# Research Workflow - Perplexity Prompting **Agent**: Perplexity Specialist **Purpose**: Create comprehensive, well-structured research prompts for Perplexity AI ## Overview This workflow guides you through creating effective research prompts using the Perfect Prompt Framework, ensuring you get accurate, well-cited, and comprehensive information from Perplexity AI. ## When to Use - Academic research and literature reviews - Market research and competitive intelligence - Current events and trend analysis - Business intelligence and industry analysis - Product research and user needs - Technical research and documentation - Any information gathering that requires real-time, cited sources ## Workflow Steps ### Step 1: Define Research Need **Goal**: Clarify what you need to know and why **Actions**: 1. State your research question or information need 2. Define the context and intended use 3. Identify what would constitute a successful answer 4. Determine appropriate depth level **Questions to Answer**: - What specific question needs answering? - What will you do with this information? - What depth do you need (quick facts, standard, comprehensive, academic)? - Are there time constraints (current events vs. timeless knowledge)? **Command**: `analyze-research-need` ### Step 2: Choose Prompt Category **Goal**: Select the right approach for your research **Categories**: - **Informational** - Gathering facts, data, and current information - **Instructional** - How-to guides and step-by-step processes - **Interactive** - Expert consultation and comparative analysis **Considerations**: - Informational: "What is...?", "Show me current data on..." - Instructional: "How do I...?", "What are the steps to...?" - Interactive: "As an expert in X, analyze...?", "Compare A and B..." ### Step 3: Build Core Prompt **Goal**: Create the foundation using the 5-component framework **Components to Define**: 1. **Clear Instruction** - What you want Perplexity to do - Be specific and actionable - Use clear verbs (analyze, summarize, compare, find, explain) 2. **Relevant Context** - Background information - Industry, field, or domain context - Why you're asking (use case) - Any constraints or assumptions 3. **Specific Input** - The subject matter - Precise topic or data to analyze - Relevant time frames - Geographic or domain boundaries 4. **Key Keywords** - Focus terms - 3-5 critical search terms - Specific terminology for your domain - Alternative terms to consider 5. **Output Format** - How results should be structured - List, table, narrative, comparison matrix - Sections or categories needed - Level of detail for each section **Command**: `create-research-prompt` or template-specific commands ### Step 4: Add Specialization **Goal**: Tailor the prompt for your specific use case **Professional Templates Available**: - **Educational** - Curriculum, learning resources, topic exploration - **Product Management** - Market research, user needs, competitive analysis - **Financial Analysis** - Market trends, company research, economic indicators - **Marketing Intelligence** - Audience insights, competitive tracking, trends **Enhancement Options**: - Request specific citation formats (APA, MLA, Chicago) - Ask for source diversity (academic, industry, news) - Require recency (within last 6 months, current year) - Specify expertise level (general audience, expert level) **Commands**: `template-educational`, `template-product-management`, etc. ### Step 5: Optimize for Perplexity **Goal**: Leverage Perplexity's unique strengths **Optimizations**: - **Real-time Data**: Request current information, latest trends - **Source Verification**: Ask for credible, diverse sources - **Live Web Search**: Emphasize need for most recent data - **Citation Requirements**: Specify how sources should be referenced **Add to Prompt**: - "Include citations for all claims" - "Focus on sources from the last [timeframe]" - "Provide a mix of academic and industry sources" - "Highlight any conflicting information from different sources" ### Step 6: Review Against Checklist **Goal**: Ensure prompt quality and completeness **Quality Checklist**: - ✅ Instructions are clear and unambiguous - ✅ Context is sufficient for understanding - ✅ Inputs are specific and well-defined - ✅ Keywords are relevant and focused - ✅ Output format is specified - ✅ Scope is appropriate and manageable - ✅ Real-time/current data is requested - ✅ Citation requirements are included - ✅ Language is straightforward, not vague **Common Issues to Fix**: - Vague terms: "good", "best", "nice" → Replace with specific criteria - Too broad: Narrow scope or break into multiple prompts - Missing format: Add structure for how results should appear - No citations: Always request sources and verification **Command**: `refine-research-prompt` ### Step 7: Test and Iterate **Goal**: Refine based on actual results **Process**: 1. Use the prompt in Perplexity 2. Evaluate the results: - Did it answer your question? - Is the depth appropriate? - Are sources credible and well-cited? - Is the format usable? 3. Identify gaps or issues 4. Refine specific components 5. Test again if needed **Iteration Focus Areas**: - Adjust depth if too superficial or too detailed - Add constraints if results are too broad - Refine keywords if missing key information - Modify output format if structure isn't helpful ## Output Deliverables ### Research Prompt Document Saved to: `{{research_prompts_folder}}/[topic]-research-prompt.md` **Contents**: ```markdown # Research Prompt: [Topic] ## Purpose [What you're researching and why] ## Perplexity Prompt [Complete, ready-to-use prompt] ## Metadata - Category: [Informational/Instructional/Interactive] - Depth: [Quick/Standard/Comprehensive/Academic] - Template: [Professional template used, if any] - Created: [Date] - Status: [Draft/Tested/Refined] ## Expected Outputs - [What you expect to receive] - [Key questions that should be answered] ## Notes [Any refinements needed, lessons learned, etc.] ``` ## Success Criteria A successful research workflow produces: - ✅ Clear, unambiguous prompt ready to use - ✅ All 5 framework components present and optimized - ✅ Appropriate depth for your needs - ✅ Citation and source requirements specified - ✅ Output format defined and usable - ✅ Leverages Perplexity's real-time capabilities - ✅ Documented for future reference and iteration ## Tips for Success 1. **Start Specific**: Better to be too narrow and expand than too broad 2. **Request Citations**: Always ask for sources and verification 3. **Define Format Early**: Knowing output structure helps focus the search 4. **Use Templates**: Leverage professional templates as starting points 5. **Iterate**: First prompts rarely perfect; refine based on results 6. **Document**: Save successful prompts for similar future needs 7. **Think Real-Time**: Perplexity's strength is current info; use it 8. **Be Clear About Depth**: Specify how comprehensive you need results ## Common Use Cases ### Quick Fact Checking - Minimal context needed - Specific, targeted questions - Request verification from multiple sources ### Market Research - Use Product Management or Marketing templates - Request competitive landscape - Ask for recent trends and data ### Academic Research - Use Academic template - Specify citation format - Request scholarly and peer-reviewed sources - Ask for recent studies and literature ### Competitive Intelligence - Request real-time competitor information - Ask for market positioning analysis - Require multiple source verification - Include industry context ### Learning & Education - Use Educational template - Request multiple perspectives - Ask for examples and applications - Specify expertise level --- *Master the art of research prompting to unlock Perplexity's full potential for accurate, comprehensive, and well-cited information.*