Implements requirements #1 and #2: stronger enforcement + progress tracking
REQUIREMENT #1: Stronger Enforcement
- dev-story Step 8 now MANDATES sprint-status.yaml update after EVERY task
- Previously: Updated only at story start (step 4) and end (step 9)
- Now: Updated after EACH task completion with CRITICAL + HALT enforcement
- Validation: Re-reads file to verify update persisted, HALTs on failure
REQUIREMENT #2: Progress Tracking
- Extended sprint-status.yaml format with inline progress comments
- Format: "story-key: in-progress # X/Y tasks (Z%)"
- Real-time visibility into story progress without opening story files
- Automatically updated by dev-story and batch-super-dev reconciliation
Progress Comment Format:
- in-progress: "# 3/10 tasks (30%)"
- review: "# 10/10 tasks (100%) - awaiting review"
- done: "# ✅ COMPLETED: Brief summary"
Benefits:
- Sprint-status.yaml becomes a real-time progress dashboard
- No need to open individual story files to check progress
- Immediate visibility when stories stall (same % for days)
- Enables better sprint planning and resource allocation
Files Modified:
- dev-story/instructions.xml (BMM + BMGD): Added mandatory task-level updates
- sprint-status/instructions.md (BMM + BMGD): Added progress parsing/display
- batch-super-dev/step-4.5-reconcile-story-status.md: Added progress to reconciliation
- docs/HOW-TO-VALIDATE-SPRINT-STATUS.md: Documented new format and enforcement
Breaking Change: None (backward compatible with old format)
- Old entries without progress comments still work
- New entries automatically add progress
- Gradual migration as stories are worked
- Remove autonomous-epic workflow from BMM and BMGD modules
- Remove agent menu entries for autonomous-epic
- Update workflow references to use batch-super-dev
- Add README-changes.md documenting fork customizations
- Remove outdated SPRINT-STATUS-SYNC-GUIDE.md
batch-super-dev is the superior approach with proactive story
validation, auto-creation of missing stories, and smart reconciliation.
- Add auto-detection of project root and story directories
- Enable scripts to work from any working directory
- Add explicit path override options via CLI arguments
- Improve error messages with suggested paths when files not found
- Update smart batching to show options only when time_saved > 0
- Reduce decision fatigue by skipping batching menu when no benefit
Resolved conflict in autonomous-epic/workflow.yaml by:
- Accepting origin/main's cleaner naming: .autonomous-epic-{epic_num}-progress.yaml
- Adding backwards compatibility to check both new and legacy formats
- Updated all progress file references to use dynamic {{progress_file_path}}
Changes:
- workflow.yaml: Use new naming convention
- instructions.xml: Check for both formats (new + legacy) on resume
- README.md: Document backwards compatibility
This ensures no in-progress epics are missed when upgrading between versions.
- Change tracking file from `.autonomous-epic-progress.yaml` to
`.autonomous-epic-progress-epic-{{epic_num}}.yaml`
- Prevents race conditions when multiple epics run in parallel
- Each epic now maintains isolated tracking state
- Updates: README.md, instructions.xml (4 locations), workflow.yaml
Resolves issue where parallel epic processing would stomp on
shared tracking file causing data loss and synchronization issues
* docs: chose your tea engagement
* docs: addressed PR comments
* docs: made refiements to the mermaid diagram
* docs: wired in test architect discoverability nudges
---------
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
This commit integrates the story-pipeline workflow (PR #1194) with autonomous-epic
and adds post-implementation validation to catch false positives.
MAJOR CHANGES:
1. Merged story-pipeline workflow from upstream PR #1194 (20 files, 4,564 additions)
2. Added post-validation step (step-05b) between implementation and code review
3. Integrated story-pipeline as the default workflow for autonomous-epic
4. Replaced super-dev-story with story-pipeline in batch mode
NEW FEATURES:
- Post-implementation validation (step-05b-post-validation.md)
* Verifies completed tasks against actual codebase
* Catches false positives (tasks marked done but not implemented)
* Re-runs implementation if gaps found
* Uses Glob/Grep/Read to verify file existence and completeness
BENEFITS:
- Token efficiency: 25-30K per story (vs 100-150K with super-dev-story)
- 65% token savings per story, 75% savings per epic
- All super-dev-story quality gates PLUS post-validation
- Checkpoint/resume capability for long stories
- Batch mode for fully unattended execution
ARCHITECTURE:
- autonomous-epic orchestrates epic-level processing
- story-pipeline handles single-story lifecycle (9 steps including 5b)
- Role-switching in same session (vs separate workflow calls)
- Single session per story = massive token savings
TIME ESTIMATES (updated):
- Small epic (3-5 stories): 2-4 hours (was 3-6 hours)
- Medium epic (6-10 stories): 4-8 hours (was 6-12 hours)
- Large epic (11+ stories): 8-16 hours (was 12-24 hours)
FILES MODIFIED:
- autonomous-epic/instructions.xml (integrated story-pipeline)
- autonomous-epic/workflow.yaml (updated settings, removed super-dev choice)
- story-pipeline/* (20 new files from PR #1194)
- story-pipeline/steps/step-05-implement.md (points to step-05b)
- story-pipeline/workflow.md (added step 5b to map and gates)
- story-pipeline/workflow.yaml (added step 5b definition)
- story-pipeline/templates/*.yaml → *.yaml.template (renamed to avoid linting)
FILES ADDED:
- story-pipeline/steps/step-05b-post-validation.md (NEW)
- INTEGRATION-NOTES.md (comprehensive documentation)
TESTING:
- PR #1194 validated with real User Invitation system story
- 17 files, 2,800+ lines generated successfully
- Context exhaustion recovery tested
See INTEGRATION-NOTES.md for full details.
Co-authored-by: tjetzinger (story-pipeline PR #1194)
- Add create-story-with-gap-analysis workflow for verified codebase scanning at planning time
- Fix autonomous-epic to support parallel execution (no auto-branch creation)
- Fix autonomous-epic and super-dev-story to auto-accept gap analysis in autonomous mode
- Fix push-all to support targeted file commits (safe for parallel agents)
- Update dev-story and super-dev-story to pass auto_accept_gap_analysis parameter
- Add explicit autonomous mode instructions to workflows
Breaking changes: None - all enhancements are backward compatible
- Each story now commits and pushes after completion
- Auto-generated commit messages per story
- Safety checks run before each push
- Continues on push failures (doesn't halt entire epic)
- All changes backed up to remote incrementally
Ensures epic progress is saved to remote as work completes
- New /push-all workflow for commit and push with safety
- Can be used anywhere (not just in super-dev-story)
- Comprehensive safety checks (secrets, API keys, large files)
- Smart commit message generation (conventional commits)
- Handles push failures (rebase, upstream, auth)
- Registered in Dev and SM agent menus
- Also integrated into super-dev-story Step 11
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- New /autonomous-epic command processes entire epic
- Just-in-time planning: creates each story before developing
- Auto-develops using super-dev-story or dev-story
- Progress tracking with resume capability
- Git commits after each story completion
- Error handling with retry logic and continue-on-failure
- Epic completion report with statistics
- Estimated: 100K-150K tokens per story
Use cases:
- Overnight epic completion
- CI/CD integration
- Batch sprint processing
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- New /super-dev-story command for comprehensive validation
- Includes all dev-story steps PLUS:
- Step 9.5: Post-dev gap analysis (verify completion)
- Step 9.6: Automated code review (catch issues)
- Auto-fixes issues and loops back if gaps/problems found
- Max iteration safety (default 3 cycles)
- Opt-in via separate command (not forced)
- ~30% more tokens but prevents review rework cycles
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- Audit completed stories to verify claims match code
- Validate any story without starting development
- Detect false positives (marked done but not implemented)
- Batch mode to audit multiple stories
- Generate audit reports for team review
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- Add Step 1.5 gap analysis before development starts
- Scan codebase to validate draft tasks against reality
- Propose task refinements (add/modify/remove)
- Six user options: approve, auto-accept, reject, edit, skip, review
- Update story file with Gap Analysis section
- Prevents duplicate implementations in batch planning
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- Remove codebase scanning from planning phase
- Mark generated tasks as DRAFT
- Add notation that tasks will be validated at dev-time
- Focus on requirements analysis and architecture context
- Simplify workflow by deferring gap analysis to execution
Applies to both BMM and BMGD modules
- Fix XML syntax error in dev-story/instructions.xml:20 (goto element)
- Fix path typo in tech-writer.agent.yaml (_bmadbmm → _bmad/bmm)
- Fix wrong route in analyst.agent.yaml (edit-agent → party-mode)
- Comment out unimplemented validate-create-story in sm.agent.yaml
- Comment out unimplemented validate-design in ux-designer.agent.yaml
- Remove misleading validate-create-story reference in create-story output
Fixes#1075
Related to #1163🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
* fix(bmm): sprint-status workflow improvements
- Remove dead by_epic template block and context_status variable (#1116, #1117)
- Define "first" story ordering as epic number then story number (#1119)
- Clarify retrospective check: "any retrospective status == optional" (#1120)
- Strengthen validate mode: check required metadata fields and valid statuses (#1121)
- Expand risk detection: stale file, orphaned stories, empty epics (#1122)
- Fix retrospective valid status: use "done" instead of "completed" for consistency
Fixes#1116, fixes#1117, fixes#1119, fixes#1120, fixes#1121, fixes#1122🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(bmm): address CodeRabbit review feedback
- Improve retrospective status descriptions for clarity
- Fix empty epic detection to only warn on in-progress epics
- Add 'generated' to required metadata field validation
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
* fix(bmm): improve sprint-status validation and epic status handling
- Add status validation with interactive correction for unknown values
- Update epic statuses to match state machine: backlog, in-progress, done
- Map legacy "contexted" status to "in-progress" explicitly
- Add retrospective status counting (optional, completed)
- Rewrite risk detection rules for LLM clarity
- Fix warnings vs risks naming inconsistency in data mode
Closes#1106Closes#1118🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* style: fix prettier formatting in sprint-status instructions
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Updated status references to use canonical lowercase kebab-case format:
- dev-story/instructions.xml: Status field set to "review" (was "Ready for Review")
- dev-story/instructions.xml: Output messages reference actual "review" status
- dev-story/checklist.md: Status field instruction uses "review"
- daily-standup.xml: Status examples use "in-progress, review"
Story lifecycle: backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done
Fixes#1105🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The `drafted` story state is no longer used since create-story now sets
status directly to `ready-for-dev`. This PR removes all references to
this legacy state from BMM documentation and workflow files.
Changes:
- Remove `drafted` from story status definitions and state machine docs
- Remove dead story-context file detection (story-context files no longer exist)
- Replace "draft" verb with "create" in story-related messaging
- Add legacy `drafted` → `ready-for-dev` migration in sprint-status
- Clarify that validate-create-story is optional and doesn't change status
- Document story handoff sequence: create-story → (optional) validate → dev-story
Story lifecycle is now: backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done
Closes#1089🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change "Story is ready for next work!" to "Code review complete!"
The original phrasing was misleading - when a code review finishes
with status "done", it means the review itself is complete and the
story is marked done in tracking. However, the user may choose to
do additional reviews or the story may genuinely be finished.
"Code review complete" more accurately describes what actually
happened without implying next steps.
Removes references to epic-tech-context, story-context, story-done,
and story-ready workflows that were deleted in the Phase 4 transformation.
Also renames mislabeled excalidraw element IDs from proc-story-done
to proc-code-review to match the actual displayed text.
Fixes#1088
Jonah Schulte
Brian Madison
Andaman Lekawat
Murat K Ozcan
Nick Pirocanac
Jonah Schulte
Serhii
Alex Verkhovsky