BMAD-METHOD/expansion-packs/bmad-rfq-government/templates/sward-analysis-tmpl.yaml

266 lines
15 KiB
YAML

# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
template:
id: sward-analysis-template
name: SWARD Analysis Template
version: 1.0
output:
format: markdown
filename: docs/sward-analysis.md
title: "{{rfq_number}} SWARD Analysis"
workflow:
mode: interactive
elicitation: advanced-elicitation
sections:
- id: overview
title: Overview
content: |
This template provides a structured format for conducting a Strengths, Weaknesses, Risks, and Deficiencies (SWARD) analysis of proposal content. It helps identify areas for improvement before submission to maximize evaluation scores.
- id: usage-instructions
title: Usage Instructions
content: |
1. Review proposal content against evaluation criteria
2. Identify strengths, weaknesses, risks, and deficiencies
3. Categorize findings by impact level
4. Provide specific recommendations for improvement
- id: template-structure
title: Template Structure
sections:
- id: analysis-header
title: Analysis Header
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
# [RFQ Number] SWARD Analysis
# [Agency Name]
# [RFQ Title]
# [Date]
# [Review Phase: Pink Team / Red Team / Gold Team / Final]
# [Section(s) Analyzed: Specify section(s)]
- id: executive-summary
title: Executive Summary
sections:
- id: overall-assessment
title: Overall Assessment
content: |
**Summary Assessment**:
[Brief 2-3 sentence summary of overall findings]
**Key Findings**:
- [Most significant strength]
- [Most critical weakness]
- [Most serious risk]
- [Most important deficiency]
**Recommendation**:
[Submit as is / Address critical issues / Major rework needed]
- id: strengths-analysis
title: Strengths Analysis
sections:
- id: major-strengths
title: Major Strengths (High Evaluation Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Strength | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| S1 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S2 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S3 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
- id: moderate-strengths
title: Moderate Strengths (Medium Evaluation Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Strength | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| S4 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S5 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S6 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
- id: minor-strengths
title: Minor Strengths (Low Evaluation Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Strength | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| S7 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S8 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
| S9 | [Description of strength] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this positively impacts evaluation] |
- id: weaknesses-analysis
title: Weaknesses Analysis
sections:
- id: critical-weaknesses
title: Critical Weaknesses (Significant Negative Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Weakness | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact | Recommendation |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| W1 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W2 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W3 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
- id: moderate-weaknesses
title: Moderate Weaknesses (Medium Negative Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Weakness | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact | Recommendation |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| W4 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W5 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W6 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
- id: minor-weaknesses
title: Minor Weaknesses (Low Negative Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Weakness | Location | Evaluation Factor | Impact | Recommendation |
| --- | ------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------- |
| W7 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W8 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
| W9 | [Description of weakness] | [Section reference] | [Evaluation factor] | [How this negatively impacts evaluation] | [Specific recommendation] |
- id: risk-analysis
title: Risk Analysis
sections:
- id: high-risks
title: High Risks (Significant Potential Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Risk | Location | Risk Type | Potential Impact | Mitigation Recommendation |
| --- | --------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| R1 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R2 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R3 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
- id: moderate-risks
title: Moderate Risks (Medium Potential Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Risk | Location | Risk Type | Potential Impact | Mitigation Recommendation |
| --- | --------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| R4 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R5 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R6 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
- id: low-risks
title: Low Risks (Minor Potential Impact)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Risk | Location | Risk Type | Potential Impact | Mitigation Recommendation |
| --- | --------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| R7 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R8 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
| R9 | [Description of risk] | [Section reference] | [Technical/Management/Cost/Schedule] | [Potential negative consequence] | [Specific mitigation strategy] |
- id: deficiencies-analysis
title: Deficiencies Analysis
sections:
- id: critical-deficiencies
title: Critical Deficiencies (Non-Compliance)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Deficiency | Location | Requirement | Impact | Correction Required |
| --- | --------------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| D1 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D2 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D3 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
- id: significant-deficiencies
title: Significant Deficiencies (Partial Compliance)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Deficiency | Location | Requirement | Impact | Correction Required |
| --- | --------------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| D4 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D5 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D6 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
- id: minor-deficiencies
title: Minor Deficiencies (Technical Compliance Issues)
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| # | Deficiency | Location | Requirement | Impact | Correction Required |
| --- | --------------------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| D7 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D8 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
| D9 | [Description of deficiency] | [Section reference] | [Specific requirement] | [How this affects compliance] | [Specific correction needed] |
- id: improvement-action-plan
title: Improvement Action Plan
sections:
- id: priority-1
title: Priority 1 (Critical - Must Address)
content: |
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- id: priority-2
title: Priority 2 (Important - Should Address)
content: |
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- id: priority-3
title: Priority 3 (Enhancement - Consider Addressing)
content: |
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- [Specific action with reference to finding]
- id: analysis-methodology
title: Analysis Methodology
sections:
- id: review-approach
title: Review Approach
content: |
[Brief description of how the analysis was conducted]
**Evaluation Criteria Applied**:
- [Evaluation factor 1]
- [Evaluation factor 2]
- [Evaluation factor 3]
- id: analysis-team
title: Analysis Team
type: code
language: markdown
content: |
| Role | Name | Sections Analyzed |
| ------ | ------ | ----------------- |
| [Role] | [Name] | [Sections] |
| [Role] | [Name] | [Sections] |
| [Role] | [Name] | [Sections] |
- id: best-practices
title: Best Practices for SWARD Analysis
content: |
- **Evaluator Perspective**: Analyze from the perspective of government evaluators
- **Criteria Focus**: Base analysis strictly on Section M evaluation criteria
- **Evidence-Based**: Provide specific examples for all findings
- **Balanced Assessment**: Identify both strengths and areas for improvement
- **Actionable Recommendations**: Provide specific, implementable suggestions
- **Prioritized Findings**: Focus on highest-impact items first
- **Objective Analysis**: Base findings on what's actually in the proposal