diff --git a/src/modules/bmm/agents/sm.agent.yaml b/src/modules/bmm/agents/sm.agent.yaml
index cb71525e..311aa714 100644
--- a/src/modules/bmm/agents/sm.agent.yaml
+++ b/src/modules/bmm/agents/sm.agent.yaml
@@ -29,31 +29,6 @@ agent:
workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-planning/workflow.yaml"
description: Generate or update sprint-status.yaml from epic files
- - trigger: create-story
- workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml"
- description: Create a Draft Story with Context
-
- - trigger: story-ready
- workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-ready/workflow.yaml"
- description: Mark drafted story ready for development
-
- - trigger: story-context
- workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-context/workflow.yaml"
- description: Assemble dynamic Story Context (XML) from latest docs and code
-
- - trigger: validate-story-context
- validate-workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-context/workflow.yaml"
- description: Validate latest Story Context XML against checklist
-
- - trigger: retrospective
- workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml"
- data: "{project-root}/bmad/_cfg/agent-manifest.csv"
- description: Facilitate team retrospective after epic/sprint
-
- - trigger: correct-course
- workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml"
- description: Execute correct-course task
-
- trigger: epic-tech-context
workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/workflow.yaml"
description: Use the PRD and Architecture to create a Tech-Spec for a specific epic
@@ -61,3 +36,32 @@ agent:
- trigger: validate-epic-tech-context
validate-workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/workflow.yaml"
description: Validate latest Tech Spec against checklist
+
+ - trigger: create-story
+ workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Create a Draft Story
+
+ - trigger: validate-create-story
+ validate-workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Validate Story Draft with Independent Review
+
+ - trigger: story-context
+ workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-context/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Assemble dynamic Story Context (XML) from latest docs and code and mark story ready for dev
+
+ - trigger: validate-story-context
+ validate-workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-context/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Validate latest Story Context XML against checklist
+
+ - trigger: story-ready-for-dev
+ workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-ready/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Mark drafted story ready for dev without generating Story Context
+
+ - trigger: epic-retrospective
+ workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml"
+ data: "{project-root}/bmad/_cfg/agent-manifest.csv"
+ description: Facilitate team retrospective after an epic is completed
+
+ - trigger: correct-course
+ workflow: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml"
+ description: Execute correct-course task
diff --git a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/instructions.md b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/instructions.md
index fc586894..d2a812d0 100644
--- a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/instructions.md
+++ b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/instructions.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Senior Developer Review - Workflow Instructions
-```xml
+````xml
The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project-root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
You MUST have already loaded and processed: {installed_path}/workflow.yaml
Communicate all responses in {communication_language} and language MUST be tailored to {user_skill_level}
@@ -206,9 +206,24 @@ Your input:
8. **Security Notes**: Security findings if any
9. **Best-Practices and References**: With links
10. **Action Items**:
- - Imperative phrasing
- - Map to related ACs or files
+ - CRITICAL: ALL action items requiring code changes MUST have checkboxes for tracking
+ - Format for actionable items: `- [ ] [Severity] Description (AC #X) [file: path:line]`
+ - Format for informational notes: `- Note: Description (no action required)`
+ - Imperative phrasing for action items
+ - Map to related ACs or files with specific line references
- Include suggested owners if clear
+ - Example format:
+ ```
+ ### Action Items
+
+ **Code Changes Required:**
+ - [ ] [High] Add input validation on login endpoint (AC #1) [file: src/routes/auth.js:23-45]
+ - [ ] [Med] Add unit test for invalid email format [file: tests/unit/auth.test.js]
+
+ **Advisory Notes:**
+ - Note: Consider adding rate limiting for production deployment
+ - Note: Document the JWT expiration policy in README
+ ```
The AC validation checklist and task validation checklist MUST be included in the review - this is the evidence trail
@@ -257,7 +272,11 @@ Your input:
- Architectural Alignment
- Security Notes
- Best-Practices and References (with links)
- - Action Items (with severity and file references)
+ - Action Items:
+ * CRITICAL: Format with checkboxes for tracking resolution
+ * Code changes required: `- [ ] [Severity] Description [file: path:line]`
+ * Advisory notes: `- Note: Description (no action required)`
+ * Group by type: "Code Changes Required" and "Advisory Notes"
Add a Change Log entry with date, version bump if applicable, and description: "Senior Developer Review notes appended".
If {{update_status_on_result}} is true: update Status to {{status_on_approve}} when approved; to {{status_on_changes_requested}} when changes requested; otherwise leave unchanged.
@@ -369,4 +388,4 @@ Review was saved to story file, but sprint-status.yaml may be out of sync.
-```
+````
diff --git a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/checklist.md b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/checklist.md
index 11f009f1..6d9f1460 100644
--- a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/checklist.md
+++ b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/checklist.md
@@ -1,39 +1,240 @@
----
-title: 'Create Story Checklist'
-validation-target: 'Newly generated story markdown file'
-required-inputs:
- - 'epics.md (preferred) or PRD'
-optional-inputs:
- - 'architecture document for architecture context'
-validation-rules:
- - 'Story structure matches sections: Status, Story, Acceptance Criteria, Tasks/Subtasks, Dev Notes, Change Log, Dev Agent Record'
- - 'Dev Notes include Project Structure Notes and References subsections'
- - 'All non-trivial technical notes include a source citation'
- - 'Tasks include explicit testing subtasks based on testing strategy'
----
+# Create Story Quality Validation Checklist
-# Create Story Checklist
+```xml
+This validation runs in a FRESH CONTEXT by an independent validator agent
+The validator audits story quality and offers to improve if issues are found
+Load only the story file and necessary source documents - do NOT load workflow instructions
-## Document Structure
+
-- [ ] Title includes story id and title
-- [ ] Status set to Draft
-- [ ] Story section present with As a / I want / so that
-- [ ] Acceptance Criteria is a numbered list
-- [ ] Tasks/Subtasks present with checkboxes
-- [ ] Dev Notes includes architecture/testing context
-- [ ] Change Log table initialized
-- [ ] Dev Agent Record sections present (Context Reference, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes, File List)
+
+**What create-story workflow should have accomplished:**
-## Content Quality
+1. **Previous Story Continuity:** If a previous story exists (status: done/review/in-progress), current story should have "Learnings from Previous Story" subsection in Dev Notes that references: new files created, completion notes, architectural decisions, unresolved review items
+2. **Source Document Coverage:** Story should cite tech spec (if exists), epics, PRD, and relevant architecture docs (architecture.md, testing-strategy.md, coding-standards.md, unified-project-structure.md)
+3. **Requirements Traceability:** ACs sourced from tech spec (preferred) or epics, not invented
+4. **Dev Notes Quality:** Specific guidance with citations, not generic advice
+5. **Task-AC Mapping:** Every AC has tasks, every task references AC, testing subtasks present
+6. **Structure:** Status="drafted", proper story statement, Dev Agent Record sections initialized
+
-- [ ] Acceptance Criteria sourced from epics/PRD (or explicitly confirmed by user)
-- [ ] Tasks reference AC numbers where applicable
-- [ ] Dev Notes do not invent details; cite sources where possible
-- [ ] File saved to stories directory from config (dev_story_location)
-- [ ] If creating a new story number, epics.md explicitly enumerates this story under the target epic; otherwise generation HALTED with instruction to run PM/SM `*correct-course` (open `{project-root}/bmad/bmm/agents/pm.md` or `{project-root}/bmad/bmm/agents/sm.md` and execute `*correct-course`)
+## Validation Steps
-## Optional Post-Generation
+### 1. Load Story and Extract Metadata
+- [ ] Load story file: {{story_file_path}}
+- [ ] Parse sections: Status, Story, ACs, Tasks, Dev Notes, Dev Agent Record, Change Log
+- [ ] Extract: epic_num, story_num, story_key, story_title
+- [ ] Initialize issue tracker (Critical/Major/Minor)
-- [ ] Story Context generation run (if auto_run_context)
-- [ ] Context Reference recorded in story
+### 2. Previous Story Continuity Check
+
+**Find previous story:**
+- [ ] Load {output_folder}/sprint-status.yaml
+- [ ] Find current {{story_key}} in development_status
+- [ ] Identify story entry immediately above (previous story)
+- [ ] Check previous story status
+
+**If previous story status is done/review/in-progress:**
+- [ ] Load previous story file: {story_dir}/{{previous_story_key}}.md
+- [ ] Extract: Dev Agent Record (Completion Notes, File List with NEW/MODIFIED)
+- [ ] Extract: Senior Developer Review section if present
+- [ ] Count unchecked [ ] items in Review Action Items
+- [ ] Count unchecked [ ] items in Review Follow-ups (AI)
+
+**Validate current story captured continuity:**
+- [ ] Check: "Learnings from Previous Story" subsection exists in Dev Notes
+ - If MISSING and previous story has content → **CRITICAL ISSUE**
+- [ ] If subsection exists, verify it includes:
+ - [ ] References to NEW files from previous story → If missing → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+ - [ ] Mentions completion notes/warnings → If missing → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+ - [ ] Calls out unresolved review items (if any exist) → If missing → **CRITICAL ISSUE**
+ - [ ] Cites previous story: [Source: stories/{{previous_story_key}}.md]
+
+**If previous story status is backlog/drafted:**
+- [ ] No continuity expected (note this)
+
+**If no previous story exists:**
+- [ ] First story in epic, no continuity expected
+
+### 3. Source Document Coverage Check
+
+**Build available docs list:**
+- [ ] Check exists: tech-spec-epic-{{epic_num}}*.md in {tech_spec_search_dir}
+- [ ] Check exists: {output_folder}/epics.md
+- [ ] Check exists: {output_folder}/PRD.md
+- [ ] Check exists in {output_folder}/ or {project-root}/docs/:
+ - architecture.md, testing-strategy.md, coding-standards.md
+ - unified-project-structure.md, tech-stack.md
+ - backend-architecture.md, frontend-architecture.md, data-models.md
+
+**Validate story references available docs:**
+- [ ] Extract all [Source: ...] citations from story Dev Notes
+- [ ] Tech spec exists but not cited → **CRITICAL ISSUE**
+- [ ] Epics exists but not cited → **CRITICAL ISSUE**
+- [ ] Architecture.md exists → Read for relevance → If relevant but not cited → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Testing-strategy.md exists → Check Dev Notes mentions testing standards → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Testing-strategy.md exists → Check Tasks have testing subtasks → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Coding-standards.md exists → Check Dev Notes references standards → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Unified-project-structure.md exists → Check Dev Notes has "Project Structure Notes" subsection → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+**Validate citation quality:**
+- [ ] Verify cited file paths are correct and files exist → Bad citations → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Check citations include section names, not just file paths → Vague citations → **MINOR ISSUE**
+
+### 4. Acceptance Criteria Quality Check
+
+- [ ] Extract Acceptance Criteria from story
+- [ ] Count ACs: {{ac_count}} (if 0 → **CRITICAL ISSUE** and halt)
+- [ ] Check story indicates AC source (tech spec, epics, PRD)
+
+**If tech spec exists:**
+- [ ] Load tech spec
+- [ ] Search for this story number
+- [ ] Extract tech spec ACs for this story
+- [ ] Compare story ACs vs tech spec ACs → If mismatch → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+**If no tech spec but epics.md exists:**
+- [ ] Load epics.md
+- [ ] Search for Epic {{epic_num}}, Story {{story_num}}
+- [ ] Story not found in epics → **CRITICAL ISSUE** (should have halted)
+- [ ] Extract epics ACs
+- [ ] Compare story ACs vs epics ACs → If mismatch without justification → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+**Validate AC quality:**
+- [ ] Each AC is testable (measurable outcome)
+- [ ] Each AC is specific (not vague)
+- [ ] Each AC is atomic (single concern)
+- [ ] Vague ACs found → **MINOR ISSUE**
+
+### 5. Task-AC Mapping Check
+
+- [ ] Extract Tasks/Subtasks from story
+- [ ] For each AC: Search tasks for "(AC: #{{ac_num}})" reference
+ - [ ] AC has no tasks → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] For each task: Check if references an AC number
+ - [ ] Tasks without AC refs (and not testing/setup) → **MINOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Count tasks with testing subtasks
+ - [ ] Testing subtasks < ac_count → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+### 6. Dev Notes Quality Check
+
+**Check required subsections exist:**
+- [ ] Architecture patterns and constraints
+- [ ] References (with citations)
+- [ ] Project Structure Notes (if unified-project-structure.md exists)
+- [ ] Learnings from Previous Story (if previous story has content)
+- [ ] Missing required subsections → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+**Validate content quality:**
+- [ ] Architecture guidance is specific (not generic "follow architecture docs") → If generic → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Count citations in References subsection
+ - [ ] No citations → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+ - [ ] < 3 citations and multiple arch docs exist → **MINOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Scan for suspicious specifics without citations:
+ - API endpoints, schema details, business rules, tech choices
+ - [ ] Likely invented details found → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+### 7. Story Structure Check
+
+- [ ] Status = "drafted" → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Story section has "As a / I want / so that" format → If malformed → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Dev Agent Record has required sections:
+ - Context Reference, Agent Model Used, Debug Log References, Completion Notes List, File List
+ - [ ] Missing sections → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] Change Log initialized → If missing → **MINOR ISSUE**
+- [ ] File in correct location: {story_dir}/{{story_key}}.md → If not → **MAJOR ISSUE**
+
+### 8. Unresolved Review Items Alert
+
+**CRITICAL CHECK for incomplete review items from previous story:**
+
+- [ ] If previous story has "Senior Developer Review (AI)" section:
+ - [ ] Count unchecked [ ] items in "Action Items"
+ - [ ] Count unchecked [ ] items in "Review Follow-ups (AI)"
+ - [ ] If unchecked items > 0:
+ - [ ] Check current story "Learnings from Previous Story" mentions these
+ - [ ] If NOT mentioned → **CRITICAL ISSUE** with details:
+ - List all unchecked items with severity
+ - Note: "These may represent epic-wide concerns"
+ - Required: Add to Learnings section with note about pending items
+
+## Validation Report Generation
+
+**Calculate severity counts:**
+- Critical: {{critical_count}}
+- Major: {{major_count}}
+- Minor: {{minor_count}}
+
+**Determine outcome:**
+- Critical > 0 OR Major > 3 → **FAIL**
+- Major ≤ 3 and Critical = 0 → **PASS with issues**
+- All = 0 → **PASS**
+
+**Generate report:**
+```
+
+# Story Quality Validation Report
+
+Story: {{story_key}} - {{story_title}}
+Outcome: {{outcome}} (Critical: {{critical_count}}, Major: {{major_count}}, Minor: {{minor_count}})
+
+## Critical Issues (Blockers)
+
+{{list_each_with_description_and_evidence}}
+
+## Major Issues (Should Fix)
+
+{{list_each_with_description_and_evidence}}
+
+## Minor Issues (Nice to Have)
+
+{{list_each_with_description}}
+
+## Successes
+
+{{list_what_was_done_well}}
+
+```
+
+## User Alert and Remediation
+
+**If FAIL:**
+- Show issues summary and top 3 issues
+- Offer options: (1) Auto-improve story, (2) Show detailed findings, (3) Fix manually, (4) Accept as-is
+- If option 1: Re-load source docs, regenerate affected sections, re-run validation
+
+**If PASS with issues:**
+- Show issues list
+- Ask: "Improve story? (y/n)"
+- If yes: Enhance story with missing items
+
+**If PASS:**
+- Confirm: All quality standards met
+- List successes
+- Ready for story-context generation
+
+
+```
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+**Validation runs in fresh context and checks:**
+
+1. ✅ Previous story continuity captured (files, notes, **unresolved review items**)
+2. ✅ All relevant source docs discovered and cited
+3. ✅ ACs match tech spec/epics exactly
+4. ✅ Tasks cover all ACs with testing
+5. ✅ Dev Notes have specific guidance with citations (not generic)
+6. ✅ Structure and metadata complete
+
+**Severity Levels:**
+
+- **CRITICAL** = Missing previous story reference, missing tech spec cite, unresolved review items not called out, story not in epics
+- **MAJOR** = Missing arch docs, missing files from previous story, vague Dev Notes, ACs don't match source, no testing subtasks
+- **MINOR** = Vague citations, orphan tasks, missing Change Log
+
+**Outcome Triggers:**
+
+- **FAIL** = Any critical OR >3 major issues
+- **PASS with issues** = ≤3 major issues, no critical
+- **PASS** = All checks passed
diff --git a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/instructions.md b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/instructions.md
index f98f26ef..1e9182a8 100644
--- a/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/instructions.md
+++ b/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/instructions.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Create Story - Workflow Instructions (Spec-compliant, non-interactive by default)
-```xml
+````xml
The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project_root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
You MUST have already loaded and processed: {installed_path}/workflow.yaml
Generate all documents in {document_output_language}
@@ -17,6 +17,74 @@
+ PREVIOUS STORY CONTINUITY: Essential for maintaining context and learning from prior development
+
+ Find the previous completed story to extract dev agent learnings and review findings:
+ 1. Load {{output_folder}}/sprint-status.yaml COMPLETELY
+ 2. Find current {{story_key}} in development_status section
+ 3. Identify the story entry IMMEDIATELY ABOVE current story (previous row in file order)
+ 4. If previous story exists:
+ - Extract {{previous_story_key}}
+ - Check previous story status (done, in-progress, review, etc.)
+ - If status is "done", "review", or "in-progress" (has some completion):
+ * Construct path: {{story_dir}}/{{previous_story_key}}.md
+ * Load the COMPLETE previous story file
+ * Parse ALL sections comprehensively:
+
+ A) Dev Agent Record → Completion Notes List:
+ - New patterns/services created (to reuse, not recreate)
+ - Architectural deviations or decisions made
+ - Technical debt deferred to future stories
+ - Warnings or recommendations for next story
+ - Interfaces/methods created for reuse
+
+ B) Dev Agent Record → Debug Log References:
+ - Issues encountered and solutions
+ - Gotchas or unexpected challenges
+ - Workarounds applied
+
+ C) Dev Agent Record → File List:
+ - Files created (NEW) - understand new capabilities
+ - Files modified (MODIFIED) - track evolving components
+ - Files deleted (DELETED) - removed functionality
+
+ D) Dev Notes:
+ - Any "future story" notes or TODOs
+ - Patterns established
+ - Constraints discovered
+
+ E) Senior Developer Review (AI) section (if present):
+ - Review outcome (Approve/Changes Requested/Blocked)
+ - Unresolved action items (unchecked [ ] items)
+ - Key findings that might affect this story
+ - Architectural concerns raised
+
+ F) Senior Developer Review → Action Items (if present):
+ - Check for unchecked [ ] items still pending
+ - Note any systemic issues that apply to multiple stories
+
+ G) Review Follow-ups (AI) tasks (if present):
+ - Check for unchecked [ ] review tasks still pending
+ - Determine if they're epic-wide concerns
+
+ H) Story Status:
+ - If "review" or "in-progress" - incomplete, note what's pending
+ - If "done" - confirmed complete
+ * Store ALL findings as {{previous_story_learnings}} with structure:
+ - new_files: [list]
+ - modified_files: [list]
+ - new_services: [list with descriptions]
+ - architectural_decisions: [list]
+ - technical_debt: [list]
+ - warnings_for_next: [list]
+ - review_findings: [list if review exists]
+ - pending_items: [list of unchecked action items]
+ - If status is "backlog" or "drafted":
+ * Set {{previous_story_learnings}} = "Previous story not yet implemented"
+ 5. If no previous story exists (first story in epic):
+ - Set {{previous_story_learnings}} = "First story in epic - no predecessor context"
+
+
If {{tech_spec_file}} empty: derive from {{tech_spec_glob_template}} with {{epic_num}} and search {{tech_spec_search_dir}} recursively. If multiple, pick most recent by modified time.
Build a prioritized document set for this epic:
1) tech_spec_file (epic-scoped)
@@ -82,8 +150,20 @@ Will update existing story file rather than creating new one.
- If a previous story exists, scan its "Dev Agent Record" for completion notes and known deviations; summarize any carry-overs relevant to this story.
+ Review {{previous_story_learnings}} and extract actionable intelligence:
+ - New patterns/services created → Note for reuse (DO NOT recreate)
+ - Architectural deviations → Understand and maintain consistency
+ - Technical debt items → Assess if this story should address them
+ - Files modified → Understand current state of evolving components
+ - Warnings/recommendations → Apply to this story's approach
+ - Review findings → Learn from issues found in previous story
+ - Pending action items → Determine if epic-wide concerns affect this story
+
+
If unified-project-structure.md present: align expected file paths, module names, and component locations; note any potential conflicts.
+
+ Cross-reference {{previous_story_learnings}}.new_files with project structure to understand where new capabilities are located.
+
structure_alignment_summary
@@ -101,6 +181,32 @@ Will update existing story file rather than creating new one.
story_header
story_body
dev_notes_with_citations
+
+ If {{previous_story_learnings}} contains actionable items (not "First story" or "not yet implemented"):
+ - Add "Learnings from Previous Story" subsection to Dev Notes
+ - Include relevant completion notes, new files/patterns, deviations
+ - Cite previous story file as reference [Source: stories/{{previous_story_key}}.md]
+ - Highlight interfaces/services to REUSE (not recreate)
+ - Note any technical debt to address in this story
+ - List pending review items that affect this story (if any)
+ - Reference specific files created: "Use {{file_path}} for {{purpose}}"
+ - Format example:
+ ```
+ ### Learnings from Previous Story
+
+ **From Story {{previous_story_key}} (Status: {{previous_status}})**
+
+ - **New Service Created**: `AuthService` base class available at `src/services/AuthService.js` - use `AuthService.register()` method
+ - **Architectural Change**: Switched from session-based to JWT authentication
+ - **Schema Changes**: User model now includes `passwordHash` field, migration applied
+ - **Technical Debt**: Email verification skipped, should be included in this or subsequent story
+ - **Testing Setup**: Auth test suite initialized at `tests/integration/auth.test.js` - follow patterns established there
+ - **Pending Review Items**: Rate limiting mentioned in review - consider for this story
+
+ [Source: stories/{{previous_story_key}}.md#Dev-Agent-Record]
+ ```
+
+
change_log
@@ -120,11 +226,10 @@ Will update existing story file rather than creating new one.
- If {{auto_run_context}} == true → Pass {{story_path}} = {default_output_file}
Report created/updated story path