BMAD-METHOD/ASSESSMENT_SUMMARY.txt

185 lines
7.2 KiB
Plaintext

================================================================================
DOCUMENTATION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY - v1.3.0 Complexity Routing
================================================================================
Assessment Date: 2026-01-07
Commit: e5ede9ec (feat: add complexity-based routing and pipeline optimizations)
Files Analyzed: 9 changed files across batch-super-dev, super-dev-pipeline, dev-story
================================================================================
OVERALL FINDINGS
================================================================================
✅ STRENGTHS:
- Clear version markers (mostly consistent)
- Well-structured step-file architecture
- Consistent tone and professional style
- Good use of emoji for visual hierarchy
⚠️ ISSUES FOUND:
- 3 CRITICAL issues (blocking implementation)
- 2 HIGH priority issues (quality gates)
- 3 MEDIUM issues (consistency)
- Zero LOW priority issues requiring action
QUALITY SCORE: 7/10
================================================================================
CRITICAL ISSUES (Must Fix Before Merge)
================================================================================
1. TASK COUNTING METHOD UNDEFINED (Line 230)
File: batch-super-dev/instructions.md
Impact: Complexity scoring inconsistent across stories
Fix: Add explicit definition including nested subtasks handling
2. FILE_COUNT COLLECTED BUT UNUSED (Line 231)
File: batch-super-dev/instructions.md
Impact: Dead code, confusing developers
Fix: Either remove collection OR implement in complexity formula
3. OVERLAPPING COMPLEXITY THRESHOLDS (Lines 242-244)
File: batch-super-dev/instructions.md
Impact: Edge cases route incorrectly
Example: 4-task "security" story with HIGH keyword
Fix: Replace with explicit decision tree (see SUGGESTED_FIXES.md)
================================================================================
HIGH PRIORITY ISSUES (Quality & Integration)
================================================================================
4. MULTI-AGENT MERGE STRATEGY MISSING (Lines 38-74)
File: step-05-code-review.md
Impact: Different merge results depending on implementer
Fix: Document deduplication, precedence, and merge algorithm
5. RISK KEYWORD MATCHING UNDEFINED (Line 232)
File: batch-super-dev/instructions.md
Impact: ±5 points variance in complexity scoring
Issues: Case sensitivity, substring vs whole-word, deduplication
Fix: Specify exact matching rules with pseudocode
================================================================================
VERSION & CONSISTENCY ISSUES
================================================================================
6. VERSION MARKER MISMATCH (Line 94)
File: step-01-init.md
Current: "NEW v1.2.0"
Should: "NEW v1.3.0" (to match commit and batch-super-dev)
7. BAILOUT vs SKIP TERMINOLOGY (Sections 4.5 + 6)
File: step-01-init.md
Issue: Both use similar language but mean different things
Fix: Document distinction clearly (see SUGGESTED_FIXES.md)
8. CASE INCONSISTENCY (Multiple files)
Issue: "MICRO" vs "micro" used inconsistently
Fix: Document convention (uppercase display, lowercase storage)
================================================================================
DECISION TREE EXAMPLE (FIX #3)
================================================================================
Current (Problematic):
MICRO: task_count ≤ 3 AND complexity_score ≤ 5 AND no HIGH risk
COMPLEX: task_count ≥ 16 OR complexity_score ≥ 20 OR has HIGH risk
STANDARD: everything else
Proposed (Clear & Unambiguous):
Step 1: Has HIGH keyword? → COMPLEX (STOP)
Step 2: task_count ≥ 16 OR score ≥ 20? → COMPLEX (STOP)
Step 3: task_count ≤ 3 AND score ≤ 5? → MICRO (STOP)
Step 4: Default → STANDARD
Test Cases:
✓ 2-task UI story: MICRO
✓ 4-task auth story: COMPLEX (HIGH keyword)
✓ 8-task standard story: STANDARD
✓ 15-task database migration: COMPLEX (HIGH keywords)
================================================================================
DOCUMENTATION DELIVERABLES
================================================================================
1. DOCUMENTATION_ASSESSMENT.md (This analysis)
- Full assessment with detailed findings
- Quality ratings and metrics
- Test scenarios for complexity scoring
- 11 sections covering all aspects
2. CRITICAL_FIXES_REQUIRED.md
- Blocking issues only
- Business impact explanation
- Specific file paths and line numbers
- Sign-off checklist before merge
3. SUGGESTED_FIXES.md
- Exact replacement text for all 5 critical issues
- Code examples and pseudocode
- Complete working solutions ready to copy-paste
- 9 detailed fixes with implementation examples
================================================================================
RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
================================================================================
PHASE 1: Address Critical Issues (2-3 hours)
☐ Fix task counting method (FIX #1)
☐ Decide on file_count (FIX #2)
☐ Implement decision tree (FIX #3)
☐ Document merge strategy (FIX #4)
☐ Specify keyword matching (FIX #5)
PHASE 2: Fix Versions & Consistency (30 minutes)
☐ Update version markers (FIX #6)
☐ Document bailout/skip (FIX #7)
☐ Document case convention (FIX #8)
PHASE 3: QA & Testing (1-2 hours)
☐ Test complexity scoring edge cases
☐ Verify template rendering
☐ Review decision tree logic
☐ Check all file paths are absolute
PHASE 4: Review & Sign-Off (1 hour)
☐ PR review with focus on critical fixes
☐ Merge with confidence
Total Estimate: 4-6 hours
================================================================================
KEY METRICS
================================================================================
Clarity: 7/10 (Good, but some ambiguous sections)
Consistency: 7/10 (Mostly consistent, some case/version issues)
Completeness: 6/10 (Missing integration details)
Correctness: 6/10 (Critical logic issues in thresholds)
Files Affected: 4 core files
Lines Modified: ~150 lines across all fixes
Breaking Changes: None (backward compatible)
Risk Level: MEDIUM (issues are fixable, non-fundamental)
================================================================================
CONTACT & REFERENCES
================================================================================
Commit: e5ede9ec
Feature: Complexity-Based Routing v1.3.0
Assessment: 2026-01-07
Files to Review:
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/batch-super-dev/instructions.md
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/super-dev-pipeline/steps/step-01-init.md
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/super-dev-pipeline/steps/step-03-implement.md
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/super-dev-pipeline/steps/step-04-post-validation.md
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/super-dev-pipeline/steps/step-05-code-review.md
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/batch-super-dev/workflow.yaml
- src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/super-dev-pipeline/workflow.yaml
================================================================================
END OF SUMMARY
================================================================================