# Pattern Compliance Checklist

## Pre-Task Execution

### Ultra-Deep Thinking Mode (UDTM)
- [ ] **UDTM Protocol Initiated**: All five phases planned
- [ ] **Multi-Angle Analysis**: Minimum 5 perspectives identified
- [ ] **Assumption Documentation**: All assumptions explicitly listed
- [ ] **Challenge Protocol**: Each assumption tested for validity
- [ ] **Verification Sources**: Three independent sources identified

### Planning and Context
- [ ] **Comprehensive Plan**: Detailed approach documented
- [ ] **Context Gathering**: All necessary information collected
- [ ] **Dependency Mapping**: All technical and business dependencies identified
- [ ] **Risk Assessment**: Potential failure modes analyzed
- [ ] **Success Criteria**: Clear, measurable outcomes defined

### Quality Gate Preparation
- [ ] **Quality Gates Defined**: Specific checkpoints established
- [ ] **Anti-Pattern Awareness**: Team briefed on patterns to avoid
- [ ] **Tool Configuration**: Linting and analysis tools properly set up
- [ ] **Review Protocol**: Brotherhood review process scheduled

## During Implementation

### Real Implementation Standards
- [ ] **No Mock Services**: All services perform actual work
- [ ] **No Placeholders**: No TODO, FIXME, or NotImplemented code
- [ ] **No Dummy Data**: Real data processing throughout
- [ ] **Specific Error Handling**: Custom exceptions for different scenarios
- [ ] **No Shortcuts**: Proper solutions, not workarounds

### Code Quality Enforcement
- [ ] **Zero Linting Violations**: Ruff checks pass completely
- [ ] **Zero Type Errors**: MyPy validation successful
- [ ] **Proper Type Hints**: All functions and methods fully typed
- [ ] **Complete Docstrings**: All public APIs documented
- [ ] **Consistent Formatting**: Code style standards enforced

### Integration Verification
- [ ] **Existing Pattern Consistency**: Follows established codebase patterns
- [ ] **API Compatibility**: Works with existing interfaces
- [ ] **Data Flow Validation**: Information flows correctly through system
- [ ] **Performance Standards**: Meets established performance criteria
- [ ] **Security Compliance**: No obvious vulnerabilities introduced

### Progressive Validation
- [ ] **Incremental Testing**: Regular testing throughout development
- [ ] **Anti-Pattern Scanning**: Continuous monitoring for prohibited patterns
- [ ] **Quality Gate Checks**: Regular validation against defined criteria
- [ ] **Integration Testing**: Ongoing verification with existing components
- [ ] **Documentation Updates**: Real-time documentation maintenance

## Brotherhood Review Requirements

### Pre-Review Preparation
- [ ] **Self-Assessment Complete**: Honest evaluation of own work
- [ ] **UDTM Documentation**: Analysis results properly documented
- [ ] **Quality Evidence**: Proof of standards compliance provided
- [ ] **Test Results**: Comprehensive testing results available
- [ ] **Issue Documentation**: Any problems and resolutions recorded

### Review Process
- [ ] **Independent Analysis**: Reviewer performs independent evaluation
- [ ] **Reality Check**: "Does this actually work?" question answered
- [ ] **Technical Validation**: Code quality and architecture verified
- [ ] **Logic Assessment**: Solution appropriateness confirmed
- [ ] **Production Readiness**: Deployment viability assessed

### Review Outcomes
- [ ] **Specific Feedback**: Concrete, actionable recommendations provided
- [ ] **Evidence-Based Assessment**: Claims supported by verifiable facts
- [ ] **Honest Evaluation**: True quality assessment, not sycophantic approval
- [ ] **Knowledge Sharing**: Learning opportunities identified and shared
- [ ] **Improvement Actions**: Clear next steps defined if needed

## Final Validation

### Functionality Verification
- [ ] **End-to-End Testing**: Complete workflow verification
- [ ] **Error Scenario Testing**: Failure modes properly handled
- [ ] **Performance Testing**: System performs within acceptable parameters
- [ ] **Security Testing**: Basic security review completed
- [ ] **User Acceptance**: Requirements fully satisfied

### Quality Standards Confirmation
- [ ] **Code Quality**: All quality metrics satisfied
- [ ] **Test Coverage**: Adequate test coverage achieved
- [ ] **Documentation Quality**: Complete and accurate documentation
- [ ] **Maintainability**: Code can be understood and modified by others
- [ ] **Scalability**: Solution handles expected growth

### Production Readiness
- [ ] **Deployment Readiness**: Can be safely deployed to production
- [ ] **Monitoring Capability**: Appropriate logging and monitoring in place
- [ ] **Rollback Capability**: Can be safely reverted if issues arise
- [ ] **Support Documentation**: Operations team has necessary information
- [ ] **Performance Baseline**: Expected performance characteristics documented

## Anti-Pattern Final Check

### Code Anti-Patterns (Zero Tolerance)
- [ ] **No Mock Services**: Verified no mock services in production paths
- [ ] **No Placeholder Code**: Confirmed no TODO, FIXME, or NotImplemented
- [ ] **No Assumption Code**: All logic based on verified facts
- [ ] **No Generic Errors**: Specific exception handling throughout

### Process Anti-Patterns (Zero Tolerance)
- [ ] **No Skipped Planning**: Proper design phase completed
- [ ] **No Quality Shortcuts**: All linting and testing standards met
- [ ] **No Assumption Implementation**: All assumptions verified before use
- [ ] **No Documentation Gaps**: Complete technical documentation provided

### Communication Anti-Patterns (Zero Tolerance)
- [ ] **No Sycophantic Approval**: All assessments include specific analysis
- [ ] **No Vague Feedback**: All feedback includes concrete examples
- [ ] **No False Confidence**: Uncertainty acknowledged where it exists
- [ ] **No Scope Creep**: Implementation matches defined requirements

## Success Criteria Validation

### Quality Achievement
- [ ] **All Standards Met**: Every quality criterion satisfied
- [ ] **Zero Critical Issues**: No blocking problems identified
- [ ] **Performance Acceptable**: Meets or exceeds performance requirements
- [ ] **Security Adequate**: No significant security vulnerabilities
- [ ] **Maintainability High**: Code is clean, well-documented, and modular

### Pattern Compliance
- [ ] **UDTM Completed**: Ultra-deep thinking mode fully executed
- [ ] **Anti-Patterns Eliminated**: Zero prohibited patterns detected
- [ ] **Quality Gates Passed**: All defined checkpoints successfully cleared
- [ ] **Brotherhood Review Completed**: Peer validation successfully completed
- [ ] **Documentation Complete**: All artifacts properly documented

### Readiness Confirmation
- [ ] **Production Ready**: Safe for production deployment
- [ ] **Team Ready**: Team understands and can support the solution
- [ ] **Process Compliant**: All organizational processes followed
- [ ] **Quality Assured**: Confidence in solution reliability and maintainability
- [ ] **Value Delivered**: Solution meets business requirements and expectations

## Checklist Completion Sign-off

**Task**: [Description]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Implementer**: [Name]
**Reviewer**: [Name]

**Compliance Status**: [ ] PASS / [ ] CONDITIONAL / [ ] FAIL
**Confidence Level**: [1-10] (Must be ≥9 for PASS)
**Notes**: [Any additional observations or concerns]

**Final Approval**: [Signature/Name] - [Date]