docs(bmvcs): add development approach analysis
- Add comprehensive DEVELOPMENT_APPROACH.md document - Document direct development vs BMB create-module comparison - Include compliance matrix with BMAD v6 standards - Add recommendations for future module development - Fix markdown formatting and URL links in README - Add new doc to Documentation section 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Serhii
parent
3f79f1f80a
commit
fd16dab3c5
|
|
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ BMVCS integrates optionally with BMM (BMad Method) agents:
|
|||
- **[VCS Agnostic Principles](./docs/VCS_AGNOSTIC_PRINCIPLES.md)** - Philosophy and approach
|
||||
- **[VCS Agnostic Proposal](./docs/VCS_AGNOSTIC_PROPOSAL.md)** - Detailed implementation design
|
||||
- **[VCS Detection Confidence](./docs/VCS_DETECTION_CONFIDENCE.md)** - How discovery scoring works
|
||||
- **[Usage Examples](./docs/examples/vcs-adaptation-examples.md)** - Practical examples
|
||||
- **[Usage Examples](./examples/vcs-adaptation-examples.md)** - Practical examples
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -187,6 +187,16 @@ src/modules/bmvcs/
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📚 Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- **[VCS Agnostic Principles](./docs/VCS_AGNOSTIC_PRINCIPLES.md)** - Philosophy and approach
|
||||
- **[VCS Agnostic Proposal](./docs/VCS_AGNOSTIC_PROPOSAL.md)** - Detailed implementation design
|
||||
- **[VCS Detection Confidence](./docs/VCS_DETECTION_CONFIDENCE.md)** - How discovery scoring works
|
||||
- **[Usage Examples](./examples/vcs-adaptation-examples.md)** - Practical examples
|
||||
- **[Development Approach](./docs/DEVELOPMENT_APPROACH.md)** - Module creation strategy and BMB comparison
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤝 Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
BMVCS is part of the BMAD Method project. See [CONTRIBUTING.md](../../../CONTRIBUTING.md) for guidelines.
|
||||
|
|
@ -208,9 +218,9 @@ Same license as BMAD Method project.
|
|||
|
||||
## 🔗 Links
|
||||
|
||||
- **BMAD Method:** https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD
|
||||
- **Issue Tracker:** https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/issues
|
||||
- **Discord:** https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj
|
||||
- **BMAD Method:** <https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD>
|
||||
- **Issue Tracker:** <https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD/issues>
|
||||
- **Discord:** <https://discord.gg/gk8jAdXWmj>
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
|
|||
# BMVCS Development Approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Type:** Module Development Analysis
|
||||
**Status:** Retrospective Analysis
|
||||
**Version:** 1.0.0
|
||||
**Date:** 2025-09-30
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document analyzes the development approach used for creating the BMVCS module and compares it with the standard BMB (BMAD Builder) `create-module` workflow introduced in BMAD v6.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Module Creation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
BMVCS was developed using a **direct development approach** rather than the standard BMB `create-module` workflow. This was an intentional choice that proved beneficial for this specific module.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Direct Development?
|
||||
|
||||
### Advantages for BMVCS
|
||||
|
||||
The direct development approach provided several key benefits:
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Speed
|
||||
|
||||
- Rapid prototyping without multi-step wizard overhead
|
||||
- Immediate implementation of ideas
|
||||
- No waiting for workflow prompts
|
||||
- Fast iteration cycles
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Flexibility
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom to experiment with VCS-agnostic concepts
|
||||
- Ability to deviate from standard patterns when needed
|
||||
- Custom structure for unique requirements
|
||||
- Real-time architectural decisions
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Customization
|
||||
|
||||
- Unique structure tailored to specific needs
|
||||
- Custom VCS adaptation templates system
|
||||
- Innovative confidence scoring mechanism
|
||||
- Specialized discovery task patterns
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Innovation
|
||||
|
||||
- Space to develop new patterns
|
||||
- Discovery tasks with interactive prompts
|
||||
- Adapter agent paradigm
|
||||
- Template-based workflow adaptations
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use Each Approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Use Direct Development When:
|
||||
|
||||
✓ You have clear vision of the module structure
|
||||
✓ Experimenting with new concepts or patterns
|
||||
✓ Working in alpha/research mode
|
||||
✓ Need fast iteration cycles
|
||||
✓ Creating innovative/non-standard modules
|
||||
✓ Have deep understanding of BMAD v6 architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Use BMB create-module When:
|
||||
|
||||
✓ First time creating a BMAD module
|
||||
✓ Need guided process with validation
|
||||
✓ Want guaranteed v6 compatibility
|
||||
✓ Prefer scaffolding over manual creation
|
||||
✓ Building standard domain modules
|
||||
✓ Want automatic roadmap and TODO generation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## BMVCS vs BMB Standards Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
Despite bypassing the BMB workflow, BMVCS fully adheres to BMAD v6 module standards:
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | BMB Standard | BMVCS Implementation | Status |
|
||||
| -------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------ |
|
||||
| **Structure** | `agents/`, `workflows/`, `tasks/`, `templates/` | All present | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Installer** | `_module-installer/` with config | Complete with custom logic | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Primary Agent** | Minimum 1 agent | `vcs-adapter.md` | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Workflows** | 2-10 workflows | `setup-vcs` workflow | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Tasks** | Supporting tasks | 3 tasks (discover, adapt, validate) | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Documentation** | README + docs | README + 4 detailed docs | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Templates** | Shared resources | 5 VCS adaptation templates | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Examples** | Usage examples | Comprehensive examples/ folder | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Installer Config** | `install-menu-config.yaml` | Complete configuration | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
| **Module Metadata** | Version, status, code | All present in README | ✅ Compliant |
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Components Beyond Standards
|
||||
|
||||
BMVCS includes components that exceed BMB standards:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Confidence Scoring System** - Novel VCS detection algorithm
|
||||
- **Adaptation Templates** - YAML-based workflow configurations
|
||||
- **Interactive Discovery** - Multi-step VCS identification process
|
||||
- **Integration Hooks** - Optional BMM agent integration points
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison: What Each Approach Provides
|
||||
|
||||
### BMB create-module Provides
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Interactive module brainstorming session
|
||||
- Module brief creation workflow
|
||||
- Step-by-step component planning
|
||||
- Automatic directory scaffolding
|
||||
- Generated configuration files
|
||||
- Module validation checks
|
||||
- Development roadmap (TODO.md)
|
||||
- Post-creation summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assurance:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Guaranteed v6 structure compliance
|
||||
- Configuration file templates
|
||||
- Installer setup automation
|
||||
- Documentation templates
|
||||
- Component naming validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Development Provides
|
||||
|
||||
**Flexibility:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Immediate implementation
|
||||
- Custom architectural patterns
|
||||
- Experimentation freedom
|
||||
- Innovation space
|
||||
- Rapid prototyping
|
||||
|
||||
**Trade-offs:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Manual structure creation
|
||||
- Self-validation required
|
||||
- Documentation written from scratch
|
||||
- Installer logic custom-built
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## BMVCS Development Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Concept & Research
|
||||
|
||||
- Analyzed BMAD v6 architecture changes
|
||||
- Researched VCS-agnostic approaches
|
||||
- Studied BMB module structure patterns
|
||||
- Decided on direct development approach
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Core Structure
|
||||
|
||||
- Created module directory structure
|
||||
- Built VCS Adapter agent
|
||||
- Designed discovery task flow
|
||||
- Implemented adaptation templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Integration & Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- Developed installer configuration
|
||||
- Created workflow components
|
||||
- Built validation mechanisms
|
||||
- Tested with multiple VCS types
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- Wrote comprehensive README
|
||||
- Created principle documents
|
||||
- Built example implementations
|
||||
- Added confidence scoring docs
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Lessons Learned
|
||||
|
||||
### What Worked Well
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Rapid Prototyping**
|
||||
- Concepts became implementations quickly
|
||||
- Easy to pivot when better ideas emerged
|
||||
- No workflow constraints slowing progress
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Custom Innovation**
|
||||
- Confidence scoring system emerged naturally
|
||||
- Template-based adaptations designed iteratively
|
||||
- Discovery flow refined through experimentation
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Architecture Flexibility**
|
||||
- Could break conventions when beneficial
|
||||
- Novel patterns (adapter agent) explored freely
|
||||
- Integration hooks added organically
|
||||
|
||||
### What Could Be Improved
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Validation Checkpoints**
|
||||
- Manual verification of BMB compliance needed
|
||||
- No automatic structure validation
|
||||
- Self-auditing required
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Documentation Overhead**
|
||||
- More upfront documentation writing
|
||||
- No auto-generated component lists
|
||||
- Manual README maintenance
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Roadmap Management**
|
||||
- No automatic TODO.md generation
|
||||
- Manual tracking of remaining work
|
||||
- Self-managed development phases
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations for Future Modules
|
||||
|
||||
### For Standard Modules
|
||||
|
||||
**Use BMB create-module workflow:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Domain-specific modules (Legal, Medical, Finance, etc.)
|
||||
- Content creation modules
|
||||
- Productivity tools
|
||||
- Game development modules
|
||||
- Standard agent + workflow combinations
|
||||
|
||||
### For Innovative Modules
|
||||
|
||||
**Consider direct development:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Novel architectural patterns
|
||||
- Research/experimental modules
|
||||
- Cross-cutting concerns (like BMVCS)
|
||||
- Infrastructure modules
|
||||
- Tool/builder modules
|
||||
|
||||
### Hybrid Approach
|
||||
|
||||
**Combine both methods:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use BMB for initial scaffolding
|
||||
2. Customize structure for special needs
|
||||
3. Add innovative components manually
|
||||
4. Leverage BMB validation at end
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Takeaways
|
||||
|
||||
### Both Approaches Are Valid
|
||||
|
||||
- **BMB create-module** = Scaffolding tool for structured creation
|
||||
- **Direct development** = Production-ready structure built manually
|
||||
|
||||
### BMVCS Proves a Point
|
||||
|
||||
Understanding BMAD v6 architecture allows successful module creation without mandatory tooling. The direct development approach can be faster and more flexible for experienced developers working on innovative modules.
|
||||
|
||||
### This May Become a Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
The "rapid prototyping pattern" demonstrated by BMVCS development could be documented as an official alternative approach for experienced BMAD module developers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Possibilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Retrospective BMB Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- Run BMB validation tools on existing modules
|
||||
- Compare hand-built vs generated structures
|
||||
- Identify gaps or improvements
|
||||
- Update module to incorporate BMB best practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Tooling Enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
- Create "validate-module" tool for manual modules
|
||||
- Build "enhance-module" to add BMB features to existing modules
|
||||
- Develop "module-audit" for compliance checking
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
- Use BMVCS as case study in BMB documentation
|
||||
- Show both approaches in module creation guides
|
||||
- Provide decision matrix for approach selection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
BMVCS demonstrates that direct development is a viable alternative to the BMB create-module workflow for certain types of modules. While BMB provides structure and guidance, direct development offers speed and flexibility for experienced developers working on innovative or experimental modules.
|
||||
|
||||
The key is understanding **when to use which approach** based on:
|
||||
|
||||
- Developer experience level
|
||||
- Module complexity and novelty
|
||||
- Need for speed vs structure
|
||||
- Standard vs innovative patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Both approaches have their place in the BMAD v6 ecosystem, and this document serves as guidance for future module developers choosing their path.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Author:** BMAD-METHOD Development Team
|
||||
**Contributors:** Claude Code AI Assistant
|
||||
**License:** Same as BMAD-METHOD project
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue