# Trend Validation Checklist ## Overview This checklist helps you systematically validate whether a potential trend is real, sustainable, and represents a genuine opportunity. Use this before investing significant time or resources into pursuing a trend. ## Quick Assessment (5 Minutes) Use this for initial filtering of potential trends: ### Minimum Viability Check - [ ] Multiple independent people/sources mentioning this (not just one viral post) - [ ] Trend has a clear name/description (not vague or ambiguous) - [ ] You can find at least 3 different data sources confirming interest - [ ] Interest appears to be growing, not declining - [ ] There's evidence people are searching for this (Google Trends confirms) **If ALL 5 are checked → Proceed to full validation** **If fewer than 5 → Likely not worth pursuing right now** --- ## Full Validation (30-60 Minutes) ### Part 1: Demand Validation #### Search Interest ✅ - [ ] Google Trends shows rising or sustained interest (not declining) - [ ] Trend data spans at least 3 months (not just a spike) - [ ] Related searches exist and are growing - [ ] People are asking questions about it (autocomplete, "People also ask") - [ ] Search volume is significant enough (not zero or "not enough data") **Evidence to collect**: - Screenshot of Google Trends graph - List of related/rising searches - Estimate of search volume level (high/medium/low) --- #### Social Proof ✅ - [ ] Active conversation on at least 2 social platforms - [ ] Hashtag or keyword shows growth (views, posts, engagement) - [ ] Multiple types of content creators covering it (not just one niche) - [ ] Comments/engagement indicate genuine interest (not bots) - [ ] User-generated content exists (people creating, not just consuming) **Evidence to collect**: - TikTok: Hashtag view counts and growth - Instagram: Post count and engagement rates - Reddit: Discussion threads and upvotes - YouTube: Video counts and view rates - Twitter: Tweet volume and sentiment **Red flags** 🚩: - Only one platform talking about it - All content from the same source/brand - Comments feel astroturfed or fake - No organic user-generated content --- #### Community Formation ✅ - [ ] Dedicated communities exist (subreddits, Facebook groups, Discord servers) - [ ] People asking questions and helping each other - [ ] Resources being created (wikis, guides, recommendations) - [ ] Recurring members/participants (not drive-by traffic) - [ ] Organic growth in community size **Evidence to collect**: - Community names and sizes - Engagement metrics (posts per day, comments) - Examples of helpful resources being created **Red flags** 🚩: - No communities exist yet - Communities are ghost towns - Only promotional content, no genuine discussion --- ### Part 2: Commercial Validation #### Products/Services Available ✅ - [ ] Products or services currently being sold - [ ] Multiple sellers/brands (not just one) - [ ] Price points established (market has agreed on value) - [ ] Sales data or indicators available (reviews, ratings, rank) - [ ] Inventory movement (products selling out or restocking) **Evidence to collect**: - Amazon: Best seller rank, review counts - Etsy/Shopify: Number of shops selling - Price range: Low to high - Sales indicators (review velocity, stock status) **Red flags** 🚩: - No commercial products exist - Only one brand with no competition - Products available but zero reviews/sales - Wildly inconsistent pricing (market confusion) --- #### Willingness to Pay ✅ - [ ] Evidence of actual purchases (reviews, unboxings, testimonials) - [ ] People asking "where to buy" in comments/forums - [ ] Affiliate links or recommendations in content - [ ] Price points seem sustainable (not loss-leaders) - [ ] Multiple price tiers exist (budget to premium) **Evidence to collect**: - Customer reviews mentioning purchase - "Where to buy" comments - Affiliate content or recommendation posts - Price analysis across tiers **Red flags** 🚩: - People interested but not buying - All commercial products are failures/negative reviews - Only free versions exist, no paid offerings - "Where to buy" questions go unanswered --- ### Part 3: Sustainability Assessment #### Trend Drivers ✅ - [ ] Clear underlying need being fulfilled (functional, emotional, social) - [ ] Multiple drivers (not just one thing making it popular) - [ ] Drivers are sustainable (not based on single event/person) - [ ] Aligns with broader macro trends - [ ] Makes logical sense (not purely random) **Evaluate each driver**: | Driver Type | Present? | Sustainable? | Notes | | ------------------ | -------- | ------------ | -------------------------------- | | Functional need | Y/N | Y/N | What problem does it solve? | | Emotional benefit | Y/N | Y/N | How does it make people feel? | | Social/identity | Y/N | Y/N | What does it signal? | | Novelty | Y/N | Y/N | What's new about it? | | Technology enabler | Y/N | Y/N | What tech makes it possible? | | Cultural shift | Y/N | Y/N | What value is changing? | | Economic factor | Y/N | Y/N | What financial aspect drives it? | **Strong trends have 3+ sustainable drivers** **Fads typically have only 1 driver (often just novelty)** --- #### Fad vs. Trend Analysis ✅ **Fad Indicators** (❌ Warning signs): - [ ] Viral spike with no sustained interest - [ ] Pure novelty with no practical benefit - [ ] Celebrity/influencer-driven only (no organic adoption) - [ ] Makes no logical sense (random) - [ ] Similar past fads that quickly died - [ ] No clear target audience problem solving - [ ] Single channel/platform phenomenon **Trend Indicators** (✅ Positive signs): - [ ] Sustained growth over months - [ ] Solves real problem or fulfills genuine need - [ ] Multiple independent drivers - [ ] Cross-platform and cross-demographic spread - [ ] Related to broader macro trends - [ ] Commercial ecosystem forming - [ ] Organic community building **Score**: - Fad indicators: [X] / 7 - Trend indicators: [X] / 7 **If more fad indicators than trend indicators → High risk** --- ### Part 4: Opportunity Assessment #### Market Characteristics ✅ - [ ] Market size is sufficient for your goals - [ ] Market is growing (not shrinking or flat) - [ ] Target audience is defined and reachable - [ ] Multiple customer segments or use cases exist - [ ] Market is not fully saturated yet **Market Size Estimate**: - Potential customers: [Estimate] - Annual spending on category: [If available] - Growth rate: [Percentage or direction] --- #### Competitive Landscape ✅ - [ ] Competitive intensity is acceptable (not zero, not overwhelming) - [ ] Existing solutions have gaps or weaknesses - [ ] Room for differentiation exists - [ ] Not dominated by major players with unlimited resources - [ ] Barriers to entry are manageable **Competition Analysis**: | Factor | Assessment | Notes | | ------------------------------ | --------------------------------- | ----- | | Number of competitors | Few / Moderate / Many | | | Quality of solutions | Poor / Mixed / Excellent | | | Market concentration | Fragmented / Balanced / Dominated | | | Innovation rate | Slow / Moderate / Fast | | | Your differentiation potential | High / Medium / Low | | --- #### Timing Assessment ✅ - [ ] Trend is early enough (not oversaturated) - [ ] Trend is mature enough (not too speculative) - [ ] Window of opportunity is open - [ ] No major negative catalysts on horizon - [ ] Momentum is in your favor **Trend Lifecycle Stage**: - [ ] Innovators (2.5%) - Very early, high risk, high potential - [ ] Early Adopters (13.5%) - Early but validated, good timing - [ ] Early Majority (34%) - Growing rapidly, competitive - [ ] Late Majority (34%) - Mature, saturated, late - [ ] Laggards (16%) - Declining, very late **Ideal entry: Early Adopters to Early Majority transition** --- ### Part 5: Execution Feasibility #### Resource Requirements ✅ - [ ] You can afford the capital investment required - [ ] You have or can acquire necessary skills - [ ] Timeline fits your constraints - [ ] You can access the target audience - [ ] You have or can build distribution channels **Resource Check**: - Capital needed: [Amount or Low/Med/High] - Key skills required: [List] - Time to first revenue: [Estimate] - Distribution channels: [Available channels] --- #### Personal Fit ✅ - [ ] Topic interests you (important for sustained effort) - [ ] Aligns with your skills or learning goals - [ ] Fits your values and brand - [ ] You understand the target audience - [ ] You're willing to commit for required timeline **Personal Alignment Score**: [X] / 5 --- ### Part 6: Risk Assessment #### Identified Risks ✅ **Market Risks**: - [ ] Assess: Could this trend reverse or decline quickly? - [ ] Assess: Is the market size actually too small? - [ ] Assess: Are customer acquisition costs too high? **Competitive Risks**: - [ ] Assess: Could a major player easily enter? - [ ] Assess: Is there a risk of being out-competed on price? - [ ] Assess: Could your approach be easily copied? **Execution Risks**: - [ ] Assess: Is this harder to execute than it appears? - [ ] Assess: Are there supply chain or operational challenges? - [ ] Assess: Do you have all the skills/resources needed? **External Risks**: - [ ] Assess: Regulatory risks? - [ ] Assess: Economic downturn impact? - [ ] Assess: Platform/distribution risks? - [ ] Assess: Cultural backlash potential? **List all identified risks**: 1. [Risk]: [Likelihood: High/Med/Low] [Impact: High/Med/Low] 2. [Risk]: [Likelihood: High/Med/Low] [Impact: High/Med/Low] 3. [Risk]: [Likelihood: High/Med/Low] [Impact: High/Med/Low] **High likelihood + High impact risks = Proceed with caution or pass** --- ## Validation Scoring ### Calculate Overall Scores **Demand Score** (/15 possible): - Search Interest: [X] / 5 - Social Proof: [X] / 5 - Community Formation: [X] / 5 - **Total**: [X] / 15 **Commercial Score** (/10 possible): - Products Available: [X] / 5 - Willingness to Pay: [X] / 5 - **Total**: [X] / 10 **Sustainability Score** (/14 possible): - Trend Drivers: [X] / 7 - Trend vs. Fad: [X] / 7 - **Total**: [X] / 14 **Opportunity Score** (/15 possible): - Market Characteristics: [X] / 5 - Competitive Landscape: [X] / 5 - Timing Assessment: [X] / 5 - **Total**: [X] / 15 **Execution Score** (/10 possible): - Resource Requirements: [X] / 5 - Personal Fit: [X] / 5 - **Total**: [X] / 10 **Overall Validation Score**: [X] / 64 --- ## Decision Framework ### Score Interpretation **50-64 points** (78%+): 🟢 **High Confidence - Pursue** - Strong trend with clear opportunity - Multiple validation signals - Manageable risks - Good personal fit - **Action**: Move forward with confidence **40-49 points** (62-77%): 🟡 **Medium Confidence - Validate Further** - Promising trend with some gaps - Some validation signals - Moderate risks - **Action**: Run small tests before full commitment **30-39 points** (47-61%): 🟠 **Low Confidence - Proceed with Caution** - Weak trend signals or poor fit - Significant risks or gaps - **Action**: Only pursue if you have unique advantages **Below 30 points** (<47%): 🔴 **Do Not Pursue** - Insufficient validation - Too many red flags - Better opportunities elsewhere - **Action**: Pass and look for better trends --- ## Red Flags Summary **Automatic disqualifiers** (even if score is high): - [ ] Clear evidence of declining interest - [ ] No commercial validation after 6+ months - [ ] Dominated by major player with unlimited resources - [ ] Conflicts with regulations or laws - [ ] Requires resources you cannot access - [ ] Purely dependent on single platform/person/event **If any of these are checked, seriously reconsider pursuing** --- ## Final Validation Questions Before committing, answer these honestly: 1. **Would you still pursue this if it took 2x longer than expected?** Y/N 2. **If this trend declined 50%, would there still be an opportunity?** Y/N 3. **Can you reach your target customers cost-effectively?** Y/N 4. **Do you have or can you build a defensible position?** Y/N 5. **Is this aligned with where you want to be in 3 years?** Y/N **If 4-5 Yes**: Green light ✅ **If 2-3 Yes**: Proceed cautiously ⚠️ **If 0-1 Yes**: Probably pass ❌ --- ## Documentation Template Use this to record your validation results: ``` TREND VALIDATION REPORT ----------------------- Trend Name: [Name] Validation Date: [Date] Validated By: [Your name] SCORES: - Demand: [X]/15 - Commercial: [X]/10 - Sustainability: [X]/14 - Opportunity: [X]/15 - Execution: [X]/10 - TOTAL: [X]/64 ([X]%) CONFIDENCE LEVEL: [High/Medium/Low] KEY FINDINGS: - Strength 1: [Finding] - Strength 2: [Finding] - Strength 3: [Finding] - Risk 1: [Finding] - Risk 2: [Finding] DECISION: [Pursue / Test / Pass] RATIONALE: [2-3 sentences explaining your decision] NEXT STEPS: 1. [Action] 2. [Action] 3. [Action] REVIEW DATE: [When to re-assess] ``` --- ## Validation Workflow **Step 1**: Quick Assessment (5 min) - If fails → Pass - If passes → Continue **Step 2**: Full Validation (60 min) - Complete all sections - Calculate scores - Document findings **Step 3**: Decision - Review score and flags - Answer final questions - Make go/no-go decision **Step 4**: Action - If pursuing → Create action plan - If testing → Design small experiment - If passing → Document for future reference **Step 5**: Review - Set reminder to re-validate in 30-90 days - Track if predictions were accurate - Refine your validation process --- ## Remember - **Validation is not procrastination** - it's smart risk management - **No trend is perfect** - you're looking for "good enough," not flawless - **Trust your gut** - if something feels off despite good scores, dig deeper - **Document everything** - future you will thank present you - **Update regularly** - trends change, re-validate periodically The best time to catch a trend is when validation is strong but competition is still light. Use this checklist to find that sweet spot! 🎯