[STARTED] Backing up original state...
[COMPLETED] Backed up original state in git stash (b5cd732e)
[STARTED] Running tasks for staged files...
[STARTED] package.json — 7 files
[STARTED] *.{js,cjs,mjs} — 0 files
[STARTED] *.yaml — 0 files
[STARTED] *.json — 0 files
[STARTED] *.md — 7 files
[SKIPPED] *.{js,cjs,mjs} — no files
[SKIPPED] *.yaml — no files
[SKIPPED] *.json — no files
[STARTED] markdownlint-cli2
[COMPLETED] markdownlint-cli2
[COMPLETED] *.md — 7 files
[COMPLETED] package.json — 7 files
[COMPLETED] Running tasks for staged files...
[STARTED] Applying modifications from tasks...
[COMPLETED] Applying modifications from tasks...
[STARTED] Cleaning up temporary files...
[COMPLETED] Cleaning up temporary files...

> bmad-method@6.0.1 test
> npm run test:schemas && npm run test:refs && npm run test:install && npm run validate:schemas && npm run lint && npm run lint:md && npm run format:check

> bmad-method@6.0.1 test:schemas
> node test/test-agent-schema.js

╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║  Agent Schema Validation Test Suite                      ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Found 52 test fixture(s)

❌ CRITICAL ACTIONS (invalid)
  ✓ empty-string-in-actions Got expected error (custom): agent.critical_actions[] must be a non-empty string
  ✓ actions-as-string Got expected error (invalid_type): Expected array, received string

❌ MENU (invalid)
  ✓ missing-menu Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ empty-menu Got expected error (too_small): agent.menu must include at least one entry

❌ MENU COMMANDS (invalid)
  ✓ no-command-target Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[] entries must include at least one command target field
  ✓ empty-command-target Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].action must be a non-empty string

❌ MENU TRIGGERS (invalid)
  ✓ trigger-with-spaces Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger must be kebab-case (lowercase words separated by hyphen)
  ✓ snake-case Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger must be kebab-case (lowercase words separated by hyphen)
  ✓ leading-asterisk Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger must be kebab-case (lowercase words separated by hyphen)
  ✓ empty-trigger Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger must be a non-empty string
  ✓ duplicate-triggers Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger duplicates "help" within the same agent
  ✓ compound-mismatched-kebab Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger compound format error: invalid compound trigger format
  ✓ compound-invalid-format Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger compound format error: invalid compound trigger format
  ✓ camel-case Got expected error (custom): agent.menu[].trigger must be kebab-case (lowercase words separated by hyphen)

❌ METADATA (invalid)
  ✓ missing-id Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ extra-metadata-fields Got expected error (unrecognized_keys): Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'unknown_field', 'another_extra'
  ✓ empty-name Got expected error (custom): agent.metadata.name must be a non-empty string
  ✓ empty-module-string Got expected error (custom): agent.metadata.module must be a non-empty string

❌ PERSONA (invalid)
  ✓ missing-role Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ extra-persona-fields Got expected error (unrecognized_keys): Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'extra_field', 'another_extra'
  ✓ empty-string-in-principles Got expected error (custom): agent.persona.principles[] must be a non-empty string
  ✓ empty-principles-array Got expected error (too_small): agent.persona.principles must include at least one entry

❌ PROMPTS (invalid)
  ✓ missing-id Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ missing-content Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ extra-prompt-fields Got expected error (unrecognized_keys): Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'extra_field'
  ✓ empty-content Got expected error (custom): agent.prompts[].content must be a non-empty string

❌ TOP LEVEL (invalid)
  ✓ missing-agent-key Got expected error (invalid_type): Required
  ✓ extra-top-level-keys Got expected error (unrecognized_keys): Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'extra_key', 'another_extra'
  ✓ empty-file Got expected error (invalid_type): Expected object, received null

❌ YAML ERRORS (invalid)
  ✓ malformed-yaml Got expected YAML parse error
  ✓ invalid-indentation Got expected YAML parse error

✅ CRITICAL ACTIONS (valid)
  ✓ valid-critical-actions Validation passed as expected
  ✓ no-critical-actions Validation passed as expected
  ✓ empty-critical-actions Validation passed as expected

✅ MENU (valid)
  ✓ single-menu-item Validation passed as expected
  ✓ multiple-menu-items Validation passed as expected

✅ MENU COMMANDS (valid)
  ✓ multiple-commands Validation passed as expected
  ✓ all-command-types Validation passed as expected

✅ MENU TRIGGERS (valid)
  ✓ kebab-case-triggers Validation passed as expected
  ✓ compound-triggers Validation passed as expected

✅ METADATA (valid)
  ✓ wrong-module-value Validation passed as expected
  ✓ module-agent-missing-module Validation passed as expected
  ✓ module-agent-correct Validation passed as expected
  ✓ malformed-path-treated-as-core Validation passed as expected
  ✓ empty-module-name-in-path Validation passed as expected
  ✓ core-agent-with-module Validation passed as expected

✅ PERSONA (valid)
  ✓ complete-persona Validation passed as expected

✅ PROMPTS (valid)
  ✓ valid-prompts-with-description Validation passed as expected
  ✓ valid-prompts-minimal Validation passed as expected
  ✓ no-prompts Validation passed as expected
  ✓ empty-prompts Validation passed as expected

✅ TOP LEVEL (valid)
  ✓ minimal-core-agent Validation passed as expected

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Test Results:
  Total:  52
  Passed: 52
  Failed: 0
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

✨ All tests passed!

> bmad-method@6.0.1 test:refs
> node test/test-file-refs-csv.js

CSV File Reference Extraction Tests

Valid fixtures
  ✓ bmm-style.csv: extracts workflow-file refs with trailing commas
  ✓ core-style.csv: extracts refs from core module-help format
  ✓ minimal.csv: extracts refs from minimal 3-column CSV

Invalid fixtures (expect 0 refs)
  ✓ no-workflow-column.csv: returns 0 refs when workflow-file column missing
  ✓ empty-data.csv: returns 0 refs when CSV has header only
  ✓ all-empty-workflow.csv: returns 0 refs when all workflow-file cells empty
  ✓ unresolvable-vars.csv: filters out template variables, keeps normal refs

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Test Results:
  Total:  7
  Passed: 7
  Failed: 0
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

All tests passed!

> bmad-method@6.0.1 test:install
> node test/test-installation-components.js

========================================
Installation Component Tests
========================================

Test Suite 1: Agent Compilation

✓ Agent compilation returns result object with outputPath
✓ Compiled agent contains <agent> tag
✓ Compiled agent contains <persona> tag
✓ Compiled agent contains <menu> tag
✓ Compiled agent contains agent title

Test Suite 2: Customization Merging

✓ Deep merge overrides customized name
✓ Deep merge preserves non-overridden title
✓ Deep merge preserves non-overridden role
✓ Deep merge overrides customized style

Test Suite 3: Path Variable Resolution

✓ Path variable resolution pattern matches expected format

Test Suite 5: QA Agent Compilation

✓ QA agent compilation includes agent title
✓ QA agent menu includes automate workflow

========================================
Test Results:
  Passed: 12
  Failed: 0
========================================

✨ All installation component tests passed!

> bmad-method@6.0.1 validate:schemas
> node tools/validate-agent-schema.js

🔍 Scanning for agent files...

Found 10 agent file(s)

✅ src/core/agents/bmad-master.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/ux-designer.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/sm.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/quick-flow-solo-dev.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/qa.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/pm.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/dev.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/architect.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/analyst.agent.yaml
✅ src/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.agent.yaml

✨ All 10 agent file(s) passed validation!

> bmad-method@6.0.1 lint
> eslint . --ext .js,.cjs,.mjs,.yaml --max-warnings=0

> bmad-method@6.0.1 lint:md
> markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"

markdownlint-cli2 v0.19.1 (markdownlint v0.39.0)
Finding: **/*.md !**/node_modules/** !test/fixtures/** !CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md !_bmad/** !_bmad*/** !_experiment/** !.agent/** !.claude/** !.roo/** !.codex/** !.kiro/** !sample-project/** !test-project-install/** !z*/**
Linting: 316 file(s)
Summary: 0 error(s)

> bmad-method@6.0.1 format:check
> prettier --check "**/*.{js,cjs,mjs,json,yaml}"

Checking formatting...
All matched files use Prettier code style!
[exp/quick-flow-redesign f1521217] fix(workflows): remove ambiguous with-argument from help task chaining
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


Committed. All tests, lints, and formatting pass. Now the push and PR.


Launching skill: tam-push


Base directory for this skill: /Users/alex/.claude/skills/tam-push

# Git Push Policy

**You are NEVER allowed to execute `git push` (or any variant) yourself.** This applies to all contexts — direct requests, post-commit workflows, PR creation, or any other situation where pushing would be relevant.

Instead, you MUST:

1. **Print the exact push command** the user should run, formatted as a code block.
2. **If the command is not a simple `git push`**, add a one-line explanation of what it does (e.g., force push, pushing a new branch, pushing to a non-default remote, pushing tags).
3. **Wait for the user to confirm** they have executed the push before proceeding with any steps that depend on it.

## Examples

Simple push (no explanation needed):
```
git push
```

Non-obvious push (include explanation):
```
git push -u origin feature/login
```
> Sets upstream tracking and pushes the new `feature/login` branch to origin.

```
git push origin --tags
```
> Pushes all local tags to origin.

## Rules

- Never run `git push`, `git push origin`, `git push --force`, `git push -u`, or ANY command that pushes to a remote — regardless of flags or arguments.
- Never work around this by using aliases, scripts, or indirect execution.
- If a workflow (like `gh pr create`) would implicitly push, push must still be done manually by the user first.
- After printing the command, ask the user to confirm when done before continuing.


```
git push
```

Once pushed, I'll create the PR against `main` for issue #1637.


Bash

say "Please run git push, then I will create the pull request."

TTS summary


TTS summary


<local-command-caveat>Caveat: The messages below were generated by the user while running local commands. DO NOT respond to these messages or otherwise consider them in your response unless the user explicitly asks you to.</local-command-caveat>


<bash-input>git push</bash-input>


<bash-stdout>To github.com:alexeyv/BMAD-METHOD.git
   1f33bd33..f1521217  exp/quick-flow-redesign -> exp/quick-flow-redesign</bash-stdout><bash-stderr></bash-stderr>


z


Pushed. Creating the PR.


gh pr create --repo bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD --base main --head alexeyv:exp/quick-flow-redesign --title "fix(workflows): remove ambiguous with-argument from help task chaining" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

- Remove `with argument` clause from 7 workflow completion steps that chain to `help.md`
- The clause caused LLMs to interpret `Read fully and follow: help.md with argument X` as a skill/function invocation instead of a file-read instruction, triggering "unknown skill" errors
- `help.md` already infers the completed workflow from the preceding "[Workflow] complete." text in conversation context — no changes to `help.md` needed

Also fixes:
- File #1 (`create-product-brief/step-06-complete.md`) had wrong argument (`Validate PRD` instead of `Create Brief`)
- File #7 (`check-implementation-readiness/step-06-final-assessment.md`) had casing mismatch (`implementation readiness` vs `Check Implementation Readiness`)

Both are moot now that arguments are removed entirely.

Closes #1637

## Test plan

- [ ] Grep `src/` for `with argument` — should return zero matches
- [ ] Run any workflow to completion (e.g., create-architecture) and verify `help.md` loads as a file read, not a skill invocation
- [ ] Verify `help.md` correctly infers the completed workflow from conversation context
EOF
)"

Create PR against upstream main


PR created: https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/pull/1739

Workflow complete.


say "Pull request 1739 created against main for issue 1637. Workflow complete."

TTS summary


@_experiment/runs/CAPTURE-RUN.md << Read fully and follow.


     1→# Capture QD2 Run Log
     2→
     3→**Read and follow these instructions after completing a QD2 test run.**
     4→
     5→---
     6→
     7→## 1. Save the Raw Log
     8→
     9→Copy the most recent JSONL conversation log to this directory:
    10→
    11→```bash
    12→# Find the most recent conversation log
    13→ls -lt ~/.claude/projects/-Users-alex-src-bmad-quick-flow-redesign/*.jsonl | head -1
    14→
    15→# Copy it with the naming convention: YYYY-MM-DD-<short-slug>.jsonl
    16→cp <path-from-above> _experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-slug>.jsonl
    17→```
    18→
    19→The slug should be a few hyphenated words capturing what the run attempted (e.g., `eliminate-apc-menu-gates`, `add-plan-review-to-task01`).
    20→
    21→## 2. Summarize the Run
    22→
    23→Create a matching `.md` file with the same name. Use this structure:
    24→
    25→```markdown
    26→# QD2 Run: <Title>
    27→
    28→**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
    29→**Workflow:** quick-dev2 (experimental)
    30→**Branch:** <branch name>
    31→
    32→---
    33→
    34→## Intent
    35→
    36→What was requested? Quote the user's actual words or paraphrase closely.
    37→
    38→## Routing
    39→
    40→- **Route chosen:** One-shot / Plan-code-review / Full BMM
    41→- **Rationale:** Why did the agent pick this route?
    42→
    43→## What Happened
    44→
    45→Narrative of what the agent actually did. Focus on:
    46→- Did it follow the workflow plumbing? (config loading, step transitions)
    47→- Did it capture intent correctly?
    48→- Where did it drift, assume, or get things wrong?
    49→- What clarifying questions did it ask (or fail to ask)?
    50→
    51→## Diff Produced
    52→
    53→Summarize the actual changes made (or note if no changes were made).
    54→
    55→## Human Notes
    56→
    57→<LEAVE BLANK — human fills this in>
    58→
    59→## Observations
    60→
    61→Bullet list of patterns, surprises, or insights worth tracking.
    62→```
    63→
    64→## 3. Get Human Notes
    65→
    66→Ask the human: **"Any notes on this run? How did it feel, what went wrong, what surprised you?"**
    67→
    68→Write their response into the **Human Notes** section verbatim or lightly edited for clarity. Do not summarize away their meaning.
    69→
    70→## 4. Verify
    71→
    72→Confirm both files exist:
    73→- `_experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.jsonl`
    74→- `_experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`
    75→

# Capture QD2 Run Log

**Read and follow these instructions after completing a QD2 test run.**

---

## 1. Save the Raw Log

Copy the most recent JSONL conversation log to this directory:

```bash
# Find the most recent conversation log
ls -lt ~/.claude/projects/-Users-alex-src-bmad-quick-flow-redesign/*.jsonl | head -1

# Copy it with the naming convention: YYYY-MM-DD-<short-slug>.jsonl
cp <path-from-above> _experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<short-slug>.jsonl
```

The slug should be a few hyphenated words capturing what the run attempted (e.g., `eliminate-apc-menu-gates`, `add-plan-review-to-task01`).

## 2. Summarize the Run

Create a matching `.md` file with the same name. Use this structure:

```markdown
# QD2 Run: <Title>

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Workflow:** quick-dev2 (experimental)
**Branch:** <branch name>

---

## Intent

What was requested? Quote the user's actual words or paraphrase closely.

## Routing

- **Route chosen:** One-shot / Plan-code-review / Full BMM
- **Rationale:** Why did the agent pick this route?

## What Happened

Narrative of what the agent actually did. Focus on:
- Did it follow the workflow plumbing? (config loading, step transitions)
- Did it capture intent correctly?
- Where did it drift, assume, or get things wrong?
- What clarifying questions did it ask (or fail to ask)?

## Diff Produced

Summarize the actual changes made (or note if no changes were made).

## Human Notes

<LEAVE BLANK — human fills this in>

## Observations

Bullet list of patterns, surprises, or insights worth tracking.
```

## 3. Get Human Notes

Ask the human: **"Any notes on this run? How did it feel, what went wrong, what surprised you?"**

Write their response into the **Human Notes** section verbatim or lightly edited for clarity. Do not summarize away their meaning.

## 4. Verify

Confirm both files exist:
- `_experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.jsonl`
- `_experiment/runs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md`


## Step 1: Save the Raw Log


ls -lt ~/.claude/projects/-Users-alex-src-bmad-quick-flow-redesign/*.jsonl | head -1

Find most recent conversation JSONL


-rw-------@ 1 alex  staff  1701348 Feb 22 20:32 /Users/alex/.claude/projects/-Users-alex-src-bmad-quick-flow-redesign/dec205ed-cb17-454e-bbc8-bcc3061edbcc.jsonl


Copy JSONL to experiment runs