# <!-- Powered by BMAD™ Core -->
template:
  id: evaluation-report-template
  name: Evaluation Report Template
  version: 1.0
  output:
    format: markdown
    filename: docs/evaluation-report.md
    title: "{{rfq_number}} Evaluation Report"

workflow:
  mode: interactive
  elicitation: advanced-elicitation

sections:
  - id: overview
    title: Overview
    content: |
      This template provides a structured format for simulating government evaluator reviews of proposal content. It helps identify strengths, weaknesses, and compliance issues before submission to maximize evaluation scores.

  - id: usage-instructions
    title: Usage Instructions
    content: |
      1. Select proposal section(s) for evaluation
      2. Apply relevant Section M evaluation criteria
      3. Conduct objective assessment from evaluator perspective
      4. Document findings and recommendations

  - id: template-structure
    title: Template Structure
    sections:
      - id: report-header
        title: Report Header
        type: code
        language: markdown
        content: |
          # [RFQ Number] Evaluation Report
          # [Agency Name]
          # [RFQ Title]
          # [Date]
          # [Review Type: Pink Team / Red Team / Gold Team]

  - id: executive-summary
    title: Executive Summary
    elicit: true
    sections:
      - id: overall-assessment
        title: Overall Assessment
        template: |
          **Adjectival Rating**: {{adjectival_rating}}

          **Summary Assessment**:
          {{summary_assessment}}

          **Key Strengths**:

          - {{strength_1}}
          - {{strength_2}}
          - {{strength_3}}

          **Critical Weaknesses**:

          - {{weakness_1}}
          - {{weakness_2}}
          - {{weakness_3}}

          **Recommendation**:
          {{recommendation}}
        instruction: Provide overall assessment, strengths, weaknesses, and recommendation
        examples:
          - "**Adjectival Rating**: Outstanding / Good / Acceptable / Marginal / Unacceptable"
          - "**Recommendation**: Submit as is / Minor revisions needed / Major revisions needed / Significant rework required"

  - id: detailed-evaluation
    title: Detailed Evaluation
    elicit: true
    sections:
      - id: technical-factor-template
        title: Technical Factor [Factor Name]
        template: |
          **Adjectival Rating**: {{factor_rating}}

          **Strengths**:

          1. {{strength_description_1}}
             - **Impact**: {{strength_impact_1}}
             - **Evidence**: {{strength_evidence_1}}

          2. {{strength_description_2}}
             - **Impact**: {{strength_impact_2}}
             - **Evidence**: {{strength_evidence_2}}

          **Weaknesses**:

          1. {{weakness_description_1}}
             - **Impact**: {{weakness_impact_1}}
             - **Recommendation**: {{weakness_recommendation_1}}

          2. {{weakness_description_2}}
             - **Impact**: {{weakness_impact_2}}
             - **Recommendation**: {{weakness_recommendation_2}}

          **Risks**:

          1. {{risk_description_1}}
             - **Impact**: {{risk_impact_1}}
             - **Mitigation Recommendation**: {{risk_mitigation_1}}

          **Deficiencies**:

          1. {{deficiency_description_1}}
             - **Impact**: {{deficiency_impact_1}}
             - **Correction Required**: {{deficiency_correction_1}}
        instruction: Repeat this section structure for each evaluation factor
        examples:
          - "**Adjectival Rating**: Outstanding / Good / Acceptable / Marginal / Unacceptable"

  - id: compliance-assessment
    title: Compliance Assessment
    elicit: true
    sections:
      - id: section-l-compliance
        title: Section L Compliance
        type: table
        columns: [Requirement, Compliant, Notes]
        instruction: Fill in the compliance assessment table
        examples:
          - "| [Requirement] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Requirement] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Requirement] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"

      - id: section-m-alignment
        title: Section M Alignment
        type: table
        columns: [Evaluation Factor, Addressed, Effectiveness, Notes]
        instruction: Fill in the alignment assessment table
        examples:
          - "| [Factor] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Factor] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Factor] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Notes] |"

  - id: win-theme-assessment
    title: Win Theme Assessment
    elicit: true
    sections:
      - id: win-theme-table
        title: Win Theme Incorporation
        type: table
        columns: [Win Theme, Effectively Incorporated, Notes]
        instruction: Fill in the win theme assessment table
        examples:
          - "| [Theme] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Theme] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"
          - "| [Theme] | [Yes/No/Partial] | [Notes] |"

  - id: improvement-recommendations
    title: Improvement Recommendations
    elicit: true
    sections:
      - id: priority-1
        title: Priority 1 (Critical)
        template: |
          - {{critical_recommendation_1}}
          - {{critical_recommendation_2}}
          - {{critical_recommendation_3}}
        instruction: Provide specific critical recommendations with reference to proposal sections

      - id: priority-2
        title: Priority 2 (Important)
        template: |
          - {{important_recommendation_1}}
          - {{important_recommendation_2}}
          - {{important_recommendation_3}}
        instruction: Provide specific important recommendations with reference to proposal sections

      - id: priority-3
        title: Priority 3 (Enhancement)
        template: |
          - {{enhancement_recommendation_1}}
          - {{enhancement_recommendation_2}}
          - {{enhancement_recommendation_3}}
        instruction: Provide specific enhancement recommendations with reference to proposal sections

  - id: evaluator-perspective
    title: Evaluator Perspective Notes
    elicit: true
    template: |
      {{evaluator_notes}}
    instruction: Provide additional notes from evaluator perspective, including overall impressions, potential scoring considerations, and comparative assessment against likely competitors

  - id: review-team
    title: Review Team
    elicit: true
    type: table
    columns: [Role, Name, Section Reviewed]
    instruction: Fill in the review team information
    examples:
      - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Section] |"
      - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Section] |"
      - "| [Role] | [Name] | [Section] |"

  - id: best-practices
    title: Best Practices for Evaluation Simulation
    content: |
      - **Evaluator Mindset**: Review from the perspective of government evaluators, not proposal authors
      - **Criteria Focus**: Base all evaluations strictly on Section M criteria
      - **Evidence-Based**: Provide specific examples for all findings
      - **Constructive Approach**: Frame weaknesses with actionable improvement recommendations
      - **Prioritized Feedback**: Focus on highest-impact improvements first
      - **Objective Assessment**: Evaluate based on what's actually in the proposal, not what authors intended
      - **Comprehensive Coverage**: Review all sections against all applicable criteria
      - **Documentation Discipline**: Maintain detailed records of all findings and recommendations