ldy26098
/
BMAD-METHOD
mirror of https://github.com/bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge bfdeef0453 into 4b2389231f

This commit is contained in:
Jacob du Toit 2026-03-20 11:00:49 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 4b2389231f bfdeef0453
commit fa04a12814
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 69 additions and 50 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

119
src/core-skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/methods.csv
View File

@ -1,51 +1,70 @@
num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
1,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment 1,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection
2,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations 2,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns
3,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis 3,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis
4,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities 4,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus
5,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact 5,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization
6,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution 6,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy
7,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding 7,advanced,Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding,Force explicit intermediate reasoning steps before any conclusion — prevents intuitive leaps that skip flawed logic,premise → step → step → conclusion
8,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view 8,advanced,Few-Shot Exemplar Priming,Provide 2-3 worked examples of the desired reasoning pattern before the real task — aligns output format and depth through demonstration,examples → pattern recognition → application
9,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result 9,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
10,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention 10,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
11,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection 11,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis
12,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns 12,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities
13,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis 13,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact
14,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus 14,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
15,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization 15,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding
16,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy 16,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view
17,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening 17,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result
18,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement 18,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
19,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards 19,collaboration,Six Thinking Hats,Rotate through six modes (facts - feelings - caution - optimism - creativity - process) to ensure a group covers every angle without crosstalk,white → red → black → yellow → green → blue
20,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale 20,collaboration,Delphi Method,Experts give independent estimates - see anonymized results - then revise — converges on calibrated group judgment while avoiding anchoring bias,independent estimates → reveal → revise → converge
21,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha 21,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening
22,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner 22,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement
23,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance 23,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards
24,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations 24,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
25,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R 25,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution
26,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward 26,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding
27,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights 27,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
28,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas 28,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion
29,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise 29,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
30,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights 30,core,Second-Order Thinking,Think beyond immediate consequences to anticipate cascading effects and long-term implications - essential for strategic decisions where first-order solutions create hidden downstream problems,action → consequences → second-order effects → informed choice
31,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis 31,core,Inversion Analysis,Flip the problem by asking what would guarantee failure instead of how to succeed - reveals hidden obstacles and blind spots by approaching challenges from the opposite direction,goal → invert → failure paths → avoidance → solution
32,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements 32,core,Problem Decomposition,Break a complex problem into independent sub-problems - solve each - then reassemble — essential when a task is too large or tangled to tackle whole,whole → parts → solutions → reassembly
33,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation 33,core,Analogy Mapping,Find a well-understood parallel domain and transfer its structure to the current problem — unlocks insight by borrowing proven mental models,source domain → mapping → target insight
34,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention 34,core,Steelmanning,Construct the strongest possible version of an opposing argument before responding — builds credibility and catches blind spots that strawmanning misses,opposing view → strongest form → honest rebuttal
35,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention 35,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
36,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening 36,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
37,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations 37,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
38,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden 38,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas
39,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach 39,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
40,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution 40,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
41,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding 41,creative,Constraint Injection,Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure,add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate
42,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined 42,creative,Morphological Analysis,List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations,parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation
43,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion 43,framing,Abstraction Laddering,"Move up (""why?"") for strategic clarity or down (""how?"") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude",concrete ↔ abstract → right level
44,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content 44,framing,Reframe the Question,Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer,stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution
45,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery 45,framing,Stakeholder Lens Rotation,Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked,perspective A → B → C → gaps found
46,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement 46,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
47,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection 47,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
48,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision 48,learning,Deliberate Practice Loop,Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition,isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat
49,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application 49,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
50,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions 50,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
51,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
52,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
53,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
54,research,Source Triangulation,Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias,claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating
55,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
56,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
57,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
58,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
59,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
60,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
61,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
62,risk,Assumption Audit,Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations,list → rate → stress-test → shore up
63,risk,Cascading Failure Simulation,Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure,trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple
64,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
65,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
66,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
67,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
68,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
69,technical,Boundary & Edge Case Sweep,Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses,inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found

1 num category method_name description output_pattern
2 1 collaboration advanced Stakeholder Round Table Tree of Thoughts Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches perspectives → synthesis → alignment paths → evaluation → selection
3 2 collaboration advanced Expert Panel Review Graph of Thoughts Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns expert views → consensus → recommendations nodes → connections → patterns
4 3 collaboration advanced Debate Club Showdown Thread of Thought Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency thesis → antithesis → synthesis context → thread → synthesis
5 4 collaboration advanced User Persona Focus Group Self-Consistency Validation Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters reactions → concerns → priorities approaches → comparison → consensus
6 5 collaboration advanced Time Traveler Council Meta-Prompting Analysis Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving past wisdom → present choice → future impact current → analysis → optimization
7 6 collaboration advanced Cross-Functional War Room Reasoning via Planning Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution model → planning → strategy
8 7 collaboration advanced Mentor and Apprentice Chain-of-Thought Scaffolding Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching Force explicit intermediate reasoning steps before any conclusion — prevents intuitive leaps that skip flawed logic explanation → questions → deeper understanding premise → step → step → conclusion
9 8 collaboration advanced Good Cop Bad Cop Few-Shot Exemplar Priming Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address Provide 2-3 worked examples of the desired reasoning pattern before the real task — aligns output format and depth through demonstration encouragement → criticism → balanced view examples → pattern recognition → application
10 9 collaboration Improv Yes-And Stakeholder Round Table Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests idea → build → build → surprising result perspectives → synthesis → alignment
11 10 collaboration Customer Support Theater Expert Panel Review Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention expert views → consensus → recommendations
12 11 advanced collaboration Tree of Thoughts Debate Club Showdown Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground paths → evaluation → selection thesis → antithesis → synthesis
13 12 advanced collaboration Graph of Thoughts User Persona Focus Group Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs nodes → connections → patterns reactions → concerns → priorities
14 13 advanced collaboration Thread of Thought Time Traveler Council Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures context → thread → synthesis past wisdom → present choice → future impact
15 14 advanced collaboration Self-Consistency Validation Cross-Functional War Room Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability approaches → comparison → consensus constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
16 15 advanced collaboration Meta-Prompting Analysis Mentor and Apprentice Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching current → analysis → optimization explanation → questions → deeper understanding
17 16 advanced collaboration Reasoning via Planning Good Cop Bad Cop Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address model → planning → strategy encouragement → criticism → balanced view
18 17 competitive collaboration Red Team vs Blue Team Improv Yes-And Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building defense → attack → hardening idea → build → build → surprising result
19 18 competitive collaboration Shark Tank Pitch Customer Support Theater Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps pitch → challenges → refinement complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
20 19 competitive collaboration Code Review Gauntlet Six Thinking Hats Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices Rotate through six modes (facts - feelings - caution - optimism - creativity - process) to ensure a group covers every angle without crosstalk reviews → debates → standards white → red → black → yellow → green → blue
21 20 technical collaboration Architecture Decision Records Delphi Method Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented Experts give independent estimates - see anonymized results - then revise — converges on calibrated group judgment while avoiding anchoring bias options → trade-offs → decision → rationale independent estimates → reveal → revise → converge
22 21 technical competitive Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Red Team vs Blue Team Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions simple → detailed → technical → aha defense → attack → hardening
23 22 technical competitive Algorithm Olympics Shark Tank Pitch Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition implementations → benchmarks → winner pitch → challenges → refinement
24 23 technical competitive Security Audit Personas Code Review Gauntlet Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance reviews → debates → standards
25 24 technical core Performance Profiler Panel First Principles Analysis Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems symptoms → analysis → optimizations assumptions → truths → new approach
26 25 creative core SCAMPER Method 5 Whys Deep Dive Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures S→C→A→M→P→E→R why chain → root cause → solution
27 26 creative core Reverse Engineering Socratic Questioning Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery end state → steps backward → path forward questions → revelations → understanding
28 27 creative core What If Scenarios Critique and Refine Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts scenarios → implications → insights strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
29 28 creative core Random Input Stimulus Explain Reasoning Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency random word → associations → novel ideas steps → logic → conclusion
30 29 creative core Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Expand or Contract for Audience Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise audience → adjustments → refined content
31 30 creative core Genre Mashup Second-Order Thinking Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination Think beyond immediate consequences to anticipate cascading effects and long-term implications - essential for strategic decisions where first-order solutions create hidden downstream problems domain A + domain B → hybrid insights action → consequences → second-order effects → informed choice
32 31 research core Literature Review Personas Inversion Analysis Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality Flip the problem by asking what would guarantee failure instead of how to succeed - reveals hidden obstacles and blind spots by approaching challenges from the opposite direction sources → critiques → synthesis goal → invert → failure paths → avoidance → solution
33 32 research core Thesis Defense Simulation Problem Decomposition Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions Break a complex problem into independent sub-problems - solve each - then reassemble — essential when a task is too large or tangled to tackle whole thesis → challenges → defense → refinements whole → parts → solutions → reassembly
34 33 research core Comparative Analysis Matrix Analogy Mapping Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring Find a well-understood parallel domain and transfer its structure to the current problem — unlocks insight by borrowing proven mental models options → criteria → scores → recommendation source domain → mapping → target insight
35 34 risk core Pre-mortem Analysis Steelmanning Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches Construct the strongest possible version of an opposing argument before responding — builds credibility and catches blind spots that strawmanning misses failure scenario → causes → prevention opposing view → strongest form → honest rebuttal
36 35 risk creative Failure Mode Analysis SCAMPER Method Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation components → failures → prevention S→C→A→M→P→E→R
37 36 risk creative Challenge from Critical Perspective Reverse Engineering Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints assumptions → challenges → strengthening end state → steps backward → path forward
38 37 risk creative Identify Potential Risks What If Scenarios Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration categories → risks → mitigations scenarios → implications → insights
39 38 risk creative Chaos Monkey Scenarios Random Input Stimulus Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking break → observe → harden random word → associations → novel ideas
40 39 core creative First Principles Analysis Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration assumptions → truths → new approach contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
41 40 core creative 5 Whys Deep Dive Genre Mashup Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination why chain → root cause → solution domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
42 41 core creative Socratic Questioning Constraint Injection Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery Deliberately add an artificial limitation (budget - time - technology) to force novel solutions — creativity thrives under pressure questions → revelations → understanding add constraint → forced creativity → remove constraint → evaluate
43 42 core creative Critique and Refine Morphological Analysis Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts List independent parameters of a problem - enumerate options for each - then systematically combine — ensures you don't miss non-obvious configurations strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined parameters → options grid → combinations → evaluation
44 43 core framing Explain Reasoning Abstraction Laddering Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency Move up ("why?") for strategic clarity or down ("how?") for tactical detail — ensures you're solving at the right altitude steps → logic → conclusion concrete ↔ abstract → right level
45 44 core framing Expand or Contract for Audience Reframe the Question Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities Challenge whether the stated problem is the real problem — often the question itself is wrong and a better framing unlocks an easy answer audience → adjustments → refined content stated problem → reframe → true problem → solution
46 45 learning framing Feynman Technique Stakeholder Lens Rotation Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding Serially adopt each stakeholder's world-view to see the same situation differently — reveals whose needs are being overlooked complex → simple → gaps → mastery perspective A → B → C → gaps found
47 46 learning Active Recall Testing Feynman Technique Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding test → gaps → reinforcement complex → simple → gaps → mastery
48 47 philosophical learning Occam's Razor Application Active Recall Testing Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps options → simplification → selection test → gaps → reinforcement
49 48 philosophical learning Trolley Problem Variations Deliberate Practice Loop Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions Identify a specific sub-skill - drill it with immediate feedback - adjust - repeat — targeted improvement beats general repetition dilemma → analysis → decision isolate → drill → feedback → adjust → repeat
50 49 retrospective philosophical Hindsight Reflection Occam's Razor Application Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging future view → insights → application options → simplification → selection
51 50 retrospective philosophical Lessons Learned Extraction Trolley Problem Variations Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions experience → lessons → actions dilemma → analysis → decision
52 51 research Literature Review Personas Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality sources → critiques → synthesis
53 52 research Thesis Defense Simulation Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
54 53 research Comparative Analysis Matrix Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring options → criteria → scores → recommendation
55 54 research Source Triangulation Require at least three independent source types (quantitative - qualitative - expert) before accepting a claim — guards against single-source bias claim → source A → source B → source C → confidence rating
56 55 retrospective Hindsight Reflection Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews future view → insights → application
57 56 retrospective Lessons Learned Extraction Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement experience → lessons → actions
58 57 risk Pre-mortem Analysis Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches failure scenario → causes → prevention
59 58 risk Failure Mode Analysis Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems components → failures → prevention
60 59 risk Challenge from Critical Perspective Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink assumptions → challenges → strengthening
61 60 risk Identify Potential Risks Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation categories → risks → mitigations
62 61 risk Chaos Monkey Scenarios Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully break → observe → harden
63 62 risk Assumption Audit Explicitly list every assumption underlying a plan - rate each by confidence and impact - then stress-test the weakest — prevents building on shaky foundations list → rate → stress-test → shore up
64 63 risk Cascading Failure Simulation Trace how one component's failure propagates through dependencies — reveals hidden coupling and single points of failure trigger failure → trace propagation → find amplifiers → decouple
65 64 technical Architecture Decision Records Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
66 65 technical Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels simple → detailed → technical → aha
67 66 technical Algorithm Olympics Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison implementations → benchmarks → winner
68 67 technical Security Audit Personas Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
69 68 technical Performance Profiler Panel Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack symptoms → analysis → optimizations
70 69 technical Boundary & Edge Case Sweep Systematically test extremes - zeros - nulls - maximums - and type mismatches — catches the failures that happy-path thinking always misses inputs → boundaries → edge cases → failures found