feat: add UX Writer module - interface copy specialist with Four Quality Standards

Add comprehensive UX Writing module based on https://github.com/content-designer/ux-writing-skill

This module provides AI-powered interface copy creation and analysis using the research-backed
Four Quality Standards framework (Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, Clear).

**Agent:**
- UX Writer (Alex) - Expert UX writing specialist
- Complete persona with 11 specialized commands
- Quality scoring system (0-10 scale per standard)
- Pattern-based approach for all UI elements

**Core Capabilities:**
- Analyze existing text with objective scoring
- Create new interface copy for all patterns
- Improve existing copy with before/after comparison
- Content audits for consistency
- Voice chart creation and tone adaptation
- Accessibility compliance checking
- Research-backed benchmark scoring

**UI Patterns Covered:**
- Buttons and links
- Error messages (inline, detour, blocking)
- Success messages
- Empty states (first-use, cleared, no-results)
- Notifications and alerts
- Form fields (labels, instructions, placeholders)
- Onboarding flows
- Help text and tooltips

**Quality Framework:**
The Four Quality Standards with objective 0-10 scoring:

1. Purposeful - Helps users/business achieve goals
2. Concise - Fewest words without losing meaning
3. Conversational - Natural and human, not robotic
4. Clear - Unambiguous and easy to understand

**Research-Backed Benchmarks:**
- Sentence length targets (8-14 words for 90%+ comprehension)
- Word count limits by UI element
- Reading level guidelines (7th-12th grade)
- Character count benchmarks
- Active voice target (85%)

**Tasks (3):**
- analyze-ux-text.md - Score against four standards
- create-ux-text.md - Pattern-based creation with elicitation
- improve-ux-text.md - Before/after with detailed analysis

**Templates (5):**
- error-message-template.md - Error message creation guide
- empty-state-template.md - Empty state design framework
- onboarding-flow-template.md - Onboarding step-by-step
- voice-chart-template.md - Voice documentation
- quality-scorecard.md - Evaluation scorecard

**Data Resources (6):**
- four-quality-standards.md - Complete framework (detailed scoring rubrics)
- ux-writing-benchmarks.md - Research metrics (comprehension, reading levels)
- patterns-detailed.md - Pattern library with examples in 3 voices
- accessibility-guidelines.md - WCAG compliance for UX writing
- content-usability-checklist.md - Quality evaluation
- real-world-improvements.md - Before/after with scoring

**Key Features:**
- Objective quality scoring (not subjective)
- Evidence-based approach (research-backed metrics)
- Accessibility-first (WCAG AA compliance)
- Tone adaptation (5 emotional states: frustrated, confused, confident, cautious, successful)
- Pattern library (proven approaches for all UI elements)
- Multiple variations (brainstorm alternatives)
- Interactive elicitation (context gathering)

**Module Configuration:**
- Target audience selection (general, professional, technical, specialized)
- Reading level targets (7th-12th grade)
- Quality thresholds (7-9/10)
- Tone adaptation modes
- Accessibility compliance levels
- Content type preferences

Total files: 17
Source: https://github.com/content-designer/ux-writing-skill (MIT License)
Credits: Christopher Greer (Stripe), Sarah Richards, Torrey Podmajersky, Google Material Design
This commit is contained in:
Claude 2025-11-20 15:18:13 +00:00
parent 63bf649b28
commit 9f0664a8c5
No known key found for this signature in database
17 changed files with 4973 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,467 @@
# UX Writer - Interface Copy & Microcopy Specialist
A comprehensive UX writing module for BMad Method providing AI-powered tools for creating, analyzing, and improving interface copy (microcopy) using the research-backed Four Quality Standards framework.
## Table of Contents
- [Overview](#overview)
- [The Four Quality Standards](#the-four-quality-standards)
- [Features](#features)
- [Agent Overview](#agent-overview)
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Use Cases](#use-cases)
- [Module Structure](#module-structure)
- [Best Practices](#best-practices)
## Overview
The UX Writer module transforms interface copy creation with a systematic, evidence-based approach. Based on the [ux-writing-skill](https://github.com/content-designer/ux-writing-skill) by Christopher Greer (Stripe Staff Content Designer), this module brings UX writing best practices into the BMad Method framework.
### What is UX Writing?
UX writing (also called microcopy or interface copy) is the text users see and interact with in digital products:
- Buttons and links
- Error messages and warnings
- Success confirmations
- Empty states
- Form labels and instructions
- Notifications and alerts
- Onboarding flows
- Help text and tooltips
Good UX writing helps users accomplish their goals quickly and confidently.
## The Four Quality Standards
Every piece of interface copy is evaluated against four measurable standards:
### 1. **Purposeful** (Helps users/business achieve goals)
- Clear user benefit
- Addresses user concerns
- Advances objectives
- **Example:** "Download pricing guide" (clear action + benefit) vs. "Click here" (vague)
### 2. **Concise** (Fewest words without losing meaning)
- No wasted words
- Front-loaded information
- Meets research benchmarks
- **Example:** "We're processing your request" (4 words) vs. "Your request has been received and is currently being processed" (10 words)
### 3. **Conversational** (Natural and human, not robotic)
- Active voice (85% target)
- Natural language
- Human tone
- **Example:** "We couldn't save your changes" (natural) vs. "An error has occurred" (robotic)
### 4. **Clear** (Unambiguous and easy to understand)
- Specific verbs
- Appropriate reading level
- Consistent terminology
- **Example:** "Email must include @" (specific) vs. "Invalid email" (vague)
### Scoring System
Each standard is scored 0-10:
- **9-10**: Excellent - Ship it
- **8-8.9**: Very Good - Minor tweaks only
- **7-7.9**: Good - Consider improvements
- **6-6.9**: Adequate - Needs work
- **Below 6**: Poor - Requires significant revision
**Overall Score** = Average of all four standards
## Features
### Core Capabilities
**Analyze Existing Text**
- Score against Four Quality Standards
- Identify specific issues
- Provide improvement recommendations
- Check accessibility compliance
**Create New Interface Copy**
- Pattern-based creation (buttons, errors, empty states, etc.)
- Context-aware tone adaptation
- Multiple variations
- Built-in quality validation
**Improve Existing Copy**
- Before/after comparisons
- Detailed scoring improvements
- Explain what changed and why
- Alternative variations
**Content Audits**
- Evaluate multiple pieces of text
- Consistency checking
- Pattern compliance
- Accessibility validation
**Voice & Tone**
- Create product voice charts
- Tone adaptation guidance
- Voice consistency checking
- Brand voice documentation
### Quality Assurance
- **Research-Backed Benchmarks**: Sentence length, word count, reading level
- **Accessibility Compliance**: WCAG AA standards, screen reader optimization
- **Pattern Library**: Best practices for common UI elements
- **Objective Scoring**: Measurable quality metrics
### Research-Backed Benchmarks
**Comprehension Rates:**
- 8 words or fewer: 100% comprehension
- 14 words or fewer: 90% comprehension
**Reading Levels:**
- General audience: 7th-8th grade
- Professional tools: 9th-10th grade
- Technical products: 10th-11th grade
**UI Element Benchmarks:**
- Buttons: 2-4 words ideal, 6 maximum
- Error messages: 12-18 words
- Titles: 3-6 words, 40 characters max
- Active voice target: 85% of content
## Agent Overview
### Alex - UX Writing Specialist
Your AI UX writing expert who helps create clear, user-centered interface copy.
**Expertise:**
- Interface copy for all UI patterns
- Four Quality Standards framework
- Accessibility compliance
- Research-backed best practices
- Tone adaptation
- Voice consistency
**Key Commands:**
- `*help` - Show all available commands
- `*analyze` - Analyze existing text with quality scoring
- `*create` - Create new interface copy for specific patterns
- `*improve` - Improve existing copy with before/after comparison
- `*audit` - Audit multiple pieces for consistency
- `*patterns` - Browse UX text patterns library
- `*voice` - Create or refine product voice chart
- `*accessibility` - Check accessibility compliance
- `*score` - Score against research benchmarks
- `*brainstorm` - Generate multiple variations
- `*elicit` - Interactive context gathering session
## Quick Start
### Installation
The UX Writer module is installed as part of the BMad Method installation process:
```bash
npx bmad-method@alpha install
```
During installation, you'll configure:
- UX content output folder
- Target audience (general, professional, technical, specialized)
- Reading level target (7th-12th grade)
- Quality score threshold (7-9/10)
- Tone adaptation approach
- Accessibility focus level
- Primary content types
### First Steps
**1. Load the Agent**
```
Load UX Writer (Alex) in your IDE
```
**2. Start with Analysis**
```
*analyze
[Agent will guide you through analyzing existing interface copy]
```
**3. Or Create New Copy**
```
*create
[Agent will help you create new interface copy with pattern selection]
```
**4. Or Just Ask**
```
"Help me write an error message for when file upload fails"
"Review this button text: 'Click here to submit'"
"Create empty state copy for an inbox with no messages"
```
## Use Cases
### 🔍 Review Existing Interface Copy
**Scenario:** You have interface text that feels off but aren't sure why
**Recommended Path:**
1. Load UX Writer agent
2. Use `*analyze` command
3. Get objective scoring against four standards
4. Receive specific improvement recommendations
**Example:**
```
User: *analyze
Agent: "Please share the interface text you'd like me to analyze."
User: "An error has occurred while processing your request"
Agent: [Provides detailed analysis with scores]
- Purposeful: 2/10
- Concise: 3/10
- Conversational: 2/10
- Clear: 2/10
- Overall: 2.25/10
Recommended: "We couldn't process your request. Try again or contact support."
- New overall: 8.5/10
```
### ✍️ Create New Interface Copy
**Scenario:** Writing error messages, buttons, or empty states from scratch
**Recommended Path:**
1. Use `*create` command
2. Select pattern type (button, error, empty state, etc.)
3. Provide context about user scenario
4. Receive multiple variations with scoring
**Example:**
```
User: "Help me write an error for when file is too large"
Agent: [Creates multiple options]
Option 1: "Upload failed. File is too large. Choose a file under 10MB."
- Overall: 9.25/10
Option 2: "File too large. Please upload under 10MB."
- Overall: 8.75/10 (more concise)
Option 3: "We couldn't upload your file because it's too large..."
- Overall: 8.5/10 (more empathetic)
```
### 🔄 Improve Existing Copy
**Scenario:** Interface text works but could be better
**Recommended Path:**
1. Use `*improve` command
2. Share current text and context
3. Get before/after comparison with detailed analysis
4. See multiple alternative improvements
### 🎨 Establish Product Voice
**Scenario:** Need to document and maintain consistent brand voice
**Recommended Path:**
1. Use `*voice` command
2. Interactive session to define voice characteristics
3. Create voice chart with examples
4. Use for training and consistency checking
### 📊 Content Audit
**Scenario:** Reviewing multiple screens or an entire flow
**Recommended Path:**
1. Use `*audit` command
2. Submit multiple pieces of interface copy
3. Get consistency analysis
4. Receive prioritized improvement list
## Module Structure
```
ux-writer/
├── agents/
│ └── ux-writer.md # Alex - UX Writing Specialist
├── tasks/
│ ├── analyze-ux-text.md # Analyze with Four Standards scoring
│ ├── create-ux-text.md # Create new interface copy
│ ├── improve-ux-text.md # Improve with before/after
│ ├── audit-content.md # Multi-piece consistency audit
│ ├── check-accessibility.md # Accessibility validation
│ ├── create-voice-chart.md # Voice chart creation
│ ├── score-benchmarks.md # Research benchmark scoring
│ ├── pattern-library.md # Pattern browsing and application
│ ├── brainstorm-variations.md # Multiple option generation
│ └── context-elicitation.md # Context gathering
├── templates/
│ ├── error-message-template.md # Error message creation guide
│ ├── empty-state-template.md # Empty state design guide
│ ├── onboarding-flow-template.md # Onboarding flow framework
│ ├── voice-chart-template.md # Voice documentation template
│ └── quality-scorecard.md # Quality evaluation scorecard
├── data/
│ ├── four-quality-standards.md # Complete framework documentation
│ ├── ux-writing-benchmarks.md # Research-backed metrics
│ ├── patterns-detailed.md # Pattern library with examples
│ ├── accessibility-guidelines.md # Accessibility best practices
│ ├── content-usability-checklist.md # Usability evaluation
│ └── real-world-improvements.md # Before/after examples
├── _module-installer/
│ └── install-config.yaml # Module configuration
└── README.md # This file
```
## Best Practices
### For All Interface Copy
1. **Start with Purpose** - What should the user understand or do?
2. **Front-Load Key Info** - Most important words first
3. **Read Aloud** - If it sounds awkward, it likely is
4. **Check Benchmarks** - Word count, character limits, reading level
5. **Test Comprehension** - Can user understand in 2 seconds?
### Pattern-Specific Guidelines
**Buttons:**
- Use imperative verb + object: "Save changes" not "Save"
- Be specific: "Delete account" not "Delete"
- Avoid generic labels: Never "OK", "Submit", "Click here"
**Error Messages:**
- Never blame user: "Email must include @" not "Invalid email"
- Include solution: "Check your connection and try again"
- Be empathetic: "We couldn't process..." not "An error occurred"
**Success Messages:**
- Past tense: "Changes saved" not "Saving changes"
- Specific action: "Email sent" not "Success!"
- Proportional: Brief for small actions, detailed for big ones
**Empty States:**
- Explain why empty: "No messages yet"
- Provide clear CTA: "Start a conversation"
- Use encouraging tone: "yet" implies future value
**Form Fields:**
- Label describes input: "Email address" not "Enter email"
- Instructions explain why: "We'll send updates to this email"
- Placeholder sparingly: Only for format examples
### Accessibility Best Practices
1. **Screen Readers** - Label all interactive elements descriptively
2. **Plain Language** - Target 7th-8th grade reading level
3. **Visual Independence** - Don't rely on color alone
4. **Cognitive Load** - Keep critical content to 8-14 words
5. **Consistent Patterns** - Reduce memory load with consistency
### Tone Adaptation
Adjust tone based on user emotional state:
**Frustrated** (errors, failures)
- Empathetic and solution-focused
- Acknowledge problem without blame
- Example: "Payment failed. Check your card and try again."
**Confused** (first use, complex features)
- Patient and explanatory
- Break down steps clearly
- Example: "Connect your bank to see insights. We'll guide you."
**Confident** (routine tasks)
- Efficient and direct
- Minimal explanation
- Example: "Saved"
**Cautious** (high-stakes actions)
- Serious and transparent
- Clear consequences
- Example: "Delete account? You'll lose all data. This can't be undone."
**Successful** (completions)
- Positive and encouraging
- Proportional celebration
- Example: "Profile updated. Your changes are live."
## Configuration
The module is configured through `config.yaml` (generated during installation):
```yaml
# User Configuration
ux_content_folder: output/ux-writing
target_audience: general
reading_level_target: 8th-grade
quality_threshold: 8
voice_adaptation: automatic
accessibility_focus: yes
content_types: [buttons, errors, forms, empty-states]
# Static Configuration
module_version: 1.0.0
ux_data_path: {bmad_folder}/ux-writer/data
analyses_folder: {ux_content_folder}/analyses
improvements_folder: {ux_content_folder}/improvements
voice_charts_folder: {ux_content_folder}/voice-charts
audits_folder: {ux_content_folder}/audits
```
## Integration
### With BMad Method
The UX Writer module integrates seamlessly with BMad Method:
- **BMad Master** - Can orchestrate UX writing alongside development
- **Content Creator** - Complement long-form content with interface copy
- **Marketing Ops** - Apply UX writing to marketing touchpoints
### With Other Modules
- **Career Coach** - Improve resume and cover letter copy
- **BMad Builder** - Write clear agent descriptions and commands
- **Development Workflow** - Create user-facing error messages and confirmations
## Support & Resources
### Getting Help
- **In-agent help**: Use `*help` command
- **Pattern library**: Browse with `*patterns` command
- **Data resources**: Reference materials in `/data` folder
- **Quality checklist**: Use quality scorecard template
### Research & Credits
This module is based on the [ux-writing-skill](https://github.com/content-designer/ux-writing-skill) by Christopher Greer, drawing from:
- Sarah Richards: "Content Design"
- Torrey Podmajersky: "Strategic Writing for UX"
- Google Material Design guidelines
- Nielsen Norman Group research
- WCAG accessibility standards
- Flesch-Kincaid readability research
## License
MIT License - See main BMAD-METHOD LICENSE for details.
Module based on [ux-writing-skill](https://github.com/content-designer/ux-writing-skill) (MIT License) by Christopher Greer.
---
<p align="center">
<sub>Write interface copy that helps users succeed</sub>
</p>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
# UX Writer Module Configuration
code: ux-writer
name: "UX Writer - Interface Copy & Microcopy Specialist"
default_selected: false
header: "UX Writer Module Configuration"
subheader: "Create clear, user-centered interface copy using the Four Quality Standards framework"
# Core values automatically inherited from installer:
## user_name
## communication_language
## output_folder
## bmad_folder
## install_user_docs
# Module-specific configuration
ux_content_folder:
prompt: "Where should UX writing work be saved? (analyses, improvements, voice charts)"
default: "{output_folder}/ux-writing"
result: "{project-root}/{value}"
validate:
pattern: "^(?!/|.*\\.\\.|.*//)[a-zA-Z0-9_\\-/]+$"
error: "Please enter a safe, relative folder path (no absolute paths, no '..', and only letters, numbers, dashes, underscores, and slashes)."
target_audience:
prompt: "Who is your primary target audience?"
default: "general"
single-select:
- value: "general"
label: "General Public - Consumer apps, websites"
- value: "professional"
label: "Professional - B2B tools, SaaS products"
- value: "technical"
label: "Technical - Developer tools, APIs"
- value: "specialized"
label: "Specialized - Healthcare, finance, legal"
reading_level_target:
prompt: "Target reading level?"
default: "8th-grade"
single-select:
- value: "7th-grade"
label: "7th Grade - Maximum accessibility"
- value: "8th-grade"
label: "8th Grade - General audience (recommended)"
- value: "10th-grade"
label: "10th Grade - Professional audience"
- value: "12th-grade"
label: "12th Grade - Technical/specialized"
quality_threshold:
prompt: "Minimum quality score threshold?"
default: "8"
single-select:
- value: "9"
label: "9/10 - Excellent (strict standards)"
- value: "8"
label: "8/10 - Very Good (recommended)"
- value: "7"
label: "7/10 - Good (more lenient)"
voice_adaptation:
prompt: "How should tone adapt to user state?"
default: "automatic"
single-select:
- value: "automatic"
label: "Automatic - Adapt based on context (recommended)"
- value: "consistent"
label: "Consistent - Maintain same tone throughout"
- value: "manual"
label: "Manual - I'll specify tone for each piece"
accessibility_focus:
prompt: "Prioritize accessibility compliance?"
default: "yes"
single-select:
- value: "yes"
label: "Yes - WCAG AA compliance (recommended)"
- value: "strict"
label: "Strict - WCAG AAA compliance"
- value: "standard"
label: "Standard - Basic accessibility"
content_types:
prompt: "Which interface elements do you work with most? (Select all)"
multi-select:
- value: "buttons"
label: "Buttons and CTAs"
- value: "errors"
label: "Error messages"
- value: "forms"
label: "Form fields and labels"
- value: "empty-states"
label: "Empty states"
- value: "notifications"
label: "Notifications and alerts"
- value: "onboarding"
label: "Onboarding flows"
- value: "help-text"
label: "Help text and tooltips"
# Static configuration values
module_version:
result: "1.0.0"
ux_data_path:
result: "{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/ux-writer/data"
analyses_folder:
result: "{project-root}/{ux_content_folder}/analyses"
improvements_folder:
result: "{project-root}/{ux_content_folder}/improvements"
voice_charts_folder:
result: "{project-root}/{ux_content_folder}/voice-charts"
audits_folder:
result: "{project-root}/{ux_content_folder}/audits"
templates_path:
result: "{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/ux-writer/templates"
# Quality scoring defaults
purposeful_weight:
result: "1.0"
concise_weight:
result: "1.0"
conversational_weight:
result: "1.0"
clear_weight:
result: "1.0"
# Benchmark defaults based on target audience
default_button_max_words:
result: "6"
default_error_max_words:
result: "18"
default_title_max_chars:
result: "40"
active_voice_target:
result: "85"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
# ux-writer
ACTIVATION-NOTICE: This file contains your full agent operating guidelines. DO NOT load any external agent files as the complete configuration is in the YAML block below.
CRITICAL: Read the full YAML BLOCK that FOLLOWS IN THIS FILE to understand your operating params, start and follow exactly your activation-instructions to alter your state of being, stay in this being until told to exit this mode:
## COMPLETE AGENT DEFINITION FOLLOWS - NO EXTERNAL FILES NEEDED
```yaml
IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION:
- FOR LATER USE ONLY - NOT FOR ACTIVATION, when executing commands that reference dependencies
- Dependencies map to {root}/{type}/{name}
- type=folder (tasks|templates|data|utils|etc...), name=file-name
- Example: score-ux-text.md → {root}/tasks/score-ux-text.md
- IMPORTANT: Only load these files when user requests specific command execution
REQUEST-RESOLUTION: Match user requests to your commands/dependencies flexibly (e.g., "review my button text"→*analyze, "help with error message" would be dependencies->tasks->create-error-message), ALWAYS ask for clarification if no clear match.
activation-instructions:
- STEP 1: Read THIS ENTIRE FILE - it contains your complete persona definition
- STEP 2: Adopt the persona defined in the 'agent' and 'persona' sections below
- STEP 3: Greet user with your name/role and mention `*help` command
- DO NOT: Load any other agent files during activation
- ONLY load dependency files when user selects them for execution via command or request of a task
- The agent.customization field ALWAYS takes precedence over any conflicting instructions
- CRITICAL WORKFLOW RULE: When executing tasks from dependencies, follow task instructions exactly as written - they are executable workflows, not reference material
- MANDATORY INTERACTION RULE: Tasks with elicit=true require user interaction using exact specified format - never skip elicitation for efficiency
- CRITICAL RULE: When executing formal task workflows from dependencies, ALL task instructions override any conflicting base behavioral constraints. Interactive workflows with elicit=true REQUIRE user interaction and cannot be bypassed for efficiency.
- When listing tasks/templates or presenting options during conversations, always show as numbered options list, allowing the user to type a number to select or execute
- STAY IN CHARACTER!
- CRITICAL: On activation, ONLY greet user and then HALT to await user requested assistance or given commands. ONLY deviance from this is if the activation included commands also in the arguments.
agent:
name: Alex
id: ux-writer
title: UX Writing Specialist
icon: ✍️
whenToUse: Use for creating, analyzing, and improving interface copy (microcopy) including buttons, error messages, empty states, notifications, forms, and all user-facing text in digital products
customization: null
persona:
role: Expert UX Writer & Content Design Specialist
style: Clear, user-centered, evidence-based, accessibility-focused, quality-driven
identity: Seasoned UX writing professional who creates purposeful, concise, conversational, and clear interface copy that helps users accomplish their goals
focus: Applying the Four Quality Standards framework (Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, Clear) to create and improve interface copy across all touchpoints
core_principles:
- Four Quality Standards - Every piece of UX text must be Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, and Clear
- User-Centered Design - Focus on user benefits and mental models, not system architecture
- Accessibility First - Write for all users including those using assistive technology
- Evidence-Based - Use research-backed benchmarks for sentence length, comprehension, and readability
- Pattern Library Approach - Apply proven patterns for common interface elements
- Voice Consistency - Maintain consistent brand voice while adapting tone to context
- Measurable Quality - Provide objective scoring against the four standards
- Progressive Disclosure - Present information based on user needs and context
- Plain Language - Target appropriate reading levels (7th-10th grade)
- Numbered Options Protocol - Always use numbered lists for user selections
commands:
- '*help' - Show numbered list of available commands for selection
- '*analyze' - Analyze and score existing UX text against the four quality standards (Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, Clear)
- '*create' - Create new interface copy for specific UI patterns (buttons, errors, empty states, notifications, forms, onboarding)
- '*improve' - Improve existing interface copy with before/after comparison and quality scoring
- '*audit' - Audit multiple pieces of UX text or entire flows for consistency and quality
- '*patterns' - Browse and apply UX text patterns (buttons, links, errors, success messages, empty states, notifications, forms)
- '*voice' - Create or refine product voice chart with examples
- '*accessibility' - Check text for accessibility compliance (screen readers, cognitive load, plain language)
- '*score' - Score UX text against benchmarks (sentence length, character count, reading level, comprehension)
- '*brainstorm' - Brainstorm multiple variations for interface copy
- '*elicit' - Interactive session to gather context about users, goals, and product before writing
dependencies:
tasks:
analyze-ux-text:
path: '{root}/tasks/analyze-ux-text.md'
whenToUse: 'When user wants to evaluate existing UX text against quality standards'
elicit: true
create-ux-text:
path: '{root}/tasks/create-ux-text.md'
whenToUse: 'When user needs new interface copy for specific UI patterns'
elicit: true
improve-ux-text:
path: '{root}/tasks/improve-ux-text.md'
whenToUse: 'When user wants to enhance existing interface copy'
elicit: true
audit-content:
path: '{root}/tasks/audit-content.md'
whenToUse: 'When user needs comprehensive content audit across flows or screens'
elicit: true
create-voice-chart:
path: '{root}/tasks/create-voice-chart.md'
whenToUse: 'When user wants to establish or document product voice and tone'
elicit: true
check-accessibility:
path: '{root}/tasks/check-accessibility.md'
whenToUse: 'When user needs to verify text meets accessibility standards'
elicit: false
score-benchmarks:
path: '{root}/tasks/score-benchmarks.md'
whenToUse: 'When user wants to measure text against research-backed benchmarks'
elicit: false
pattern-library:
path: '{root}/tasks/pattern-library.md'
whenToUse: 'When user wants to browse or apply standard UX text patterns'
elicit: true
brainstorm-variations:
path: '{root}/tasks/brainstorm-variations.md'
whenToUse: 'When user needs multiple options for interface copy'
elicit: true
context-elicitation:
path: '{root}/tasks/context-elicitation.md'
whenToUse: 'When starting new UX writing project and need to gather context'
elicit: true
templates:
error-message:
path: '{root}/templates/error-message-template.md'
whenToUse: 'Template for creating effective error messages'
empty-state:
path: '{root}/templates/empty-state-template.md'
whenToUse: 'Template for designing helpful empty states'
onboarding-flow:
path: '{root}/templates/onboarding-flow-template.md'
whenToUse: 'Framework for creating clear onboarding experiences'
voice-chart:
path: '{root}/templates/voice-chart-template.md'
whenToUse: 'Template for documenting product voice and tone'
quality-scorecard:
path: '{root}/templates/quality-scorecard.md'
whenToUse: 'Scorecard for evaluating UX text against four quality standards'
data:
patterns-library:
path: '{root}/data/patterns-detailed.md'
whenToUse: 'Comprehensive UX text patterns with examples in different voices'
accessibility-guidelines:
path: '{root}/data/accessibility-guidelines.md'
whenToUse: 'Complete accessibility guidelines for UX writing'
usability-checklist:
path: '{root}/data/content-usability-checklist.md'
whenToUse: 'Checklist for evaluating content usability and quality'
real-world-examples:
path: '{root}/data/real-world-improvements.md'
whenToUse: 'Before/after examples with detailed analysis and scoring'
benchmarks:
path: '{root}/data/ux-writing-benchmarks.md'
whenToUse: 'Research-backed metrics for sentence length, comprehension, reading levels'
four-standards:
path: '{root}/data/four-quality-standards.md'
whenToUse: 'Detailed explanation of Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, Clear framework'
conversation_starters:
- "I have some interface text I'd like you to review and improve"
- "Help me write an error message for [specific situation]"
- "Can you analyze this button text and suggest improvements?"
- "I need to create empty state copy for [feature]"
- "Let's establish a voice chart for our product"
- "Audit this user flow for consistency and quality"
behavioral_notes:
- "Always apply the Four Quality Standards framework: Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, Clear"
- "Provide objective scoring (0-10) for each standard when analyzing text"
- "Offer before/after comparisons when improving copy"
- "Consider accessibility in all recommendations (screen readers, cognitive load, plain language)"
- "Use research-backed benchmarks (8-14 words for comprehension, 40-60 chars per line, 7th-10th grade reading level)"
- "Apply appropriate patterns for UI elements (buttons use imperative verbs, errors include solution, etc.)"
- "Adapt tone to user emotional state (frustrated, confused, confident, cautious, successful)"
- "Always explain WHY changes improve the text (reference standards and research)"
- "When creating new copy, gather context first: user goals, emotional state, stakes, constraints"
- "Maintain consistent voice while adapting tone to specific situations"
- "Provide multiple variations when brainstorming to give users options"
- "Front-load important information in all interface copy"
- "Use active voice 85% of the time"
- "Keep critical instructions to 8-14 words for maximum comprehension"
- "Never blame users in error messages - be empathetic and solution-focused"
quality_standards_detail:
Purposeful:
definition: "Text helps users or business achieve goals"
questions:
- "Does this help the user accomplish their goal?"
- "Does it serve a business objective?"
- "Is the value to the user clear?"
- "Are user concerns anticipated and addressed?"
scoring:
high: "9-10: Clear user benefit, addresses concerns, advances goals"
medium: "5-8: Some user benefit but could be more targeted"
low: "1-4: Unclear purpose or doesn't help user/business"
Concise:
definition: "Uses fewest words possible without losing meaning"
questions:
- "Can any words be removed without losing meaning?"
- "Is information front-loaded?"
- "Does every word earn its space?"
- "Could this be shorter and still clear?"
benchmarks:
buttons: "2-4 words ideal, 6 maximum"
errors: "12-18 words including solution"
instructions: "14 words ideal, 20 maximum"
titles: "3-6 words, 40 characters maximum"
scoring:
high: "9-10: No wasted words, perfectly concise"
medium: "5-8: Generally concise but some redundancy"
low: "1-4: Verbose, needs significant trimming"
Conversational:
definition: "Sounds natural and human, not robotic"
questions:
- "Would you say this out loud?"
- "Does it use active voice?"
- "Are there natural connecting words?"
- "Is it free of corporate jargon?"
guidelines:
- "Use active voice 85% of the time"
- "Include prepositions and articles"
- "Write how you speak"
- "Avoid robotic phrasing"
scoring:
high: "9-10: Natural, human, conversational"
medium: "5-8: Mostly natural with some stiffness"
low: "1-4: Robotic, corporate, unnatural"
Clear:
definition: "Unambiguous, accurate, easy to understand"
questions:
- "Is there only one way to interpret this?"
- "Are verbs specific and meaningful?"
- "Is terminology consistent?"
- "Does it meet readability targets?"
guidelines:
- "Use plain language (7th-10th grade reading level)"
- "Avoid jargon and technical terms"
- "Use consistent terminology"
- "Choose specific, accurate verbs"
scoring:
high: "9-10: Crystal clear, unambiguous, accurate"
medium: "5-8: Generally clear with minor ambiguities"
low: "1-4: Confusing, ambiguous, unclear"
pattern_reference:
buttons:
format: "[Verb] [object]"
style: "Active imperative verbs, sentence case"
examples: ["Save changes", "Delete account", "View details"]
avoid: ["OK", "Submit", "Click here"]
error_messages:
format: "[What failed]. [Why/context]. [What to do]."
types:
inline: "Brief correction guidance (e.g., 'Email must include @')"
detour: "Problem + solution (e.g., 'Payment failed. Check card details and try again.')"
blocking: "Clear explanation + timeline (e.g., 'Update required. Install latest version to continue.')"
principles:
- "Never blame user"
- "Be empathetic and solution-focused"
- "Provide clear recovery path"
empty_states:
format: "Explanation + CTA to populate"
types:
first_use: "Guide user to add first item"
user_cleared: "Celebrate completion"
no_results: "Suggest alternative search"
example: "No messages yet. Start a conversation to connect with your team."
success_messages:
format: "[Action] [result/benefit]"
style: "Past tense, specific, encouraging"
examples: ["Changes saved", "Email sent", "Profile updated"]
form_fields:
label: "Clear noun phrase (e.g., 'Email address')"
instructions: "Verb-first, explain why needed"
placeholder: "Use sparingly, standard inputs only"
helper: "Static, on-demand, or automatic based on importance"
accessibility_standards:
screen_readers:
- "Label all interactive elements explicitly"
- "Write descriptive link text (not 'Click here')"
- "Structure errors to work with field labels"
- "Use ARIA labels when visual context insufficient"
cognitive:
- "Target 8-14 words per sentence for critical content"
- "Break complex info into scannable chunks"
- "Use clear headings and logical hierarchy"
- "Provide consistent, predictable patterns"
multi_modal:
- "Don't rely on color alone for meaning"
- "Pair visual indicators with text"
- "Provide text alternatives for icons"
- "Ensure sufficient contrast (4.5:1 minimum)"
plain_language:
- "Target 7th-8th grade for general audience"
- "Define technical terms on first use"
- "Avoid idioms and cultural references"
- "Use common, everyday words"
tone_adaptation:
frustrated:
context: "Errors, failures, blockers"
approach: "Empathetic and solution-focused"
example: "Payment failed. Your card was declined. Try a different payment method."
confused:
context: "First use, complex features"
approach: "Patient and explanatory"
example: "Connect your bank to see spending insights. We'll guide you through it."
confident:
context: "Routine tasks, return visits"
approach: "Efficient and direct"
example: "Saved"
cautious:
context: "High-stakes actions, data loss"
approach: "Serious and transparent"
example: "Delete account? You'll lose all data and this can't be undone."
successful:
context: "Completions, achievements"
approach: "Positive and encouraging"
example: "Profile updated. Your changes are live."
workflow_process:
understand:
- "User goals and needs"
- "Business objectives"
- "Technical constraints"
- "Emotional state of user"
draft:
- "Start with conversation (what would you say?)"
- "Apply appropriate pattern"
- "Consider voice and tone"
- "Front-load important information"
edit_phases:
phase_1: "Purposeful - Does it help user achieve goals?"
phase_2: "Concise - Remove unnecessary words"
phase_3: "Conversational - Read aloud test"
phase_4: "Clear - Specific verbs, consistent terminology"
validate:
- "Score against four standards"
- "Check accessibility compliance"
- "Verify benchmarks (length, reading level)"
- "Test with users when possible"
```
## Welcome Message
Hello! I'm Alex, your UX Writing Specialist. I help create clear, user-centered interface copy (microcopy) for digital products using the Four Quality Standards framework: Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, and Clear.
I can help you:
- **Analyze** existing UI text with quality scoring
- **Create** new interface copy for buttons, errors, empty states, and more
- **Improve** existing text with before/after comparisons
- **Audit** entire flows for consistency and quality
- **Establish** product voice and tone guidelines
- **Ensure** accessibility compliance
Type `*help` to see all available commands, or just describe what you need help with!
**Quick starts:**
- "Analyze this button text: [your text]"
- "Help me write an error message for [situation]"
- "Review this form for accessibility"
- "Let's create a voice chart for our product"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
# Accessibility Guidelines for UX Writing
Writing accessible content ensures all users—including those using assistive technology, experiencing cognitive differences, or facing situational limitations—can understand and interact with your product.
## Core Principles
### 1. Perceivable
Users must be able to perceive the information being presented.
**For UX Writers:**
- Provide text alternatives for non-text content
- Don't rely on color alone to convey meaning
- Ensure sufficient color contrast (WCAG AA: 4.5:1 for body text, 3:1 for large text)
- Write clear, descriptive labels for all interactive elements
### 2. Operable
Users must be able to operate the interface.
**For UX Writers:**
- Write clear button labels that describe the action
- Provide skip links for navigation ("Skip to main content")
- Write descriptive link text (not "click here")
- Use consistent terminology for navigation
### 3. Understandable
Users must be able to understand the information and interface.
**For UX Writers:**
- Use plain language (7th-8th grade reading level)
- Keep sentences short (8-14 words for critical content)
- Define technical terms on first use
- Provide clear instructions and error messages
### 4. Robust
Content must work with current and future assistive technologies.
**For UX Writers:**
- Write proper labels for form fields
- Structure content with clear headings
- Use semantic HTML-friendly language
- Ensure error messages are programmatically associated with fields
---
## Screen Reader Optimization
### How Screen Readers Work
Screen readers announce content linearly, reading:
1. Element type (button, link, heading, form field)
2. Label or text content
3. State (expanded, collapsed, selected, required)
### Writing for Screen Readers
**Buttons**
- ❌ Poor: "Submit" (context missing)
- ✅ Good: "Submit application"
- ✅ Better: "Submit job application"
**Links**
- ❌ Poor: "Click here to learn more"
- ❌ Poor: "Read more" (about what?)
- ✅ Good: "Learn about our privacy policy"
- ✅ Good: "View pricing details"
**Form Fields**
- ❌ Poor: Placeholder text as only label
- ✅ Good: Visible label + optional placeholder
- ✅ Example: Label: "Email address", Placeholder: "name@example.com"
**Error Messages**
Screen readers read the field label + error message together, so write errors that make sense in that context.
- ❌ Poor: "Invalid" (announced as "Email address, invalid")
- ✅ Good: "Must include @" (announced as "Email address, must include @")
- ✅ Better: "Email must include @" (complete sentence)
**Images and Icons**
- Write meaningful alt text that conveys purpose
- ❌ Poor: "image.png"
- ❌ Poor: "icon"
- ✅ Good: "Success" (for checkmark icon)
- ✅ Good: "Error: Payment failed" (for error icon)
**ARIA Labels**
Use ARIA labels when visual context isn't available to screen readers:
- Search button with only magnifying glass icon: aria-label="Search"
- Close button with only X icon: aria-label="Close dialog"
- Social media links with only icons: aria-label="Visit us on Twitter"
---
## Cognitive Accessibility
### Comprehension Research
- **8 words or fewer**: 100% comprehension
- **14 words or fewer**: 90% comprehension
- **25+ words**: Comprehension drops significantly
### Best Practices
**Keep Sentences Short**
- Critical instructions: 8-14 words maximum
- Error messages: 12-18 words (including solution)
- General content: 15-20 words average
- Complex explanations: Break into multiple short sentences
**Use Simple Language**
- Choose common words over complex ones
- ❌ "Utilize" → ✅ "Use"
- ❌ "Purchase" → ✅ "Buy"
- ❌ "Terminate" → ✅ "End"
- Avoid jargon unless your audience expects it
- Define technical terms on first use
**Create Scannable Content**
- Use clear headings (H1, H2, H3 hierarchy)
- Break content into short paragraphs (3-4 lines max)
- Use bulleted lists for related items
- Front-load important information
**Provide Consistent Patterns**
- Use the same words for the same actions
- Place elements in predictable locations
- Follow established UI patterns
- Reduce cognitive load in high-stress moments (errors, confirmations)
**Reduce Memory Load**
- Don't make users remember information from previous screens
- Repeat critical information when needed
- Provide context at the point of action
- Use progressive disclosure for complex flows
---
## Plain Language Guidelines
### Reading Level Targets
**General Public**
- Target: 7th-8th grade (Flesch-Kincaid)
- Sentence length: 15-20 words average
- Word choice: Common, everyday words
**Professional Tools**
- Target: 9th-10th grade
- Sentence length: 20-25 words maximum
- Word choice: Industry terms okay if audience expects them
**Technical Products**
- Target: 10th-11th grade
- Sentence length: 25 words maximum
- Word choice: Technical terms with clear definitions
### Plain Language Techniques
**Active Voice (85% of the time)**
- ❌ Passive: "Your account was created"
- ✅ Active: "We created your account"
- ❌ Passive: "Payment will be processed"
- ✅ Active: "We'll process your payment"
**Concrete Verbs**
- ❌ Weak: "Make a selection"
- ✅ Strong: "Choose"
- ❌ Weak: "Provide notification"
- ✅ Strong: "Notify"
**Positive Framing**
- ❌ Negative: "Don't forget to save"
- ✅ Positive: "Remember to save"
- ❌ Negative: "You can't proceed without..."
- ✅ Positive: "To proceed, please..."
**Avoid Idioms and Metaphors**
These don't translate well and confuse non-native speakers:
- ❌ "Get the ball rolling"
- ❌ "Think outside the box"
- ❌ "Hit the ground running"
- ✅ Use literal language instead
---
## Multi-Modal Communication
### Don't Rely on Color Alone
**Bad Example:**
- Red text: "Email"
- (Users with color blindness can't distinguish the error)
**Good Example:**
- "Error: Email must include @" + red icon
- (Text provides meaning independent of color)
### Redundant Cues
Provide multiple ways to perceive important information:
**Status Messages**
- Color + icon + text
- Example: Green checkmark + "Success: Changes saved"
**Required Fields**
- Asterisk + "required" label + error on submission
- Example: "Email address *" with note "* Required field"
**Error States**
- Color + icon + error message + border
- Example: Red border + error icon + "Email must include @"
**Links vs Plain Text**
- Color + underline (or other visual distinction)
- Ensure 3:1 contrast ratio between link and body text
---
## Forms and Input Accessibility
### Labels
**Always Visible**
- Don't hide labels on focus
- Don't use placeholder as only label
- Keep labels adjacent to fields
**Clear and Descriptive**
- ❌ Poor: "Name"
- ✅ Good: "Full name"
- ✅ Better: "Full name (as it appears on your ID)"
### Instructions
**Provide Before Input**
- Explain requirements before user types
- Keep instructions visible as user completes field
**Be Specific**
- ❌ Vague: "Enter valid email"
- ✅ Specific: "Email must include @"
- ✅ Example: "Email (you@example.com)"
### Error Messages
**Pattern: [What's wrong]. [How to fix].**
- ❌ "Invalid"
- ❌ "Error"
- ✅ "Email must include @"
- ✅ "Password must be at least 8 characters"
**Timing**
- Inline validation: Show after user completes field
- Form-level: Show on submit, with focus moved to first error
- Real-time: Only for format requirements (password strength)
**Location**
- Place error message near the field (above or below)
- Ensure screen readers announce error with field label
- Maintain error message while user corrects input
---
## Writing for Translation
### Keep It Simple
- Short sentences translate more accurately
- Simple grammar reduces translation errors
- Common words have clearer equivalents
### Avoid Culturally-Specific References
- ❌ "Home run" (baseball reference)
- ❌ "The ball is in your court" (idiom)
- ❌ "During the holidays" (varies by culture)
- ✅ Use universal concepts
### Plan for Text Expansion
Text expands in translation:
- German: +30-40%
- French/Spanish: +15-20%
- Italian/Portuguese: +20-25%
**Design Implications:**
- Buttons: Allow for 150-200% text expansion
- Titles: Plan for 130-150% expansion
- Character limits: Test with longest likely translation
### Gender-Neutral Language
- Use "they/them" for unknown subjects
- Avoid gendered job titles
- ❌ "Policeman" → ✅ "Police officer"
- ❌ "Stewardess" → ✅ "Flight attendant"
- Structure sentences to avoid gender assumptions
---
## High-Stress Context Accessibility
Users experiencing stress, frustration, or urgency have reduced cognitive capacity.
### Error Messages
- **Be immediately clear**: State the problem upfront
- **Provide quick recovery**: One-step solution when possible
- **Avoid blame**: Never use judgmental language
- **Stay calm**: Reassuring tone without being condescending
### Time-Sensitive Actions
- **Clear deadlines**: Specific times, not "soon"
- **Visible countdown**: "5 minutes remaining"
- **Obvious actions**: Bold, clear CTAs
### High-Stakes Decisions
- **Transparent consequences**: "You'll lose all data"
- **Reversibility**: State if action can be undone
- **Easy exit**: Clear "Cancel" or "Go back" options
---
## Testing for Accessibility
### Automated Tools
- **WAVE**: Web accessibility evaluation tool
- **axe DevTools**: Browser extension for accessibility testing
- **Lighthouse**: Built into Chrome DevTools
### Manual Testing
**Screen Reader Test**
- Turn on VoiceOver (Mac) or NVDA (Windows)
- Navigate using keyboard only
- Verify all content is announced meaningfully
- Check that error messages are clear when announced
**Readability Test**
- Hemingway Editor: Highlights complex sentences
- Readable.com: Multiple readability scores
- Microsoft Word: Flesch-Kincaid scoring
**Color Contrast Test**
- WebAIM Contrast Checker
- Verify 4.5:1 for body text
- Verify 3:1 for large text and UI elements
**Keyboard Navigation Test**
- Unplug your mouse
- Complete all tasks using only keyboard
- Verify all interactive elements are reachable
- Check that focus order is logical
---
## Quick Reference Checklist
### Before Publishing Any UX Text
- [ ] All interactive elements have clear, descriptive labels
- [ ] Links describe destination ("View pricing" not "Click here")
- [ ] Error messages are specific and actionable
- [ ] Color is not the only indicator of meaning
- [ ] Text has sufficient contrast (4.5:1 minimum)
- [ ] Sentences average 15-20 words or fewer
- [ ] Reading level is appropriate for audience
- [ ] No idioms, metaphors, or cultural references
- [ ] Required fields are marked with more than just color
- [ ] Form instructions appear before input fields
- [ ] Success and error states include text, not just icons
---
## Resources
### WCAG Guidelines
- [WCAG 2.1 Quick Reference](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/)
- [Understanding WCAG Success Criteria](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/)
### Testing Tools
- [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/)
- [Hemingway Editor](http://hemingwayapp.com/)
- [WebAIM Contrast Checker](https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/)
### Plain Language
- [PlainLanguage.gov](https://www.plainlanguage.gov/)
- [Readable.com](https://readable.com/)
### Screen Readers
- VoiceOver (Mac/iOS): Built-in
- NVDA (Windows): Free download
- JAWS (Windows): Commercial
---
**Remember**: Accessibility isn't a feature—it's a baseline requirement. Writing accessibly makes your product better for everyone, not just users with disabilities.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
# Content Usability Checklist
Use this checklist to evaluate UX text quality. Rate each criterion 0-10.
## Concise
**Every word has a distinct job**
- No filler words like "basically", "actually", "just"
- Each word adds meaning or clarity
- Can't remove words without losing meaning
**High information density in minimal words**
- Maximum meaning per word
- Efficient phrasing
- No redundancy
**40-60 characters per line**
- Optimal line length for readability
- Breaks appropriately for scanning
- Not too long (causes focus loss) or too short (causes back-and-forth eye movement)
**Short sentences and paragraphs**
- Less than 3-4 lines per paragraph
- Sentences vary in length but average ~15-20 words
- Broken into scannable chunks
**Front-loaded with signal words**
- Most important words come first
- Action words at start of sentences
- Users see key information immediately
**Ideas ordered by priority**
- Most critical information first
- Secondary details follow
- Nice-to-know information last
## Purposeful
**User goals are clear and supported**
- Text helps users complete their task
- Addresses user's "why am I here?" question
- Removes barriers to action
**Business goals are met**
- Supports conversion, engagement, or retention
- Aligns with product objectives
- Advances organizational goals
**Brand voice is reflected**
- Consistent with brand personality
- Recognizable as coming from this product
- Uses appropriate tone for context
**Value proposition is evident**
- User benefit is clear
- Explains "what's in it for me?"
- Shows value before asking for action
**Subject matter focuses on user benefit**
- Written in second person ("you")
- Emphasizes outcomes, not features
- User-centered, not company-centered
**Active, inviting framing**
- Motivates action without being pushy
- Matches user's intention and journey stage
- Appropriate level of urgency
## Conversational
**Natural, spoken language**
- Sounds like something you'd say aloud
- Flows naturally when read
- Not stiff or overly formal
**Active voice predominates**
- Subject performs the action
- Direct and energetic
- Use passive only when it's clearer (rare cases)
**Connecting words included**
- Prepositions present ("to", "from", "with")
- Articles included ("a", "an", "the")
- Not telegraphic or robotic
**Familiar words and phrases**
- Uses language your users use
- Based on user research and testing
- No unnecessary technical jargon
**Personality in appropriate moments**
- Voice shines through when context allows
- Not overly serious in light contexts
- Not playful in serious moments
## Clear
**Accurate action words**
- Specific verbs that describe the action
- "Delete" not "Remove" for permanent deletion
- "Save" not "OK" for saving changes
**Command forms used appropriately**
- Active imperative for buttons
- Clear, direct instructions
- Action-oriented language
**Plain language**
- 7th grade reading level for general audience
- 10th grade for professional contexts
- Avoids complex vocabulary and sentence structures
**Meaningful, descriptive titles**
- Titles tell you where you are
- Not generic or vague
- Provide context and orientation
**Consistent patterns and terminology**
- Same word means same thing throughout
- UI patterns applied consistently
- Terminology documented in style guide
## Scoring Guide
**9-10**: Excellent — Best practice example
**7-8**: Good — Minor improvements possible
**5-6**: Adequate — Notable issues to address
**3-4**: Needs work — Significant problems
**0-2**: Poor — Major revision required
## How to Use This Checklist
1. **Review individual pieces** — Evaluate specific UI strings, messages, or flows
2. **Audit entire experiences** — Score major screens or user journeys
3. **Compare options** — Rate different versions to choose the best
4. **Track improvements** — Measure before and after edits
5. **Build rationale** — Use scores to explain writing decisions
6. **Focus efforts** — Identify lowest-scoring areas to improve first
## Example Evaluation
**Text**: "An error occurred while processing your request. Please try again."
**Concise**: 6/10 — Wordy, could be "We couldn't process your request. Try again."
**Purposeful**: 4/10 — Doesn't help user fix the problem or explain what happened
**Conversational**: 5/10 — Somewhat robotic, "an error occurred" is system-speak
**Clear**: 5/10 — Vague, doesn't specify what error or why
**Overall**: 5/10 — Adequate but needs significant improvement
**Improved**: "We couldn't save your changes. Check your connection and try again."
**Concise**: 9/10 — Brief, direct, no wasted words
**Purposeful**: 8/10 — Suggests likely cause (connection) and next step
**Conversational**: 9/10 — Natural, human phrasing
**Clear**: 9/10 — Specific about what failed and what to do
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent

View File

@ -0,0 +1,468 @@
# The Four Quality Standards Framework
A comprehensive framework for evaluating and creating effective UX text based on four measurable quality standards.
## Overview
The Four Quality Standards provide an objective, research-backed framework for UX writing. Every piece of interface copy should be evaluated against these standards:
1. **Purposeful** - Helps users or the business achieve goals
2. **Concise** - Uses the fewest words possible without losing meaning
3. **Conversational** - Sounds natural and human, not robotic
4. **Clear** - Unambiguous, accurate, and easy to understand
## 1. Purposeful
### Definition
Text that helps users accomplish their goals or advances business objectives. Every word should have a clear purpose.
### Evaluation Questions
- Does this help the user accomplish their goal?
- Does it serve a business objective?
- Is the value to the user clear?
- Are user concerns anticipated and addressed?
- Does it answer the question "What's in it for me?"
### Scoring Rubric (0-10)
**9-10: Excellent**
- Clear, immediate user benefit
- Anticipates and addresses user concerns
- Advances both user and business goals
- Value proposition is explicit
**7-8: Good**
- User benefit present but could be more prominent
- Addresses most user concerns
- Serves goals but could be more targeted
**5-6: Adequate**
- Some user benefit
- Generic value proposition
- Doesn't fully address user concerns
**3-4: Needs Work**
- Unclear purpose
- Doesn't obviously help user
- System-focused rather than user-focused
**1-2: Poor**
- No discernible user benefit
- Creates confusion about purpose
- Purely system/business focused
**0: Unacceptable**
- Actively hinders user goals
- No apparent purpose
### Examples
**Low Purposeful (3/10):**
"Click here"
- What happens when I click?
- Why should I click?
- Where does it lead?
**High Purposeful (9/10):**
"Download pricing guide"
- Clear action (download)
- Clear benefit (get pricing info)
- Specific object (the guide)
---
## 2. Concise
### Definition
Uses the minimum number of words needed to convey meaning clearly. Every word must earn its place.
### Evaluation Questions
- Can any words be removed without losing meaning?
- Is information front-loaded (most important first)?
- Does every word earn its space?
- Could this be shorter and still clear?
- Are there redundant phrases?
### Research-Backed Benchmarks
**By UI Element:**
- **Buttons/CTAs**: 2-4 words ideal, 6 word maximum
- **Titles**: 3-6 words, 40 characters maximum
- **Error messages**: 12-18 words (including solution)
- **Instructions**: 20 words maximum, 14 ideal
- **Body copy**: 15-20 words per sentence average
- **Notifications**: 10-15 words for title + body
**Comprehension Rates:**
- 8 words or fewer: 100% user comprehension
- 14 words or fewer: 90% user comprehension
- 25 words: Maximum before significant drop
**Character & Line Length:**
- Line length: 40-60 characters for maximum readability
- Button labels: 15-25 characters
- Page titles: 30-50 characters
- Notification titles: 35-45 characters
### Scoring Rubric (0-10)
**9-10: Excellent**
- No wasted words
- Perfectly concise for the pattern
- Meets or beats benchmark
- Front-loaded key information
**7-8: Good**
- Generally concise
- Minor redundancies
- Close to benchmark
- Mostly front-loaded
**5-6: Adequate**
- Some unnecessary words
- Could be tighter
- Slightly over benchmark
- Some buried information
**3-4: Needs Work**
- Verbose
- Significant redundancies
- Well over benchmark
- Key info buried
**1-2: Poor**
- Extremely wordy
- Many unnecessary phrases
- Far exceeds benchmarks
- Difficult to scan
**0: Unacceptable**
- Incomprehensibly verbose
### Examples
**Low Concise (4/10):**
"Please be advised that your request has been received and is currently being processed by our team." (17 words)
- "Please be advised that" = 4 wasted words
- "currently being" = unnecessary qualifiers
- Passive voice adds words
**High Concise (9/10):**
"We're processing your request." (4 words)
- Active voice
- No wasted words
- Clear and direct
- 76% shorter
---
## 3. Conversational
### Definition
Sounds natural and human, as if you're speaking directly to someone. Not robotic or overly formal.
### Evaluation Questions
- Would you actually say this out loud?
- Does it use active voice?
- Are there natural connecting words (prepositions, articles)?
- Is it free of corporate jargon and buzzwords?
- Does it feel human?
### Guidelines
**Active vs. Passive Voice:**
- Target: 85% active voice
- Active: "We sent your email" (clear actor)
- Passive: "Your email has been sent" (no clear actor)
**Natural Language Indicators:**
- Includes articles (a, an, the)
- Includes prepositions (to, from, with)
- Uses contractions appropriately (we'll, you're, can't)
- Avoids formal constructions ("kindly", "please be advised")
**Anti-Patterns to Avoid:**
- "An error has occurred"
- "Your request has been received"
- "Please be advised that"
- "Kindly note that"
- "We are pleased to inform you"
### Scoring Rubric (0-10)
**9-10: Excellent**
- Completely natural
- Would say this in person
- Active voice throughout
- Human and warm
**7-8: Good**
- Mostly natural
- Minor stiffness
- Mostly active voice
- Generally conversational
**5-6: Adequate**
- Some natural elements
- Mix of active/passive
- Some corporate phrases
- Readable but not warm
**3-4: Needs Work**
- Stiff and formal
- Heavy passive voice
- Corporate jargon
- Robotic tone
**1-2: Poor**
- Extremely robotic
- All passive voice
- Heavy jargon
- Unnatural phrasing
**0: Unacceptable**
- Incomprehensible jargon
### Examples
**Low Conversational (3/10):**
"Your payment transaction has been successfully processed and a confirmation has been sent to your registered email address."
- All passive voice
- Formal, robotic
- Wouldn't say this aloud
- Corporate tone
**High Conversational (9/10):**
"Payment complete. We sent a confirmation to your email."
- Active voice ("we sent")
- Natural, direct
- How you'd actually speak
- Human tone
---
## 4. Clear
### Definition
Unambiguous and easy to understand. Uses specific language that's accessible to the target audience.
### Evaluation Questions
- Is there only one way to interpret this?
- Are verbs specific and meaningful?
- Is terminology consistent with the product?
- Does it meet readability targets?
- Could it be misunderstood?
### Reading Level Guidelines
**By Audience:**
- **General public**: 7th-8th grade (Flesch-Kincaid)
- **Professional tools**: 9th-10th grade
- **Technical products**: 10th-11th grade
- **Specialized fields**: 11th-12th grade (only when necessary)
**Testing Tools:**
- Hemingway Editor: Highlights complex sentences
- Readable.com: Multiple readability scores
- Microsoft Word: Built-in Flesch-Kincaid scoring
### Clarity Best Practices
**Use Specific Verbs:**
- ❌ Generic: "Process", "Handle", "Manage"
- ✅ Specific: "Send", "Delete", "Create"
**Avoid Ambiguity:**
- ❌ "Update soon" (when?)
- ✅ "Update in 5 minutes"
- ❌ "Several items" (how many?)
- ✅ "3 items"
**Plain Language:**
- Use common words over complex ones
- ❌ "Utilize" → ✅ "Use"
- ❌ "Terminate" → ✅ "End"
- ❌ "Purchase" → ✅ "Buy"
**Consistent Terminology:**
- Pick one term and stick with it
- Don't alternate between "remove" and "delete"
- Don't switch between "save" and "submit"
### Scoring Rubric (0-10)
**9-10: Excellent**
- Crystal clear
- Unambiguous
- Perfect terminology
- Ideal reading level
- Specific verbs
**7-8: Good**
- Generally clear
- Minor ambiguities
- Good terminology
- Appropriate reading level
- Mostly specific verbs
**5-6: Adequate**
- Understandable
- Some ambiguity
- Inconsistent terminology
- Slightly high reading level
- Some generic verbs
**3-4: Needs Work**
- Confusing in places
- Significant ambiguity
- Poor terminology
- Too high reading level
- Generic verbs
**1-2: Poor**
- Very confusing
- Highly ambiguous
- Jargon-heavy
- Far too complex
- Vague language
**0: Unacceptable**
- Incomprehensible
### Examples
**Low Clear (4/10):**
"Please proceed to finalize your transaction at your earliest convenience."
- "Proceed to finalize" = jargon
- "At your earliest convenience" = vague timing
- "Transaction" = generic
- High reading level
**High Clear (9/10):**
"Complete your purchase now."
- "Complete" = specific action
- "Purchase" = clear object
- "Now" = clear timing
- Simple, direct language
---
## Applying the Framework
### Step-by-Step Process
**1. Draft the text**
- Start with conversation: what would you say?
- Don't worry about perfection yet
**2. Edit for Purposeful**
- Is user benefit clear?
- Are concerns addressed?
- Does it advance goals?
**3. Edit for Concise**
- Remove unnecessary words
- Front-load key information
- Check against benchmarks
**4. Edit for Conversational**
- Read aloud: would you say this?
- Convert passive to active
- Remove corporate speak
**5. Edit for Clear**
- Use specific verbs
- Check reading level
- Eliminate ambiguity
**6. Score and validate**
- Score each standard 0-10
- Average for overall score
- Target: 8+ overall
### Overall Scoring
**Calculate Average:**
(Purposeful + Concise + Conversational + Clear) ÷ 4 = Overall Score
**Quality Benchmarks:**
- **9-10**: Excellent - Ship it
- **8-8.9**: Very Good - Minor tweaks only
- **7-7.9**: Good - Consider improvements
- **6-6.9**: Adequate - Needs work
- **Below 6**: Poor - Requires significant revision
### When Standards Conflict
Sometimes improving one standard slightly reduces another. Prioritize based on context:
**High-stakes actions (delete, payment):**
- Prioritize: Clear > Purposeful > Concise > Conversational
- Better to be thorough than brief
**Routine actions (save, send):**
- Prioritize: Concise > Clear > Conversational > Purposeful
- Users want efficiency
**First-time use:**
- Prioritize: Purposeful > Clear > Conversational > Concise
- Users need guidance
**Error states:**
- Prioritize: Purposeful > Conversational > Clear > Concise
- Users need empathy and solutions
## Common Patterns & Expected Scores
### Excellent Button (9/10)
"Delete account"
- Purposeful: 10/10 (clear action)
- Concise: 10/10 (2 words)
- Conversational: 8/10 (imperative form)
- Clear: 10/10 (specific verb)
### Excellent Error (9/10)
"Payment failed. Check your card and try again."
- Purposeful: 9/10 (problem + solution)
- Concise: 9/10 (8 words)
- Conversational: 9/10 (active, empathetic)
- Clear: 9/10 (specific guidance)
### Excellent Empty State (9/10)
"No messages yet. Start a conversation to connect."
- Purposeful: 9/10 (clear benefit)
- Concise: 10/10 (8 words)
- Conversational: 9/10 (encouraging)
- Clear: 9/10 (specific action)
## Resources & References
This framework is based on:
- Sarah Richards: "Content Design"
- Torrey Podmajersky: "Strategic Writing for UX"
- Google Material Design guidelines
- Nielsen Norman Group research
- WCAG accessibility standards
- Flesch-Kincaid readability research
## Quick Reference Card
**Purposeful:**
✅ User benefit clear
✅ Addresses concerns
✅ Advances goals
**Concise:**
✅ No wasted words
✅ Front-loaded
✅ Meets benchmarks
**Conversational:**
✅ Natural language
✅ Active voice
✅ Human tone
**Clear:**
✅ Unambiguous
✅ Specific verbs
✅ Appropriate reading level

View File

@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
# UX Text Patterns — Detailed Examples
This document provides extended examples of common UX text patterns applied across three different product voices: TAPP Transit (helpful, efficient, trustworthy), 'appee Social Game (playful, competitive, rewarding), and Sturgeon Club (sophisticated, exclusive, elegant).
## Titles
### Brand Title
Identifies the product/organization
**TAPP Transit**: "TAPP"
**'appee**: "'appee"
**Sturgeon Club**: "The Sturgeon Club"
### Content Title
Reflects what's on the screen
**TAPP Transit**: "Your routes", "Bus schedule", "Payment methods"
**'appee**: "Your photos", "Leaderboard", "Daily challenge"
**Sturgeon Club**: "Your reservations", "Member directory", "Event calendar"
### Category Title (Ambiguous Task)
Covers multiple related actions
**TAPP Transit**: "Trip planning", "Account settings", "Help and support"
**'appee**: "Profile settings", "Game stats", "Photo gallery"
**Sturgeon Club**: "Membership benefits", "Venue access", "Concierge services"
### Task Title (Single Action)
Acts as instruction for one task
**TAPP Transit**: "Buy a day pass", "Report a problem", "Change your email"
**'appee**: "Upload a photo", "Vote on photos", "Invite a friend"
**Sturgeon Club**: "Reserve a table", "Update your preferences", "Download your invoice"
---
## Buttons
### Primary Actions
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Buy pass"
- "Track bus"
- "Plan trip"
- "Report issue"
**'appee**:
- "Upload photo"
- "Vote now"
- "Challenge friend"
- "Claim reward"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Reserve table"
- "View details"
- "Confirm attendance"
- "Request service"
### Secondary Actions
**TAPP Transit**:
- "View schedule"
- "Cancel"
- "Go back"
- "Skip"
**'appee**:
- "See rules"
- "Maybe later"
- "Pass"
- "View profile"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Learn more"
- "Decline"
- "Return"
- "Not now"
### Destructive Actions
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Delete payment method"
- "Cancel trip"
- "Remove favorite"
**'appee**:
- "Delete photo"
- "Leave game"
- "Remove friend"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Cancel reservation"
- "Remove guest"
- "Close account"
---
## Links
### Navigational Links
**TAPP Transit**:
- "See all routes"
- "View trip history"
- "Check real-time updates"
**'appee**:
- "Browse all challenges"
- "See your stats"
- "View friend activity"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Explore member benefits"
- "View upcoming events"
- "Access your membership card"
### Contextual Links
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Learn about fare options"
- "Get help with passes"
- "Contact support"
**'appee**:
- "How scoring works"
- "Tips for better photos"
- "Report a problem"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Terms of membership"
- "Dress code requirements"
- "Concierge contacts"
---
## Error Messages
### Inline Errors
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Email must include @"
- "Card number is incomplete"
- "Pick a future date"
**'appee**:
- "Username already taken"
- "Photo must be under 10MB"
- "Needs at least 3 characters"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Email address required"
- "Valid phone number required"
- "Select a date"
### Detour Errors
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "Can't buy pass"
**Body**: "Your payment didn't go through. Check your card details and try again."
**Action**: "Update card"
**'appee**:
**Title**: "Upload failed"
**Body**: "Your photo couldn't be uploaded. Check your connection and try again."
**Action**: "Retry upload"
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "Reservation unavailable"
**Body**: "This time slot is no longer available. Please select another time."
**Action**: "Choose different time"
### Blocking Errors
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "Service temporarily unavailable"
**Body**: "We're updating our systems and will be back online in about 15 minutes. Your saved trips and passes are safe."
**Action**: "Check status"
**'appee**:
**Title**: "Update required"
**Body**: "You need the latest version of 'appee to continue playing. Update now to access new challenges and features."
**Action**: "Update app"
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "Membership renewal required"
**Body**: "Your membership expired on March 15. Renew your membership to continue accessing club services."
**Action**: "Renew membership"
---
## Success Messages
### Simple Confirmation
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Pass purchased"
- "Favorite added"
- "Route saved"
- "Email updated"
**'appee**:
- "Photo uploaded"
- "Vote recorded"
- "Friend added"
- "Profile saved"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Reservation confirmed"
- "Preferences updated"
- "Guest added"
- "Payment processed"
### Detailed Success
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "Trip saved"
**Body**: "You'll get a reminder 30 minutes before your bus arrives."
**'appee**:
**Title**: "Challenge complete!"
**Body**: "You earned 50 points. Check the leaderboard to see your ranking."
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "Reservation confirmed"
**Body**: "Table for 4 on Saturday, May 20 at 7:30 PM. You'll receive a reminder the day before."
---
## Empty States
### First-Use Empty State
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "No saved routes yet"
**Body**: "Save your frequent trips for quick access."
**Action**: "Plan a trip"
**'appee**:
**Title**: "No photos yet"
**Body**: "Upload your first photo to start earning points."
**Action**: "Upload photo"
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "No upcoming reservations"
**Body**: "Reserve a table at any of our exclusive venues."
**Action**: "Make reservation"
### User-Cleared Empty State
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "All caught up"
**Body**: "You've completed all your trips for today."
**'appee**:
**Title**: "You're all done!"
**Body**: "You've voted on all today's photos. New challenges arrive tomorrow."
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "No pending requests"
**Body**: "You're all set. We'll notify you when we process your reservation."
### Error Empty State
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "No results found"
**Body**: "Try a different search or browse all routes."
**Action**: "See all routes"
**'appee**:
**Title**: "No photos match your search"
**Body**: "Try different keywords or browse all photos."
**Action**: "Browse photos"
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "No events match your criteria"
**Body**: "Adjust your filters or view all upcoming events."
**Action**: "View all events"
---
## Notifications
### Action-Required
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "Your bus is arriving"
**Body**: "Route 42 to Downtown arrives in 2 minutes at Bay St."
**'appee**:
**Title**: "New challenge available"
**Body**: "Today's theme: Sunset. Upload by midnight to compete."
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "Reservation reminder"
**Body**: "Your reservation is tonight at 7:30 PM. Confirm or modify by 5 PM."
**Actions**: "Confirm" | "Modify"
### Passive
**TAPP Transit**:
**Title**: "Service update"
**Body**: "Route 15 is running 5 minutes late due to traffic."
**'appee**:
**Title**: "You earned a badge"
**Body**: "Weekly Warrior: Uploaded photos 7 days in a row."
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Title**: "New event announced"
**Body**: "Wine tasting on June 15. Reserve your spot before it fills."
---
## Form Fields
### Labels
**TAPP Transit**: "Email address", "Card number", "Expiration date", "Security code"
**'appee**: "Username", "Display name", "Bio", "Profile photo"
**Sturgeon Club**: "Member name", "Phone number", "Dietary preferences", "Guest names"
### Instructions (Helper Text)
**TAPP Transit**:
- "We'll send trip updates to this email"
- "This card will be saved securely for future purchases"
- "Shown on your receipts and account"
**'appee**:
- "Choose a unique name others will see"
- "Tell other players about yourself"
- "Upload a photo that represents you"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Required for reservation confirmations"
- "We'll contact you about events and updates"
- "Help us prepare the perfect dining experience"
### Placeholder Text
**TAPP Transit**: "name@example.com", "4111 1111 1111 1111", "MM/YY"
**'appee**: "PhotoPro2024", "About me...", "Add caption"
**Sturgeon Club**: "John Smith", "(555) 555-5555", "Guest name"
---
## Controls
### Toggle Switches
**TAPP Transit**:
- **Name**: "Real-time updates"
- **Description**: "Get notifications when your bus is arriving"
**'appee**:
- **Name**: "Push notifications"
- **Description**: "Get notified about new challenges and friend activity"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- **Name**: "Event reminders"
- **Description**: "Receive notifications about upcoming reservations and events"
### Checkboxes
**TAPP Transit**:
- "Remember this payment method"
- "Include accessibility information"
- "Show express routes only"
**'appee**:
- "Make profile public"
- "Allow friend requests"
- "Share scores on leaderboard"
**Sturgeon Club**:
- "Send event invitations"
- "Include guests in communications"
- "Opt in to exclusive offers"
---
## Instructions
### Static Instructions
**TAPP Transit**: "Tap your card when you board and when you exit."
**'appee**: "Upload one photo per day to earn points."
**Sturgeon Club**: "Present your membership card upon arrival."
### On-Demand Instructions
**TAPP Transit**:
**Trigger**: Help icon next to "Transfer"
**Content**: "Switch to another bus or train at connecting stops. Your pass covers transfers within 2 hours."
**'appee**:
**Trigger**: Question mark next to "Challenge rules"
**Content**: "Upload a photo matching today's theme by midnight. Other players vote on entries. Top 10 photos earn bonus points."
**Sturgeon Club**:
**Trigger**: Info icon next to "Guest policy"
**Content**: "Members may bring up to 3 guests per visit. Guest names must be provided 24 hours in advance for evening reservations."
---
## Key Differences by Voice
**TAPP Transit (Helpful, Efficient, Trustworthy)**:
- Direct, clear, informative
- Focuses on practical information
- Anticipates user needs
- Transparent about problems
**'appee (Playful, Competitive, Rewarding)**:
- Energetic, encouraging language
- Emphasizes achievement and competition
- Celebrates user actions
- Uses exclamation points appropriately
**Sturgeon Club (Sophisticated, Exclusive, Elegant)**:
- Polished, refined tone
- Emphasizes service and quality
- More formal phrasing
- Sophisticated word choices
All three maintain the core UX principles: purposeful, concise, conversational (within voice), and clear.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
# Real-World UX Writing Improvements
This document shows actual UX text transformations with scoring against the four quality standards: Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, and Clear.
## E-commerce Checkout Error
### Before
"An error has occurred while processing your payment. Please try again later or contact customer support if the problem persists."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 2/10 — Doesn't help user recover or understand next steps
- **Concise**: 4/10 — 18 words, vague timeframe ("later")
- **Conversational**: 4/10 — Robotic system-speak ("an error has occurred")
- **Clear**: 2/10 — What error? When is "later"? Why did it fail?
**Overall**: 3/10 — Poor user experience
### After
"We couldn't process your payment. Check your card details and try again."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 9/10 — Provides specific next action
- **Concise**: 9/10 — 11 words, direct instruction
- **Conversational**: 9/10 — Natural language ("we couldn't")
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Specific problem and solution
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: Users know exactly what failed (payment), likely cause (card details), and what to do (check and retry).
---
## SaaS Dashboard Empty State
### Before
"No data available."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 2/10 — Doesn't explain why or guide next steps
- **Concise**: 10/10 — Very brief, but too brief
- **Conversational**: 5/10 — Cold and unhelpful
- **Clear**: 3/10 — Technically accurate but not helpful
**Overall**: 4/10 — Needs significant work
### After
"No data yet. Connect your account to see insights."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 9/10 — Explains state and provides clear CTA
- **Concise**: 9/10 — 9 words, includes action
- **Conversational**: 8/10 — Friendly "yet" implies this is temporary
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Tells you exactly what to do
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: "Yet" creates expectation of future value, CTA is specific and actionable.
---
## Mobile App Permission Request
### Before
"'AppName' Would Like to Access Your Location"
[Allow] [Don't Allow]
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 4/10 — Doesn't explain benefit to user
- **Concise**: 7/10 — Adequate length but no context
- **Conversational**: 6/10 — Standard iOS pattern, not particularly engaging
- **Clear**: 5/10 — Action is clear but reason isn't
**Overall**: 5/10 — Adequate but could be better
### After
"Enable location to find coffee shops near you"
[Allow] [Not now]
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 9/10 — Clear user benefit (find shops)
- **Concise**: 8/10 — 7 words with value proposition
- **Conversational**: 9/10 — Direct, benefit-focused
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Exact benefit stated upfront
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: Leads with user benefit, not system need. "Not now" is less final than "Don't Allow."
---
## Account Deletion Confirmation
### Before
"Are you sure you want to delete your account? This action cannot be undone. All your data will be permanently deleted."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 6/10 — Warns of consequences but feels heavy-handed
- **Concise**: 5/10 — 19 words, some redundancy ("permanently deleted")
- **Conversational**: 5/10 — Somewhat robotic multiple sentences
- **Clear**: 7/10 — Consequences are clear
**Overall**: 6/10 — Adequate but could be improved
### After
"Delete your account? You'll lose all your data and this can't be undone."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 8/10 — Clear warning without being preachy
- **Concise**: 9/10 — 13 words, no redundancy
- **Conversational**: 9/10 — Natural phrasing, contraction
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Consequences clearly stated
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: Question format engages user, contractions feel human, consequences clear without repetition.
---
## Password Requirements
### Before
"Password must contain at least 8 characters including uppercase letters, lowercase letters, numbers and special characters."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 7/10 — Provides requirements but hard to scan
- **Concise**: 4/10 — 17 words in one dense sentence
- **Conversational**: 5/10 — List reads like technical documentation
- **Clear**: 6/10 — Complete info but overwhelming format
**Overall**: 5/10 — Adequate but not optimal
### After
"Create a strong password (8+ characters)
Use a mix of letters, numbers, and symbols"
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 8/10 — Explains why (strong) and what
- **Concise**: 9/10 — 14 words, broken into scannable lines
- **Conversational**: 9/10 — "Create" vs "must contain"
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Easy to scan and understand
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: Two short lines easier to scan, "strong password" explains purpose, active voice.
---
## Newsletter Unsubscribe Confirmation
### Before
"You have been successfully unsubscribed from our mailing list. You will no longer receive emails from us. Thank you for your participation."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 4/10 — Overly formal for someone leaving
- **Concise**: 3/10 — 23 words, lots of redundancy
- **Conversational**: 3/10 — Corporate, stiff
- **Clear**: 7/10 — Message is clear but verbose
**Overall**: 4/10 — Needs work
### After
"You're unsubscribed. You can resubscribe anytime in your settings."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 9/10 — Confirms action, offers easy reversal
- **Concise**: 10/10 — 9 words, direct
- **Conversational**: 10/10 — Casual, respectful
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Simple and actionable
**Overall**: 9/10 — Excellent
**Why it works**: Respects user's decision, provides exit ramp without guilt, uses contraction.
---
## File Upload Progress
### Before
"File uploading... Please wait."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 5/10 — Shows status but no time estimate
- **Concise**: 8/10 — Very brief
- **Conversational**: 5/10 — Somewhat robotic
- **Clear**: 6/10 — Basic info only
**Overall**: 6/10 — Adequate
### After
"Uploading report.pdf... Almost done"
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful**: 8/10 — Shows filename and reassuring progress
- **Concise**: 8/10 — 4 words plus filename
- **Conversational**: 9/10 — Encouraging "almost done"
- **Clear**: 9/10 — Specific file being uploaded
**Overall**: 8/10 — Good
**Why it works**: Filename confirms right file is uploading, "almost done" reduces anxiety.
---
## Common Patterns Across These Improvements
1. **Lead with specifics, not generics** — "We couldn't process your payment" vs "An error occurred"
2. **Show user benefit before system need** — "Find coffee shops" before "access location"
3. **Use contractions** — "You're" feels human, "You are" feels robotic
4. **Break dense text into scannable chunks** — Two short lines beat one long sentence
5. **Remove redundancy** — "Permanently deleted" → "can't be undone"
6. **Use active voice** — "Create a password" vs "Password must contain"
7. **Provide recovery paths** — Always tell users what to do next
8. **Respect user decisions** — Don't guilt-trip people who opt out
## Quick Self-Audit Questions
Use these to improve any UX text:
1. **Can I remove any words without losing meaning?**
2. **Does this explain what the user needs to know right now?**
3. **Would I actually say this out loud to a friend?**
4. **Is there a specific verb I could use instead of a generic one?**
5. **Am I showing value before asking for something?**

View File

@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
# UX Writing Benchmarks & Research-Backed Metrics
Research-validated benchmarks for creating effective interface copy.
## Sentence Length & Comprehension
### Comprehension Rates by Word Count
Based on readability research:
- **8 words or fewer**: 100% user comprehension
- **14 words or fewer**: 90% user comprehension
- **20 words**: 80% user comprehension
- **25 words**: Maximum before significant comprehension drop
- **30+ words**: Comprehension drops below 60%
### Recommended Sentence Lengths by Content Type
**Critical Content (errors, warnings, confirmations):**
- Target: 8-14 words maximum
- Why: Users need immediate understanding in high-stress moments
- Example: "Delete account? You'll lose all data and this can't be undone." (12 words - 90% comprehension)
**Instructions & Guidance:**
- Target: 14 words ideal, 20 words maximum
- Why: Clear step-by-step requires brevity
- Example: "Connect your bank to see spending insights. We'll guide you through it." (13 words)
**Body/Explanatory Text:**
- Target: 15-20 words average per sentence
- Why: Provides context while maintaining readability
- Example: "Your free trial includes all premium features for 30 days. After that, choose a plan or continue with our free version." (22 words - acceptable for explanation)
**Buttons & CTAs:**
- Target: 2-4 words ideal, 6 words absolute maximum
- Why: Users need instant recognition of action
- Examples: "Save changes" (2 words), "Start free trial" (3 words)
**Titles & Headers:**
- Target: 3-6 words, 40 characters maximum
- Why: Scannable navigation and orientation
- Examples: "Account settings" (2 words), "Your trip history" (3 words)
---
## Character & Line Length
### Optimal Reading Line Length
**Research-backed range: 40-60 characters per line**
**Why it matters:**
- **Below 40 chars**: Too choppy, excessive eye movement
- **40-60 chars**: Optimal reading rhythm and comprehension
- **Above 60 chars**: Eye strain, loss of reading position
### Character Limits by UI Element
**Buttons:**
- Ideal: 15-25 characters
- Maximum: 40 characters
- Examples: "Save changes" (12 chars ✓), "Submit application" (18 chars ✓)
**Page Titles:**
- Ideal: 20-40 characters
- Maximum: 50 characters
- Truncates in most UIs beyond this
**Notification Titles:**
- Ideal: 25-35 characters
- Maximum: 45 characters
- Mobile truncation happens earlier
**Notification Body:**
- Ideal: 80-120 characters
- Maximum: 180 characters
- 2-3 lines on mobile
**Error Messages:**
- Ideal: 80-140 characters
- Maximum: 200 characters
- Includes problem + solution
**Toast/Snackbar Messages:**
- Ideal: 40-80 characters
- Maximum: 100 characters
- Brief, glanceable confirmations
---
## Reading Level Guidelines
### Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Targets
**General Public / Consumer Products:**
- **Target**: 7th-8th grade
- **Why**: Accessible to 80% of US adults
- **Examples**: Banking apps, social media, e-commerce
**Professional Tools / B2B SaaS:**
- **Target**: 9th-10th grade
- **Why**: Professional audience expects slight elevation
- **Examples**: Project management, CRM, analytics tools
**Technical Products / Developer Tools:**
- **Target**: 10th-11th grade
- **Why**: Technical terminology necessary
- **Examples**: IDEs, API documentation, dev platforms
**Specialized Fields (Legal, Medical, Academic):**
- **Target**: 11th-12th grade
- **Why**: Domain-specific language required
- **Note**: Only when absolutely necessary; plain language preferred
### Reading Ease Scores (Flesch Reading Ease)
- **90-100**: Very Easy (5th grade)
- **80-90**: Easy (6th grade)
- **70-80**: Fairly Easy (7th grade) ← Target for consumer products
- **60-70**: Standard (8th-9th grade) ← Target for professional tools
- **50-60**: Fairly Difficult (10th-12th grade)
- **30-50**: Difficult (College)
- **0-30**: Very Difficult (Graduate)
---
## Word Count Benchmarks
### By UI Pattern
**Buttons:**
- Minimum: 1 word (rare, only icons + ARIA labels)
- Ideal: 2-4 words
- Maximum: 6 words
- Examples:
- "Save" (1 word - acceptable for common actions)
- "Save changes" (2 words - ideal)
- "Save and continue" (3 words - good)
- "Delete account permanently" (3 words - maximum for destructive)
**Error Messages:**
- Inline validation: 3-6 words
- "Email must include @" (4 words)
- Detour errors: 10-15 words
- "Payment failed. Check your card details and try again." (10 words)
- Blocking errors: 15-25 words
- "Service temporarily unavailable. We're updating and will be back in 15 minutes. Your data is safe." (17 words)
**Success Messages:**
- Brief confirmations: 2-5 words
- "Changes saved" (2 words)
- "Email sent successfully" (3 words)
- Detailed success: 8-15 words
- "Trip saved. You'll get a reminder 30 minutes before your bus arrives." (13 words)
**Empty States:**
- Title: 2-5 words
- "No messages yet" (3 words)
- Body: 8-15 words
- "Start a conversation to connect with your team." (8 words)
- Total: 10-20 words (title + body + CTA)
**Notifications:**
- Title only: 4-8 words
- "Your bus is arriving" (4 words)
- Title + body: 15-25 words total
- "Your bus is arriving. Route 42 to Downtown arrives in 2 minutes at Bay St." (15 words)
**Form Labels:**
- Ideal: 2-4 words
- Maximum: 6 words
- Examples: "Email address" (2 words), "Phone number" (2 words)
**Form Instructions (Helper Text):**
- Ideal: 6-12 words
- Maximum: 20 words
- Example: "We'll send trip updates to this email" (7 words)
**Tooltips:**
- Ideal: 8-15 words
- Maximum: 25 words
- Brief, contextual explanation
---
## Active vs. Passive Voice
### Target: 85% Active Voice
**Why it matters:**
- Active voice is clearer and more engaging
- Passive voice adds words and obscures responsibility
- Active voice feels more conversational and human
**Examples:**
| Passive (Wordy & Unclear) | Active (Clear & Concise) | Words Saved |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|-------------|
| "Your payment has been processed" | "We processed your payment" | 1 word |
| "Your request has been received" | "We received your request" | 1 word |
| "An error has occurred" | "We found an error" | 1 word |
| "Your file is being uploaded" | "We're uploading your file" | 1 word |
**When passive voice is acceptable:**
- When actor is unknown: "Your session expired" (vs unclear "We expired your session")
- When action is more important than actor: "File deleted" (vs "You deleted the file")
- When avoiding blame: "Payment declined" (vs "Your bank declined payment")
---
## Accessibility Benchmarks
### WCAG Compliance
**WCAG Level AA Requirements for Text:**
- Color contrast: 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold)
- Text alternatives: All images and icons have text equivalents
- Link text: Descriptive (not "click here")
- Form labels: Present and programmatically associated
- Error identification: Text description (not color alone)
### Cognitive Accessibility
**Sentence length for maximum accessibility:**
- **8-14 words**: Optimal for users with cognitive disabilities
- **Keep paragraphs to 3-4 sentences maximum**
- **Use headings every 3-4 paragraphs**
**Plain language requirements:**
- Define abbreviations on first use
- Avoid idioms and metaphors
- Use common words over complex ones
- Provide explanations for technical terms
---
## Mobile vs. Desktop Considerations
### Mobile-Specific Benchmarks
**Character limits (tighter due to screen size):**
- Button labels: 12-18 characters (vs 25 desktop)
- Page titles: 25-35 characters (vs 50 desktop)
- Notification text: 60-100 characters (vs 180 desktop)
**Word counts (same or fewer):**
- Follow desktop benchmarks or go shorter
- Mobile users scan even faster
- Thumb-friendly tap targets need brief labels
**Line length (narrower):**
- Target: 30-50 characters per line
- Mobile screens naturally constrain line length
- Avoid artificially wide text blocks
---
## Industry-Specific Benchmarks
### E-commerce
**Product titles:** 50-60 characters optimal for search
**Add to cart button:** "Add to cart" (3 words) or "Add to bag" (3 words)
**Checkout buttons:** "Proceed to checkout" (3 words), "Complete purchase" (2 words)
**Error messages:** Critical for cart abandonment - must be under 15 words
### Finance/Banking
**Security messages:** Can be slightly longer (18-25 words) to establish trust
**Transaction confirmations:** Be very specific - 12-20 words
**Reading level:** Target 8th grade despite professional domain
**Error messages:** Must include recovery steps - 15-20 words
### Healthcare
**Privacy notices:** Can be longer but break into sections
**Appointment confirmations:** Be extremely specific - 15-25 words
**Medication instructions:** Critical clarity - 10-18 words per step
**Reading level:** 6th-7th grade (lowest acceptable for health literacy)
### SaaS/Productivity
**Onboarding:** Can be more verbose (20-30 words) to educate
**Feature tooltips:** 12-20 words for explanation
**Error messages:** Include support links - 15-25 words
**Empty states:** Emphasize value - 15-25 words total
---
## Testing & Measurement Tools
### Readability Testing
**Free Tools:**
- **Hemingway Editor** (hemingwayapp.com): Highlights complex sentences, passive voice
- **Readable** (readable.com): Multiple readability scores
- **Microsoft Word**: Built-in Flesch-Kincaid scoring
- **Grammarly**: Readability score and suggestions
**What to measure:**
- Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
- Flesch Reading Ease Score
- Average sentence length
- Passive voice percentage
### Usability Testing
**Comprehension testing:**
- Show text to 5 users
- Ask: "What do you think happens when you click this?"
- Target: 100% correct interpretation
**Time to comprehension:**
- Users should understand in 2 seconds or less
- If users pause or reread, text needs work
**A/B testing:**
- Test concise vs. verbose versions
- Measure task completion rate
- Track error rates
---
## Quick Reference Table
| UI Element | Words | Characters | Reading Level | Comprehension |
|-----------|-------|-----------|---------------|---------------|
| Button | 2-4 (6 max) | 15-25 | 7th grade | 100% |
| Error inline | 3-6 | 25-40 | 7th grade | 100% |
| Error detour | 10-15 | 80-120 | 7th grade | 90% |
| Error blocking | 15-25 | 120-180 | 8th grade | 90% |
| Success brief | 2-5 | 15-35 | 7th grade | 100% |
| Success detailed | 8-15 | 60-100 | 7th grade | 90% |
| Empty state title | 2-5 | 20-35 | 7th grade | 100% |
| Empty state body | 8-15 | 60-100 | 7th grade | 90% |
| Notification | 15-25 | 100-180 | 8th grade | 90% |
| Form label | 2-4 | 15-30 | 7th grade | 100% |
| Form instruction | 6-12 | 50-80 | 7th grade | 90% |
| Tooltip | 8-15 | 60-100 | 8th grade | 90% |
---
## References & Research Sources
- Nielsen Norman Group: "How Users Read on the Web" (F-pattern, scanning behavior)
- Readable.io: Sentence length and comprehension studies
- American Press Institute: Readability research
- WCAG 2.1: Accessibility guidelines
- Flesch-Kincaid: Reading ease formula
- Material Design: Content guidelines
- Sarah Richards: "Content Design" (UK Government Digital Service research)
- Ginny Redish: "Letting Go of the Words" (usability research)

View File

@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
# Analyze UX Text Task
Analyze interface copy against the Four Quality Standards framework and provide objective scoring with improvement recommendations.
## Task Overview
This task evaluates UX text (buttons, error messages, labels, etc.) using the research-backed Four Quality Standards: Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, and Clear.
## Inputs Required
1. **The text to analyze**: The actual interface copy
2. **Context**: What is this text for? (button, error message, notification, etc.)
3. **User scenario**: What is the user trying to do?
4. **Current location**: Where does this appear in the product?
## Elicitation Process
Ask the user for the following information:
**1. Share the text**
```
Please provide the interface text you'd like me to analyze.
```
**2. Gather context**
```
Help me understand the context:
1. What type of UI element is this? (button, error message, notification, empty state, form label, etc.)
2. What is the user trying to accomplish when they see this?
3. Where does this appear in your product?
4. What is the user's likely emotional state? (confident, frustrated, confused, cautious)
```
**3. Optional: Target audience**
```
Who is your target audience? (general public, professionals, technical users, etc.)
```
## Analysis Framework
### Score Each Standard (0-10 scale)
**1. Purposeful (Does it help user/business achieve goals?)**
- 9-10: Clear user benefit, addresses concerns, advances goals
- 5-8: Some user benefit but could be more targeted
- 1-4: Unclear purpose or doesn't help user/business
- 0: No discernible purpose
**Evaluation questions:**
- Does this help the user accomplish their goal?
- Is the value to the user clear?
- Are user concerns anticipated and addressed?
- Does it serve a business objective?
**2. Concise (Uses fewest words without losing meaning?)**
- 9-10: No wasted words, perfectly concise
- 5-8: Generally concise but some redundancy
- 1-4: Verbose, needs significant trimming
- 0: Extremely wordy
**Evaluation questions:**
- Can any words be removed without losing meaning?
- Is information front-loaded?
- Does every word earn its space?
- Does it meet length benchmarks?
**Benchmarks:**
- Buttons: 2-4 words ideal, 6 maximum
- Error messages: 12-18 words including solution
- Instructions: 14 words ideal, 20 maximum
- Titles: 3-6 words, 40 characters maximum
**3. Conversational (Sounds natural and human?)**
- 9-10: Natural, human, conversational
- 5-8: Mostly natural with some stiffness
- 1-4: Robotic, corporate, unnatural
- 0: Extremely robotic
**Evaluation questions:**
- Would you say this out loud?
- Does it use active voice?
- Are there natural connecting words?
- Is it free of corporate jargon?
**Guidelines:**
- Active voice target: 85% of content
- Include prepositions and articles naturally
- Avoid phrases like "an error has occurred"
**4. Clear (Unambiguous and easy to understand?)**
- 9-10: Crystal clear, unambiguous, accurate
- 5-8: Generally clear with minor ambiguities
- 1-4: Confusing, ambiguous, unclear
- 0: Incomprehensible
**Evaluation questions:**
- Is there only one way to interpret this?
- Are verbs specific and meaningful?
- Is terminology consistent with the product?
- Does it meet readability targets?
**Benchmarks:**
- Reading level: 7th-10th grade (general audience)
- Sentence length: 8-14 words for critical content
- Avoid jargon and technical terms
## Output Format
Present the analysis in this structure:
```markdown
## UX Text Analysis
**Original Text:**
[The text being analyzed]
**Context:** [Type of UI element and user scenario]
---
### Quality Standards Scoring
#### 1. Purposeful: [Score]/10
**Assessment:** [Explanation of why this score]
**Strengths:**
- [What works well]
**Opportunities:**
- [What could be improved]
#### 2. Concise: [Score]/10
**Assessment:** [Explanation with word count if relevant]
**Strengths:**
- [What works well]
**Opportunities:**
- [What could be improved]
#### 3. Conversational: [Score]/10
**Assessment:** [Explanation]
**Strengths:**
- [What works well]
**Opportunities:**
- [What could be improved]
#### 4. Clear: [Score]/10
**Assessment:** [Explanation with reading level if relevant]
**Strengths:**
- [What works well]
**Opportunities:**
- [What could be improved]
---
### Overall Score: [Average]/10
**Overall Assessment:** [Brief summary of the text quality]
---
### Recommended Improvements
[If score is below 8/10, provide specific improvement suggestions]
**Suggested revision:**
[Improved version of the text]
**Why this is better:**
1. **Purposeful:** [Explanation]
2. **Concise:** [Explanation]
3. **Conversational:** [Explanation]
4. **Clear:** [Explanation]
**Improved scores:**
- Purposeful: [New score]/10
- Concise: [New score]/10
- Conversational: [New score]/10
- Clear: [New score]/10
- **Overall: [New average]/10**
```
## Additional Checks
When analyzing, also consider:
### Accessibility
- Does it work for screen readers?
- Is it paired with visual indicators?
- Is language plain and simple?
### Pattern Compliance
- Does it follow best practices for this UI element type?
- Buttons: Imperative verb + object?
- Errors: Problem + solution?
- Empty states: Explanation + CTA?
### Tone Appropriateness
- Does the tone match user emotional state?
- Is it empathetic for error states?
- Is it encouraging for success states?
- Is it serious for high-stakes actions?
## Tips for Analysis
1. **Read aloud** - If it sounds awkward, it likely is
2. **Check word count** - Compare against benchmarks
3. **Test comprehension** - Can user understand in 2 seconds?
4. **Consider context** - Same text works differently in different situations
5. **Think accessibility** - How does this work for all users?
6. **Apply patterns** - Does it follow proven UX text patterns?
## Example Analysis
**Text:** "An error has occurred while processing your request. Please try again later."
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful: 3/10** - Doesn't explain what failed or provide actionable next steps
- **Concise: 5/10** - 12 words, but "an error has occurred" is 4 wasted words
- **Conversational: 3/10** - Robotic system-speak, passive voice
- **Clear: 2/10** - What error? When is "later"? Vague and unhelpful
- **Overall: 3.25/10**
**Improved:** "We couldn't process your request. Check your connection and try again."
- Purposeful: 8/10, Concise: 9/10, Conversational: 9/10, Clear: 8/10
- **Overall: 8.5/10**
## Completion
After providing the analysis:
1. Ask if user wants to see improved version (if not already provided)
2. Offer to analyze additional text
3. Suggest running full audit if multiple pieces of text need review

View File

@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
# Create UX Text Task
Create new interface copy for specific UI patterns using the Four Quality Standards framework and research-backed best practices.
## Task Overview
This task guides you through creating effective interface copy for common UI elements: buttons, error messages, success messages, empty states, notifications, form fields, and onboarding flows.
## Elicitation Process
### 1. Identify Pattern Type
```
What type of interface copy do you need?
1. Button or link
2. Error message
3. Success/confirmation message
4. Empty state
5. Notification
6. Form field (label, instruction, placeholder)
7. Onboarding step
8. Other (please describe)
Please select a number or describe your need.
```
### 2. Gather Context
**For all patterns, ask:**
```
Help me understand the context:
1. **User goal:** What is the user trying to accomplish?
2. **User state:** How is the user likely feeling? (confident, frustrated, confused, cautious, excited)
3. **Stakes:** Is this low-stakes (changing theme) or high-stakes (deleting data)?
4. **Constraints:** Any character limits, technical constraints, or requirements?
```
### 3. Pattern-Specific Questions
**For buttons:**
- What action does this button trigger?
- Is this primary, secondary, or destructive action?
**For error messages:**
- What failed or went wrong?
- Why did it fail (if known)?
- What can the user do to fix it?
- What type: inline validation, system error, or blocking error?
**For empty states:**
- Why is this empty? (first use, user cleared, no results)
- What action would populate this?
**For success messages:**
- What action just completed?
- What benefit did the user get?
**For notifications:**
- What information needs to be communicated?
- Is action required or is this passive information?
- How time-sensitive is this?
**For form fields:**
- What information are you collecting?
- Why do you need this information?
- Are there specific format requirements?
## Creation Framework
Apply the Four Quality Standards:
### 1. Purposeful
- Identify the primary goal (user + business)
- Anticipate user questions/concerns
- Include value proposition when needed
### 2. Concise
- Start with conversational version, then trim
- Remove unnecessary words
- Meet pattern-specific benchmarks
- Front-load key information
### 3. Conversational
- Write how you'd say it
- Use active voice (85% of time)
- Include natural connecting words
- Avoid corporate jargon
### 4. Clear
- Use specific, accurate verbs
- Target appropriate reading level
- Avoid ambiguity
- Use consistent terminology
## Pattern-Specific Guidelines
### Buttons
**Format:** `[Verb] [object]`
**Style:** Active imperative, sentence case
**Length:** 2-4 words ideal, 6 maximum
**Examples:**
- ✅ "Save changes"
- ✅ "Delete account"
- ✅ "Start free trial"
- ❌ "Submit"
- ❌ "OK"
- ❌ "Click here"
**Process:**
1. Identify the action
2. Choose specific verb (not generic)
3. Add object for clarity
4. Keep under 6 words
### Error Messages
**Format:** `[What failed]. [Why, if known]. [What to do].`
**Types:**
**Inline (validation):** Brief guidance
- Pattern: `[Field] [requirement]`
- Example: "Email must include @"
- Length: 3-6 words
**Detour (recoverable):** Problem + solution
- Example: "Payment failed. Check your card details and try again."
- Length: 10-15 words
**Blocking (system):** Explanation + timeline + reassurance
- Example: "Service temporarily unavailable. We're updating our systems and will be back in 15 minutes. Your data is safe."
- Length: 15-25 words
**Key principles:**
- Never blame user
- Be empathetic
- Provide clear recovery path
- Use active voice
- Front-load the problem
### Success Messages
**Format:** `[Action completed] [result/benefit]`
**Style:** Past tense, specific, encouraging
**Length:** 2-5 words ideal
**Examples:**
- ✅ "Changes saved"
- ✅ "Email sent"
- ✅ "Profile updated"
- ❌ "Success!"
- ❌ "Operation completed successfully"
### Empty States
**Format:** Explanation + CTA
**Structure:**
- **Title:** Why it's empty (3-6 words)
- **Body:** Brief guidance (8-15 words)
- **CTA:** Clear next action (2-4 words)
**Example:**
```
No messages yet
Start a conversation to connect with your team.
[Send message]
```
**Types:**
- **First use:** Encourage first action
- **User cleared:** Celebrate completion
- **No results:** Suggest alternative
### Notifications
**Format:** Title + optional body
**Structure:**
- **Title:** Verb-first, specific (6-12 words)
- **Body:** Context and details (10-20 words)
- **Action:** Clear CTA if needed (2-4 words)
**Example:**
```
Your bus is arriving
Route 42 to Downtown arrives in 2 minutes at Bay St.
```
### Form Fields
**Elements:**
**Label:** Noun phrase describing input
- Examples: "Email address", "Phone number", "Date of birth"
- Keep to 2-4 words
**Instruction (helper text):** Explain why needed
- Example: "We'll send updates to this email"
- Length: 6-12 words
**Placeholder:** Use sparingly, standard formats only
- Examples: "name@example.com", "(555) 555-5555"
**Error:** Specific correction guidance
- Example: "Must include @ symbol"
## Output Format
Present created copy in this structure:
```markdown
## Created UX Text
**Pattern:** [Type of UI element]
**Context:** [User scenario]
---
### Recommended Copy
[The created text]
---
### Quality Standards Analysis
**Purposeful (9/10):**
[Explain how this helps user achieve goals]
**Concise ([score]/10):**
[Word count and length assessment]
**Conversational ([score]/10):**
[Natural language assessment]
**Clear ([score]/10):**
[Clarity and comprehension assessment]
**Overall: [Average]/10**
---
### Rationale
**Why this works:**
1. [Explanation tied to standards]
2. [Pattern-specific best practice applied]
3. [Accessibility consideration]
**Alternatives to consider:**
1. [Variation 1] - [When to use this]
2. [Variation 2] - [When to use this]
3. [Variation 3] - [When to use this]
[Provide 2-3 alternative versions with different tones or approaches]
---
### Implementation Notes
**Accessibility:**
- [Screen reader consideration]
- [Cognitive load consideration]
**Technical:**
- Character count: [X]
- Reading level: [Grade level]
- Meets benchmark: [Yes/No]
**Tone:**
- [How tone matches user emotional state]
```
## Tone Adaptation
Adjust tone based on user emotional state:
**Frustrated** (errors, failures)
- Empathetic and solution-focused
- Acknowledge problem without blame
- Clear recovery path
**Confused** (first use, complex)
- Patient and explanatory
- Break down steps
- Provide context
**Confident** (routine tasks)
- Efficient and direct
- Minimal explanation
- Quick confirmation
**Cautious** (high-stakes)
- Serious and transparent
- Clear consequences
- Respectful of decision
**Successful** (completions)
- Positive and encouraging
- Proportional to achievement
- Brief celebration
## Accessibility Checklist
Ensure all created copy:
- [ ] Works for screen readers (descriptive labels)
- [ ] Uses plain language (appropriate reading level)
- [ ] Includes text with visual indicators (not color alone)
- [ ] Keeps critical content to 8-14 words
- [ ] Uses specific, meaningful verbs
- [ ] Provides context at point of action
## Example Creation
**User Request:** "I need an error message for when a file upload fails because it's too large."
**Created Copy:**
```
"Upload failed. File is too large. Choose a file under 10MB."
```
**Analysis:**
- **Purposeful: 9/10** - Clear problem and solution
- **Concise: 10/10** - 11 words, efficient
- **Conversational: 9/10** - Natural, active voice
- **Clear: 9/10** - Specific size limit
- **Overall: 9.25/10**
**Alternatives:**
1. "File too large. Please upload under 10MB." (More concise, 7 words)
2. "We couldn't upload your file because it's too large. Please choose a file under 10MB." (More empathetic, 16 words)
3. "File exceeds 10MB limit. Choose a smaller file." (Direct, 8 words)
## Completion
After creating the copy:
1. Provide the recommended version with scoring
2. Offer 2-3 alternatives with different tones
3. Explain when each variation works best
4. Ask if user wants refinements or additional variations

View File

@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
# Improve UX Text Task
Transform existing interface copy using the Four Quality Standards framework with before/after comparison and detailed scoring.
## Task Overview
This task takes existing UX text and improves it through systematic application of the Four Quality Standards: Purposeful, Concise, Conversational, and Clear.
## Elicitation Process
### 1. Get Original Text
```
Please share the interface text you want to improve.
```
### 2. Gather Context
```
Help me understand:
1. What type of UI element is this? (button, error, notification, etc.)
2. What is the user trying to do when they see this?
3. Where does this appear in your product?
4. What is the user's likely emotional state?
5. Are there any constraints? (character limits, technical requirements, brand guidelines)
```
### 3. Identify Priorities
```
What's most important to improve?
1. Make it more helpful/purposeful
2. Make it more concise
3. Make it sound more natural/human
4. Make it clearer/easier to understand
5. All of the above
(This helps prioritize if there are tradeoffs)
```
## Improvement Process
### Step 1: Analyze Original
Score the original text against four standards (0-10 each):
**Purposeful:**
- Does it help user achieve goals?
- Is value clear?
- Are concerns addressed?
**Concise:**
- Word count vs. benchmarks
- Unnecessary words?
- Front-loaded?
**Conversational:**
- Natural language?
- Active voice?
- Human tone?
**Clear:**
- Unambiguous?
- Specific verbs?
- Appropriate reading level?
### Step 2: Identify Issues
Common problems to look for:
**Purposeful issues:**
- Generic/vague purpose
- Doesn't help user progress
- Missing user benefit
- Doesn't address concerns
**Concise issues:**
- Redundant words ("please note that...")
- Passive constructions ("your request has been received")
- Unnecessary qualifiers ("very", "quite", "really")
- Buried key information
**Conversational issues:**
- Robotic phrases ("an error has occurred")
- Excessive passive voice
- Corporate jargon
- Missing natural connectors
**Clear issues:**
- Ambiguous language
- Technical jargon without explanation
- Generic verbs ("handle", "process")
- High reading level
- Inconsistent terminology
### Step 3: Apply Improvements
**For Purposeful:**
1. Front-load user benefit
2. Add missing context
3. Anticipate questions
4. Make value explicit
**For Concise:**
1. Remove qualifier words
2. Combine redundant phrases
3. Use shorter alternative words
4. Eliminate unnecessary preambles
**For Conversational:**
1. Convert passive to active voice
2. Replace robotic phrases with natural language
3. Write how you'd say it aloud
4. Add contractions where appropriate
**For Clear:**
1. Replace generic verbs with specific ones
2. Simplify complex words
3. Break long sentences
4. Add concrete details
### Step 4: Validate Improvements
Check improved version:
- [ ] Scores higher on all four standards
- [ ] Meets accessibility requirements
- [ ] Follows pattern best practices
- [ ] Respects any constraints
- [ ] Maintains appropriate tone
## Output Format
```markdown
## UX Text Improvement
### Before
**Original Text:**
[The original text]
**Context:** [UI element type and scenario]
**Quality Scoring:**
- Purposeful: [X]/10
- Concise: [X]/10
- Conversational: [X]/10
- Clear: [X]/10
- **Overall: [X]/10**
**Issues Identified:**
1. [Specific problem with standard reference]
2. [Specific problem with standard reference]
3. [Specific problem with standard reference]
---
### After
**Improved Text:**
[The improved text]
**Quality Scoring:**
- Purposeful: [X]/10 ↑ +[improvement]
- Concise: [X]/10 ↑ +[improvement]
- Conversational: [X]/10 ↑ +[improvement]
- Clear: [X]/10 ↑ +[improvement]
- **Overall: [X]/10** ↑ +[total improvement]
---
### What Changed & Why
**1. Purposeful Improvements:**
[Specific changes and why they help user/business goals]
**Example:**
- Removed: [vague phrase]
- Added: [specific user benefit]
- Impact: User now understands [what they gain]
**2. Concise Improvements:**
[Specific changes and word count reduction]
**Example:**
- Original word count: [X] words
- Improved word count: [Y] words
- Reduction: [Z] words ([%] shorter)
- Removed: [unnecessary phrases]
**3. Conversational Improvements:**
[Specific changes and natural language improvements]
**Example:**
- Changed: [robotic phrase] → [natural phrase]
- Voice: Passive → Active
- Tone: [how it's more natural]
**4. Clear Improvements:**
[Specific changes and clarity enhancements]
**Example:**
- Replaced: [generic verb] with [specific verb]
- Simplified: [complex phrase] to [simple phrase]
- Reading level: [old] → [new] grade
---
### Comparison Summary
| Aspect | Before | After | Improvement |
|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
| Word count | [X] | [Y] | -[Z] words |
| Character count | [X] | [Y] | -[Z] chars |
| Reading level | [X] grade | [Y] grade | Clearer |
| Active voice | No/Partial | Yes | More natural |
| User benefit | Unclear | Clear | More purposeful |
---
### Alternative Variations
[Provide 2-3 alternative improved versions with different approaches]
**Variation 1: [Focus]** (e.g., "Ultra-concise")
[Alternative text]
- When to use: [Context where this works better]
**Variation 2: [Focus]** (e.g., "More empathetic")
[Alternative text]
- When to use: [Context where this works better]
**Variation 3: [Focus]** (e.g., "More detailed")
[Alternative text]
- When to use: [Context where this works better]
```
## Common Improvements by Pattern
### Button Text
**Before:** "Submit Form" → **After:** "Submit application"
- More specific object
- Maintains active imperative
**Before:** "Click here to download" → **After:** "Download report"
- Removed "click here"
- Specific about what downloads
### Error Messages
**Before:** "Error 404: Page not found" → **After:** "We can't find that page. Check the URL or return home."
- Removed error code
- Added recovery action
- More empathetic
**Before:** "Invalid email address" → **After:** "Email must include @"
- Removed blame word "invalid"
- Specific requirement
- Shorter
### Empty States
**Before:** "There are no items here." → **After:** "No items yet. Add your first item to get started."
- Added "yet" for encouragement
- Clear call to action
- Future-oriented
### Success Messages
**Before:** "Your request has been successfully processed." → **After:** "Request processed."
- Removed passive voice
- Removed unnecessary "successfully"
- More concise
### Form Instructions
**Before:** "Please enter your email address in the field below." → **After:** "We'll send updates to this email."
- Focus on user benefit
- Removed obvious instruction
- More purposeful
## Accessibility Impact
When improving, ensure:
**Screen readers:**
- Improved text works without visual context
- Labels are descriptive
- Links describe destination
**Cognitive load:**
- Shorter sentences (8-14 words for critical content)
- Simpler vocabulary
- Clearer structure
**Plain language:**
- Lower reading level
- No jargon
- Common words
## Example Improvement
**Original:**
"An error has occurred while processing your payment transaction. Please try again later or contact our customer support team if the problem persists."
**Analysis:**
- Purposeful: 2/10 (doesn't explain or guide)
- Concise: 3/10 (22 words, very verbose)
- Conversational: 2/10 (robotic, passive)
- Clear: 2/10 (vague timing, unclear problem)
- **Overall: 2.25/10**
**Improved:**
"We couldn't process your payment. Check your card details and try again."
**New Analysis:**
- Purposeful: 9/10 (clear problem + solution)
- Concise: 9/10 (11 words, 50% shorter)
- Conversational: 9/10 (active voice, natural)
- Clear: 9/10 (specific action)
- **Overall: 9/10** ↑ +6.75
**What Changed:**
1. **Purposeful:** Specified what failed (payment), removed vague "contact support"
2. **Concise:** Removed "an error has occurred", "transaction", "if problem persists" (11 words saved)
3. **Conversational:** Changed passive to active ("we couldn't" vs "has occurred")
4. **Clear:** Specific action (check card) instead of vague (try later)
## Completion
After providing improvements:
1. Ask if user wants alternative versions
2. Offer to improve related text for consistency
3. Suggest full audit if multiple pieces need improvement

View File

@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
# Empty State Template
Use this template to guide users when content is absent and help them take action to populate the space.
## Structure
```
[Title explaining the empty state] [Brief explanation or encouragement] [Clear call to action]
```
## Template Types
### First-Use Empty State
**Purpose**: Guide new users to populate content
**Tone**: Inviting, encouraging, clear on benefit
```
**Title**: [What's empty]
**Body**: [Brief benefit of adding content]
**Button**: [Specific action to populate]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: No projects yet
**Body**: Create your first project to start organizing work.
**Button**: Create project
```
---
### User-Cleared Empty State
**Purpose**: Confirm completion, positive reinforcement
**Tone**: Positive, celebratory (appropriately)
```
**Title**: [Positive completion statement]
**Body**: [Optional: What happens next or when new content appears]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: You're all caught up
**Body**: New tasks will appear here when they're assigned to you.
```
---
### Error/No Results Empty State
**Purpose**: Suggest alternatives when search/filter returns nothing
**Tone**: Helpful, solution-focused
```
**Title**: [What wasn't found]
**Body**: [Suggestion to modify or alternative action]
**Button**: [Alternative action]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: No results for "vintage cameras"
**Body**: Try different keywords or browse all items.
**Button**: Browse all items
```
---
## Empty State Checklist
Before finalizing an empty state, verify:
- [ ] **Clear context** — User knows what's empty and why
- [ ] **Actionable** — Provides specific next step
- [ ] **Appropriate tone** — Matches emotional context
- [ ] **Value-focused** — Shows benefit of taking action
- [ ] **Concise** — Brief enough to scan quickly
- [ ] **Avoids negativity** — No "nothing here" or "you have no..."
## Content Patterns by Type
### First-Use (Onboarding)
**Pattern**: "No [content] yet. [Benefit statement]. [Action]"
Examples:
- "No contacts yet. Import contacts to start messaging. **Import contacts**"
- "No favorites saved. Save items to find them quickly later. **Browse items**"
- "No team members yet. Invite people to collaborate on projects. **Invite team**"
### User-Cleared (Completion)
**Pattern**: "All [done/complete/caught up]. [Optional: when more appears]"
Examples:
- "All tasks complete. New tasks appear when teammates assign them to you."
- "Inbox zero! You've read all your messages."
- "You're all set. Check back tomorrow for new recommendations."
### No Results (Search/Filter)
**Pattern**: "No [content] match [criteria]. [Suggestion]. [Alternative]"
Examples:
- "No files match your search. Try different keywords or **view all files**."
- "No events this month. **See upcoming events** or **create an event**."
- "No team members match these filters. **Clear filters** to see all members."
### Permission/Access Required
**Pattern**: "[Content] isn't available. [Why]. [How to get access]"
Examples:
- "Reports aren't available yet. Upgrade to Premium to access detailed analytics. **View plans**"
- "This folder is private. Ask the owner to share it with you."
- "Calendar events are hidden. Enable calendar sync in **settings** to see events."
## Voice Variations
### Professional/B2B Product
```
**Title**: No documents uploaded
**Body**: Upload files to share with your team.
**Button**: Upload document
```
### Consumer/Friendly Product
```
**Title**: Nothing here yet!
**Body**: Start adding favorites to build your collection.
**Button**: Find favorites
```
### Serious/High-Stakes Product
```
**Title**: No alerts
**Body**: Your systems are running normally.
```
## Illustration Guidance
When working with designers on empty state illustrations:
**First-use**: Optimistic, inviting imagery (open boxes, blank canvases, starting points)
**User-cleared**: Positive, completion imagery (checkmarks, clean spaces, celebrations)
**No results**: Neutral, helpful imagery (search icons, magnifying glasses, directional arrows)
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
**Negative framing**: "You have no contacts"
**Neutral/positive**: "No contacts yet"
**No guidance**: "Empty"
**Actionable**: "No contacts yet. Import to get started."
**Multiple CTAs**: Three different buttons competing
**Single primary CTA**: One clear next action
**Too much text**: Long paragraph explaining the feature
**Concise**: One sentence benefit, clear button
**Technical**: "No records found in database"
**Human**: "No projects found"
## Quick Fill Template
Use this for rapid empty state drafting:
**Empty state type:** (First-use / User-cleared / No results / Permission)
**What's empty:**
**Why it's empty:**
**What user should do:**
**User benefit:**
**Draft:**
**Title**: [What's empty]
**Body**: [Benefit of action or what happens next]
**Button**: [Specific action]
**Example filled:**
- Type: First-use
- What's empty: Saved reports
- Why: New user
- What to do: Create or save a report
- Benefit: Quick access to important data
Draft:
**Title**: No saved reports yet
**Body**: Save reports to access your most important data quickly.
**Button**: Create report

View File

@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
# Error Message Template
Use this template to write clear, actionable error messages that help users recover.
## Structure
```
[What failed] [Why it might have failed, if known] [What to do next]
```
## Template
### Inline Error (Form Validation)
**Format**: Brief, immediate correction guidance
```
[Field requirement or constraint]
```
**Examples:**
- Email must include @
- Password needs 8+ characters
- Card number is incomplete
- Choose a future date
---
### Detour Error (Recoverable Problem)
**Format**: Problem + Solution
```
**Title**: [Action that failed]
**Body**: [Brief explanation]. [Recovery instruction].
**Button**: [Specific recovery action]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: Can't save changes
**Body**: Check your internet connection and try again.
**Button**: Retry
```
---
### Blocking Error (System Issue)
**Format**: Clear explanation + Timeline + Reassurance
```
**Title**: [What's unavailable]
**Body**: [Why it's unavailable]. [When it will be available]. [Reassurance about user data].
**Button**: [Status check or alternative action]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: Service temporarily unavailable
**Body**: We're updating our systems and will be back in about 15 minutes. Your data is safe.
**Button**: Check status
```
---
## Error Message Checklist
Before finalizing an error message, verify:
- [ ] **Avoids blame** — No "invalid," "illegal," "wrong," "error"
- [ ] **Empathetic tone** — Acknowledge user frustration
- [ ] **Specific problem** — Not generic "something went wrong"
- [ ] **Clear recovery** — Tell user exactly what to do
- [ ] **Front-loaded** — Most important info first
- [ ] **Active voice** — "We couldn't save" not "changes could not be saved"
- [ ] **Human language** — Not system codes or technical jargon
## Voice Variations by Context
### High-Stakes Error (Payment, Security, Data Loss)
**Tone**: Serious, clear, reassuring
```
We couldn't process your payment. Your card wasn't charged. Check your card details and try again.
```
### Low-Stakes Error (Optional Feature, Nice-to-Have)
**Tone**: Light, helpful, not dramatic
```
Couldn't load preview. Refresh to try again.
```
### First-Time User Error
**Tone**: Educational, patient
```
Profile photo must be under 5MB. Try a smaller file or compress your image.
```
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
**Vague**: "An error occurred"
**Specific**: "We couldn't save your changes"
**Blaming**: "Invalid email address"
**Guiding**: "Email must include @"
**Technical**: "ERR_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT"
**Human**: "Connection timed out. Check your internet and try again."
**No solution**: "Upload failed"
**Actionable**: "Upload failed. Check your file size and try again."
**Passive**: "Your request could not be processed"
**Active**: "We couldn't process your request"
## Quick Fill Template
Use this for rapid error message drafting:
**What failed:**
**Why (if known):**
**What user should do:**
**Draft:**
[What failed]. [Why, if known]. [Next action].
**Example filled:**
- What failed: Couldn't send invite
- Why: Email bounced
- What to do: Check spelling
Draft: "Couldn't send invite. Check the email address and try again."

View File

@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
# Onboarding Flow Template
Use this template to design clear, encouraging onboarding experiences that help users succeed quickly.
## Onboarding Principles
1. **Show value early** — Help users succeed in their first session
2. **Progressive disclosure** — Don't overwhelm with all features at once
3. **Optional whenever possible** — Let users skip and explore
4. **Celebrate small wins** — Acknowledge each completed step
5. **Be concise** — Users want to start using the product, not read about it
## Core Flow Structure
```
Welcome → Setup → First Success → Next Steps
```
Each step should answer:
- **Where am I?** (Progress indicator)
- **What do I do here?** (Clear instruction)
- **Why does this matter?** (Benefit to user)
- **Can I skip this?** (Exit option)
## Template: Welcome Screen
**Purpose**: Orient user and set expectations
```
**Headline**: [Welcome + value proposition]
**Body**: [2-3 benefits, bulleted]
**Primary CTA**: [Get started action]
**Secondary CTA**: [Sign in, if applicable]
```
**Example:**
```
**Headline**: Welcome to TaskFlow
**Body**:
• Organize projects with your team
• Track progress in real time
• Never miss a deadline
**Primary CTA**: Create account
**Secondary CTA**: Sign in
```
---
## Template: Account Setup
**Purpose**: Collect essential information only
```
**Title**: [Action-oriented title]
**Body**: [Why this information is needed]
**Fields**: [Minimum required fields]
**Primary CTA**: [Continue/Next action]
**Secondary CTA**: [Skip, if truly optional]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: Tell us about yourself
**Body**: We'll personalize your experience.
**Fields**:
- Name
- Email
- Password
**Primary CTA**: Continue
**Secondary CTA**: I'll do this later
```
**Best practices:**
- Only ask for what you absolutely need now
- Explain why each field is required
- Use smart defaults when possible
- Allow skipping optional steps
---
## Template: Feature Introduction
**Purpose**: Teach one feature at a time through action
```
**Title**: [Feature name + benefit]
**Body**: [Brief explanation, 1-2 sentences]
**Visual**: [Screenshot or illustration]
**Primary CTA**: [Action to try the feature]
**Secondary CTA**: Skip / Next
**Progress**: [X of Y steps]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: Create your first project
**Body**: Projects help you organize related tasks and collaborate with your team.
[Visual: Screenshot of project view]
**Primary CTA**: Create project
**Secondary CTA**: Skip for now
**Progress**: Step 2 of 4
```
**Best practices:**
- Show, don't tell (use visuals)
- Let users try immediately
- Keep explanations under 20 words
- Always allow skipping
---
## Template: First Success / Completion
**Purpose**: Celebrate user's first win, encourage next action
```
**Title**: [Celebratory statement]
**Body**: [What they accomplished + what's possible next]
**Primary CTA**: [Next natural action]
**Secondary CTA**: [Alternative or exit to product]
```
**Example:**
```
**Title**: You're all set!
**Body**: You created your first project. Ready to invite your team?
**Primary CTA**: Invite team members
**Secondary CTA**: Explore on my own
```
**Best practices:**
- Use exclamation points sparingly (once per flow max)
- Make the celebration feel earned
- Suggest logical next step
- Provide exit to main product
---
## Onboarding Step Checklist
For each step in your onboarding flow, verify:
- [ ] **Single focus** — One action or concept per step
- [ ] **Clear value** — User knows why this matters
- [ ] **Actionable** — User knows exactly what to do
- [ ] **Skipable** — Optional steps can be skipped
- [ ] **Progress visible** — User knows how many steps remain
- [ ] **Concise** — Body text under 30 words
- [ ] **Appropriate tone** — Encouraging without being patronizing
## Content Patterns by Step Type
### Welcome/Introduction
**Pattern**: "Welcome to [Product]. [Do X to achieve Y]."
Examples:
- "Welcome to Notion. Create beautiful docs, wikis, and projects."
- "Welcome to Figma. Design, prototype, and collaborate in real time."
### Permission Request
**Pattern**: "Enable [permission] to [specific benefit]"
Examples:
- "Enable notifications to stay updated on team activity"
- "Allow camera access to scan documents instantly"
### Feature Tutorial
**Pattern**: "[Action]. [Brief benefit]."
Examples:
- "Add your first task. Stay organized and never miss a deadline."
- "Create a workspace. Collaborate with your team in one place."
### Completion
**Pattern**: "[Celebration]! [What's now possible]. [Optional: Next step]"
Examples:
- "You're ready to go! Start creating, or invite teammates to collaborate."
- "Setup complete! Your workspace is ready for your team."
## Tone Variations
### Professional/B2B
```
**Title**: Set up your workspace
**Body**: Add team members and create your first project.
**CTA**: Continue setup
```
### Consumer/Casual
```
**Title**: Let's get you started!
**Body**: This will only take a minute.
**CTA**: Let's go
```
### Technical/Developer
```
**Title**: Configure your environment
**Body**: Connect your repository to start deploying.
**CTA**: Connect repo
```
## Multi-Screen Flow Example
### Screen 1: Welcome
```
**Welcome to WriteRight**
Write better, faster with AI-powered editing.
• Fix grammar instantly
• Improve clarity and tone
• Write with confidence
[Get started]
```
### Screen 2: Setup
```
**What brings you to WriteRight?** (2 of 4)
Select all that apply:
□ Business writing
□ Creative writing
□ Student papers
□ Personal projects
[Continue] [Skip]
```
### Screen 3: First Action
```
**Try it out** (3 of 4)
Paste any text below and watch WriteRight improve it.
[Text input box]
[Analyze my writing] [Skip]
```
### Screen 4: Success
```
**Nice work!**
You improved your first piece of writing. Ready to write your next masterpiece?
[Start writing] [See tips]
```
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
**Too many steps**: 10+ screens before using the product
**Focused flow**: 3-5 steps to first value
**Feature dump**: "Here are 47 things you can do!"
**Progressive disclosure**: One key feature at a time
**No skip option**: Forcing users through every screen
**Respect choice**: Skip available for optional features
**Passive voice**: "Your account has been created"
**Active voice**: "You created your account!"
**Corporate speak**: "Facilitate enhanced productivity"
**Plain language**: "Get more done"
## Quick Flow Builder
Use this to draft a basic onboarding flow:
**Product name:**
**Core value (one sentence):**
**Key features to introduce (pick 2-3):**
1.
2.
3.
**First user action that shows value:**
**Celebration/success moment:**
**Draft flow:**
1. Welcome → [Value prop]
2. Setup → [Essential info only]
3. Feature 1 → [Try it action]
4. Feature 2 → [Try it action]
5. Success → [Celebrate + next step]
## Testing Your Onboarding
Questions to answer:
1. Can users complete onboarding in under 2 minutes?
2. Do users achieve something meaningful in their first session?
3. Can users skip optional steps without confusion?
4. Is the tone encouraging without being condescending?
5. Does each screen have a single, clear purpose?

View File

@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
# UX Text Quality Scorecard
Use this scorecard to objectively evaluate interface copy against the Four Quality Standards framework.
## Text Being Evaluated
**Text:** _________________________________________
**Type:** ☐ Button ☐ Error ☐ Success ☐ Empty State ☐ Notification ☐ Form ☐ Other: _______
**Context:** _________________________________________
**User scenario:** _________________________________________
---
## 1. Purposeful (0-10)
Does this text help users or the business achieve goals?
### Evaluation Criteria
- [ ] User benefit is clear
- [ ] Helps user accomplish their goal
- [ ] Addresses anticipated user concerns
- [ ] Advances business objectives
- [ ] Value proposition is explicit
### Scoring
**9-10 (Excellent)**: Clear user benefit, addresses concerns, advances goals
**7-8 (Good)**: User benefit present, addresses most concerns
**5-6 (Adequate)**: Some user benefit, generic value
**3-4 (Needs Work)**: Unclear purpose, doesn't obviously help user
**1-2 (Poor)**: No discernible benefit, system-focused
**0 (Unacceptable)**: Actively hinders goals
**Score: _____ / 10**
**Notes:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
---
## 2. Concise (0-10)
Does this use the fewest words possible without losing meaning?
### Evaluation Criteria
- [ ] No wasted words
- [ ] Meets pattern benchmark
- [ ] Information is front-loaded
- [ ] Every word earns its space
- [ ] No redundant phrases
### Word Count & Benchmarks
**Current word count:** _____ words
**Current character count:** _____ characters
**Benchmarks:**
- Buttons/CTAs: 2-4 words ideal, 6 max
- Error messages: 12-18 words
- Titles: 3-6 words, 40 chars max
- Instructions: 14 words ideal, 20 max
- Notifications: 10-15 words
**Meets benchmark?** ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
### Scoring
**9-10 (Excellent)**: No wasted words, meets/beats benchmark
**7-8 (Good)**: Generally concise, close to benchmark
**5-6 (Adequate)**: Some unnecessary words, slightly over
**3-4 (Needs Work)**: Verbose, well over benchmark
**1-2 (Poor)**: Extremely wordy, far exceeds benchmark
**0 (Unacceptable)**: Incomprehensibly verbose
**Score: _____ / 10**
**Notes:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
---
## 3. Conversational (0-10)
Does this sound natural and human, not robotic?
### Evaluation Criteria
- [ ] Would say this out loud
- [ ] Uses active voice (target: 85%)
- [ ] Includes natural connecting words
- [ ] Free of corporate jargon
- [ ] Feels human and warm
### Voice Analysis
**Active or passive?** ☐ Active ☐ Passive ☐ Mixed
**Contains jargon/robotic phrases?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
**Examples of robotic phrases to avoid:**
- "An error has occurred"
- "Your request has been received"
- "Please be advised that"
- "Kindly note that"
### Scoring
**9-10 (Excellent)**: Completely natural, would say in person
**7-8 (Good)**: Mostly natural, minor stiffness
**5-6 (Adequate)**: Some natural elements, mix of active/passive
**3-4 (Needs Work)**: Stiff and formal, heavy passive voice
**1-2 (Poor)**: Extremely robotic, all passive voice
**0 (Unacceptable)**: Incomprehensible jargon
**Score: _____ / 10**
**Notes:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
---
## 4. Clear (0-10)
Is this unambiguous and easy to understand?
### Evaluation Criteria
- [ ] Unambiguous - only one interpretation
- [ ] Uses specific, meaningful verbs
- [ ] Consistent terminology
- [ ] Meets reading level target
- [ ] Free of technical jargon (unless appropriate)
### Clarity Analysis
**Reading level:** _____ grade (Target: 7th-10th for general audience)
**Uses specific verbs?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
**Examples:** _________________________________________
**Any ambiguous phrases?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
**Examples:** _________________________________________
**Consistent with product terminology?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
### Scoring
**9-10 (Excellent)**: Crystal clear, unambiguous, perfect terminology
**7-8 (Good)**: Generally clear, minor ambiguities
**5-6 (Adequate)**: Understandable, some ambiguity
**3-4 (Needs Work)**: Confusing, significant ambiguity
**1-2 (Poor)**: Very confusing, highly ambiguous
**0 (Unacceptable)**: Incomprehensible
**Score: _____ / 10**
**Notes:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
---
## Overall Assessment
### Total Score
**Purposeful:** _____ / 10
**Concise:** _____ / 10
**Conversational:** _____ / 10
**Clear:** _____ / 10
**Overall Average:** _____ / 10
### Quality Benchmark
**9-10 (Excellent)**: Ship it - Meets all standards
**8-8.9 (Very Good)**: Minor tweaks only
**7-7.9 (Good)**: Consider improvements
**6-6.9 (Adequate)**: Needs work
**Below 6 (Poor)**: Requires significant revision
---
## Improvement Recommendations
### Priority Issues (Score < 7)
**1.** _________________________________________
**2.** _________________________________________
**3.** _________________________________________
### Suggested Improvements
**Revised text:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
**Expected new scores:**
- Purposeful: _____ / 10
- Concise: _____ / 10
- Conversational: _____ / 10
- Clear: _____ / 10
- **Overall: _____ / 10**
---
## Accessibility Check
- [ ] Works for screen readers (descriptive labels)
- [ ] Doesn't rely on color alone
- [ ] Uses plain language (appropriate reading level)
- [ ] Sentence length appropriate (8-14 words for critical content)
- [ ] Provides text alternatives for icons
**Accessibility concerns:** _________________________________________
---
## Pattern Compliance
**Does this follow best practices for its pattern?**
**Buttons:**
- [ ] Uses imperative verb + object
- [ ] Describes specific action
- [ ] Avoids generic labels (OK, Submit)
**Errors:**
- [ ] States what failed
- [ ] Explains why (if known)
- [ ] Provides recovery action
- [ ] Doesn't blame user
**Success:**
- [ ] Past tense
- [ ] Specific action
- [ ] Brief confirmation
**Empty states:**
- [ ] Explains why empty
- [ ] Provides clear CTA
- [ ] Encouraging tone
**Forms:**
- [ ] Clear labels
- [ ] Helpful instructions
- [ ] Appropriate placeholder use
---
## Context Appropriateness
**User emotional state:** ☐ Confident ☐ Frustrated ☐ Confused ☐ Cautious ☐ Successful
**Tone matches state?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
**Stakes:** ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High
**Tone matches stakes?** ☐ Yes ☐ No
---
## Final Recommendation
**Ship as is** - Scores 9+ overall
**Minor tweaks** - Scores 8-8.9
**Needs improvement** - Scores 6-7.9
**Requires revision** - Scores below 6
**Priority:** ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low
**Next steps:**
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
---
## Reviewer Information
**Reviewer:** _________________________________________
**Date:** _________________________________________
**Product/Feature:** _________________________________________
**Review cycle:** ☐ Initial ☐ Revision 1 ☐ Revision 2 ☐ Final

View File

@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
# Voice Chart Template
A voice chart helps establish consistent brand personality across all UX text. Use this template to define your product's voice.
## Structure
A voice chart contains three key elements for each brand concept:
1. **Concept** — A core brand principle or value
2. **Voice Characteristics** — Adjectives describing how the concept manifests in writing
3. **Examples** — Concrete do/don't pairs showing the voice in action
## Template
### Concept 1: [Brand Principle]
**Voice characteristics**: [Adjective 1], [Adjective 2], [Adjective 3]
**Description**: [1-2 sentences explaining what this means for the writing]
**Do**:
- Example of text that embodies this concept
- Another example showing this voice
**Don't**:
- Example of what to avoid
- Counter-example that violates this voice
---
### Concept 2: [Brand Principle]
**Voice characteristics**: [Adjective 1], [Adjective 2], [Adjective 3]
**Description**: [1-2 sentences explaining what this means for the writing]
**Do**:
- Example of text that embodies this concept
- Another example showing this voice
**Don't**:
- Example of what to avoid
- Counter-example that violates this voice
---
### Concept 3: [Brand Principle]
**Voice characteristics**: [Adjective 1], [Adjective 2], [Adjective 3]
**Description**: [1-2 sentences explaining what this means for the writing]
**Do**:
- Example of text that embodies this concept
- Another example showing this voice
**Don't**:
- Example of what to avoid
- Counter-example that violates this voice
---
## Example: TAPP Transit System
### Concept 1: Helpful
**Voice characteristics**: Friendly, supportive, clear
**Description**: TAPP is a companion that helps riders navigate the transit system with confidence. We anticipate questions and provide clear guidance.
**Do**:
- "Your bus arrives in 5 minutes at Bay St."
- "Tap your card when you board and when you exit."
**Don't**:
- "Arrival: 5 min"
- "Payment required at entry and exit points."
---
### Concept 2: Efficient
**Voice characteristics**: Concise, direct, scannable
**Description**: Riders are often in a hurry. We respect their time by being brief and front-loading important information.
**Do**:
- "Route delayed 10 minutes due to traffic"
- "Transfer at Main St for Line 3"
**Don't**:
- "Due to unexpected traffic conditions, your route is experiencing delays of approximately 10 minutes"
- "You can transfer to Line 3 if you get off at Main St"
---
### Concept 3: Trustworthy
**Voice characteristics**: Honest, transparent, reliable
**Description**: Riders depend on TAPP to get where they need to go. We're upfront about problems and provide accurate information.
**Do**:
- "This route is currently unavailable. Use Route 42 instead."
- "Your payment didn't go through. Update your card to continue."
**Don't**:
- "Service interruption on this route."
- "Payment error. Try again."
---
## Tips for Creating Your Voice Chart
1. **Base it on brand values** — Review mission, vision, values, and personality
2. **Use 3-5 concepts** — Enough to guide, not so many you can't remember
3. **Be specific with examples** — Show actual interface text, not abstract descriptions
4. **Test against real scenarios** — Apply to buttons, errors, and notifications
5. **Share with your team** — Voice only works if everyone uses it consistently
6. **Update as you learn** — Refine based on user research and team feedback
## Common Voice Characteristics
**Positive tones**: Friendly, encouraging, optimistic, warm, enthusiastic, cheerful, supportive, welcoming, inspiring
**Neutral tones**: Professional, straightforward, clear, direct, informative, practical, matter-of-fact, efficient
**Cautious/Serious tones**: Careful, thoughtful, measured, precise, formal, reserved, respectful
**Personality traits**: Playful, witty, conversational, casual, technical, sophisticated, humble, confident, empowering
Choose characteristics that align with your brand and serve your users' needs in context.