3bbc877d4c
Critical UX improvement: Decision happens at the RIGHT moment. Changes to Step 2.2 (Repository Settings): - ADDED: Comprehensive 'Single vs Separate Repo' decision framework - Decision now happens DURING naming (not after) - Clear naming convention: 'my-project' vs 'my-project-specs' Single Repository Use Cases: ✅ Close to development team ✅ Simple, direct communication needed ✅ Building the project yourself ✅ Working closely with other designers ✅ Small team with full ownership ✅ Rapid iteration and feedback Separate Repository Use Cases: ✅ Corporate or enterprise environment ✅ Specifications serve multiple products/platforms ✅ Development team has many developers ✅ Extensive or complex codebase ✅ Clear handoff boundaries needed ✅ Design and dev have separate workflows Changes to Step 2.3: - Acknowledge decision was made - Remind about implications Changes to Step 4.1: - SIMPLIFIED: Just recap the decision made in Step 2 - No longer presenting options (already decided!) - Cleaner flow Reasoning: Repository NAME determines structure. The decision must happen when naming the repository, not later. This is when GitHub asks 'what do you want to call this?' - that's the natural decision point. Benefits: - Decision at natural moment (when naming) - Clear naming conventions prevent confusion - Users understand implications before creating - No 'oops, I named it wrong' moments - Professional guidance on when to use each approach |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bmb | ||
| bmgd | ||
| bmm | ||
| cis | ||
| wds | ||