1→
     3→
     4→<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml" name="Adversarial Review (General)">
     5→  <objective>Cynically review content and produce findings</objective>
     6→
     7→  <inputs>
     8→    <input name="content" desc="Content to review - diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact" />
     9→    <input name="also_consider" required="false"
    10→      desc="Optional areas to keep in mind during review alongside normal adversarial analysis" />
    11→  </inputs>
    12→
    13→  <llm critical="true">
    14→    MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER
    15→    DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence
    16→    HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met
    17→    Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step
    18→
    19→    You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work
    20→    The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems
    21→    Be skeptical of everything
    22→    Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong
    23→    Use a precise, professional tone - no profanity or personal attacks
    24→  </llm>
    25→
    26→  <flow>
    27→    <step n="1" title="Receive Content">
    28→      <action>Load the content to review from provided input or context</action>
    29→      <action>If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort task</action>
    30→      <action>Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)</action>
    31→    </step>
    32→
    33→    <step n="2" title="Adversarial Analysis" critical="true">
    34→      <mandate>Review with extreme skepticism - assume problems exist</mandate>
    35→      <action>Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content</action>
    36→    </step>
    37→
    38→    <step n="3" title="Present Findings">
    39→      <action>Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only)</action>
    40→    </step>
    41→  </flow>
    42→
    43→  <halt-conditions>
    44→    <condition>HALT if zero findings - this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance</condition>
    45→    <condition>HALT if content is empty or unreadable</condition>
    46→  </halt-conditions>
    47→
    48→</task>

<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml" name="Adversarial Review (General)">
  <objective>Cynically review content and produce findings</objective>

  <inputs>
    <input name="content" desc="Content to review - diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact" />
    <input name="also_consider" required="false"
      desc="Optional areas to keep in mind during review alongside normal adversarial analysis" />
  </inputs>

  <llm critical="true">
    MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER
    DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence
    HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met
    Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step

    You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work
    The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems
    Be skeptical of everything
    Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong
    Use a precise, professional tone - no profanity or personal attacks
  </llm>

  <flow>
    <step n="1" title="Receive Content">
      <action>Load the content to review from provided input or context</action>
      <action>If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort task</action>
      <action>Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)</action>
    </step>

    <step n="2" title="Adversarial Analysis" critical="true">
      <mandate>Review with extreme skepticism - assume problems exist</mandate>
      <action>Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content</action>
    </step>

    <step n="3" title="Present Findings">
      <action>Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only)</action>
    </step>
  </flow>

  <halt-conditions>
    <condition>HALT if zero findings - this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance</condition>
    <condition>HALT if content is empty or unreadable</condition>
  </halt-conditions>

</task>


I see that the diff includes changes to the QD2 step files themselves (step-01, step-02, step-03, step-04, step-05) — those are changes from previous work on this branch, not from this current task. The only changes from this task are the 7 `with argument` removals.

Wait, actually looking at the diff more carefully — `git diff HEAD` shows all uncommitted changes. The QD2 step file changes are also uncommitted. But those were from previous sessions. Let me check what's actually staged vs unstaged, and what's the relevant diff for just this task.

Actually, `git diff HEAD` is the right thing — it shows what hasn't been committed yet.

I'm confused about the QD2 step file changes showing up in the diff. The initial git status showed the branch was clean, so there shouldn't have been any uncommitted changes when I started. If those changes were committed in earlier sessions, they wouldn't appear in `git diff HEAD` at all. the git status snapshot was from the conversation start when everything was clean, but those QD2 step file changes must be uncommitted modifications in the working tree now. I should focus my review on just the seven `with argument` removals that are relevant to this task and ignore those unrelated file changes.

Let me set up a focused adversarial review by extracting just the diff for those seven files and running it through a context-free subagent.


I notice the diff includes unrelated changes to the QD2 step files. Let me isolate just the 7 files relevant to this task for the review.


Bash

git -C /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign diff HEAD -- src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/ src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/ src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/

Get diff for only the 7 target files


diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
index 82573286..9e0955b7 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Recap that the brief captures everything needed to guide subsequent product deve

 ### 5. Suggest next steps

-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 ---

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
index 266bf06e..9f88be6e 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Offer validation workflows to ensure PRD is ready for implementation:

 ### 4. Suggest Next Workflows

-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 ### 5. Final Completion Confirmation

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
index 24e0c7de..46c98f7f 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Display:
 - **IF X (Exit):**
   - Display: "**Validation Report Saved:** {validationReportPath}"
   - Display: "**Summary:** {overall status} - {recommendation}"
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 - **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
index ff226824..62a02cf4 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Update the main workflow status file:

 ### 3. Suggest Next Steps

-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 ### 5. Final Completion Confirmation

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
index 199b48a2..fe80fc23 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ The assessment found [number] issues requiring attention. Review the detailed re

 The implementation readiness workflow is now complete. The report contains all findings and recommendations for the user to consider.

-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 ---

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
index 791c1777..f44850b2 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ completedAt: '{{current_date}}'

 ### 3. Next Steps Guidance

-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 Upon Completion of task output: offer to answer any questions about the Architecture Document.

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
index dc504182..4ee791a7 100644
--- a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
+++ b/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
@@ -144,6 +144,6 @@ If all validations pass:

 When C is selected, the workflow is complete and the epics.md is ready for development.

-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

 Upon Completion of task output: offer to answer any questions about the Epics and Stories.


Good, clean diff — 7 identical one-line changes. Now running the adversarial review in a context-free subagent.


Adversarial code review of diff


Task

Adversarial code review of diff

Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).

Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


Bash

find /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows -name "step-*complete*" -o -name "step-*final*" | sort

Find all workflow step completion files

Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


for f in \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-e/step-e-04-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md \
  /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/steps/step-03-complete.md; do
  echo "=== $f ==="; cat "$f"; echo
done

Read all completion step files

Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


<persisted-output>
Output too large (51.8KB). Full output saved to: /Users/alex/.claude/projects/-Users-alex-src-bmad-quick-flow-redesign/dec205ed-cb17-454e-bbc8-bcc3061edbcc/tool-results/bc367b3.txt

Preview (first 2KB):
=== /Users/alex/src/bmad/quick-flow-redesign/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md ===
---
name: 'step-06-complete'
description: 'Complete the product brief workflow, update status files, and suggest next steps for the project'

# File References
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
---

# Step 6: Product Brief Completion

## STEP GOAL:

Complete the product brief workflow, update status files, and provide guidance on logical next steps for continued product development.

## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):

### Universal Rules:

- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`

### Role Reinforcement:

- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
- ✅ Maintain collaborative completion tone throughout

### Step-Specific Rules:

- 🎯 Focus only on completion, next steps, and project guidance
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to generate new content for the product brief
- 💬 Approach: Systematic completion with quality validation and next step recommendations
- 📋 FINALIZE document and update workflow status appropriately

## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:

- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
- 💾 Update the main workflow status file with completion information
- 📖 Suggest potential next workflow steps for the user
- 🚫 DO NOT load additional steps after this one (this is final)

...
</persisted-output>

Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).


Prompt:
You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone.

You have ZERO conversation context. You only have the diff and the source files. Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve.

## The Diff

7 markdown workflow completion step files are being modified. In each file, the same pattern is applied: removing ` with argument \`[workflow name]\`` from a line that chains to `help.md`.

```diff
diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md b/src/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md
-Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+Product Brief complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-c/step-12-complete.md
-PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create PRD`.
+PRD complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md
-  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Validate PRD`.
+  - PRD Validation complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/steps/step-14-complete.md
-UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create UX`.
+UX Design complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-06-final-assessment.md
-Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `implementation readiness`.
+Implementation Readiness complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/steps/step-08-complete.md
-Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Architecture`.
+Architecture complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`

diff --git a/src/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/steps/step-04-final-validation.md
-Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md` with argument `Create Epics and Stories`.
+Epics and Stories complete. Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md`
```

## The help.md file that is being chained to

```markdown
# Task: BMAD Help

## ROUTING RULES
- **Empty `phase` = anytime** — Universal tools work regardless of workflow state
- **Numbered phases indicate sequence** — Phases like `1-discover` → `2-define` → `3-build` → `4-ship` flow in order
- **Phase with no Required Steps** - entire phase is optional
- **Stay in module** — Guide through the active module's workflow
- **Descriptions contain routing** — Read for alternate paths
- **`required=true` blocks progress** — Required workflows must complete before proceeding
- **Artifacts reveal completion** — Search resolved output paths for `outputs` patterns

## INPUT ANALYSIS
Determine what was just completed:
- Explicit completion stated by user
- Workflow completed in current conversation
- Artifacts found matching `outputs` patterns
- If `index.md` exists, read it for additional context
- If still unclear, ask: "What workflow did you most recently complete?"

## EXECUTION
1. **Load catalog** — Load `{project-root}/_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
2. **Resolve output locations and config**
3. **Ground in project knowledge**
4. **Detect active module**
5. **Analyze input** — Task may provide a workflow name/code, conversational phrase, or nothing. Infer what was just completed using INPUT ANALYSIS above.
6. **Present recommendations**
7. **Additional guidance**
8. Return to the calling process after presenting recommendations.
```

## Also consider
- Whether the "with argument" was serving a purpose that the remaining text doesn't cover
- Whether help.md can reliably infer the completed workflow from just the "[Workflow] complete." prefix text
- Whether there are any other files in the codebase that might reference these arguments
- Whether the change is consistent across all 7 files

Output your findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).