# template: id: pricing-strategy-template name: Pricing Strategy Template version: 1.0 output: format: markdown filename: docs/pricing-strategy.md title: "{{rfq_number}} Pricing Strategy" workflow: mode: interactive elicitation: advanced-elicitation sections: - id: overview title: Overview content: | This template provides a structured format for developing a comprehensive pricing strategy for government RFQ responses. It helps teams create competitive yet realistic pricing approaches that balance win probability with profitability. - id: usage-instructions title: Usage Instructions content: | 1. Complete this template during the early proposal planning phase 2. Involve both business development and pricing teams 3. Align pricing strategy with technical approach and win themes 4. Update as new information becomes available - id: template-structure title: Template Structure sections: - id: strategy-header title: Strategy Header type: code language: markdown content: | # [RFQ Number] Pricing Strategy # [Agency Name] # [RFQ Title] # [Date] - id: executive-summary title: Executive Summary elicit: true sections: - id: strategy-overview title: Strategy Overview template: | **Pricing Approach**: {{pricing_approach}} **Target Price Range**: ${{lower_bound}} - ${{upper_bound}} **Summary Strategy**: {{summary_strategy}} **Key Strategy Elements**: - {{element_1}} - {{element_2}} - {{element_3}} instruction: Provide an overview of your pricing strategy, including approach, target price range, summary, and key elements - id: market-analysis title: Market Analysis elicit: true sections: - id: customer-budget-analysis title: Customer Budget Analysis type: table columns: [Budget Factor, Assessment, Source, Impact on Strategy] instruction: Analyze the customer budget factors and their impact on your pricing strategy examples: - "| Published budget | $[Amount] | [Source] | [Impact] |" - "| Historical contract value | $[Amount] | [Source] | [Impact] |" - "| Market intelligence | $[Amount] | [Source] | [Impact] |" - "| Customer constraints | [Constraints] | [Source] | [Impact] |" - "| Budget cycle factors | [Factors] | [Source] | [Impact] |" - id: competitive-analysis title: Competitive Analysis type: table columns: [Competitor, Pricing Approach, Strengths, Vulnerabilities, Our Strategy] instruction: Analyze competitors and develop strategic responses to their pricing approaches examples: - "| [Competitor 1] | [Approach] | [Strengths] | [Vulnerabilities] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Competitor 2] | [Approach] | [Strengths] | [Vulnerabilities] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Competitor 3] | [Approach] | [Strengths] | [Vulnerabilities] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Competitor 4] | [Approach] | [Strengths] | [Vulnerabilities] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Competitor 5] | [Approach] | [Strengths] | [Vulnerabilities] | [Strategy] |" - id: price-sensitivity-analysis title: Price Sensitivity Analysis type: table columns: [Factor, Assessment, Evidence, Strategy Implication] instruction: Analyze factors affecting price sensitivity and their implications for your strategy examples: - "| Budget constraints | [High/Medium/Low] | [Evidence] | [Implication] |" - "| Technical emphasis | [High/Medium/Low] | [Evidence] | [Implication] |" - "| Incumbent pricing | [High/Medium/Low] | [Evidence] | [Implication] |" - "| Value sensitivity | [High/Medium/Low] | [Evidence] | [Implication] |" - "| LPTA vs. best value | [High/Medium/Low] | [Evidence] | [Implication] |" - id: pricing-approach title: Pricing Approach elicit: true sections: - id: contract-type-strategy title: Contract Type Strategy template: | **Contract Type**: {{contract_type}} **Rationale**: {{contract_rationale}} **Risk Considerations**: - {{risk_1}} - {{risk_2}} - {{risk_3}} instruction: Specify the contract type, provide rationale, and list risk considerations - id: labor-rate-strategy title: Labor Rate Strategy type: table columns: [Labor Category, Market Position, Rationale, Risk Assessment] instruction: Detail your labor rate strategy for key categories examples: - "| [Category 1] | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| [Category 2] | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| [Category 3] | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| [Category 4] | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| [Category 5] | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - id: indirect-rate-strategy title: Indirect Rate Strategy type: table columns: [Rate Category, Rate, Market Position, Rationale, Risk Assessment] instruction: Detail your indirect rate strategy examples: - "| Fringe | [Rate]% | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| Overhead | [Rate]% | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| G&A | [Rate]% | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - "| Fee/Profit | [Rate]% | [Above/At/Below market] | [Rationale] | [Risk] |" - id: subcontractor-pricing-strategy title: Subcontractor Pricing Strategy type: table columns: [Subcontractor, Pricing Approach, Negotiation Strategy, Risk Management] instruction: Detail your strategy for each subcontractor examples: - "| [Subcontractor 1] | [Approach] | [Strategy] | [Risk Management] |" - "| [Subcontractor 2] | [Approach] | [Strategy] | [Risk Management] |" - "| [Subcontractor 3] | [Approach] | [Strategy] | [Risk Management] |" - id: cost-reduction-strategies title: Cost Reduction Strategies elicit: true sections: - id: efficiency-measures title: Efficiency Measures type: table columns: [Efficiency Measure, Cost Impact, Implementation Approach, Technical Risk] instruction: Identify efficiency measures to reduce costs examples: - "| [Measure 1] | $[Amount] | [Approach] | [Risk] |" - "| [Measure 2] | $[Amount] | [Approach] | [Risk] |" - "| [Measure 3] | $[Amount] | [Approach] | [Risk] |" - "| [Measure 4] | $[Amount] | [Approach] | [Risk] |" - "| [Measure 5] | $[Amount] | [Approach] | [Risk] |" - id: alternative-approaches title: Alternative Approaches type: table columns: [Alternative, Cost Impact, Technical Impact, Risk Assessment, Recommendation] instruction: Identify alternative approaches that could reduce costs examples: - "| [Alternative 1] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Risk] | [Recommendation] |" - "| [Alternative 2] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Risk] | [Recommendation] |" - "| [Alternative 3] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Risk] | [Recommendation] |" - id: pricing-scenarios title: Pricing Scenarios elicit: true sections: - id: base-case-scenario title: Base Case Scenario type: table columns: [Element, Approach, Price Impact, Win Probability, Profit Impact] instruction: Detail your base case pricing scenario examples: - "| Labor rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Staffing levels | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Indirect rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Subcontractors | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| ODCs | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Fee/Profit | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| **Total** | | $[Amount] | [Probability]% | [Margin]% |" - id: aggressive-scenario title: Aggressive Scenario type: table columns: [Element, Approach, Price Impact, Win Probability, Profit Impact] instruction: Detail your aggressive pricing scenario examples: - "| Labor rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Staffing levels | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Indirect rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Subcontractors | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| ODCs | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Fee/Profit | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| **Total** | | $[Amount] | [Probability]% | [Margin]% |" - id: conservative-scenario title: Conservative Scenario type: table columns: [Element, Approach, Price Impact, Win Probability, Profit Impact] instruction: Detail your conservative pricing scenario examples: - "| Labor rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Staffing levels | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Indirect rates | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Subcontractors | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| ODCs | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| Fee/Profit | [Approach] | $[Amount] | [Impact] | [Impact] |" - "| **Total** | | $[Amount] | [Probability]% | [Margin]% |" - id: risk-management title: Risk Management elicit: true sections: - id: pricing-risks title: Pricing Risks type: table columns: [Risk, Probability, Impact, Mitigation Strategy] instruction: Identify and analyze pricing risks examples: - "| [Risk 1] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Risk 2] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Risk 3] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Risk 4] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |" - "| [Risk 5] | [High/Medium/Low] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Strategy] |" - id: cost-realism-strategy title: Cost Realism Strategy type: table columns: [Element, Realism Approach, Evidence, Narrative Strategy] instruction: Detail your approach to ensuring cost realism examples: - "| Labor rates | [Approach] | [Evidence] | [Strategy] |" - "| Labor hours | [Approach] | [Evidence] | [Strategy] |" - "| Indirect rates | [Approach] | [Evidence] | [Strategy] |" - "| Subcontractors | [Approach] | [Evidence] | [Strategy] |" - "| ODCs | [Approach] | [Evidence] | [Strategy] |" - id: value-proposition title: Value Proposition elicit: true sections: - id: price-to-win-strategy title: Price-to-Win Strategy template: | **Target Price Point**: ${{target_price_point}} **Rationale**: {{price_rationale}} **Competitive Positioning**: {{competitive_positioning}} instruction: Specify the target price point, provide rationale, and explain competitive positioning - id: value-messaging title: Value Messaging type: table columns: [Value Element, Cost Impact, Customer Benefit, Messaging Approach] instruction: Identify and describe value elements that justify your pricing examples: - "| [Element 1] | $[Amount] | [Benefit] | [Approach] |" - "| [Element 2] | $[Amount] | [Benefit] | [Approach] |" - "| [Element 3] | $[Amount] | [Benefit] | [Approach] |" - "| [Element 4] | $[Amount] | [Benefit] | [Approach] |" - "| [Element 5] | $[Amount] | [Benefit] | [Approach] |" - id: implementation-plan title: Implementation Plan elicit: true sections: - id: pricing-development-timeline title: Pricing Development Timeline type: table columns: [Milestone, Date, Owner, Deliverables] instruction: Detail the timeline for developing and finalizing your pricing examples: - "| Initial strategy | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - "| Technical alignment | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - "| Subcontractor pricing | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - "| Draft pricing | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - "| Review and adjustment | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - "| Final pricing | [Date] | [Owner] | [Deliverables] |" - id: pricing-team title: Pricing Team type: table columns: [Role, Name, Responsibilities] instruction: Identify team members and their responsibilities examples: - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Responsibilities] |" - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Responsibilities] |" - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Responsibilities] |" - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Responsibilities] |" - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Responsibilities] |" - id: pricing-strategy-best-practices title: Pricing Strategy Best Practices content: | - **Customer Focus**: Understand customer budget constraints and priorities - **Competitive Awareness**: Position pricing strategically against competitors - **Technical Alignment**: Ensure pricing strategy aligns with technical approach - **Risk Balance**: Balance competitive pricing with appropriate risk management - **Value Emphasis**: Emphasize value over lowest price when appropriate - **Cost Realism**: Ensure pricing is realistic and defensible - **Scenario Planning**: Develop multiple pricing scenarios for flexibility - **Win Theme Integration**: Align pricing strategy with overall win themes - **Data-Driven**: Base pricing decisions on market data and intelligence - **Strategic Flexibility**: Build in flexibility to adjust as new information emerges