From 4d401d37f27ac499f45e67f72bff26323f331237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sdev Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:48:59 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] fix: soften isolation claim, clarify new session instruction, add return path --- .../bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md b/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md index 5b5d4d2e6..b581d2d56 100644 --- a/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md +++ b/src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/steps/step-04-review.md @@ -122,13 +122,15 @@ Saved to: {finalFile} --- -For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a fresh context to ensure information asymmetry (the reviewer has no knowledge of your design decisions, only the spec): +For best results, run **Adversarial Review** in a separate session so the reviewer only sees the spec, not your design rationale. Open a new chat/session and run: \`\`\` bmad-review-adversarial-general {finalFile} \`\`\` -Once you are fully satisfied with the spec (ideally after **Adversarial Review** and maybe a few rounds of **Advanced Elicitation**), run implementation in a FRESH CONTEXT for best results: +Bring the findings back to this session to triage and apply fixes before moving to development. + +Once you are fully satisfied with the spec (ideally after **Adversarial Review** and maybe a few rounds of **Advanced Elicitation**), open a new chat/session and run implementation for best results: \`\`\` quick-dev {finalFile}