# Step 6.4: Handoff Dialog ## Your Task Initiate a structured handoff conversation with the BMad Architect to transfer design knowledge and align on implementation. --- ## Before You Start **Ensure you have:** - ✅ Completed step 6.3 (Test Scenario created) - ✅ Design Delivery file ready: `deliveries/DD-XXX-name.yaml` - ✅ Test Scenario file ready: `test-scenarios/TS-XXX-name.yaml` - ✅ 20-30 minutes available for focused conversation --- ## Handoff Protocol **Full protocol:** `src/core/resources/wds/handoff-protocol.md` **Duration:** 20-30 minutes **Participants:** - WDS UX Expert (you) - BMad Architect --- ## Handoff Dialog Structure ### Phase 1: Introduction (2 min) **You say:** ``` "Hey Architect! I've completed the design for [Flow Name]. I'd like to walk you through Design Delivery DD-XXX. This delivery includes: - [Number] scenarios - [Number] components - Complete test scenarios Ready for the walkthrough?" ``` **Architect responds:** ``` "Absolutely! Let's go through it." ``` --- ### Phase 2: User Value (3 min) **Explain the user value:** ``` "First, let me explain what problem we're solving: Problem: [Describe the user problem] Solution: [Describe how this flow solves it] Success Criteria: - [Metric 1] - [Metric 2] - [Metric 3] This is critical because [business value]." ``` **Questions to answer:** - Why does this flow matter? - What business value does it deliver? - How will we measure success? --- ### Phase 3: Scenario Walkthrough (8 min) **Walk through each scenario:** ``` "Let me walk you through the user flow: Scenario 1: [Name] - User starts at: [Entry point] - User action: [What they do] - System response: [What happens] - User sees: [What's displayed] - Design reference: C-Scenarios/XX-name/ [Repeat for each scenario] The complete flow is: [Entry point] → [Step 1] → [Step 2] → [Exit point]" ``` **Show:** - Excalidraw sketches (if available) - Scenario specifications - User flow diagrams **Architect may ask:** - "What happens if [edge case]?" - "How does this integrate with [existing feature]?" - "What's the data flow here?" **Answer clearly and reference specifications!** --- ### Phase 4: Technical Requirements (4 min) **Review technical requirements:** ``` "Technical requirements: Platform: - Frontend: [Framework + version] - Backend: [Framework + version] - Database: [Database + version] Integrations: - [Integration 1]: [Purpose] - [Integration 2]: [Purpose] Data Models: - [Model 1]: [Fields] - [Model 2]: [Fields] Performance: - [Requirement 1] - [Requirement 2] Security: - [Requirement 1] - [Requirement 2]" ``` **Architect may ask:** - "Why this tech stack?" - "Are there any constraints?" - "What about [technical concern]?" **Answer:** Reference `platform-requirements.yaml` if needed! --- ### Phase 5: Design System Components (3 min) **Review components:** ``` "Design system components used: Button: - Primary variant: [Usage] - Secondary variant: [Usage] - Specs: D-Design-System/.../Buttons/ Input: - Text variant: [Usage] - Email variant: [Usage] - Password variant: [Usage] - Specs: D-Design-System/.../Inputs/ [List all components] All components follow our design tokens: - Colors: tokens/colors.json - Typography: tokens/typography.json - Spacing: tokens/spacing.json" ``` **Architect may ask:** - "Do these components already exist?" - "Any new components needed?" - "What about [specific state]?" **Answer:** Reference component specifications! --- ### Phase 6: Acceptance Criteria (3 min) **Review acceptance criteria:** ``` "Acceptance criteria: Functional: - [Criterion 1] - [Criterion 2] - [Criterion 3] Non-Functional: - [Criterion 1] - [Criterion 2] Edge Cases: - [Case 1] - [Case 2] All criteria are testable and defined in TS-XXX.yaml" ``` --- ### Phase 7: Testing Approach (2 min) **Explain testing:** ``` "Testing approach: I've created test scenario TS-XXX which includes: - Happy path tests ([number] tests) - Error state tests ([number] tests) - Edge case tests ([number] tests) - Design system validation - Accessibility tests When you're done implementing, I'll: 1. Run these test scenarios 2. Create issues if problems found 3. Iterate with you until approved 4. Sign off when quality meets standards" ``` --- ### Phase 8: Complexity Estimate (2 min) **Discuss complexity:** ``` "My complexity estimate: Size: [Small/Medium/Large] Effort: [Time estimate] Risk: [Low/Medium/High] Dependencies: - [Dependency 1] - [Dependency 2] Assumptions: - [Assumption 1] - [Assumption 2] Does this align with your technical assessment?" ``` **Architect responds with their estimate:** ``` "I'll break this into [number] epics: - Epic 1: [Name] ([time]) - Epic 2: [Name] ([time]) - Epic 3: [Name] ([time]) Total: [time estimate]" ``` **Discuss any discrepancies!** --- ### Phase 9: Special Considerations (2 min) **Highlight anything special:** ``` "Special considerations: - [Important note 1] - [Important note 2] - [Potential gotcha] - [Critical requirement] Questions or concerns?" ``` **Architect may raise:** - Technical challenges - Integration concerns - Timeline issues - Resource needs **Discuss and resolve!** --- ### Phase 10: Confirmation & Next Steps (1 min) **Confirm handoff:** ``` You: "So to confirm: - You have DD-XXX.yaml (Design Delivery) - You have TS-XXX.yaml (Test Scenario) - You have all scenario specs in C-Scenarios/ - You have all component specs in D-Design-System/ - You'll break this into [number] epics - Estimated [time] to implement - You'll notify me when ready for validation Anything else you need?" Architect: "All set! I'll start architecture design and break this down into epics. I'll notify you when implementation is complete and ready for your validation." You: "Perfect! I'll start designing the next flow while you build this one. Thanks!" ``` --- ## Document the Handoff **Create handoff log:** `deliveries/DD-XXX-handoff-log.md` ```markdown # Handoff Log: DD-XXX **Date:** 2024-12-09 **Duration:** 25 minutes **Participants:** - WDS UX Expert: [Your name] - BMad Architect: Winston ## Key Points Discussed - User value and success criteria - Complete scenario walkthrough - Technical requirements confirmed - Design system components reviewed - Acceptance criteria agreed - Testing approach explained - Complexity estimate aligned ## Epic Breakdown Agreed 1. Epic 1: Authentication & Session Management (1 week) 2. Epic 2: Onboarding UI & Flow (1 week) 3. Epic 3: Family Setup & Data Models (0.5 week) 4. Epic 4: Error Handling & Edge Cases (0.5 week) **Total:** 3 weeks ## Questions & Answers Q: "How do we handle session persistence?" A: "Use Supabase Auth SDK, 30-day expiration" Q: "What if user closes app mid-onboarding?" A: "Save progress, resume at last incomplete step" ## Action Items - [ ] Architect: Create architecture document - [ ] Architect: Break down into dev stories - [ ] Architect: Notify designer when ready for validation - [ ] Designer: Start designing next flow (DD-002) ## Status **Handoff:** Complete ✅ **Delivery Status:** in_development **Next Touch Point:** Designer validation (Phase 7) ``` --- ## Update Delivery Status **Update `deliveries/DD-XXX-name.yaml`:** ```yaml delivery: status: 'in_development' # Changed from "ready" handed_off_at: '2024-12-09T12:30:00Z' assigned_to: 'bmad-architect' handoff_log: 'deliveries/DD-XXX-handoff-log.md' ``` --- ## Next Step After completing the handoff dialog: ``` [C] Continue to step-6.5-hand-off.md ``` --- ## Success Metrics ✅ Handoff dialog completed (20-30 min) ✅ All 10 phases covered ✅ Architect understands design vision ✅ Epic breakdown agreed ✅ Questions answered ✅ Handoff log documented ✅ Delivery status updated --- ## Failure Modes ❌ Rushing through handoff (< 15 min) ❌ Skipping phases ❌ Not answering architect's questions ❌ No epic breakdown agreement ❌ Not documenting handoff ❌ Leaving architect confused --- **Remember:** This handoff is critical! Take your time and ensure the architect fully understands the design!