Compare commits

...

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jacob du Toit 6bd611413c
Merge 92498ebb52 into 1f99eb0496 2026-03-31 12:55:53 +00:00
Taras Romaniv 1f99eb0496
fix: preserve local custom module sources during quick update (#2172)
* fix: preserve local custom module sources during quick update

Keep customModules in the generated main manifest so local custom
module source paths survive update runs. Load those preserved source
paths during stock quick update before falling back to the custom
cache directory.

This fixes the case where BMAD would drop customModules, lose the
original source path for a local module, and then skip the module or
try to re-cache from _bmad/_config/custom/<module>, which could fail
with ENOENT after the cache directory was removed.

Also adds an installation component regression test to verify
customModules and sourcePath are preserved in manifest generation.

Fixes #1582

* fix: ensure consistent formatting

* refactor: extract quick update custom source assembly

Move quick-update custom module source collection out of Installer and into
CustomModules as assembleQuickUpdateSources(). This keeps discoverPaths() focused on consuming prepared install inputs while
making the quick-update source assembly step explicit and easier to evolve.

Also:
- preserve customModules metadata in manifest regeneration for installed modules
- drop stale customModules entries when modules are no longer installed
- cover manifest preservation and manifest-backed quick-update sources in tests
2026-03-30 17:49:05 -07:00
Jacob du Toit 92498ebb52
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-26 05:31:03 +02:00
Jacob du Toit fdfe23fc22
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-23 04:01:03 +02:00
Jacob du Toit f32d1d4e8d
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-22 06:03:59 +02:00
Alex Verkhovsky f9e7d65cf9
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-20 15:20:27 -06:00
Jacob du Toit bfdeef0453
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-20 11:00:45 +02:00
Jacob du Toit 3ac8736756
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-20 06:25:14 +02:00
Brian 417fc44a98
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-19 19:29:28 -05:00
Jacob du Toit 4e96a50515
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expand-advanced-elicitation-methods 2026-03-19 07:53:14 +02:00
de Villiers du Toit ad77c8e1c6 feat: expand advanced elicitation methods with 19 new techniques
Adds 19 new elicitation methods across 7 categories including a new
'framing' category. All existing 50 methods preserved. Entries sorted
alphabetically by category then method name.

New methods added:
- advanced: Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding, Few-Shot Exemplar Priming
- collaboration: Six Thinking Hats, Delphi Method
- core: Second-Order Thinking, Inversion Analysis, Problem Decomposition,
  Analogy Mapping, Steelmanning
- creative: Constraint Injection, Morphological Analysis
- framing (new): Abstraction Laddering, Reframe the Question,
  Stakeholder Lens Rotation
- learning: Deliberate Practice Loop
- research: Source Triangulation
- risk: Assumption Audit, Cascading Failure Simulation
- technical: Boundary & Edge Case Sweep

Closes #2061
2026-03-19 05:28:52 +02:00
5 changed files with 342 additions and 103 deletions

View File

@ -1,51 +1,70 @@
num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
1,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment 1,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection
2,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations 2,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns
3,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis 3,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis
4,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities 4,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus
5,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact 5,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization
6,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution 6,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy
7,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding 7,advanced,Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding,Force explicit intermediate reasoning steps before any conclusion — prevents intuitive leaps that skip flawed logic,premise → step → step → conclusion
8,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view 8,advanced,Few-Shot Exemplar Priming,Provide 2-3 worked examples of the desired reasoning pattern before the real task — aligns output format and depth through demonstration,examples → pattern recognition → application
9,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result 9,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
10,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention 10,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
11,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection 11,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis
12,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns 12,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities
13,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis 13,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact
14,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus 14,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
15,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization 15,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding
16,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy 16,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view
17,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening 17,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result
18,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement 18,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
19,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards 19,collaboration,Six Thinking Hats,Rotate through six modes (facts - feelings - caution - optimism - creativity - process) to ensure a group covers every angle without crosstalk,white → red → black → yellow → green → blue
20,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale 20,collaboration,Delphi Method,Experts give independent estimates - see anonymized results - then revise — converges on calibrated group judgment while avoiding anchoring bias,independent estimates → reveal → revise → converge
21,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha 21,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening
22,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner 22,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement
23,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance 23,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards
24,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations 24,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
25,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R 25,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution
26,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward 26,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding
27,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights 27,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
28,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas 28,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion
29,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise 29,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
30,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights 30,core,Second-Order Thinking,Think beyond immediate consequences to anticipate cascading effects and long-term implications - essential for strategic decisions where first-order solutions create hidden downstream problems,action → consequences → second-order effects → informed choice
31,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis 31,core,Inversion Analysis,Flip the problem by asking what would guarantee failure instead of how to succeed - reveals hidden obstacles and blind spots by approaching challenges from the opposite direction,goal → invert → failure paths → avoidance → solution
32,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements 32,core,Problem Decomposition,Break a complex problem into independent sub-problems - solve each - then reassemble — essential when a task is too large or tangled to tackle whole,whole → parts → solutions → reassembly
33,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation 33,core,Analogy Mapping,Find a well-understood parallel domain and transfer its structure to the current problem — unlocks insight by borrowing proven mental models,source domain → mapping → target insight
34,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention 34,core,Steelmanning,Construct the strongest possible version of an opposing argument before responding — builds credibility and catches blind spots that strawmanning misses,opposing view → strongest form → honest rebuttal
35,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention 35,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
36,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening 36,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
37,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations 37,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
38,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden 38,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas
39,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach 39,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
40,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution 40,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
41,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding 41,creative,Constraint Injection,Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure,add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate
42,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined 42,creative,Morphological Analysis,List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations,parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation
43,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion 43,framing,Abstraction Laddering,"Move up (""why?"") for strategic clarity or down (""how?"") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude",concrete ↔ abstract → right level
44,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content 44,framing,Reframe the Question,Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer,stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution
45,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery 45,framing,Stakeholder Lens Rotation,Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked,perspective A → B → C → gaps found
46,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement 46,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
47,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection 47,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
48,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision 48,learning,Deliberate Practice Loop,Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition,isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat
49,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application 49,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
50,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions 50,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
51,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
52,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
53,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
54,research,Source Triangulation,Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias,claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating
55,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
56,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
57,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
58,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
59,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
60,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
61,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
62,risk,Assumption Audit,Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations,list → rate → stress-test → shore up
63,risk,Cascading Failure Simulation,Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure,trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple
64,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
65,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
66,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
67,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
68,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
69,technical,Boundary & Edge Case Sweep,Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses,inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found

1 num category method_name description output_pattern
2 1 collaboration advanced Stakeholder Round Table Tree of Thoughts Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches perspectives → synthesis → alignment paths → evaluation → selection
3 2 collaboration advanced Expert Panel Review Graph of Thoughts Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns expert views → consensus → recommendations nodes → connections → patterns
4 3 collaboration advanced Debate Club Showdown Thread of Thought Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency thesis → antithesis → synthesis context → thread → synthesis
5 4 collaboration advanced User Persona Focus Group Self-Consistency Validation Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters reactions → concerns → priorities approaches → comparison → consensus
6 5 collaboration advanced Time Traveler Council Meta-Prompting Analysis Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving past wisdom → present choice → future impact current → analysis → optimization
7 6 collaboration advanced Cross-Functional War Room Reasoning via Planning Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution model → planning → strategy
8 7 collaboration advanced Mentor and Apprentice Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching Force explicit intermediate reasoning steps before any conclusion — prevents intuitive leaps that skip flawed logic explanation → questions → deeper understanding premise → step → step → conclusion
9 8 collaboration advanced Good Cop Bad Cop Few-Shot Exemplar Priming Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address Provide 2-3 worked examples of the desired reasoning pattern before the real task — aligns output format and depth through demonstration encouragement → criticism → balanced view examples → pattern recognition → application
10 9 collaboration Improv Yes-And Stakeholder Round Table Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests idea → build → build → surprising result perspectives → synthesis → alignment
11 10 collaboration Customer Support Theater Expert Panel Review Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention expert views → consensus → recommendations
12 11 advanced collaboration Tree of Thoughts Debate Club Showdown Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground paths → evaluation → selection thesis → antithesis → synthesis
13 12 advanced collaboration Graph of Thoughts User Persona Focus Group Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs nodes → connections → patterns reactions → concerns → priorities
14 13 advanced collaboration Thread of Thought Time Traveler Council Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures context → thread → synthesis past wisdom → present choice → future impact
15 14 advanced collaboration Self-Consistency Validation Cross-Functional War Room Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability approaches → comparison → consensus constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
16 15 advanced collaboration Meta-Prompting Analysis Mentor and Apprentice Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching current → analysis → optimization explanation → questions → deeper understanding
17 16 advanced collaboration Reasoning via Planning Good Cop Bad Cop Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address model → planning → strategy encouragement → criticism → balanced view
18 17 competitive collaboration Red Team vs Blue Team Improv Yes-And Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building defense → attack → hardening idea → build → build → surprising result
19 18 competitive collaboration Shark Tank Pitch Customer Support Theater Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps pitch → challenges → refinement complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
20 19 competitive collaboration Code Review Gauntlet Six Thinking Hats Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices Rotate through six modes (facts - feelings - caution - optimism - creativity - process) to ensure a group covers every angle without crosstalk reviews → debates → standards white → red → black → yellow → green → blue
21 20 technical collaboration Architecture Decision Records Delphi Method Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented Experts give independent estimates - see anonymized results - then revise — converges on calibrated group judgment while avoiding anchoring bias options → trade-offs → decision → rationale independent estimates → reveal → revise → converge
22 21 technical competitive Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Red Team vs Blue Team Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions simple → detailed → technical → aha defense → attack → hardening
23 22 technical competitive Algorithm Olympics Shark Tank Pitch Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition implementations → benchmarks → winner pitch → challenges → refinement
24 23 technical competitive Security Audit Personas Code Review Gauntlet Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance reviews → debates → standards
25 24 technical core Performance Profiler Panel First Principles Analysis Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems symptoms → analysis → optimizations assumptions → truths → new approach
26 25 creative core SCAMPER Method 5 Whys Deep Dive Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures S→C→A→M→P→E→R why chain → root cause → solution
27 26 creative core Reverse Engineering Socratic Questioning Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery end state → steps backward → path forward questions → revelations → understanding
28 27 creative core What If Scenarios Critique and Refine Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts scenarios → implications → insights strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
29 28 creative core Random Input Stimulus Explain Reasoning Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency random word → associations → novel ideas steps → logic → conclusion
30 29 creative core Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Expand or Contract for Audience Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise audience → adjustments → refined content
31 30 creative core Genre Mashup Second-Order Thinking Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination Think beyond immediate consequences to anticipate cascading effects and long-term implications - essential for strategic decisions where first-order solutions create hidden downstream problems domain A + domain B → hybrid insights action → consequences → second-order effects → informed choice
32 31 research core Literature Review Personas Inversion Analysis Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality Flip the problem by asking what would guarantee failure instead of how to succeed - reveals hidden obstacles and blind spots by approaching challenges from the opposite direction sources → critiques → synthesis goal → invert → failure paths → avoidance → solution
33 32 research core Thesis Defense Simulation Problem Decomposition Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions Break a complex problem into independent sub-problems - solve each - then reassemble — essential when a task is too large or tangled to tackle whole thesis → challenges → defense → refinements whole → parts → solutions → reassembly
34 33 research core Comparative Analysis Matrix Analogy Mapping Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring Find a well-understood parallel domain and transfer its structure to the current problem — unlocks insight by borrowing proven mental models options → criteria → scores → recommendation source domain → mapping → target insight
35 34 risk core Pre-mortem Analysis Steelmanning Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches Construct the strongest possible version of an opposing argument before responding — builds credibility and catches blind spots that strawmanning misses failure scenario → causes → prevention opposing view → strongest form → honest rebuttal
36 35 risk creative Failure Mode Analysis SCAMPER Method Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation components → failures → prevention S→C→A→M→P→E→R
37 36 risk creative Challenge from Critical Perspective Reverse Engineering Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints assumptions → challenges → strengthening end state → steps backward → path forward
38 37 risk creative Identify Potential Risks What If Scenarios Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration categories → risks → mitigations scenarios → implications → insights
39 38 risk creative Chaos Monkey Scenarios Random Input Stimulus Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking break → observe → harden random word → associations → novel ideas
40 39 core creative First Principles Analysis Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration assumptions → truths → new approach contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
41 40 core creative 5 Whys Deep Dive Genre Mashup Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination why chain → root cause → solution domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
42 41 core creative Socratic Questioning Constraint Injection Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure questions → revelations → understanding add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate
43 42 core creative Critique and Refine Morphological Analysis Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation
44 43 core framing Explain Reasoning Abstraction Laddering Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency Move up ("why?") for strategic clarity or down ("how?") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude steps → logic → conclusion concrete ↔ abstract → right level
45 44 core framing Expand or Contract for Audience Reframe the Question Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer audience → adjustments → refined content stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution
46 45 learning framing Feynman Technique Stakeholder Lens Rotation Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked complex → simple → gaps → mastery perspective A → B → C → gaps found
47 46 learning Active Recall Testing Feynman Technique Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding test → gaps → reinforcement complex → simple → gaps → mastery
48 47 philosophical learning Occam's Razor Application Active Recall Testing Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps options → simplification → selection test → gaps → reinforcement
49 48 philosophical learning Trolley Problem Variations Deliberate Practice Loop Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition dilemma → analysis → decision isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat
50 49 retrospective philosophical Hindsight Reflection Occam's Razor Application Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging future view → insights → application options → simplification → selection
51 50 retrospective philosophical Lessons Learned Extraction Trolley Problem Variations Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions experience → lessons → actions dilemma → analysis → decision
52 51 research Literature Review Personas Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality sources → critiques → synthesis
53 52 research Thesis Defense Simulation Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
54 53 research Comparative Analysis Matrix Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring options → criteria → scores → recommendation
55 54 research Source Triangulation Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating
56 55 retrospective Hindsight Reflection Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews future view → insights → application
57 56 retrospective Lessons Learned Extraction Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement experience → lessons → actions
58 57 risk Pre-mortem Analysis Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches failure scenario → causes → prevention
59 58 risk Failure Mode Analysis Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems components → failures → prevention
60 59 risk Challenge from Critical Perspective Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink assumptions → challenges → strengthening
61 60 risk Identify Potential Risks Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation categories → risks → mitigations
62 61 risk Chaos Monkey Scenarios Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully break → observe → harden
63 62 risk Assumption Audit Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations list → rate → stress-test → shore up
64 63 risk Cascading Failure Simulation Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple
65 64 technical Architecture Decision Records Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
66 65 technical Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels simple → detailed → technical → aha
67 66 technical Algorithm Olympics Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison implementations → benchmarks → winner
68 67 technical Security Audit Personas Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
69 68 technical Performance Profiler Panel Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack symptoms → analysis → optimizations
70 69 technical Boundary & Edge Case Sweep Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found

View File

@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
const path = require('node:path'); const path = require('node:path');
const os = require('node:os'); const os = require('node:os');
const fs = require('fs-extra'); const fs = require('fs-extra');
const { Installer } = require('../tools/installer/core/installer');
const { ManifestGenerator } = require('../tools/installer/core/manifest-generator'); const { ManifestGenerator } = require('../tools/installer/core/manifest-generator');
const { OfficialModules } = require('../tools/installer/modules/official-modules');
const { IdeManager } = require('../tools/installer/ide/manager'); const { IdeManager } = require('../tools/installer/ide/manager');
const { clearCache, loadPlatformCodes } = require('../tools/installer/ide/platform-codes'); const { clearCache, loadPlatformCodes } = require('../tools/installer/ide/platform-codes');
@ -126,6 +128,56 @@ async function createSkillCollisionFixture() {
return { root: fixtureRoot, bmadDir: fixtureDir }; return { root: fixtureRoot, bmadDir: fixtureDir };
} }
async function createCustomModuleManifestFixture() {
const fixtureRoot = await fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'bmad-custom-manifest-'));
const bmadDir = path.join(fixtureRoot, '_bmad');
const configDir = path.join(bmadDir, '_config');
const moduleSourceDir = path.join(fixtureRoot, 'test-module-source');
await fs.ensureDir(configDir);
await fs.ensureDir(moduleSourceDir);
const minimalAgent = '<agent name="Test" title="T"><persona>p</persona></agent>';
await fs.ensureDir(path.join(bmadDir, 'core', 'agents'));
await fs.writeFile(path.join(bmadDir, 'core', 'agents', 'test.md'), minimalAgent);
await fs.ensureDir(path.join(bmadDir, 'test-module', 'agents'));
await fs.writeFile(path.join(bmadDir, 'test-module', 'agents', 'test.md'), minimalAgent);
await fs.writeFile(path.join(moduleSourceDir, 'module.yaml'), ['code: test-module', 'name: Test Module', ''].join('\n'));
await fs.writeFile(
path.join(configDir, 'manifest.yaml'),
[
'installation:',
' version: 6.2.2',
' installDate: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
' lastUpdated: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
'modules:',
' - name: core',
' version: 6.2.2',
' installDate: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
' lastUpdated: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
' source: built-in',
' npmPackage: null',
' repoUrl: null',
' - name: test-module',
' version: null',
' installDate: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
' lastUpdated: 2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z',
' source: custom',
' npmPackage: null',
' repoUrl: null',
'customModules:',
' - id: test-module',
' name: "Test Module"',
` sourcePath: ${JSON.stringify(moduleSourceDir)}`,
'ides:',
' - codex',
'',
].join('\n'),
);
return { root: fixtureRoot, bmadDir, manifestPath: path.join(configDir, 'manifest.yaml'), moduleSourceDir };
}
/** /**
* Test Suite * Test Suite
*/ */
@ -1713,6 +1765,107 @@ async function runTests() {
console.log(''); console.log('');
// ============================================================
// Suite 33: Main manifest preserves active customModules only
// ============================================================
console.log(`${colors.yellow}Test Suite 33: Preserve active customModules in main manifest${colors.reset}\n`);
let customManifestFixture = null;
try {
customManifestFixture = await createCustomModuleManifestFixture();
const yaml = require('yaml');
const originalManifest = yaml.parse(await fs.readFile(customManifestFixture.manifestPath, 'utf8'));
originalManifest.customModules.push({
id: 'removed-module',
name: 'Removed Module',
sourcePath: path.join(customManifestFixture.root, 'removed-module-source'),
});
await fs.writeFile(customManifestFixture.manifestPath, yaml.stringify(originalManifest), 'utf8');
const generator33 = new ManifestGenerator();
await generator33.generateManifests(customManifestFixture.bmadDir, ['core', 'test-module'], [], { ides: ['codex'] });
const updatedManifest = yaml.parse(await fs.readFile(customManifestFixture.manifestPath, 'utf8'));
const customModule = updatedManifest.customModules?.find((entry) => entry.id === 'test-module');
assert(Array.isArray(updatedManifest.customModules), 'Main manifest keeps customModules array');
assert(customModule !== undefined, 'Main manifest preserves existing custom module entry');
assert(
customModule && customModule.sourcePath === customManifestFixture.moduleSourceDir,
'Main manifest preserves custom module sourcePath',
);
assert(
!updatedManifest.customModules?.some((entry) => entry.id === 'removed-module'),
'Main manifest drops stale custom module entries',
);
} catch (error) {
assert(false, 'Main manifest preserves customModules test succeeds', error.message);
} finally {
if (customManifestFixture?.root) await fs.remove(customManifestFixture.root).catch(() => {});
}
console.log('');
// ============================================================
// Suite 34: Quick update uses manifest-backed custom sources
// ============================================================
console.log(`${colors.yellow}Test Suite 34: Quick update uses manifest-backed custom module sources${colors.reset}\n`);
let quickUpdateFixture = null;
const originalListAvailable34 = OfficialModules.prototype.listAvailable;
const originalLoadExistingConfig34 = OfficialModules.prototype.loadExistingConfig;
const originalCollectModuleConfigQuick34 = OfficialModules.prototype.collectModuleConfigQuick;
try {
quickUpdateFixture = await createCustomModuleManifestFixture();
const installer34 = new Installer();
installer34.externalModuleManager.hasModule = async () => false;
installer34.externalModuleManager.listAvailable = async () => [];
let capturedInstallConfig34 = null;
installer34.install = async (config) => {
capturedInstallConfig34 = config;
return { success: true };
};
OfficialModules.prototype.listAvailable = async function () {
return { modules: [], customModules: [] };
};
OfficialModules.prototype.loadExistingConfig = async function () {
this.collectedConfig = this.collectedConfig || {};
};
OfficialModules.prototype.collectModuleConfigQuick = async function (moduleName) {
this.collectedConfig = this.collectedConfig || {};
if (!this.collectedConfig[moduleName]) {
this.collectedConfig[moduleName] = {};
}
return false;
};
await installer34.quickUpdate({
directory: quickUpdateFixture.root,
skipPrompts: true,
});
const customModule34 = capturedInstallConfig34?._customModuleSources?.get('test-module');
assert(capturedInstallConfig34 !== null, 'Quick update forwards config to install');
assert(customModule34 !== undefined, 'Quick update keeps manifest-backed custom module updateable');
assert(customModule34 && customModule34.cached === false, 'Quick update uses manifest-backed source before cache');
assert(
customModule34 && customModule34.sourcePath === quickUpdateFixture.moduleSourceDir,
'Quick update uses preserved manifest sourcePath for custom modules',
);
} catch (error) {
assert(false, 'Quick update manifest-backed custom source test succeeds', error.message);
} finally {
OfficialModules.prototype.listAvailable = originalListAvailable34;
OfficialModules.prototype.loadExistingConfig = originalLoadExistingConfig34;
OfficialModules.prototype.collectModuleConfigQuick = originalCollectModuleConfigQuick34;
if (quickUpdateFixture?.root) await fs.remove(quickUpdateFixture.root).catch(() => {});
}
console.log('');
// ============================================================ // ============================================================
// Summary // Summary
// ============================================================ // ============================================================

View File

@ -1144,59 +1144,12 @@ class Installer {
const configuredIdes = existingInstall.ides; const configuredIdes = existingInstall.ides;
const projectRoot = path.dirname(bmadDir); const projectRoot = path.dirname(bmadDir);
// Get custom module sources: first from --custom-content (re-cache from source), then from cache const customModuleSources = await this.customModules.assembleQuickUpdateSources(
const customModuleSources = new Map(); config,
if (config.customContent?.sources?.length > 0) { existingInstall,
for (const source of config.customContent.sources) { bmadDir,
if (source.id && source.path && (await fs.pathExists(source.path))) { this.externalModuleManager,
customModuleSources.set(source.id, { );
id: source.id,
name: source.name || source.id,
sourcePath: source.path,
cached: false, // From CLI, will be re-cached
});
}
}
}
const cacheDir = path.join(bmadDir, '_config', 'custom');
if (await fs.pathExists(cacheDir)) {
const cachedModules = await fs.readdir(cacheDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const cachedModule of cachedModules) {
const moduleId = cachedModule.name;
const cachedPath = path.join(cacheDir, moduleId);
// Skip if path doesn't exist (broken symlink, deleted dir) - avoids lstat ENOENT
if (!(await fs.pathExists(cachedPath))) {
continue;
}
if (!cachedModule.isDirectory()) {
continue;
}
// Skip if we already have this module from manifest
if (customModuleSources.has(moduleId)) {
continue;
}
// Check if this is an external official module - skip cache for those
const isExternal = await this.externalModuleManager.hasModule(moduleId);
if (isExternal) {
continue;
}
// Check if this is actually a custom module (has module.yaml)
const moduleYamlPath = path.join(cachedPath, 'module.yaml');
if (await fs.pathExists(moduleYamlPath)) {
customModuleSources.set(moduleId, {
id: moduleId,
name: moduleId,
sourcePath: cachedPath,
cached: true,
});
}
}
}
// Get available modules (what we have source for) // Get available modules (what we have source for)
const availableModulesData = await new OfficialModules().listAvailable(); const availableModulesData = await new OfficialModules().listAvailable();

View File

@ -377,10 +377,12 @@ class ManifestGenerator {
*/ */
async writeMainManifest(cfgDir) { async writeMainManifest(cfgDir) {
const manifestPath = path.join(cfgDir, 'manifest.yaml'); const manifestPath = path.join(cfgDir, 'manifest.yaml');
const installedModuleSet = new Set(this.modules);
// Read existing manifest to preserve install date // Read existing manifest to preserve install date
let existingInstallDate = null; let existingInstallDate = null;
const existingModulesMap = new Map(); const existingModulesMap = new Map();
let existingCustomModules = [];
if (await fs.pathExists(manifestPath)) { if (await fs.pathExists(manifestPath)) {
try { try {
@ -402,6 +404,12 @@ class ManifestGenerator {
} }
} }
} }
if (existingManifest.customModules && Array.isArray(existingManifest.customModules)) {
// We filter here so manifest regeneration preserves source metadata only for custom modules that
// are still installed. Without that, customModules can retain stale entries for modules that were removed.
existingCustomModules = existingManifest.customModules.filter((customModule) => installedModuleSet.has(customModule?.id));
}
} catch { } catch {
// If we can't read existing manifest, continue with defaults // If we can't read existing manifest, continue with defaults
} }
@ -437,6 +445,7 @@ class ManifestGenerator {
lastUpdated: new Date().toISOString(), lastUpdated: new Date().toISOString(),
}, },
modules: updatedModules, modules: updatedModules,
customModules: existingCustomModules,
ides: this.selectedIdes, ides: this.selectedIdes,
}; };

View File

@ -192,6 +192,111 @@ class CustomModules {
return this.paths; return this.paths;
} }
/**
* Assemble quick-update source candidates before install() hands them to discoverPaths().
* This exists because discoverPaths() consumes already-prepared quick-update sources,
* while quickUpdate() still has to build that source map from manifest, explicit inputs,
* and cache conventions.
* Precedence: manifest-backed paths, explicit sources override them, then cached modules.
* @param {Object} config - Quick update configuration
* @param {Object} existingInstall - Existing installation snapshot
* @param {string} bmadDir - BMAD directory
* @param {Object} externalModuleManager - External module manager
* @returns {Promise<Map<string, Object>>} Map of custom module ID to source info
*/
async assembleQuickUpdateSources(config, existingInstall, bmadDir, externalModuleManager) {
const projectRoot = path.dirname(bmadDir);
const customModuleSources = new Map();
if (existingInstall.customModules) {
for (const customModule of existingInstall.customModules) {
// Skip if no ID - can't reliably track or re-cache without it
if (!customModule?.id) continue;
let sourcePath = customModule.sourcePath;
if (sourcePath && sourcePath.startsWith('_config')) {
// Paths are relative to BMAD dir, but we want absolute paths for install
sourcePath = path.join(bmadDir, sourcePath);
} else if (!sourcePath && customModule.relativePath) {
// Fall back to relativePath
sourcePath = path.resolve(projectRoot, customModule.relativePath);
} else if (sourcePath && !path.isAbsolute(sourcePath)) {
// If we have a sourcePath but it's not absolute, resolve it relative to project root
sourcePath = path.resolve(projectRoot, sourcePath);
}
// If we still don't have a valid source path, skip this module
if (!sourcePath || !(await fs.pathExists(sourcePath))) {
continue;
}
customModuleSources.set(customModule.id, {
id: customModule.id,
name: customModule.name || customModule.id,
sourcePath,
relativePath: customModule.relativePath,
cached: false,
});
}
}
if (config.customContent?.sources?.length > 0) {
for (const source of config.customContent.sources) {
if (source.id && source.path) {
customModuleSources.set(source.id, {
id: source.id,
name: source.name || source.id,
sourcePath: source.path,
cached: false, // From CLI, will be re-cached
});
}
}
}
const cacheDir = path.join(bmadDir, '_config', 'custom');
if (!(await fs.pathExists(cacheDir))) {
return customModuleSources;
}
const cachedModules = await fs.readdir(cacheDir, { withFileTypes: true });
for (const cachedModule of cachedModules) {
const moduleId = cachedModule.name;
const cachedPath = path.join(cacheDir, moduleId);
// Skip if path doesn't exist (broken symlink, deleted dir) - avoids lstat ENOENT
if (!(await fs.pathExists(cachedPath))) {
continue;
}
if (!cachedModule.isDirectory()) {
continue;
}
// Skip if we already have this module from manifest
if (customModuleSources.has(moduleId)) {
continue;
}
// Check if this is an external official module - skip cache for those
const isExternal = await externalModuleManager.hasModule(moduleId);
if (isExternal) {
continue;
}
// Check if this is actually a custom module (has module.yaml)
const moduleYamlPath = path.join(cachedPath, 'module.yaml');
if (await fs.pathExists(moduleYamlPath)) {
customModuleSources.set(moduleId, {
id: moduleId,
name: moduleId,
sourcePath: cachedPath,
cached: true,
});
}
}
return customModuleSources;
}
} }
module.exports = { CustomModules }; module.exports = { CustomModules };