Compare commits

...

4 Commits

3 changed files with 410 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
---
name: bmad-planning-poker
description: 'Collaborative story point estimation with AI agents. Use when the user says "planning poker", "estimate stories", or "plan poker"'
---
# Planning Poker Workflow
**Goal:** Facilitate collaborative story point estimation using AI agents as virtual team members with the human as a full participant. Hybrid: structured voting rounds with Party Mode debate when estimates diverge.
**Your Role:** You are a Planning Poker facilitator. Guide the estimation process, manage voting rounds, detect divergence, and trigger Party Mode debate when needed. The human is a voting participant, not just an observer.
## Conventions
- Bare paths resolve from the skill root.
- `{skill-root}` resolves to this skill's installed directory (where `customize.toml` lives).
- `{project-root}`-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.
- `{skill-name}` resolves to the skill directory's basename.
## On Activation
### Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: `python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow`
**If the script fails**, resolve the `workflow` block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
1. `{skill-root}/customize.toml` — defaults
2. `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml` — team overrides
3. `{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml` — personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped.
### Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_prepend}` in order before proceeding.
### Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in `{workflow.persistent_facts}` as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run.
### Step 4: Load Config
Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
- `project_name`, `user_name`
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`
- `implementation_artifacts`, `planning_artifacts`
- `date` as system-generated current datetime
- `project_context` = `**/project-context.md` (load if exists)
- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Step 5: Greet the User
Greet `{user_name}`, speaking in `{communication_language}`.
### Step 6: Execute Append Steps
Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_append}` in order.
Activation is complete.
## Paths
- `sprint_status_file` = `{implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml`
- `session_report_file` = `{implementation_artifacts}/planning-poker-{date}.md`
- `estimation_scale` = `{workflow.estimation_scale}` (default: fibonacci)
- `divergence_threshold` = `{workflow.divergence_threshold}` (default: 2.0)
- `max_rounds` = `{workflow.max_rounds}` (default: 3)
- `participating_agents` = `{workflow.participating_agents}`
## Input Files
| Input | Path | Load Strategy |
|-------|------|---------------|
| Sprint status | `{sprint_status_file}` | FULL_LOAD |
## Estimation Scales
### Fibonacci (default)
1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 — use for relative effort estimation.
### T-shirt
XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL — use when effort is too uncertain for numbers.
### Linear
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 — use when the team prefers absolute scale.
## Execution
<workflow>
<step n="1" goal="Discover unestimated stories">
<action>Load {project_context} for project-wide patterns and conventions (if exists)</action>
<action>Communicate in {communication_language} with {user_name}</action>
<action>Read the FULL file: {sprint_status_file}</action>
<check if="file not found">
<output>No sprint-status.yaml found. Run sprint-planning first to generate it.</output>
<action>Exit workflow</action>
</check>
<action>Parse the YAML. Look for the `development_status` section.</action>
<action>If a `story_points` section exists, skip any story that already has a story_points entry.</action>
<action>Collect all unestimated stories (keys matching `{epic_num}-{story_num}-{title}` pattern with no story_points entry).</action>
<action>Sort stories by epic number, then story number.</action>
<check if="no unestimated stories found">
<output>All stories already estimated. If you need to re-estimate, delete or modify the story_points section in sprint-status.yaml first.</output>
<action>Exit workflow</action>
</check>
<output>
**Stories to Estimate:** {{unestimated_count}}
{{#each unestimated_stories}}
- **{{key}}** — {{title}}
{{/each}}
**Scale:** {{estimation_scale}}
**Divergence threshold:** {{divergence_threshold}}x
**Participating agents:** {{participating_agents}}
**Human participant:** {{user_name}} (you)
</output>
<check if="unestimated_count > 15">
<output>⚠️ Large backlog detected. Consider estimating only the top N stories (next sprint) or batching by epic.</output>
<ask>Estimate all {{unestimated_count}} stories, limit to top-N by priority, or batch by epic? [all / top-N / epic / quit]</ask>
</check>
</step>
<step n="2" goal="Estimate each story">
<action>For each unestimated story in order:</action>
<substep n="2a" goal="Present the story">
<action>Display the story details:</action>
<output>
---
## Story {{story_key}}: {{story_title}}
{{story_description}}
**Acceptance Criteria:**
{{#each acceptance_criteria}}
- {{this}}
{{/each}}
---
</output>
</substep>
<substep n="2b" goal="Silent voting round">
<output>
🎴 **Silent Round** — Everyone estimates privately.
Valid values: {{scale_values}}
**{{user_name}}**, what is your estimate for this story?
</output>
<ask>Your estimate (or "?" if unsure / "skip" to skip this story):</ask>
<check if="user_input == 'skip'">
<action>Mark story as skipped, continue to next story</action>
</check>
<check if="user_input == '?'">
<action>Treat as "needs discussion" — estimate as "?" and proceed to reveal</action>
</check>
<action>Store human estimate as `{{human_estimate}}`</action>
<action>For each agent in {{participating_agents}}, load the agent's persona from `{project-root}/_bmad/core/config.yaml` agents section and ask them to estimate in character. Each agent gives ONLY their estimate and a 1-sentence reason. Agents do NOT see each other's estimates yet.</action>
<action>Collect agent estimates into `{{agent_estimates}}` map: `{agent_name: {estimate: value, reason: "..."}}`</action>
</substep>
<substep n="2c" goal="Reveal all estimates">
<output>
## Reveal — Story {{story_key}}
| Participant | Estimate |
|-------------|----------|
| **{{user_name}} (You)** | {{human_estimate}} |
{{#each agent_estimates}}
| {{name}} ({{title}}) | {{estimate}} |
{{/each}}
**Reasoning:**
{{#each agent_estimates}}
- **{{name}}:** {{reason}}
{{/each}}
</output>
</substep>
<substep n="2d" goal="Check for divergence">
<action>Find the max and min numeric estimates from {{all_estimates}} (exclude "?" values).</action>
<action>Calculate ratio: max_estimate / min_estimate</action>
<check if="any estimate is '?'">
<action>Divergence is automatic — trigger debate to clarify.</action>
</check>
<check if="ratio > {{divergence_threshold}}">
<output>
⚠️ **Divergence detected!**
Max estimate ({{max_estimate}}) is {{ratio}}x the min estimate ({{min_estimate}}).
Threshold: {{divergence_threshold}}x
**The outliers should explain their reasoning.**
</output>
<action>Proceed to Party Debate (step 2e)</action>
</check>
<check if="ratio <= {{divergence_threshold}} AND no '?' estimates">
<action>Skip debate — estimates are within acceptable range. Proceed to consensus (step 2f).</action>
</check>
</substep>
<substep n="2e" goal="Party Mode debate">
<action>If this is round > {{max_rounds}}, skip debate and go to PM tiebreak (step 2f).</action>
<output>
💬 **Entering debate mode.** The agents will discuss their estimates. You can challenge, agree, or push back on any point. This is your team talking — jump in anytime.
*Loading Party Mode...*
</output>
<action>Invoke the Party Mode skill (`bmad-party-mode`) context. Present the situation:</action>
<action>
- The story being estimated: {{story_key}}: {{story_title}} — {{story_description}}
- The current round's estimates: show all estimates
- The divergence: max ({{max_estimate}}) vs min ({{min_estimate}})
- Instruction: "These agents need to debate their estimates for this story. {{user_name}} is a participant. The high and low estimators should defend their positions. Goal: converge or clarify the disagreement."
- Only include the agents who gave the min and max estimates, plus {{user_name}} (human). Other agents can stay silent unless they have a relevant point.
</action>
<action>Run the Party Mode exchange (3-5 turns max for this debate). After the debate, summarize the key arguments made.</action>
<action>After debate, return to silent voting round (step 2b) for a re-vote. Increment round counter.</action>
<check if="round > {{max_rounds}}">
<output>Maximum rounds reached ({{max_rounds}}). The PM will cast the final estimate.</output>
<action>PM (John) reviews all debate arguments and casts the final estimate. Display it with reasoning.</action>
<action>Set `{{consensus_estimate}}` = PM's estimate.</action>
<action>Proceed to save (step 3).</action>
</check>
</substep>
<substep n="2f" goal="Reach consensus">
<check if="estimates converge naturally (ratio <= threshold AND no '?')">
<output>
✅ **Consensus reached!**
Estimates cluster around: {{mode_estimate}}
| Participant | Final Estimate |
|-------------|---------------|
| **Consensus** | {{consensus_estimate}} |
</output>
<action>Set `{{consensus_estimate}}` = the mode (most common) of all estimates, or the median if no mode.</action>
</check>
<action>Ask for final confirmation:</action>
<ask>The consensus estimate for **{{story_key}}** is **{{consensus_estimate}}**.
Accept this estimate? [y / n (provide your own) / skip]</ask>
<check if="user says 'n' with alternative">
<action>Use user's alternative as `{{consensus_estimate}}`. The human has final authority.</action>
</check>
<check if="user says 'skip'">
<action>Mark story as skipped. Continue to next story.</action>
</check>
<action>Store `{{consensus_estimate}}` with justification from the debate/discussion.</action>
</substep>
<step n="3" goal="Save estimation results">
<action>Update `{sprint_status_file}`:</action>
<action>Add a `story_points` section alongside `development_status` (do NOT modify `development_status`):</action>
```yaml
story_points:
1-1-user-authentication: 5
1-2-account-management: 8
```
<action>Each entry: story key → consensus estimate (number or t-shirt size string).</action>
<action>Do NOT overwrite existing story_points entries — only add new ones for stories estimated in this session.</action>
<output>
**sprint-status.yaml updated** — {{newly_estimated_count}} stories estimated.
</output>
</step>
<step n="4" goal="Generate session report">
<action>Create `{{session_report_file}}` with full trace:</action>
```markdown
# Planning Poker Session — {{date}}
**Project:** {{project_name}}
**Scale:** {{estimation_scale}}
**Threshold:** {{divergence_threshold}}x
**Max rounds:** {{max_rounds}}
**Agents:** {{participating_agents}}
**Human:** {{user_name}}
---
## Summary
| Story | Final Estimate | Rounds | Debate? |
|-------|---------------|--------|---------|
{{#each estimated_stories}}
| {{key}} | {{estimate}} | {{rounds}} | {{had_debate}} |
{{/each}}
---
## Detailed Results
{{#each estimated_stories}}
### {{key}}: {{title}}
**Description:** {{description}}
**Round 1:**
| Participant | Estimate | Reasoning |
|-------------|----------|-----------|
| {{user_name}} (You) | {{human_est}} | — |
{{#each agent_estimates}}
| {{name}} ({{title}}) | {{estimate}} | {{reason}} |
{{/each}}
{{#if had_debate}}
**Debate:** {{debate_summary}}
**Round {{final_round}} (re-vote):**
| Participant | Estimate |
|-------------|----------|
| Consensus | {{final_estimate}} |
{{/if}}
**Final Estimate:** {{final_estimate}}
**Justification:** {{justification}}
---
{{/each}}
```
<action>Write report to `{{session_report_file}}`.</action>
<output>
📄 **Session report saved:** {{session_report_file}}
</output>
</step>
<step n="5" goal="Display completion summary">
<output>
## Planning Poker Complete 🎴
- **Stories estimated:** {{estimated_count}}
- **Stories skipped:** {{skipped_count}}
- **Debates triggered:** {{debate_count}}
- **Average rounds per story:** {{avg_rounds}}
**Updated:** `{{sprint_status_file}}` (story_points section)
**Report:** `{{session_report_file}}`
**Next:** Run sprint-planning to incorporate estimates into your sprint plan.
</output>
<action>Run: `python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow.on_complete` — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.</action>
</step>
</workflow>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# DO NOT EDIT -- overwritten on every update.
#
# Workflow customization surface for bmad-planning-poker. Mirrors the
# agent customization shape under the [workflow] namespace.
[workflow]
# Steps to run before the standard activation (config load, greet).
activation_steps_prepend = []
# Steps to run after greet but before the workflow begins.
activation_steps_append = []
# Persistent facts the workflow keeps in mind for the whole run.
persistent_facts = [
"file:{project-root}/**/project-context.md",
]
# Estimation scale: fibonacci | tshirt | linear
estimation_scale = "fibonacci"
# Divergence threshold: max/min > this triggers debate
divergence_threshold = 2.0
# Maximum re-vote rounds before PM tiebreaks
max_rounds = 3
# Agents participating in estimation (agent codes)
participating_agents = ["bmad-agent-pm", "bmad-agent-dev", "bmad-agent-architect"]
# Post-completion hook (empty by default)
on_complete = ""

View File

@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ BMad Method,bmad-checkpoint-preview,Checkpoint,CK,Guided walkthrough of a change
BMad Method,bmad-qa-generate-e2e-tests,QA Automation Test,QA,Generate automated API and E2E tests for implemented code. NOT for code review or story validation — use CR for that.,,,4-implementation,bmad-dev-story,,false,implementation_artifacts,test suite
BMad Method,bmad-retrospective,Retrospective,ER,Optional at epic end: Review completed work lessons learned and next epic or if major issues consider CC.,,,4-implementation,bmad-code-review,,false,implementation_artifacts,retrospective
BMad Method,bmad-investigate,Investigate,IN,Forensic case investigation calibrated to the input. Evidence-graded analysis with hypothesis tracking. Produces a structured case file.,,4-implementation,,,false,implementation_artifacts,investigation report
BMad Method,bmad-planning-poker,Plan Poker,PP,Collaborative story point estimation with AI agents. Silent voting rounds and Party Mode debate when estimates diverge.,,,4-implementation,bmad-create-epics-and-stories,bmad-sprint-planning,false,implementation_artifacts,session report and story points

Can't render this file because it has a wrong number of fields in line 32.