fix: soften adversarial review isolation claim per review feedback
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6e9fd8c5b
commit
9dd924526e
|
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Saved to: {finalFile}
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer only sees the spec, not your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run:
|
||||
For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer should only be provided the spec (`{finalFile}`) when possible. Note that project read access may still exist, but the reviewer should focus solely on the spec content rather than your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run:
|
||||
|
||||
\`\`\`
|
||||
bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile}
|
||||
|
|
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ b) **HALT and wait for user selection.**
|
|||
|
||||
`{finalFile}`
|
||||
|
||||
If you haven't run an adversarial review yet, open a new chat/session and run:
|
||||
If you haven't run an adversarial review yet, open a new chat/session (the reviewer should only be provided the spec when possible -- project read access may still exist, but the focus should be solely on the spec content) and run:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue