# PR #826 Syntax & Convention Analysis Date: 2025-10-28 File: `high-level-product-plan.md` --- ## Summary **Verdict**: ⚠️ The document has **placement issues** but **syntax is valid**. The file follows standard Markdown syntax and would pass basic validation, but it doesn't follow BMAD-METHOD conventions for documentation organization or integrate with the BMAD framework. --- ## Syntax Validation ### ✅ Markdown Format - **Valid Markdown**: Standard ATX headings, bullet lists, bold formatting - **Prettier Compatible**: Will pass `npm run format:check` (standard Markdown) - **No Special BMAD Syntax Required**: Unlike agents (`.agent.yaml`) or workflows (`workflow.yaml`), regular docs just need valid Markdown ### ✅ Content Structure - Logical 8-section hierarchy - Consistent formatting (headings, lists, bold) - No broken links or invalid syntax - Readable and well-organized --- ## BMAD Convention Issues ### ❌ Placement Violation **Problem**: File is placed at repository root (`/high-level-product-plan.md`) **BMAD Repository Root Convention**: Based on current structure, root-level `.md` files are limited to: - `README.md` - Project overview and quick start - `CHANGELOG.md` - Version history - `CONTRIBUTING.md` - Contribution guidelines - `v6-open-items.md` - Development tracking (temporary/internal) **Root directory observations**: ``` bmad-v6/ ├── README.md ← Entry point ├── CHANGELOG.md ← Version history ├── CONTRIBUTING.md ← How to contribute ├── v6-open-items.md ← Internal dev notes ├── PRD.md ← DOES NOT EXIST (workflows generate this in project dirs) ├── LICENSE ├── package.json ├── docs/ ← Documentation home ├── bmad/ ← Method assets ├── src/ ← Source code └── tools/ ← CLI and utilities ``` ### ❌ Documentation Organization **Expected location**: `docs/planning/` or `docs/guides/` **Evidence from codebase**: - `docs/` directory exists for documentation - `docs/ide-info/` - IDE-specific guides - `docs/installers-bundlers/` - Technical guides - Pattern suggests: `docs/{category}/{topic}.md` ### ❌ No BMAD Integration **Issue**: Content is 100% generic, no BMAD-specific elements **Missing BMAD integration opportunities**: 1. **No references to BMAD workflows** - Should reference `prd` workflow for PRD creation - Should reference `tech-spec` workflow for technical planning - Should reference `architect` agent for architecture decisions 2. **No CLI commands** - Could show `bmad architect` for architecture planning - Could show `bmad pm` for product planning - Could show workflow triggers 3. **No BMAD terminology** - Doesn't mention agents, modules, or workflows - Doesn't align with BMM (BMAD Method for Managing) concepts - Generic "Agile/Scrum/Kanban" instead of BMAD's leveled approach **From commit message**: > "Structure content to align with BMad Method PRD and Architecture templates" **Reality**: Content does NOT actually align with BMAD templates or reference them. --- ## Comparison with BMAD Documentation Patterns ### BMAD Workflow Documentation Pattern **Example**: `src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/README.md` - Describes workflow purpose and BMAD context - Shows CLI invocation (`*prd`, `bmad pm`) - References agents and other workflows - Includes BMAD-specific levels and phases ### This PR's Document - Generic planning checklist - No CLI integration - No agent references - No workflow context - Could apply to any software project --- ## Issues Detected | Issue | Severity | Description | | --------------------------- | -------- | ------------------------------------------- | | **Root placement** | High | Violates repository organization convention | | **No BMAD integration** | Medium | Generic content doesn't leverage BMAD | | **Filename genericity** | Low | `high-level-product-plan.md` is vague | | **Missing categorization** | Medium | Unclear if reference, guide, or template | | **Commit message mismatch** | Medium | Claims BMAD alignment but doesn't deliver | --- ## Recommendations ### Option 1: Relocate with BMAD Enhancement (Recommended) **Action**: Move to `docs/planning/product-planning-checklist.md` **Enhancements to add**: ```markdown ## Using BMAD for Product Planning This checklist can be completed using BMAD workflows: - **Product Requirements**: Use `bmad pm` → `*prd` workflow - **Architecture Planning**: Use `bmad architect` → `*architecture` workflow - **Technical Specifications**: Use `bmad architect` → `*tech-spec` workflow For detailed planning, see: - [BMM Planning Workflows](../src/modules/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/README.md) - [Architecture Workflows](../src/modules/bmm/workflows/3-architecture/README.md) ``` ### Option 2: Keep Generic, Relocate **Action**: Move to `docs/references/product-planning-considerations.md` **Add disclaimer**: ```markdown > **Note**: This is a general reference guide. For BMAD-specific planning, > see the [BMM Module documentation](../src/modules/bmm/README.md). ``` ### Option 3: Request Rewrite as BMAD Guide **Action**: Ask contributor to transform into BMAD-specific guide **Example structure**: ```markdown # Product Planning with BMAD ## 1. Initial Planning (Level 0-1) Use `bmad pm` agent with `*brief` workflow... ## 2. Requirements (Level 2-4) Use `bmad pm` agent with `*prd` workflow... ## 3. Architecture Planning Use `bmad architect` agent... ``` --- ## Testing Plan If we accept with relocation: 1. **Lint check**: ```bash npm run format:check -- "docs/planning/product-planning-checklist.md" ``` 2. **Link validation**: Ensure any added BMAD references are valid paths 3. **Documentation index**: Update `docs/README.md` if it exists 4. **Consistency check**: Verify filename follows kebab-case pattern --- ## Conclusion **Syntax**: ✅ Valid Markdown, no formatting issues **BMAD Convention**: ❌ Violates placement, lacks integration **Fix Complexity**: Low (simple file move + optional enhancements) **Recommended Action**: Request relocation to `docs/planning/` with optional BMAD integration suggestions