When provided, the style_guide input overrides all generic principles
(including Microsoft Style Guide baseline, reader-type priorities, and
structure-model selection) except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT.
Changes to both editorial-review-structure.xml and editorial-review-prose.xml:
- Add style_guide input after content input
- Add STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE instruction in llm section
- Add "Consult style_guide" action in Step 3 for mid-flow refresh
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat: add editorial review tasks for structure and prose
Add two complementary editorial review tasks:
- editorial-review-structure.xml: Structural editor that proposes cuts,
reorganization, and simplification. Includes 5 document archetype models
(Tutorial, Reference, Explanation, Prompt, Strategic) for targeted evaluation.
- editorial-review-prose.xml: Clinical copy-editor for prose improvements
using Microsoft Writing Style Guide as baseline.
Both tasks support humans and llm target audiences with different principles.
* fix: add content-sacrosanct guardrail to editorial review tasks
Both editorial review tasks (prose and structure) were missing the key
constraint that reviewers should never challenge the ideas/knowledge
themselves—only how clearly they are communicated. This restores the
original design intent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: align reader_type parameter naming across editorial tasks
Prose task was using 'target_audience' for the humans/llm optimization
flag while structure task correctly separates 'target_audience' (who
reads) from 'reader_type' (optimization mode). Aligns to reader_type.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
Brian
Brian Madison
Alex Verkhovsky