refactor(code-review): remove cargo cult failure modes repetition from step-01
FAILURE MODES section was just inverted SUCCESS METRICS. Not valuable. Replaced with single catch-all statement: failure to meet any success metric = failure. Let actual failure modes emerge from usage patterns, not speculation. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ae6799cb6
commit
38ab12da85
|
|
@ -110,17 +110,12 @@ Set `git_discrepancies` with categories:
|
|||
- `story_path` identified and loaded
|
||||
- `story_key` extracted
|
||||
- `story_content` captured completely and unmodified
|
||||
- `story_file_list` compiled from Dev Agent Record
|
||||
- `git_changed_files` discovered via git commands
|
||||
- `story_file_list` compiled from Dev Agent Record (or NO_FILE_LIST if not found)
|
||||
- `git_changed_files` discovered via git commands (or NO_GIT if not a git repo)
|
||||
- `git_discrepancies` calculated
|
||||
- Explicit NEXT directive provided
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES
|
||||
|
||||
- Proceeding without story file loaded
|
||||
- Missing `story_key` extraction
|
||||
- `story_content` incomplete or modified (breaks later steps)
|
||||
- Skipping git change discovery
|
||||
- Not calculating discrepancies
|
||||
- No explicit NEXT directive at step completion
|
||||
Failure to meet any SUCCESS METRIC constitutes workflow failure.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue