fix: soften isolation claim, clarify new session instruction, add return path
This commit is contained in:
parent
415d90933e
commit
4d401d37f2
|
|
@ -122,13 +122,15 @@ Saved to: {finalFile}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a fresh context to ensure information asymmetry (the reviewer has no knowledge of your design decisions, only the spec):
|
For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer only sees the spec, not your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\`\`\`
|
\`\`\`
|
||||||
bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile}
|
bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile}
|
||||||
\`\`\`
|
\`\`\`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once you are fully satisfied with the spec (ideally after **Adversarial Review** and maybe a few rounds of **Advanced Elicitation**), run implementation in a FRESH CONTEXT for best results:
|
Bring the findings back to this session to triage and apply fixes before moving to development.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Once you are fully satisfied with the spec (ideally after **Adversarial Review** and maybe a few rounds of **Advanced Elicitation**), open a new chat/session and run implementation for best results:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\`\`\`
|
\`\`\`
|
||||||
quick-dev {finalFile}
|
quick-dev {finalFile}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue