# PR #667 Implementation Plan **PR**: fix: correct status terminology to match story template **Issue**: Agents were setting invalid status values that don't match the story template valid choices **Status**: Implementation in progress **Branch**: `feature/status-terminology-667` --- ## 📋 Issue Summary ### Problem The story template (`bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml`) defines valid status choices as: - `Draft` - `Approved` - `InProgress` - `Review` - `Done` However, agents were instructing to set invalid status values: - `bmad-core/agents/dev.md` - instructed: `'Ready for Review'` (❌ invalid) - `bmad-core/tasks/apply-qa-fixes.md` - instructed: `'Ready for Done'` or `'Ready for Review'` (❌ both invalid) This causes agents to set invalid status values that violate the story template constraints. ### Impact - Stories could be created with invalid status values - Template validation could fail - Inconsistent agent behavior across different story workflows --- ## 🎯 Solution ### Changes Required #### 1. bmad-core/agents/dev.md **Line 68** - In completion command: - ❌ Change FROM: `set story status: 'Ready for Review'` - ✅ Change TO: `set story status: 'Review'` #### 2. bmad-core/tasks/apply-qa-fixes.md **Line 107-108** - In Status Rule: - ❌ Change FROM: `set Status: Ready for Done` - ✅ Change TO: `set Status: Done` - ❌ Change FROM: `set Status: Ready for Review` - ✅ Change TO: `set Status: Review` ### Total Changes - **Files modified**: 2 - **Lines changed**: 3 - **Lines added**: 3 - **Lines deleted**: 3 --- ## 🔧 Technical Details ### Story Template Valid Status Values ```yaml status: type: string enum: - Draft - Approved - InProgress - Review - Done ``` ### Terminology Mapping | Invalid Status | Valid Status | Context | | -------------------- | ------------ | ----------------------------------------- | | `'Ready for Review'` | `'Review'` | After dev completes tasks, move to review | | `'Ready for Done'` | `'Done'` | After QA approves, mark as complete | ### Why This Matters - Valid status values ensure stories are in proper workflow states - Invalid values cause template validation failures - Affects both human and AI agent understanding of story progress - Ensures consistent terminology across all agents and tasks --- ## 📊 Implementation Phases ### Phase 1: Apply Changes ✅ - [x] Read current dev.md content - [x] Replace invalid status in dev.md - [x] Read current apply-qa-fixes.md content - [x] Replace invalid statuses in apply-qa-fixes.md ### Phase 2: Validation 🔄 - [ ] Run npm validate - [ ] Run npm lint - [ ] Verify no new errors - [ ] Check schema compliance ### Phase 3: Documentation - [ ] Create comprehensive diffs - [ ] Create patch summary file - [ ] Document test results - [ ] Create final status report ### Phase 4: Commit & GitHub - [ ] Commit changes with proper message - [ ] Post GitHub comment with results - [ ] Copy .patch/667 to backup location --- ## ✅ Validation Checklist ### Pre-Commit Validation - [ ] Files modified: 2 - [ ] Status values corrected in both files - [ ] npm validate: All agents & teams pass - [ ] npm lint: No new errors from our changes - [ ] No syntax errors introduced - [ ] Changes match PR specification exactly ### Post-Commit Validation - [ ] Commits with proper message - [ ] Branch ready for merge - [ ] Documentation comprehensive - [ ] All tests passing --- ## 🎓 Key Points 1. **Minimal Change**: Only 3 lines changed across 2 files 2. **Bug Fix Type**: Correcting invalid status values to match template 3. **Zero Regressions**: Core system unaffected 4. **Backward Compatible**: Agents now use valid status values 5. **Improves Quality**: Ensures compliance with story template constraints --- ## 📝 Related Files - `bmad-core/templates/story-tmpl.yaml` - Defines valid status choices - `bmad-core/agents/dev.md` - Dev agent instructions (line 68) - `bmad-core/tasks/apply-qa-fixes.md` - QA fix task instructions (lines 107-108) --- **Next Steps**: Validate changes and run tests