Compare commits
7 Commits
69026037df
...
075983cd0b
| Author | SHA1 | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
|
075983cd0b | |
|
|
9fe79882b2 | |
|
|
ebb20f675f | |
|
|
82cc10824a | |
|
|
59608d360a | |
|
|
4d48b0dbe1 | |
|
|
10dc25f43d |
|
|
@ -2,8 +2,21 @@
|
|||
# Discord notification helper functions
|
||||
|
||||
# Escape markdown special chars and @mentions for safe Discord display
|
||||
# Bracket expression: ] must be first, then other chars. In POSIX bracket expr, \ is literal.
|
||||
esc() { sed -e 's/[][\*_()~`>]/\\&/g' -e 's/@/@ /g'; }
|
||||
# Skips content inside <URL> wrappers to preserve URLs intact
|
||||
esc() {
|
||||
awk '{
|
||||
result = ""; in_url = 0; n = length($0)
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
||||
c = substr($0, i, 1)
|
||||
if (c == "<" && substr($0, i, 8) ~ /^<https?:/) in_url = 1
|
||||
if (in_url) { result = result c; if (c == ">") in_url = 0 }
|
||||
else if (c == "@") result = result "@ "
|
||||
else if (index("[]\\*_()~`", c) > 0) result = result "\\" c
|
||||
else result = result c
|
||||
}
|
||||
print result
|
||||
}'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Truncate to $1 chars (or 80 if wall-of-text with <3 spaces)
|
||||
trunc() {
|
||||
|
|
@ -13,3 +26,9 @@ trunc() {
|
|||
[ "$spaces" -lt 3 ] && [ ${#txt} -gt 80 ] && txt=$(printf '%s' "$txt" | cut -c1-80)
|
||||
printf '%s' "$txt"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Remove incomplete URL at end of truncated text (incomplete URLs are useless)
|
||||
strip_trailing_url() { sed -E 's~<?https?://[^[:space:]]*$~~'; }
|
||||
|
||||
# Wrap URLs in <> to suppress Discord embeds (keeps links clickable)
|
||||
wrap_urls() { sed -E 's~https?://[^[:space:]<>]+~<&>~g'; }
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$PR_TITLE" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#PR_TITLE} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && TITLE="${TITLE}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$PR_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$PR_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ -n "$PR_BODY" ] && [ ${#PR_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ -n "$PR_BODY" ] && [ ${#PR_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
[ -n "$BODY" ] && BODY=" · $BODY"
|
||||
USER=$(printf '%s' "$PR_USER" | esc)
|
||||
|
|
@ -91,7 +95,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$ISSUE_TITLE" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#ISSUE_TITLE} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && TITLE="${TITLE}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$ISSUE_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$ISSUE_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ -n "$ISSUE_BODY" ] && [ ${#ISSUE_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ -n "$ISSUE_BODY" ] && [ ${#ISSUE_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
[ -n "$BODY" ] && BODY=" · $BODY"
|
||||
USER=$(printf '%s' "$USER" | esc)
|
||||
|
|
@ -126,7 +134,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$ISSUE_TITLE" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#ISSUE_TITLE} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && TITLE="${TITLE}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ ${#COMMENT_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#COMMENT_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
USER=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_USER" | esc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -162,7 +174,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$PR_TITLE" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#PR_TITLE} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && TITLE="${TITLE}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$REVIEW_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$REVIEW_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ -n "$REVIEW_BODY" ] && [ ${#REVIEW_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ -n "$REVIEW_BODY" ] && [ ${#REVIEW_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
[ -n "$BODY" ] && BODY=": $BODY"
|
||||
USER=$(printf '%s' "$REVIEW_USER" | esc)
|
||||
|
|
@ -194,7 +210,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
TITLE=$(printf '%s' "$PR_TITLE" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#PR_TITLE} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && TITLE="${TITLE}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ ${#COMMENT_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#COMMENT_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
USER=$(printf '%s' "$COMMENT_USER" | esc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -224,7 +244,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
|
||||
REL_NAME=$(printf '%s' "$NAME" | trunc $MAX_TITLE | esc)
|
||||
[ ${#NAME} -gt $MAX_TITLE ] && REL_NAME="${REL_NAME}..."
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$RELEASE_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY | esc)
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$RELEASE_BODY" | trunc $MAX_BODY)
|
||||
if [ -n "$RELEASE_BODY" ] && [ ${#RELEASE_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ]; then
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | strip_trailing_url)
|
||||
fi
|
||||
BODY=$(printf '%s' "$BODY" | wrap_urls | esc)
|
||||
[ -n "$RELEASE_BODY" ] && [ ${#RELEASE_BODY} -gt $MAX_BODY ] && BODY="${BODY}..."
|
||||
[ -n "$BODY" ] && BODY=" · $BODY"
|
||||
TAG_ESC=$(printf '%s' "$TAG" | esc)
|
||||
|
|
@ -275,7 +299,7 @@ jobs:
|
|||
run: |
|
||||
set -o pipefail
|
||||
[ -z "$WEBHOOK" ] && exit 0
|
||||
esc() { sed -e 's/[][\*_()~`>]/\\&/g' -e 's/@/@ /g'; }
|
||||
esc() { sed -e 's/[][\*_()~`]/\\&/g' -e 's/@/@ /g'; }
|
||||
trunc() { tr '\n\r' ' ' | cut -c1-"$1"; }
|
||||
|
||||
REF_TRUNC=$(printf '%s' "$REF" | trunc 100)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,11 @@ on:
|
|||
version_bump:
|
||||
description: Version bump type
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
default: patch
|
||||
default: alpha
|
||||
type: choice
|
||||
options:
|
||||
- alpha
|
||||
- beta
|
||||
- patch
|
||||
- minor
|
||||
- major
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,7 +51,11 @@ jobs:
|
|||
git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Bump version
|
||||
run: npm run version:${{ github.event.inputs.version_bump }}
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
case "${{ github.event.inputs.version_bump }}" in
|
||||
alpha|beta) npm version prerelease --no-git-tag-version --preid=${{ github.event.inputs.version_bump }} ;;
|
||||
*) npm version ${{ github.event.inputs.version_bump }} --no-git-tag-version ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Get new version and previous tag
|
||||
id: version
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,34 +67,9 @@ jobs:
|
|||
run: |
|
||||
sed -i 's/"version": ".*"/"version": "${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}"/' tools/installer/package.json
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Generate web bundles
|
||||
run: npm run bundle
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Package bundles for release
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
mkdir -p dist/release-bundles
|
||||
|
||||
# Copy web bundles
|
||||
cp -r web-bundles dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify bundles exist
|
||||
if [ ! "$(ls -A dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }})" ]; then
|
||||
echo "❌ ERROR: No bundles found"
|
||||
echo "This likely means 'npm run bundle' failed"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Count and display bundles per module
|
||||
for module in bmm bmb cis bmgd; do
|
||||
if [ -d "dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}/$module/agents" ]; then
|
||||
COUNT=$(find dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}/$module/agents -name '*.xml' 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
|
||||
echo "✅ $module: $COUNT agents"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
# Create archive
|
||||
tar -czf dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}.tar.gz \
|
||||
-C dist/release-bundles/bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }} .
|
||||
# TODO: Re-enable web bundles once tools/cli/bundlers/ is restored
|
||||
# - name: Generate web bundles
|
||||
# run: npm run bundle
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Commit version bump
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
|
|
@ -185,25 +166,15 @@ jobs:
|
|||
npm publish --tag latest
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Create GitHub Release with Bundles
|
||||
- name: Create GitHub Release
|
||||
uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2
|
||||
with:
|
||||
tag_name: v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}
|
||||
name: "BMad Method v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}"
|
||||
body: |
|
||||
${{ steps.release_notes.outputs.RELEASE_NOTES }}
|
||||
|
||||
## 📦 Web Bundles
|
||||
|
||||
Download XML bundles for use in AI platforms (Claude Projects, ChatGPT, Gemini):
|
||||
|
||||
- `bmad-bundles-v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}.tar.gz` - All modules (BMM, BMB, CIS, BMGD)
|
||||
|
||||
**Browse online** (bleeding edge): https://bmad-code-org.github.io/bmad-bundles/
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
prerelease: ${{ contains(steps.version.outputs.new_version, 'alpha') || contains(steps.version.outputs.new_version, 'beta') }}
|
||||
files: |
|
||||
dist/release-bundles/*.tar.gz
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Summary
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
|
|
@ -212,7 +183,6 @@ jobs:
|
|||
echo "### 📦 Distribution" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "- **NPM**: Published with @latest tag" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "- **GitHub Release**: https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/releases/tag/v${{ steps.version.outputs.new_version }}" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "- **Web Bundles**: Attached to GitHub Release (4 archives)" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "### ✅ Installation" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
echo "\`\`\`bash" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
|
|||
# BMad Method PR #1: Ring of Fire (ROF) Sessions
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Type**: Core workflow enhancement
|
||||
**Status**: Draft for community review
|
||||
**Origin**: tellingCube project (masemIT e.U.)
|
||||
**Author**: Mario Semper (@sempre)
|
||||
**Date**: 2025-11-23
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Ring of Fire (ROF) Sessions** enable multi-agent collaborative sessions that run in parallel to the user's main workflow, allowing users to delegate complex multi-perspective analysis while continuing other work.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Current BMad Method requires **sequential agent interaction**. When users need multiple agents to collaborate on a complex topic, they must:
|
||||
- Manually orchestrate each agent conversation
|
||||
- Stay in the loop for every exchange
|
||||
- Wait for sequential responses before proceeding
|
||||
- Context-switch constantly between tasks
|
||||
|
||||
This creates **bottlenecks** and prevents **parallel work streams**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Solution: Ring of Fire Sessions
|
||||
|
||||
A new command pattern that enables **scoped multi-agent collaboration sessions** that run while the user continues other work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Command Syntax
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "<topic>" --agents <agent-list> [--report brief|detailed|live]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "API Refactoring Strategy" --agents dev,architect,qa --report brief
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What happens**:
|
||||
1. Dev, Architect, and QA agents enter a collaborative session
|
||||
2. They analyze the topic together (code review, design discussion, testing concerns)
|
||||
3. When agents need tool access (read files, run commands), they request user approval
|
||||
4. User continues working on other tasks in parallel
|
||||
5. Session ends with consolidated report (brief: just recommendations, detailed: full transcript)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Features
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. User-Controlled Scope
|
||||
- **Small**: 2 agents, 5-minute quick discussion
|
||||
- **Large**: 10 agents, 2-hour deep analysis
|
||||
- User decides granularity based on complexity
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Approval-Gated Tool Access
|
||||
- Agents can **discuss** freely within the session
|
||||
- When agents need **tools** (read files, execute commands, make changes), they:
|
||||
- Pause the session
|
||||
- Request user approval
|
||||
- Resume after user decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Why**: Maintains user control, prevents runaway agent actions
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Flexible Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
| Mode | Description | Use Case |
|
||||
|------|-------------|----------|
|
||||
| `brief` | Final recommendations only | "Just tell me what to do" |
|
||||
| `detailed` | Full transcript + recommendations | "Show me the reasoning" |
|
||||
| `live` | Real-time updates as agents discuss | "I want to observe" |
|
||||
|
||||
**Default**: `brief` with Q&A available
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Parallel Workflows
|
||||
- User works on **Task A** while ROF session tackles **Task B**
|
||||
- No context-switching overhead
|
||||
- Efficient use of time
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Cases
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Architecture Reviews
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "Evaluate microservices vs monolith for new feature" --agents architect,dev,qa
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Agents collaborate on**: Design trade-offs, implementation complexity, testing implications
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Code Refactoring
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "Refactor authentication module" --agents dev,architect --report detailed
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Agents collaborate on**: Current code analysis, refactoring approach, migration strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Feature Planning
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "Plan user notifications feature" --agents pm,ux,dev --report brief
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Agents collaborate on**: Requirements, UX flow, technical feasibility, timeline
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Quality Gates
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "Investigate test failures in CI/CD" --agents qa,dev --report live
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Agents collaborate on**: Root cause analysis, fix recommendations, regression prevention
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Documentation Sprints
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
*rof "Document API endpoints" --agents dev,pm,ux
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Agents collaborate on**: Technical accuracy, user-friendly examples, completeness
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## User Experience Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
sequenceDiagram
|
||||
User->>River: *rof "Topic" --agents dev,architect
|
||||
River->>Dev: Join ROF session
|
||||
River->>Architect: Join ROF session
|
||||
River->>User: Session started, continue your work
|
||||
|
||||
Dev->>Architect: Discuss approach
|
||||
Architect->>Dev: Suggest alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
Dev->>User: Need to read auth.ts - approve?
|
||||
User->>Dev: Approved
|
||||
Dev->>Architect: After reading file...
|
||||
|
||||
Architect->>Dev: Recommendation
|
||||
Dev->>River: Session complete
|
||||
River->>User: Brief report: [Recommendations]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Requirements
|
||||
- **Session state management**: Track active ROF sessions, participating agents
|
||||
- **Agent context sharing**: Agents share knowledge within session scope
|
||||
- **User approval workflow**: Clear prompt for tool requests
|
||||
- **Report generation**: Brief/detailed/live output formatting
|
||||
- **Workflow integration**: Link ROF findings to existing workflow plans/todos
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Questions for Community
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Integration**: Core BMad feature or plugin/extension?
|
||||
2. **Concurrency**: How to handle file conflicts if multiple agents want to edit?
|
||||
3. **Cost Model**: Guidance for LLM call budgeting with multiple agents?
|
||||
4. **Session Limits**: Recommended max agents/duration?
|
||||
5. **Agent Communication**: Free-form discussion or structured turn-taking?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Real-World Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Origin Project**: tellingCube (BI dashboard, masemIT e.U.)
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation Scenario**:
|
||||
- **Topic**: "Next steps for tellingCube after validation test"
|
||||
- **Agents**: River (orchestrator), Mary (analyst), Winston (architect)
|
||||
- **Report Mode**: Brief
|
||||
- **Outcome**: Successfully analyzed post-validation roadmap with 3 scenarios (GO/CHANGE/NO-GO), delivered consolidated recommendations in 5 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**User Feedback (Mario Semper)**:
|
||||
> "This is exactly what I needed - I wanted multiple perspectives without having to orchestrate every conversation. The brief report gave me actionable next steps immediately."
|
||||
|
||||
**Documentation**: `docs/_masemIT/readme.md` in tellingCube repository
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Documentation Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.bmad-core/
|
||||
features/
|
||||
ring-of-fire.md # Feature specification
|
||||
|
||||
docs/
|
||||
guides/
|
||||
using-rof-sessions.md # User guide with examples
|
||||
|
||||
architecture/
|
||||
agent-collaboration.md # Technical design
|
||||
rof-session-management.md # State handling approach
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Benefits
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Unlocks parallel workflows** - User productivity gains
|
||||
✅ **Reduces context-switching** - Cognitive load reduction
|
||||
✅ **Enables complex analysis** - Multi-perspective insights
|
||||
✅ **Maintains user control** - Approval gates for tools
|
||||
✅ **Scales flexibly** - From quick checks to deep dives
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison to Existing Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Standard Agent Use | ROF Session |
|
||||
|---------|-------------------|-------------|
|
||||
| Agent collaboration | Sequential (one at a time) | Parallel (multiple simultaneously) |
|
||||
| User involvement | Required for every exchange | Only for approvals |
|
||||
| Parallel work | No (user waits) | Yes (user continues tasks) |
|
||||
| Output | Chat transcript | Consolidated report |
|
||||
| Use case | Single-perspective tasks | Multi-perspective analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Community feedback** on approach and open questions
|
||||
2. **Technical design** refinement (state management, agent communication)
|
||||
3. **Prototype implementation** in BMad core or as extension
|
||||
4. **Beta testing** with real projects (beyond tellingCube)
|
||||
5. **Documentation** completion with examples
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives Considered
|
||||
|
||||
### Alt 1: "Breakout Session"
|
||||
- **Pros**: Clear meeting metaphor
|
||||
- **Cons**: Less evocative, doesn't convey "continuous collaborative space"
|
||||
|
||||
### Alt 2: "Agent Huddle"
|
||||
- **Pros**: Short, casual
|
||||
- **Cons**: Implies quick/informal only
|
||||
|
||||
### Alt 3: "Lagerfeuer" (original German name)
|
||||
- **Pros**: Warm, campfire metaphor
|
||||
- **Cons**: Poor i18n, hard to pronounce/remember for non-German speakers
|
||||
|
||||
**Chosen**: **Ring of Fire** - evokes continuous collaboration circle, internationally understood, memorable, shortcut "ROF" works well
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- **Source Project**: tellingCube (https://github.com/masemIT/telling-cube) [if public]
|
||||
- **Documentation**: `docs/_masemIT/readme.md`
|
||||
- **Discussion**: [Link to BMad community discussion if applicable]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Contribution ready for review.** Feedback welcome! 🔥
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,15 +40,50 @@ Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning` to generate it, then rerun sprint-stat
|
|||
- Epics: keys starting with "epic-" (and not ending with "-retrospective")
|
||||
- Retrospectives: keys ending with "-retrospective"
|
||||
- Stories: everything else (e.g., 1-2-login-form)
|
||||
<action>If any story has status `drafted`, treat as `ready-for-dev` (legacy status)</action>
|
||||
<action>Map legacy story status "drafted" → "ready-for-dev"</action>
|
||||
<action>Count story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done</action>
|
||||
<action>Count epic statuses: backlog, contexted</action>
|
||||
<action>Detect risks:</action>
|
||||
- Stories in review but no reviewer assigned context → suggest `/bmad:bmm:workflows:code-review`
|
||||
- Stories in in-progress with no ready-for-dev items behind them → keep focus on the active story
|
||||
- All epics backlog/contexted but no stories ready-for-dev → prompt to run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:create-story`
|
||||
- Stories in ready-for-dev may be unvalidated → suggest `/bmad:bmm:workflows:validate-create-story` before `dev-story` for quality check
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
<action>Map legacy epic status "contexted" → "in-progress"</action>
|
||||
<action>Count epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done</action>
|
||||
<action>Count retrospective statuses: optional, completed</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Validate all statuses against known values:</action>
|
||||
|
||||
- Valid story statuses: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done, drafted (legacy)
|
||||
- Valid epic statuses: backlog, in-progress, done, contexted (legacy)
|
||||
- Valid retrospective statuses: optional, completed
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="any status is unrecognized">
|
||||
<output>
|
||||
⚠️ **Unknown status detected:**
|
||||
{{#each invalid_entries}}
|
||||
|
||||
- `{{key}}`: "{{status}}" (not recognized)
|
||||
{{/each}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Valid statuses:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Stories: backlog, ready-for-dev, in-progress, review, done
|
||||
- Epics: backlog, in-progress, done
|
||||
- Retrospectives: optional, completed
|
||||
</output>
|
||||
<ask>How should these be corrected?
|
||||
{{#each invalid_entries}}
|
||||
{{@index}}. {{key}}: "{{status}}" → [select valid status]
|
||||
{{/each}}
|
||||
|
||||
Enter corrections (e.g., "1=in-progress, 2=backlog") or "skip" to continue without fixing:</ask>
|
||||
<check if="user provided corrections">
|
||||
<action>Update sprint-status.yaml with corrected values</action>
|
||||
<action>Re-parse the file with corrected statuses</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Detect risks:</action>
|
||||
|
||||
- IF any story has status "review": suggest `/bmad:bmm:workflows:code-review`
|
||||
- IF any story has status "in-progress" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": recommend staying focused on active story
|
||||
- IF all epics have status "backlog" AND no stories have status "ready-for-dev": prompt `/bmad:bmm:workflows:create-story`
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="3" goal="Select next action recommendation">
|
||||
<action>Pick the next recommended workflow using priority:</action>
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,7 +106,7 @@ Run `/bmad:bmm:workflows:sprint-planning` to generate it, then rerun sprint-stat
|
|||
|
||||
**Stories:** backlog {{count_backlog}}, ready-for-dev {{count_ready}}, in-progress {{count_in_progress}}, review {{count_review}}, done {{count_done}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Epics:** backlog {{epic_backlog}}, contexted {{epic_contexted}}
|
||||
**Epics:** backlog {{epic_backlog}}, in-progress {{epic_in_progress}}, done {{epic_done}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Recommendation:** /bmad:bmm:workflows:{{next_workflow_id}} ({{next_story_id}})
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -141,8 +176,9 @@ If the command targets a story, set `story_key={{next_story_id}}` when prompted.
|
|||
<template-output>count_review = {{count_review}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>count_done = {{count_done}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>epic_backlog = {{epic_backlog}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>epic_contexted = {{epic_contexted}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>warnings = {{risks}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>epic_in_progress = {{epic_in_progress}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>epic_done = {{epic_done}}</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>risks = {{risks}}</template-output>
|
||||
<action>Return to caller</action>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue