maintain epic scope and objectives
- Verify business value delivery still intact - Verify business value delivery still intact
- Check that MVP boundaries respected - Check that project phase boundaries respected
5. **Validate UX fixes using browser testing tools** 5. **Validate UX fixes using project-appropriate testing tools**
**When UX validation needed:** **When UX validation needed:**
- Visual interface changes described in story - User interface changes described in story (web, desktop, mobile, CLI, etc.)
- User interaction flow modifications - User interaction flow modifications
- Accessibility improvements requiring testing - Accessibility improvements requiring testing
- Design consistency updates - Design consistency updates
**Comprehensive Browser MCP Testing Protocol:** **Comprehensive UI Testing Protocol:**
**Phase 1: Environment Setup** **Phase 1: Environment Setup**
- Launch browser MCP session (prefer Playwright MCP for full automation) - Launch UI testing tools as specified in project documentation (check README.md or test configuration)
- Use dedicated incognito/private browser context for clean state - Use clean testing environment appropriate for project type (browser, desktop app, mobile simulator, CLI, etc.)
- Clear all cache, cookies, and local storage before testing - Clear relevant caches and state according to project architecture
- Set viewport to standard desktop resolution (1920x1080) - Set appropriate viewport/window size for project target platform
- Configure browser for debugging (enable console logging) - Configure testing environment for debugging (enable logging as per project standards)
**Phase 2: Pre-Testing Validation** **Phase 2: Pre-Testing Validation**
- Navigate to application base URL - Navigate to application entry point (URL, app launch, CLI command, etc.)
- Verify application loads without errors (check console) - Verify application loads/starts without errors (check relevant logs)
- Take baseline screenshot of unaffected areas for comparison - Take baseline screenshot/capture of unaffected areas for comparison
- Document initial application state and version - Document initial application state and version
**Phase 3: Feature-Specific Testing** **Phase 3: Feature-Specific Testing**
@ -108,30 +108,30 @@ This task provides efficient architect-only validation after comprehensive Round
* Capture screenshot AFTER each significant interaction * Capture screenshot AFTER each significant interaction
* Validate loading states and transitions work correctly * Validate loading states and transitions work correctly
**Phase 4: Accessibility & Responsive Testing** **Phase 4: Accessibility & Responsive Testing (if applicable to project type)**
- Test keyboard navigation for new/changed interactive elements - Test keyboard/alternative navigation for new/changed interactive elements
- Verify ARIA labels and roles if accessibility improvements documented - Verify accessibility features if improvements documented (ARIA, screen reader compatibility, etc.)
- Test responsive behavior at mobile (375px), tablet (768px), desktop (1920px) viewports - Test responsive behavior according to project target platforms (mobile, tablet, desktop, multiple screen sizes)
- Validate color contrast and text readability for visual changes - Validate contrast and readability for visual changes according to project standards
**Phase 5: Cross-Browser Compatibility (if critical changes)** **Phase 5: Cross-Platform Compatibility (if critical changes)**
- Repeat core tests in Chrome, Firefox, and Safari (via MCP if supported) - Repeat core tests across project target platforms (different browsers, OS versions, device types, etc.)
- Document any browser-specific issues discovered - Document any platform-specific issues discovered
- Capture comparative screenshots across browsers for visual changes - Capture comparative evidence across platforms for visual/behavioral changes
**Phase 6: Evidence Documentation and Cleanup** **Phase 6: Evidence Documentation and Cleanup**
- Save all screenshots to temporary validation directory with descriptive filenames (feature_state_timestamp.png) - Save all screenshots/captures to temporary validation directory with descriptive filenames (feature_state_timestamp.png)
- Record any console errors or warnings encountered - Record any errors or warnings encountered in relevant logs
- Document specific browser MCP commands used for reproducibility - Document specific testing commands/tools used for reproducibility
- Create testing summary with pass/fail status for each tested component - Create testing summary with pass/fail status for each tested component
- Note: All browser testing artifacts are temporary and will be cleaned up after validation completion - Note: All testing artifacts are temporary and will be cleaned up after validation completion
**Browser MCP Session Management:** **Testing Session Management:**
- Maintain single browser context throughout testing for consistency - Maintain consistent testing context throughout validation for consistency
- Use page reload between major test sections to ensure clean state - Reset application state between major test sections to ensure clean state
- Close and reopen browser context if session becomes unstable - Restart testing environment if session becomes unstable
- Document MCP tool version and configuration used - Document testing tool versions and configuration used (refer to project documentation)
- Clean up browser sessions and temporary files after validation - Clean up testing sessions and temporary files after validation
**File Management:** **File Management:**
- All screenshots and evidence saved to temporary validation workspace - All screenshots and evidence saved to temporary validation workspace
@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ This task provides efficient architect-only validation after comprehensive Round
**If APPROVED:** **If APPROVED:**
- Mark story as ready for delivery - Mark story as ready for delivery
- Document successful completion - Document successful completion
- Note any POST-MVP items for future tracking - Note any IMPROVEMENT items for future tracking
**If NEEDS_FIXES:** **If NEEDS_FIXES:**
- Provide specific, actionable feedback - Provide specific, actionable feedback
@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ If browser MCP testing fails:
- Consider scope adjustment if UX changes cannot be properly validated via available MCP tools - Consider scope adjustment if UX changes cannot be properly validated via available MCP tools
If validation reveals new issues: If validation reveals new issues:
1. Classify as MVP-BLOCKING vs POST-MVP 1. Classify as REQUIRED-FOR-COMPLETION vs IMPROVEMENT
2. Provide clear guidance for resolution 2. Provide clear guidance for resolution
3. Update feedback for next implementation cycle 3. Update feedback for next implementation cycle
4. Consider if scope adjustment needed 4. Consider if scope adjustment needed