From 9dd924526e7c6860910ebec7176b505db5a3876c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sdev Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 18:48:45 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] fix: soften adversarial review isolation claim per review feedback --- .../bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md b/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md index 11ede9b11..c2268801f 100644 --- a/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md +++ b/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Saved to: {finalFile} --- -For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer only sees the spec, not your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run: +For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer should only be provided the spec (`{finalFile}`) when possible. Note that project read access may still exist, but the reviewer should focus solely on the spec content rather than your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run: \`\`\` bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile} @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ b) **HALT and wait for user selection.** `{finalFile}` -If you haven't run an adversarial review yet, open a new chat/session and run: +If you haven't run an adversarial review yet, open a new chat/session (the reviewer should only be provided the spec when possible -- project read access may still exist, but the focus should be solely on the spec content) and run: ``` bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile}