Merge 1a6cfef6e5 into 2302d9cdc5

Syncs French translation with commit 1040c3c (fix: correctly resolve
output_folder paths outside project root #2132).

Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>

docs/fr/how-to/non-interactive-installation.md

@@ -37,7 +37,19 @@ Nécessite [Node.js](https://nodejs.org) v20+ et `npx` (inclus avec npm).
 | `--user-name <nom>` | Nom à utiliser par les agents | Nom d'utilisateur système |
 | `--communication-language <langue>` | Langue de communication des agents | Anglais |
 | `--document-output-language <langue>` | Langue de sortie des documents | Anglais |
-| `--output-folder <chemin>` | Chemin du dossier de sortie | _bmad-output |
+| `--output-folder <chemin>` | Chemin du dossier de sortie (voir les règles de résolution ci-dessous) | `_bmad-output` |
+
+#### Résolution du chemin du dossier de sortie
+
+La valeur passée à `--output-folder` (ou saisie de manière interactive) est résolue selon ces règles :
+
+| Type d'entrée                 | Exemple                    | Résolu comme                                                 |
+|-------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Chemin relatif (par défaut)   | `_bmad-output`             | `<racine-du-projet>/_bmad-output`                            |
+| Chemin relatif avec traversée | `../../shared-outputs`     | Chemin absolu normalisé — ex. `/Users/me/shared-outputs`     |
+| Chemin absolu                 | `/Users/me/shared-outputs` | Utilisé tel quel — la racine du projet n'est **pas** ajoutée |
+
+Le chemin résolu est ce que les agents et les workflows vont utiliser lors de l'écriture des fichiers de sortie. L'utilisation d'un chemin absolu ou d'un chemin relatif avec traversée vous permet de diriger tous les artefacts générés vers un répertoire en dehors de l'arborescence de votre projet — utile pour les configurations partagées ou les monorepos.
 
 ### Autres options
 
@@ -141,6 +153,7 @@ Les valeurs invalides entraîneront soit :
 
 :::tip[Bonnes pratiques]
 - Utilisez des chemins absolus pour `--directory` pour éviter toute ambiguïté
+- Utilisez un chemin absolu pour `--output-folder` lorsque vous souhaitez que les artefacts soient écrits en dehors de l'arborescence du projet (ex. un répertoire de sorties partagé dans un monorepo)
 - Testez les options localement avant de les utiliser dans des pipelines CI/CD
 - Combinez avec `-y` pour des installations vraiment sans surveillance
 - Utilisez `--debug` si vous rencontrez des problèmes lors de l'installation

src/bmm-skills/4-implementation/bmad-quick-dev/step-01-clarify-and-route.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 wipFile: '{implementation_artifacts}/spec-wip.md'
 deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
-spec_file: '' # set at runtime for plan-code-review before leaving this step
+spec_file: '' # set at runtime for both routes before leaving this step
 ---
 
 # Step 1: Clarify and Route
@@ -52,11 +52,13 @@ Never ask extra questions if you already understand what the user intends.
    - On **K**: Proceed as-is.
 5. Route — choose exactly one:
 
+   Derive a valid kebab-case slug from the clarified intent. If the intent references a tracking identifier (story number, issue number, ticket ID), lead the slug with it (e.g. `3-2-digest-delivery`, `gh-47-fix-auth`). If `{implementation_artifacts}/spec-{slug}.md` already exists, append `-2`, `-3`, etc. Set `spec_file` = `{implementation_artifacts}/spec-{slug}.md`.
+
    **a) One-shot** — zero blast radius: no plausible path by which this change causes unintended consequences elsewhere. Clear intent, no architectural decisions.
+
    **EARLY EXIT** → `./step-oneshot.md`
 
    **b) Plan-code-review** — everything else. When uncertain whether blast radius is truly zero, choose this path.
-   1. Derive a valid kebab-case slug from the clarified intent. If the intent references a tracking identifier (story number, issue number, ticket ID), lead the slug with it (e.g. `3-2-digest-delivery`, `gh-47-fix-auth`). If `{implementation_artifacts}/spec-{slug}.md` already exists, append `-2`, `-3`, etc. Set `spec_file` = `{implementation_artifacts}/spec-{slug}.md`.
 
 
 ## NEXT

src/bmm-skills/4-implementation/bmad-quick-dev/step-oneshot.md

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 ---
 deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
+spec_file: '' # set by step-01 before entering this step
 ---
 
 # Step One-Shot: Implement, Review, Present
@@ -29,19 +30,31 @@ Deduplicate all review findings. Three categories only:
 
 If a finding is caused by this change but too significant for a trivial patch, HALT and present it to the human for decision before proceeding.
 
+### Generate Spec Trace
+
+Set `{title}` = a concise title derived from the clarified intent.
+
+Write `{spec_file}` using `./spec-template.md`. Fill only these sections — delete all others:
+
+1. **Frontmatter** — set `title: '{title}'`, `type`, `created`, `status: 'done'`. Add `route: 'one-shot'`.
+2. **Title and Intent** — `# {title}` heading and `## Intent` with **Problem** and **Approach** lines. Reuse the summary you already generated for the terminal.
+3. **Suggested Review Order** — append after Intent. Build using the same convention as `./step-05-present.md` § "Generate Suggested Review Order" (spec-file-relative links, concern-based ordering, ultra-concise framing).
+
 ### Commit
 
 If version control is available and the tree is dirty, create a local commit with a conventional message derived from the intent. If VCS is unavailable, skip.
 
 ### Present
 
-1. Open all changed files in the user's editor so they can review the code directly:
+1. Open the spec in the user's editor so they can click through the Suggested Review Order:
-   - Resolve two sets of absolute paths: (1) the repository root (`git rev-parse --show-toplevel` — returns the worktree root when in a worktree, project root otherwise; if this fails, fall back to the current working directory), (2) each changed file. Run `code -r "{absolute-root}" <absolute-changed-file-paths>` — the root first so VS Code opens in the right context, then each changed file. Always double-quote paths to handle spaces and special characters.
+   - Resolve two absolute paths: (1) the repository root (`git rev-parse --show-toplevel` — returns the worktree root when in a worktree, project root otherwise; if this fails, fall back to the current working directory), (2) `{spec_file}`. Run `code -r "{absolute-root}" "{absolute-spec-file}"` — the root first so VS Code opens in the right context, then the spec file. Always double-quote paths to handle spaces and special characters.
-   - If `code` is not available (command fails), skip gracefully and list the file paths instead.
+   - If `code` is not available (command fails), skip gracefully and tell the user the spec file path instead.
 2. Display a summary in conversation output, including:
    - The commit hash (if one was created).
-   - List of files changed with one-line descriptions. Use CWD-relative paths with `:line` notation (e.g., `src/path/file.ts:42`) for terminal clickability. No leading `/`.
+   - List of files changed with one-line descriptions. Any file paths shown in conversation/terminal output must use CWD-relative format (no leading `/`) with `:line` notation (e.g., `src/path/file.ts:42`) for terminal clickability — this differs from spec-file links which use spec-file-relative paths.
    - Review findings breakdown: patches applied, items deferred, items rejected. If all findings were rejected, say so.
+   - A note that the spec is open in their editor (or the file path if it couldn't be opened). Mention that `{spec_file}` now contains a Suggested Review Order.
+   - **Navigation tip:** "Ctrl+click (Cmd+click on macOS) the links in the Suggested Review Order to jump to each stop."
 3. Offer to push and/or create a pull request.
 
 HALT and wait for human input.

src/core-skills/bmad-party-mode/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: 'Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enab
 
 # Party Mode
 
-Facilitate roundtable discussions where BMAD agents participate as **real subagents** — each spawned independently via the Agent tool so they think for themselves. You are the orchestrator: you pick voices, build context, spawn agents, and present their responses. You never generate agent responses yourself.
+Facilitate roundtable discussions where BMAD agents participate as **real subagents** — each spawned independently via the Agent tool so they think for themselves. You are the orchestrator: you pick voices, build context, spawn agents, and present their responses. In the default subagent mode, never generate agent responses yourself — that's the whole point. In `--solo` mode, you roleplay all agents directly.
 
 ## Why This Matters
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Party mode accepts optional arguments when invoked:
 
 1. **Parse arguments** — check for `--model` and `--solo` flags from the user's invocation.
 
-2. Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
+2. Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/core/config.yaml` and resolve:
   - Use `{user_name}` for greeting
   - Use `{communication_language}` for all communications
 
@@ -88,9 +88,11 @@ You are {displayName} ({title}), a BMAD agent in a collaborative roundtable disc
 
 ### 3. Present Responses
 
-Collect all agent responses and present them to the user as-is. Don't summarize, edit, or reorder them. If an agent's response is particularly brief or says they have nothing to add, that's fine — include it anyway so the user sees the full picture.
+Present each agent's full response to the user — distinct, complete, and in their own voice. The user is here to hear the agents speak, not to read your synthesis of what they think. Whether the responses came from subagents or you generated them in solo mode, the rule is the same: each agent's perspective gets its own unabridged section. Never blend, paraphrase, or condense agent responses into a summary.
 
-After presenting, you can optionally add a brief orchestrator note if it would help — like flagging a clear disagreement worth exploring, or noting an agent whose perspective might be relevant but wasn't included this round.
+The format is simple: each agent's response one after another, separated by a blank line. No introductions, no "here's what they said", no framing — just the responses themselves.
+
+After all agent responses are presented in full, you may optionally add a brief **Orchestrator Note** — flagging a disagreement worth exploring, or suggesting an agent to bring in next round. Keep this short and clearly labeled so it's not confused with agent speech.
 
 ### 4. Handle Follow-ups