# Branching Strategy BMad uses a **stable-branch** model: `main` is the development branch, and numbered branches hold stable releases that receive only cherry-picked fixes. ``` main ●───●───●───●───●───●───●───●──────► 7.0, ... \ \ v6 ●───●───● \ patches only │ │ │ \ v6.0.0 v6.0.2 \ │ \ v6.0.1 \ \ v6.1 ●───●───● patches only │ │ v6.1.0 v6.1.1 ``` Every minor version (6.0, 6.1, ...) ships from `main` as its own stable branch. Only patches are cherry-picked onto stable branches. This pattern is used by Node.js, Go, and Python — adapted here for a project that ships an npm CLI. --- ## The Three Lanes | Branch | Purpose | What goes here | Gets tagged? | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `main` | Next version development | All new work, via PRs | Pre-release only (`X.Y.0-alpha.N`) | | `v` (e.g., `v6`, `v6.1`) | Stable release maintenance | Cherry-picks from `main` only | Yes — `vX.Y.Z` | | Forks | Experimental work | Anything | Never | ### Rules 1. **All fixes must land on `main` first**, then get cherry-picked to the stable branch. 2. **One stable branch at a time.** When a new major version ships, the old one stops receiving patches. --- ## Lifecycle **New version:** Feature branches target `main` (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md)). Pre-release tags cut from `main` as needed. **Stable release:** When ready, cut a stable branch from `main` (e.g., `v6`, `v6.1`), tag it, bump `main` to the next version. From that point, `main` is the next release. **Patch:** Fix lands on `main` via normal PR. Cherry-pick the merged commit to the stable branch. Tag the patch release. **Retirement:** When the next major ships, the old stable branch is left as-is. Tags remain as permanent references. --- ## FAQ **Why not Git Flow?** Git Flow adds a `develop` branch and release branches per version. For one active version and a small team, that's overhead without benefit. **Why cherry-pick instead of merging `main` into stable?** Cherry-picking isolates fixes; merging would pull incomplete features from `main`.